Reuters Reviews 

I have found Reuters to be in line with most major media outlets which is far to the left. Their "stories" tell only a portion of the facts, and then only those that favor the left. For some odd reason many of their reports are sent from Bengalaru which tells me that they report only what they're told to. Reuters is not a reliable source for factual information.

Horrible inconsiderate people running this news channel. Need to access their website for a project i am working on in school. The website blocks me because I am using an adblocker and tells me I cannot access if it I either disable it or pay up right now. Are you kidding me? how greedy does a company need to be especially a news station lol. I ended up using a modified browser that blocked the popup. LOL you people aint getting a cent outta me.

On 090426, Reuters reported that President Trump has a 33% approval rating. In all my 70+ years, I have never met anyone who was contacted by Reuters for polling. I believe Reuters' approval is at 3%. Works both ways.

After paying for a subscription the commercials continue unabated, to the point you can't even read the content.

I wish there is zero for review the Reuters is worse reporter in a world they are supporting terrorist regime of Islamic republic of iran and against majority of people is IRAN ,the interview with crown prince Reza Pahlavi who is supporting as a leader with most people in IRAN and they are calling him as democratic leader as his father was very nationalist king and we love and trust them more than everybody else that interview was so insulting to our leader Reza Pahlavi and they tried to attack him personally and they did not mention even one words about regime in iran killed almost 52000 people in 10 hours in Jan 2026 and they executing insane people every day just because they raise their voice for justice . This is vey disappointing and disrespectful interview they had two day ago . This is not trustworthy and reliable journalist and reporters . They proved it

The doxxed Banksy. Scum bags

Extremely biased. Just another example of everything that is wrong with modern media.

Completely tasteless behavior.
Is this a site for journalism or just a low acting gossip site !?!

Exposing Banksy is You pinnacle of stupidity and poor taste.

Not what I hoped for, they are turning into a gossipmedia

Shame on this company for revealing Banksy's identity. It's a profound human right breach, for the sake of a stupid article

Definitely one of the most biased news broadcasts that I have seen in a while and that is saying a lot.

Reuters "Fact Check" team is the most deranged and unbelievable form of journalism this planet has ever seen. Anything Reuters says. Is the opposite.

Highly reliable unbiased oufit. The problem is they want people to subscribe at a fee to be able to read their broadcasted news…!
Ridiculous…!

I’ve been following reuters for years, and it’s one of the most reliable sources when it comes to getting quick news. They always publish facts, not trash info. Sometimes navigation around the website may lag, but overall it’s good for reading useful articles in daily routinte. I feel how I get older and looking like a granfather. xD

Horrible reporting. They couldn't find the truth if it slapped them in the face. I recently read on article so full of lies about someone I hope they are slapped with a defamation suit. Blocked their sorry reporting from my feed.

When you go to the Asian section of Reuters Markets on main Reuters Web Page news it only seems to show Indian news though China is much bigger and second largest economy after USA where as india is smaller. Think Indians are now controlling Reuters as all offshored to India. Makes sense. I no longer read reuters. Prefer CNBC.

Very poor journalism. Do not trust.

Reuters (alongside the FT and BBC) is where I get my news from. The reporting is in-depth and fact checked and its coverage of global affairs is excellent. It employs its own reporters and journalists. It is regularly updated. For those reasons, I tend to give Reuters stories high credence. For me, the subscription is absolutely worth it.

I watched Donald Trump show a video to the South African president of himself chanting death to white farmers, and the next day Reuter’s says it’s fake news…. When it’s quite clear. Why is Reuter’s spreading fake news. This platform has become so biased, and spreading false news!