[Go to site: main page, start]

Το κινητό σου σύντομα δεν θα σου ανήκει πια.

77 μέρες μέχρι το lockdown

Από τον Σεπτέμβριο του 2026, μια αθόρυβη αναβάθμιση, που θα εγκαταστήσει η Google χωρίς συναίνεση, θα μπλοκάρει κάθε εφαρμογή Android της οποίας ο προγραμματιστής δεν έχει εγγραφεί στην Google, δεν έχει υπογράψει το συμβόλαιο της, δεν έχει πληρώσει και δεν έχει παραδώσει κρατικό έγγραφο ταυτοπροσωπίας.

Κάθε εφαρμογή και κάθε συσκευή, παγκοσμίως, χωρίς δυνατότητα άρνησης.

Τι κάνει η Google

Τον Αύγουστο του 2025, η Google ανακοίνωσε μία νέα προϋπόθεση: Από τον Σεπτέμβριο του 2026, κάθε προγραμματιστής εφαρμογών Android θα πρέπει να εγγραφεί κεντρικά στη Google προτού το λογισμικό του μπορέσει να εγκατασταθεί σε οποιαδήποτε συσκευή. Όχι μόνο εφαρμογές του Play Store: Όλες οι εφαρμογές. Αυτό περιλαμβάνει εφαρμογές που μοιράζονται φίλοι μεταξύ τους, εφαρμογές που διανέμονται μέσω του F-Droid, εφαρμογές φτιαγμένες από ερασιτέχνες για προσωπική χρήση. Ανεξάρτητοι προγραμματιστές, θρησκευτικές και κοινωνικές ομάδες, καθώς και ερασιτέχνες, θα στερηθούν τη δυνατότητα να αναπτύσσουν και να διανέμουν το λογισμικό τους.

Η εγγραφή προϋποθέτει:

  • Πληρωμή χρέωσης στην Google
  • Συμφωνία με τους Όρους και Προϋποθέσεις της Google
  • Παράδοση κρατικού εγγράφου ταυτοπροσωπίας
  • Παροχή αποδείξης για το ιδιωτικό κλειδί ψηφιακών υπογραφών
  • Απαρίθμηση όλων τον τωρινών και μελλοντικών αναγνωριστικών της εφαρμογής

Αν ένας προγραμματιστής δεν συμμορφωθεί, οι εφαρμογές του μπλοκάρονται αθόρυβα σε όλες τις συσκευές Android παγκοσμίως.

Ποιοί βλάπτονται

Εσύ

Αγόρασες ένα τηλέφωνο Android επειδή η Google σου είπε ότι ήταν ανοιχτό. Μπορούσες να εγκαταστήσεις ό,τι ήθελες, και αυτή ήταν η συμφωνία

Η Google τώρα αλλάζει αυτή τη συμφωνία, αναδρομικά, σε συσκευές που ήδη σου ανήκουν. Μετά την ενημέρωση, θα μπορείς να τρέξεις μόνο λογισμικό που η Google έχει προεγκρίνει. Στο τηλέφωνο σου: Την ιδιοκτησία σου, για την οποία εσύ πλήρωσες.

Ανεξάρτητοι προγραμματιστές

Η πρώτη εφαρμογή ενός εφήβου, το εργαλείο ιδιωτικότητας που έγραψε ένας εθελοντής, ή η εμπιστευτική εσωτερική έκδοση beta μιας εταιρείας. Δεν έχει σημασία ποιο. Μετά τον Σεπτέμβριο του 2026, κανένα από αυτά δε θα μπορεί να εγκατασταθεί χωρίς την «ευλογία» της Google.

Το F-Droid, πηγή για χιλιάδες δωρεάν εφαρμογές Android ανοιχτού κώδικα, έχει αποκαλέσει αυτό το γεγονός ως «υπαρξιακή» απειλή. Ο Cory Doctorow το αποκαλεί "Darth Android".

Κυβερνήσεις και η Κοινωνία των Πολιτών

Η Google έχει αποδεδειγμένο ιστορικό συμμόρφωσης όταν αυταρχικά καθεστώτα απαιτούν την κατάργηση εφαρμογών. Με αυτό το πρόγραμμα, το λογισμικό που υποστηρίζει τις κρατικές υπηρεσίες της χώρας σου θα εξαρτάται από τη βούληση μιας και μόνο ξένης εταιρείας που δεν λογοδοτεί σε κανέναν.

Το EFF (Electronic Frontier Foundation) χαρακτηρίζει τον έλεγχο πρόσβασης στις εφαρμογές ως «έναν συνεχώς διευρυνόμενο δρόμο προς τη λογοκρισία στο διαδίκτυο».

Η «έξοδος διαφυγής» που προσφέρει η Google είναι μία παγίδα.

Η Google αναφέρει ότι «προχωρημένοι χρήστες» μπορούν «ακόμα να εγκαταστήσουν» μη επαληθευμένες εφαρμογές. Δείτε πώς θα γίνεται αυτό στην πραγματικότητα:

  1. Άνοιξε τις Ρυθμίσεις, βρες τις «Επιλογές προγραμματιστή»
  2. Πάτα πάνω στον «Αριθμό Κατασκευής» επτά φορές για να ενεργοποιήσεις τη Λειτουργία Προγραμματιστή
  3. Αγνόησε τις κινδυνολόγες προειδοποιήσεις περί εξαναγκασμού
  4. Πληκτρολόγησε το PIN σου
  5. Κάνε επανεκκίνηση της συσκευής
  6. Περίμενε 24 ώρες
  7. Επίστρεψε, αγνόησε ακόμα περισσότερα μηνύματα με κινδυνολογία
  8. Επίλεξε «Να επιτρέπεται προσωρινά» (7 ημέρες) ή «Να επιτρέπεται πάντα»
  9. Επιβεβαίωσε, για μία ακόμη φορα, ότι κατανοείς «τους κινδύνους»

Εννέα βήματα. Μία υποχρεωτική περίοδος αναμονής 24 ωρών. Για να εγκαταστήσεις λογισμικό σε μία συσκευή που σου ανήκει

Ακόμη χειρότερα: Αυτή η διαδικασία τρέχει αποκλειστικά μέσω των Υπηρεσιών Google Play, όχι μέσω του λειτουργικού συστήματος Android. Η Google μπορεί να την αλλάξει, να την περιορίσει, ή να την αφαιρέσει ανά πάσα στιγμή, χωρίς να χρειαστεί κάποια ενημέρωση λογισμικού ή έγκριση από τον χρήστη. Και μέχρι σήμερα, δεν έχει κυκλοφορήσει σε καμία έκδοση beta, preview ή canary. Υπάρχει μόνο ως ανάρτηση σε blog και μερικά mockups.

Αυτό είναι μεγαλύτερο από το Android

Αν η Google μπορεί να «κλειδώσει» αναδρομικά δισεκατομμύρια συσκευές που πουλήθηκαν ως ανοιχτές πλατφόρμες, κάθε παραγωγός hardware στον πλανήτη παρακολουθεί.

Η αρχή που καθιερώνεται είναι η εξής: η εταιρεία που κατασκεύασε τη συσκευή σου έχει το δικαίωμα να αποφασίζει, αφού την αγοράσεις, ποιο λογισμικό επιτρέπεται να χρησιμοποιείς. Στον κόσμο του λογισμικού, αυτό ονομάζεται «rug pull» - αλλά τουλάχιστον σε αυτή την περίπτωση μπορούσες πάντα να εγκαταστήσεις ανταγωνιστικό λογισμικό. Στον κόσμο του hardware, πρόκειται για ένα τετελεσμένο γεγονός που σου στερεί κάθε δυνατότητα επιλογής και σε καθιστά ανίσχυρο απέναντι στις ιδιοτροπίες ενός και μοναδικού, μη υπόλογου «φρουρού» και νομικά διαπιστωμένου μονοπωλητή.

Η «ανοιχτή φύση» του Android δεν ήταν ποτέ απλώς ένα χαρακτηριστικό του. Ήταν η υπόσχεση που το καθιστούσε διαφορετικό από το iPhone. Εκατομμύρια χρήστες επέλεξαν το Android ακριβώς για αυτόν τον λόγο. Η Google τώρα ανακαλεί μονομερώς αυτή την υπόσχεση, σε συσκευές που βρίσκονται ήδη στην κατοχή των χρηστών, επειδή αποφάσισε ότι έχει αρκετή κυριαρχία στην αγορά και επιρροή στους ρυθμιστικούς φορείς ώστε να τη γλιτώσει.

Ars Technica: «Ο φθόνος της Google για την Apple απειλεί να καταστρέψει την παράδοση της ανοιχτής πλατφόρμας του Android.»

Μισό λεπτό, μήπως αυτό...

«...έχει να κάνει απλώς με την ασφάλεια;»

Το επιχείρημα της ασφάλειας είναι παραπλανητικό. Το Google Play Protect ήδη ελέγχει για κακόβουλο λογισμικό ανεξάρτητα από την ταυτότητα του προγραμματιστή. Η απαίτηση κρατικής ταυτότητας δεν κάνει τον κώδικα πιο ασφαλή. Κάνει τους προγραμματιστές αναγνωρίσιμους και ελεγχόμενους. Οι δημιουργοί κακόβουλου λογισμικού μπορούν να εγγραφούν. Οι ανεξάρτητοι προγραμματιστές και οι διαφωνούντες συχνά δεν μπορούν. Το EFF είναι κατηγορηματικό: Ο έλεγχος πρόσβασης βάσει ταυτότητας είναι ένα εργαλείο λογοκρισίας, όχι ασφάλειας.

«...συνεχίζει να επιτρέπει το sideloading εάν χρησιμοποιήσεις την προχωρημένη μέθοδο;»

Εννέα βήματα, αναμονή 24 ωρών, κρυμμένα στις Επιλογές Προγραμματιστή, παρεχόμενα μέσω μίας ιδιόκτητης υπηρεσίας που η Google μπορεί να ανακαλέσει όποτε θέλει. Αυτό δεν είναι «sideloading». Είναι ένας μηχανισμός αποτροπής που έχει σχεδιαστεί για να διασφαλίζει ότι σχεδόν κανείς δεν θα τον ολοκληρώσει. Και δεδομένου ότι λειτουργεί μέσω των Play Services και όχι μέσω του λειτουργικού συστήματος, η Google μπορεί να τον περιορίσει ή να τον καταργήσει αθόρυβα.

«...αποτελεί πρόβλημα μόνο αν έχεις να κρύψεις κάτι;»

Οι πληροφοριοδότες, οι δημοσιογράφοι και οι ακτιβιστές που ζουν υπό αυταρχικά καθεστώτα θα είναι τα πρώτα θύματα. Ακολουθούν τα άτομα που βιώνουν ενδοοικογενειακή βία. Όλες αυτές οι ομάδες έχουν βάσιμους λόγους να διανέμουν ή να χρησιμοποιούν λογισμικό χωρίς να καταχωρίζουν τα πραγματικά τους στοιχεία σε μια βάση δεδομένων της Google. Η ανώνυμη συνεισφορά στον ανοιχτό κώδικα είναι μια παράδοση παλαιότερη από την ίδια τη Google. Αυτή η πολιτική, τερματίζει αυτή την παράδοση στο Android.

«...είναι το ίδιο πράγμα που κάνει και η Apple;»

Η Apple ήταν εξαρχής ένα «κλειστό» οικοσύστημα. Ο κόσμος επέλεξε το Android επειδή ήταν διαφορετικό. Η δικαιολογία του «και η Apple το κάνει» αποτελεί ισοπέδωση προς τα κάτω και ένα αδύναμο λογικό επιχείρημα τύπου tu quoque. Και υπό την πίεση των ρυθμιστικών αρχών (ο Νόμος για τις Ψηφιακές Αγορές της ΕΕ), ακόμη και η Apple αναγκάζεται να ανοίξει το οικοσύστημά της. Η Google κινείται προς την αντίθετη κατεύθυνση: προσπαθεί να εδραιώσει περαιτέρω τη θέση της ως «φρουρός».

«...κοστίζει μόνο 25 δολλάρια και εμπεριέχει απλώς λίγη χαρτούρα;

Ίσως, αν είσαι προγραμματιστής στις ΗΠΑ και διαθέτεις πιστωτική κάρτα και άδεια οδήγησης. Προσπάθησε να μπεις στη θέση ενός φοιτητή στην υποσαχάρια Αφρική, ή ενός αντιφρονούντα στη Μιανμάρ, ή ενός εθελοντή που συντηρεί μια εφαρμογή για την υγεία της κοινότητας. Το κόστος δεν είναι μόνο οικονομικό: παραδίδεις την ταυτότητα που σου έχει εκδώσει η κυβέρνηση και τα αποδεικτικά στοιχεία των κλειδιών υπογραφής σου σε μια εταιρεία που συμμορφώνεται συστηματικά με τις απαιτήσεις κυβερνήσεων να αφαιρέσει εφαρμογές και να εκθέσει προγραμματιστές.

Αντιστάσου

Όλοι

Προγραμματιστές

Μην εγγραφείς. Μην μπεις στο πρόγραμμα κάνοντας εγγραφή στην Κονσόλα Προγραμματιστών Android και μην αποδεχτείς τους αμετάκλητους Όρους και Προϋποθέσεις τους. Μην επαληθεύσεις την ταυτότητά σου. Μη μπεις στο χορό.

Το σχέδιο της Google δουλεύει μόνο εάν οι προγραμματιστές εγγραφούν. Μην το κάνεις.

Εργαζόμενοι της Google

Αν γνωρίζεις κάτι σχετικά με την τεχνική υλοποίηση ή εσωτερική λογική του προγράμματος, επικοινώνησε με τη διεύθυνση tips@keepandroidopen.org από μία συσκευή εκτός του εργασιακού σου χώρου και μέσω ενός λογαριασμού που δεν είναι Gmail. Εγγυημένη απόλυτη εμπιστευτικότητα.

Ολοί οσοι αντιτίθενται…

71 οργανισμοί από 23 χώρες έχουν υπογράψει την ανοιχτή επιστολή

GNOME Foundation gnome.org The European Consumer Organisation (BEUC) beuc.eu Techlore techlore.tech Unified Push unifiedpush.org The Chaos Computer Club (CCC) ccc.de Aurora Store auroraoss.com The Digital Rights Foundation digitalrightsfoundation.pk The Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) fsfe.org European Digital Rights (EDRi) edri.org Brave brave.com Data Rights datarights.ngo The Tor Project torproject.org Forbrukerrådet forbrukerradet.no Associação Nacional para o Software Livre (ANSOL) ansol.org /e/ Foundation e.foundation iodé iode.tech JMP.chat jmp.chat Ghostery ghostery.com KDE e.V. kde.org LineageOS lineageos.org Fundación Karisma karisma.org.co epicenter.works – for digital rights epicenter.works Digital Rights Watch digitalrightswatch.org.au Technopolice Bruxelles technopolice.be OW2 ow2.org The Calyx Institute calyx.org IzzyOnDroid izzyondroid.org Vivaldi Technologies AS vivaldi.com CryptPad cryptpad.org OpenMedia openmedia.org Cryptee crypt.ee The App Fair Project appfair.org FACiL facil.qc.ca Fedimedia fedimedia.it XMPP Standards Foundation xmpp.org AdGuard adguard.com Osservatorio Nessuno OdV osservatorionessuno.org The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) eff.org GrapheneOS Foundation grapheneos.org Software Freedom Conservancy sfconservancy.org The Guardian Project guardianproject.info FULU Foundation fulu.org Software Liberty Association of Taiwan slat.org.tw The OpenStreetMap Foundation (OSMF) osmfoundation.org Digitale Gesellschaft digitale-gesellschaft.ch Molly molly.im Codeberg e.V. codeberg.org GitHub Store github-store.org microG microg.org Fastmail fastmail.com Open Web Advocacy open-web-advocacy.org Tuta Mail tuta.com Proton AG proton.me La Quadrature du Net laquadrature.net Rocky Linux rockylinux.org The Center for Digital Progress (D64) d-64.org GNU/Linux València gnulinuxvalencia.org Privacy Guides privacyguides.org April april.org Rossmann Group rossmanngroup.com F-Droid f-droid.org Open Rights Group (ORG) openrightsgroup.org ARTICLE 19 article19.org Obtainium obtainium.imranr.dev The Free Software Foundation (FSF) fsf.org Nextcloud nextcloud.com VideoLAN videolan.org Italian Linux Society ils.org FOSDEM fosdem.org MetaBrainz Foundation metabrainz.org FUTO futo.org

Διάβασε ολόκληρη την ανοιχτή επιστολή και ευχαρίστησε τους υπογράφοντες →

Τι λένε

Δημοσιογράφοι τεχνολογίας

"Android app store provider Aptoide hits Google with fresh lawsuit alleging monopoly and anticompetitive chokehold"

Benzinga

"Google plans to block side-loading like Apple, declaring war on Android freedom"

Tuta Blog

"Google will make you wait 24 hours to sideload Android apps"

How-To Geek

"Google Clamps down On Android's Openness"

Internet Freedom Foundation (India)

"Open letter warns mandatory registration 'threatens innovation, competition, privacy and user freedom'"

Infosecurity Magazine

"F-Droid project threatened by Google's new dev registration rules"

Bleeping Computer

"Open-Source Android Apps at Risk Under Google's New Decree"

TechRepublic

"Sideloading on Android? Soon It'll Be Like a TSA Check for Apps"

Android Headlines

"Google's New Developer ID Rule Could Harm F-Droid"

Reclaim The Net

"Resistance to Google's Android verification grows among developers"

Techzine EU

"It effectively makes the Play Store a monopoly without actually mandating that it is a monopoly."

I-Programmer

"Google's New Developer Rules Threaten to End the F-Droid Open-Source App Store"

How-To Geek

"This will wipe out Android as an actual alternative to Apple's mobile OS offerings."

Hackaday

"Google is restricting one of Android's most important features, and users are outraged"

SlashGear

"Google kneecaps indie Android devs, forces them to register"

The Register

"Open-Source Android Apps Threatened by Google's New Policy"

Datamation

"Google will verify Android developers distributing apps outside the Play store"

The Verge

"Sideloading is dead for all intents and purposes. The Android you know and love is slowly disappearing."

Android Police

"F-Droid Slams Google for Misleading Users About Android's App Verification"

Android Headlines

"Google's Attack on Sideloading Will Rob Android of One of Its Best Features"

How-To Geek

"F-Droid says Google's new sideloading restrictions will kill the project"

Ars Technica

"An 'existential' threat to alternative app stores"

The New Stack

"Google's Attack on Sideloading Will Rob Android of One of Its Best Features"

How-To Geek

"Google says it's making Android sideloading 'high-friction' to better warn users about potential risks"

XDA Developers

"Google's Android developer verification program draws pushback"

InfoWorld

"Google's new ID requirements could destroy independent app stores"

TechSpot

"Google's Requirement For All Android Developers To Register And Be Verified Threatens To Close Down Open Source App Store F-Droid"

Techdirt

"Google's dev registration plan 'will end the F-Droid project'"

The Register

"F-Droid Says Google Is Lying About the Future of Sideloading on Android"

How-To Geek

"F-Droid Says Google Is Lying About the Future of Sideloading on Android"

How-To Geek

"Google's developer registration 'decree' means the end for alternative app stores"

Cybernews

"Keep Android Open"

Linux Magazine

"Google's Apple envy threatens to dismantle Android's open legacy"

Ars Technica

"Google will require developer verification to install Android apps, including sideloading"

9to5Google

"Android's sideloading limits are its most anti-consumer move yet"

MakeUseOf

"Android Security or Vendor Lock-In? Google's New Sideloading Rules Smell Fishy"

It's FOSS News

"'Keep Android Open' Movement Challenges Google's Developer Verification Rule"

Open Source For U

"Google will require developer verification for Android apps outside the Play Store"

TechCrunch

"We all know that's a load of bullshit. Adding a goddamn 24-hour waiting period is batshit insanity."

Thom Holwerda, OSnews

"I've been an Android user for almost 15 years -- and Google's sideloading changes are pushing me back to iPhone"

Tom's Guide

"I've been an Android user for almost 15 years -- and Google's sideloading changes are pushing me back to iPhone"

Tom's Guide

"Google's new developer rules could threaten sideloading and F-Droid's future"

Gizmochina

"Over 67 groups urge the company to drop ID checks for apps distributed outside Play"

The Register

"Sideloading on Android? Soon It'll Be Like a TSA Check for Apps"

Android Headlines

"Keep Android Open – Abwehr gegen Verbot anonymer Apps von Google"

heise online

"Android, Epic, and What's Really Behind Google's 'Existential' Threat to F-Droid"

Slashdot

Editorials & ανάλυση

Οργανισμοί & ανοιχτές επιστολές

"Google's abusive approach to the Android operating system has only gotten worse in recent years. Software freedom is sorely lacking in the 'computers in our pockets' we call cell phones."

Free Software Foundation

"The European Pirate Party called for proportionate and transparent measures that ensure security without restricting innovation, limiting anonymity, or distorting competition."

European Pirate Party

"Remember: It's your phone, your data, your freedom. Don't let Google take it away."

Tuta

"Developers who choose not to use Google's services should not be forced to register with, and submit to the judgement of, Google."

Open letter, over 67 signatory organizations

"A policy that forces every Android developer to hand their identity to Google, regardless of whether they use Google's services, makes Android a less-open and less-private platform."

Brave

"Unilaterally consolidating power to approve software into the hands of a single unaccountable corporation is a threat to digital sovereignty everywhere."

Nextcloud

"Nearly 50 organizations published an open letter opposing what they characterize as a 'kill switch for the open ecosystem.'"

Tech-ish Kenya

"If it were to be put into effect, the developer registration decree will end the F-Droid project and other free/open source app distribution sources as we know them today."

F-Droid

"Your Smartphone, Their Rules: How App Stores Enable Corporate-Government Censorship."

ACLU

"We are running out of time until Google becomes the gate-keeper of all users devices."

F-Droid

"Google Play itself has repeatedly hosted malware, proving that corporate gatekeeping doesn't guarantee user protection."

F-Droid

"There are governments who might very much like to know the names of the developers of those applications so that they can go after them."

Electronic Frontier Foundation

"Centralised, intransparent security architectures certainly help secure monetization and the market by locking out competitors."

Nextcloud

"Android's biggest strength has always been its openness. That's what attracted developers and users in the first place."

AdGuard

"This is a profound change, one that shatters the entire premise of the Android ecosystem, long regarded as the antithesis of the closed Apple ecosystem."

AdGuard

"Google is turning Android into a walled garden monopoly. We must prevent it."

Osservatorio Nessuno

"This invasion of privacy of developers is not just an overreach of Google's authority over Android, but also jeopardizes developer safety."

Software Freedom Conservancy

"For developers building tools specifically designed to protect user privacy, being forced to surrender their own personal data as a precondition for distribution is deeply contradictory."

AdGuard

"Changes would impose barriers to entry for individual developers, small teams and volunteer projects by imposing fees, identity checks and terms that may not align with the principles of an open ecosystem."

Infosecurity Magazine

"When you set up a gate, you invite authorities to use it to block things they don't like. And when you build a database, you invite governments to try to get access."

Electronic Frontier Foundation

"Developers who build privacy-first browsers, encrypted messaging apps, VPNs, Tor-based software or tools for journalists and activists would be required to upload government ID to Google. These developers are unlikely to trust Google and might stop developing for Android."

Brave

"A centralized global registration system for Android will inevitably chill this work. Those communities are likely to drop out of developing for Android altogether."

Electronic Frontier Foundation

"Verification just confirms who's behind the app, it doesn't guarantee clean code or rule out malicious behavior."

AdGuard

"Google's developer verification policy creates a centralized database, controlled by a single corporation, containing the real-world identity of every person who writes software for Android."

Brave

"Forcing software creators into a centralized registration scheme is as egregious as forcing writers and artists to register with a central authority."

F-Droid

"While Android used to be praised for its freedom and independence, it will become a closed shop just like Apple."

Tuta

"We unequivocally advise against signing up for this program, now or ever."

F-Droid Open Letter

"MEP Christel Schaldemose formally questioned whether Google's mandatory central registration is compatible with the Digital Markets Act."

European Parliament

"This extends Google's gatekeeping authority beyond its own marketplace into distribution channels where it has no legitimate operational role."

Open letter, over 67 signatory organizations

"Google will cut off independent developers to Android if they do not register with Google first. This will kill independent platforms like F-Droid and severely impede FLOSS devs from creating apps for Android."

KDE

"Independent software distribution on Android will now require Google's explicit permission."

AdGuard

"Ultimately, Google's plan will stop you from owning your Android phone."

Tuta

YouTubers & δημιουργοί

"Google decides what's safe for you, and you don't get a say."

fireborn – Blog

"Every single time a company takes away your ability to do what you want with what you bought and paid for, every single time they twist a knife, we have to point it out."

Louis Rossmann – YouTube

"A world where two tech companies from the same city that dominate all of our mobile devices both require centralized developer registration is a world with one more lever for surveillance, one more checkpoint for censorship."

Techlore – YouTube

"This is an iPhone now. I didn't want to buy an iPhone. I use Android because it gives me freedom. If you are not going to give me freedom with my computer, then why would I buy your stuff anymore?"

Louis Rossmann – YouTube

"That's not openness. That is control."

ChiefGyk3D – YouTube

"I'm not using the word 'phone.' I'm using the word 'computer.' This has over 8 GB of RAM, a terabyte of storage. It's a computer. And I'm also not going to be using words like 'sideload.' When you download an exe file onto your Windows computer, you've installed an application. You haven't 'sideloaded' something."

Louis Rossmann – YouTube

"Your device, their rules. The phone you bought and paid for is no longer really yours."

Tuta Blog – Blog

"This represents the last real safe place for free and open-source software in the entire mobile ecosystem. Once it's gone, it's gone. And we're going to spend the next decade trying to claw it back."

Techlore – YouTube

"This means you can't sideload an app from an unofficial source. But it could also be used to lock the ecosystem so we're forced to install only Google apps on approved Google OS versions."

Rob Braxman Tech – Locals

"Google isn't testing this in the US or Europe first. They're starting in countries like Brazil, Indonesia, Singapore, and Thailand. Why? Because these are massive growth markets where regulation is weaker. By the time regulators catch up, the damage will already be done."

ChiefGyk3D – YouTube

"Google is doing to Android what Microsoft once tried to do to the web. Embrace, extend, extinguish. Just wrapped in a shinier open-source package."

ChiefGyk3D – YouTube

"Google already can disable malware that they find on your device. It's already a built-in feature. So what is developer registration actually adding here? Is it security or control? You decide."

Techlore – YouTube

"Follow the money. Google makes money when apps are downloaded from its store. Google has completely forgotten about its earlier company motto: Don't be evil."

Tuta Blog – Blog

"F-Droid is basically saying that the new Google developer registration process will likely kill the open-source app store entirely."

The Linux Experiment – YouTube

"The widely-circulated narrative that Google already backed down from this is false. They didn't, and that misunderstanding may be the most dangerous part of the story right now."

Techlore – YouTube

"Developers of privacy-focused tools and emulators will have to dox themselves, making them vulnerable to government agencies or legal action."

SomeOrdinaryGamers (Mutahar) – YouTube

"When you download applications, you've simply installed an application. I don't want to use words like 'sideload.'"

SomeOrdinaryGamers (Mutahar) – YouTube

"I have really no more strong reason to not recommend you all get iPhones, because this just is pretty much an iPhone with a Google logo on it at this point."

Techlore – YouTube

"The fact of the matter is, this is my device. I paid a lot of money for it. I should be able to do with it what I want."

Switched to Linux – YouTube

"Android has become what they set out to destroy."

Linus Sebastian, LMG Clips – YouTube

"Imagine Dell told you that you could no longer install any operating system other than Windows on your laptop. That's what Google is doing to your phone."

SomeOrdinaryGamers (Mutahar) – YouTube

"This has obvious problems for non-Google operating systems like iodeOS, LineageOS, or BraxOS. Google Android will 'check in' with Google to verify the identity of the app and to validate the operating system."

Rob Braxman Tech – Locals

"Google is removing the one key advantage Android has over iOS."

SomeOrdinaryGamers (Mutahar) – YouTube

"Google keeps getting in as much trouble as Apple when Google is half evil and Apple is full evil. So there are probably people inside Google saying, 'Why not just go full evil?'"

Louis Rossmann – YouTube

"Google is setting a requirement that only they can fulfill, forcing developers to go through Google and killing off thousands of apps. Countless users stranded."

Techlore – YouTube

"Google has been carefully watching from the sidelines to see what exactly it is that Apple can get away with."

Linus Sebastian, LMG Clips – YouTube

"If I'm going to be trapped in a walled garden anyway, I'll take the one that's built properly."

fireborn – Blog

Προγραμματιστές & κοινότητα

"Play store is full of scam apps, F-Droid isn't, but Play Store is considered secure. It's all theatre."

gcupc, Lobsters

"For 'security' -- always security with these assholes. They're just building the walls of the walled garden higher."

lynxy, Tildes

"If the likes of Google, Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, and others have their way, you will not own your computer; those companies will effectively own your computers."

RUs1729, Slashdot

"I teach digital literacy and 99% of unsavory software I encounter on people's phones come from the Play Store or App Store. I will believe they're serious about protecting users when I see them do something about the crap ton of borderline scam apps infesting their stores."

1995ToyotaCorolla, Lemmy

"Google has no right to be my parent. As long as I can't reject paternalism, I don't believe for a second this is done with the well-being of scam victims as the main priority."

gspr, Lobsters

"This is a war on users that want to keep control of their phones and when it's done, you will not be able to escape the enshittification."

ikidd, Lemmy

"It took them 17 years to finally pull the cage all the way shut."

Apocryphon, Hacker News

"'Sideload' is like 'jaywalking'; seeks to stigmatize humans being human."

tejtm, Hacker News

"Social engineering is destroyed with education, not with restriction and control. Trading freedom for safety eliminates both."

survirtual, Hacker News

"They're boiling the frog -- slowly removing features until all choice is gone."

hn92726819, Hacker News

"Any time someone puts a lock on something that belongs to you, and won't give you a key, they're not doing it for your benefit."

vord (quoting Cory Doctorow), Tildes

"Google now has a flag on my phone they can control remotely to keep me from accessing the apps I want."

vala, Lemmy

"Software gatekeeping is a threat to human rights. Just recently an app to track ICE was banned from the iOS app store even though this should clearly be protected first amendment speech."

gthing, Reddit

"You are essentially a child to them. The difference is society has decided not to step in to protect you from your abusive parents."

globular-toast, Hacker News

"If your country is ever in the crosshairs of 'American interests' and bears the brunt of its sanctions, it is possible that you cannot install apps from your fellow citizens. Your own local government, bank, and store apps."

devsda, Hacker News

"It is a disgrace how Google has managed this situation. The promised 'advanced flow' hasn't appeared in any Android 16 or 17 betas. Google is quietly proceeding with the original lockdown."

fermigier, Hacker News

"They have stolen a free product and are now actively locking out the people who built it."

TheTearMiser, Lemmy

"Google's own Play Store had over 600 million malware downloads. They keep talking about 'security' but their own store is crawling with fake apps and straight up malware while actual useful stuff gets buried or rejected."

Historical-Employ129 (324 upvotes), Reddit

"I hate this so much. More and more I get the feeling I have no control over the devices I own. My fear is that Windows will eventually follow. For security reasons of course. It's the path we're on now."

cheesyvoetjes, Reddit

"I still remember how in the early days of Android vs iOS discussions, the main point was 'but it's OPEN!' The word 'open' was used as a comma by Google people. It was The Thing. The Difference. Good vs Evil and all that."

jwr, Hacker News

"Google selling Android as both open source and open to running any software you like in order to quickly gain market share, only to break those promises after driving competing platforms out of the market is nothing more than fraud."

GeekyBear, Hacker News

"If I go down this path, I will stop all development on Android. I implore all other developers to resist this. This will completely lock down the platform forever, there will be no going back."

BatteryMountain, Hacker News

"Give me liberty or give me Symbian."

masterofn001, Lemmy

"The open Android I knew and loved is long gone."

girvo, Hacker News

"Years ago, I wondered how Google would try to get away with locking down Android and shutting the cage door after capturing such a large dependent user base. Now I see how they are trying to get away with it."

chaznabin, Reddit

"Can't come at a worse time. People are just learning to make things through vibe coding, and they're gonna want to put their own apps on their phones. And now Google says no."

Serinus, Lemmy

"We are talking about something categorically worse than vendor lock-in: Collective vendor lock-in."

anordal, Lobsters

"Google wants the authority of a gatekeeper without the overhead of human accountability."

afferi300rina, Hacker News

"You have no right telling me what I can and cannot run on my own devices."

MrZander, Hacker News

"Android was never actually open and now they are abandoning even the thin pretense."

Tiraon, Tildes

"Requiring a government ID to distribute software. Holy shit. If you are a kid and want to create a game for your friends, you better get that birth certificate ready!"

llitz, Reddit

"This isn't just a competition between app stores; it's a struggle for choice and dignity. Your phone shouldn't be a cage carefully constructed by others, but an extension of your own will."

renshijian, Hacker News

"Brazil government app refuses to operate with developer mode on."

flykespice (developer in Brazil), Hacker News

"Google seems to actively hate people who develop for their platforms."

hbn, Hacker News

"We need to start treating phones differently. We're entering a world where we can't choose what we run on them. Their primary purpose is to gather data on us and serve us advertising, they're engineered for addiction, yet engaging in the world is immensely difficult without one."

specproc, Hacker News

"Android is for everyone, provided they submit to Google exclusively."

gumby271, Hacker News

"Some time in the future, we will look back to this era and ask ourselves what went wrong."

BenjaminRi, Lobsters

"Twice I have had to deal with Google silently disabling my drone app to the point I had to buy an older phone to perform work. When I purchase a device that works with another device, under no circumstances should I be at the mercy of any updates they make."

cbrophoto (drone professional), Reddit

"Whatever Google is doing kind of scares me. We have a big DIY community of diabetics in Germany running tools like AndroidAPS that cannot ever be distributed through official channels."

pimeys (Type 1 diabetic, DIY medical software), Lobsters

"Computing is infrastructure. Personal computers are a means of expressing agency. This is like banning people from moving furniture around their house without approval from mortgage lenders."

wervenyt, Tildes

"Modern life practically forces you to put all your eggs into a phone controlled by one of two profit-seeking companies."

koala, Lobsters

"Signal, VPNs -- they'll have a list of everyone opting out of government-mandated backdoors."

Max-P, Lemmy

"After 15 years of professional development on Android I too am now thinking about switching my focus to something different. And it sucks."

MrDresden, Hacker News

"If Android's sandbox and permission systems actually worked, then the mere act of installing an app from an arbitrary source would be as harmless as visiting an arbitrary website."

mwcampbell, Lobsters

"Anyone else thinking this looks like a precursor to banning Signal and similar? 1) Put Google in control of what you can install. 2) Get Google to block it."

harry8, Hacker News

"It's not cyclic. It's a ratchet and it gets tighter and tighter."

BenjaminRi, Lobsters

"Google's plan to require developer verification would give Google and governments the ability to ban any app."

Zak, Hacker News

"Making it harder makes it harder to treat ourselves. Software like AndroidAPS is unique. It's hard to find or very expensive and inferior in the proprietary market."

pimeys (diabetic user on life-critical medical software), Lobsters

"I want to deploy apps on my device. They are my apps, it's my device, and I should not be required to ask for permission to do so."

fsniper, Hacker News

"Antitrust action is badly needed. It is ridiculous that I need permission from my device manufacturer to install software on hardware I own."

jim201, Hacker News

"Once deployed, there's a near 100% chance of such a mechanism being used for evil."

Zak, Lemmy

"My Pixel 6 just broke, and after 15 years of using Android, I've finally been convinced to move to iOS. If I must live in a walled garden, I suppose I'll choose the one with nicer flowers."

yonato, Hacker News

"The fundamental problem is that we are relying on the good graces of Google to keep Android open, despite the fact that it often runs contrary to their goals as a $4T for-profit behemoth. The 'don't be evil' days are very far behind us."

paxys, Hacker News

"There's an entire genre of scamming where the scammers spend months building rapport with their victims before cashing out. One day is nothing."

free_bip (on the 24-hour wait defeating scammers), Hacker News

"All the banking and payment apps in India refuse to open if you have developer mode on."

nibbleyou (developer in India), Hacker News

"Don't beg. Don't get in a position that freedoms depend on the whims of a corporation or willingness of a government to regulate them. Build."

jzb, Lobsters

"The phrase 'sideload' is psychological propaganda we are all best off rejecting."

WaffleMonster, Slashdot

"The war on General Purpose Computing is the death of innovation and a direct attack on digital freedom."

layfellow, Hacker News

"I buy a device with my own money, which I supposedly then own, but then I need to ask some corporation permission to use it."

askonomm, Hacker News

Φωνές απο τη συλλογή υπογραφών

"This update will ruin everything great about android "

Parker, change.org

"In the eyes of serious digital Android users & developers this is an another blatant attempt by Google to monopolize & obtain total centralized control over our application space. Shockingly this mirrors a similar path seen within despotic nations, nations who are our adversaries. History has already proven this is a slippery slope. These actions will take away many jobs from from the countless Android developers & truly harm the intended purpose of Android in America. We must pick, freedom for the common people or tyranny to help a mega corporation in this new digital age. "

Phillip, change.org

"Freedom to think and develop without cynicism. "

David, change.org

"I like android. I don't want it to be like ios 🤮 "

Luke, change.org

"This is exactly why I will NEVER use Apple *anything* not even movies on Apple TV. I've championed Android since it first came on the scene in my 25+ years of work in the wireless industry because of the open source nature of Android. It is also why I have switch all my devices but one to Linux in place of Windows (They have forever lost my support). Open source matters. It's also what sets Android apart from Apple. I will absolutely not purchase another Android device going forward if it is no longer open source. I have no problem falling back to a basic phone and running open source OSes on my PC, gaming handhelds and the like. This, to me, feels akin to the idea of the United States just erasing the first amendment. I doubt words will change your mind, but my dollars will back my opinion. It's sad that Google has decided to go this route. You've fallen so far since the beginning. I remember getting my Gmail account with beta invite. I remember being happy to see Google become a publicly traded company. I fear now I'll remember how Google became a huge disappointment. At least it's an interesting story seeing first hand the rise and fall of a search engine who's name became a verb because it was so superior. To just become a huge bully to the types of users that propped you up from the start. Of course jailbreaking will happen but how does that improve security? How does that differentiate you from the competition? "

Jeremy, change.org

"Completely Unacceptable "

Joe, change.org

"Google is going to ruin what they built and turn into Apple. "

Abnormal Software, change.org

"Google shouldn't be able to restrict something that made us purchase the phones in the first place! "

Yousef, change.org

"I use Android phones rather than iphones because it allows for more user end control, including the ability to use/install open-source apk. If the choice is made to restrict this functionality, my next phone will not be an android. "

Rebecca, change.org

"You either die being choice free and open for the people, or live long enough to change your values and become like Apple. Don't be disgusting. "

Daniel, change.org

"Dear Google, you are single handedly destroying the whole purpose for which we use Android. Not only will you see a mass exodus from Google devices/services, you will force the creation of alternative operating systems that allow for user privacy and fredom for app developers. You all are making it harder for yourselves and for us. "

Kevin, change.org

"Freedom of choice and the end users ability to load applications and make changes to their devices is exactly why I switched to Android so many years ago. Truly hoping this is resolved and back to the core android roots once again. "

Ryan, change.org

"Keep it open source! "

Brad, change.org

"Why did I even buy an android phone?? They think I went iOS to android for no reason? WE WANT IT OPEN! "

David, change.org

"I have been an android user for as long as I can remember, do not change that now Google. I have just started to develop android apps, because I find the alternatives not so friendly and bothersome. Android has been my driving flag and I would not want that to change for any reason. "

Nijel, change.org

"Apple is one of the lamest companies in the world. You have no control on an iPhone. That's always been one of the selling points about Android is that you have basically total control over your device. There's literally no reason to change being able to download independent and open source apps from trusted developers. There are higher chances of getting a sketchy app through the play store. Don't break what isn't broken and then say you fixed something. We already lost our SD card slots. If you see this and you haven't signed the petition, please sign it. Also for more info, go here: https://keepandroidopen.org/ "

Dakota, change.org

"The freedom and flexibility was literally the reason I never owned an iPhone. It's like Google wants me to use Ubuntu Touch or something... "

Katrina, change.org

"This move by Google is part of a larger trend to limit freedom online and verify everything. Government ID belongs to the government only not Google, so Google has no right to demand usage of it it's not their property and it's not Google users' property either it's the government's. Making developers present this is unnecessary as code review already prevents bad actors on Google Play Store. Limiting side loading APKs is anti freedom, and anti American. When you buy a device that means you are not restricted from doing anything you wish with it. Additionally basically nobody installs something from outside the play store or other markets like Samsung so this clearly isn't a safety thing because only the people who want or need this feature seek it out, and everyone continues to benefit from the availability of open platforms because they could decide tomorrow to install a app store other than google play store to seek out cheaper apps or ones that match their ethics such as open source. Android itself is licensed as open source and inclusion of proprietary google owned code in devices is sketchy anyway. "

Jagur, change.org

"Android providing more freedom than any other OS has been it's drawing point for ages. The fact that that is being taken away for the sake of a corporation's whims is absolutely disgusting, and I would see no reason to continue supporting it. The fact that google believes it has absolute authority to filter content is frankly abhorrent, and it would provide no difference between android and any other OS. "

Guadalupe, change.org

"The freedom of android is what makes me not think about moving to another system such as ios, which could be lost depending on what Google decides, the charm of android is this for me. "

José Antônio, change.org

"I am developer and i need work that, dont block my work "

Celso, change.org

"I've been an user of Android based phones for a very long time. I am fully against the idea of this move Google is trying, as it is just another notch in the attempted censorship and surveillance of the internet as a whole. If this move is allowed to go through, I will find workarounds or work towards getting a third party phone deal where I don't have to deal with this. These big tech companies should not have the authority to force us to bend to them. We have the power to make them back down. Let our voice be heard. Boycott these companies and make them lose money. The moment their financial gains are threatened, they will surrender. "

Brandon, change.org

"One of the things that makes Android special is the freedom it gives developers and users, I hope it doesn't go away. "

Chris, change.org

"Google you suck ass. the whole point of Android is freedom. you're going to destroy so much and anger so many people if you do this 3 do it on pixel n ChromeOS or whatever but leave everything else alone you're ruining something beautiful "

liam, change.org

"Android is the most popular open phone OS currently. Google is going back on their promise of an open ecosystem in favor of one where they have control and government entities can pressure them to give up our information to them. "

Andrew, change.org

"Android livre! "

Wanderson, change.org

"My device is my device. "

arianna, change.org

"Open source apps is what makes Android the best over ios "

Billy, change.org

"When we buy a phone, we’re buying the right to use it as we see fit. For years, the core promise of Android was that it was an "open" platform, a space where users had the freedom to choose their software and developers had the freedom to innovate without a middleman. The move to mandate central registration for APK files and developer verification fundamentally breaks that promise. I believe in a future where technology serves the person who bought it. Let's call on Google to honor the original vision of Android as an open computing platform. Let’s keep Android open for the creators, for the consumers, and for the sake of a free and diverse digital future. "

Jessie, change.org

"Compared to iOS, Android always felt less restrictive and easier to work with, both as a user and developer. Now, Google would like to take that competitive niche and throw it in the dumpster. This benefits no users or developers. It is blatantly greedy, controlling, and nonsensical. It adds more red tape for developers, higher potential for censorship at the whim of Google, and it will turn Android into another iOS. Android users chose not to go with iOS when they bought their devices, for several reasons. For me personally, I liked that Android allowed certain kinds of apps that Apple did not allow on iOS. If Android didn't have that advantage, I would've picked iOS. It's a bad move for Google's business, it's a bad move for developers, and it's a bad move for consumers. Terrible idea all around. "

Bill, change.org

"I have used android since the begining and the entire reason ive stuck with it (and this has been getting VERY hard lately with all the locking down of android, version by version, more and more like iOS).. this would just be the nail in the coffin for android, for me.. I'd rather daily drive graphene or a very limited linux os than this. Really a shame though when you talk people into using android and all the reasons people choose to switch are being removed. This is something im a single issue voter on, I will cease all google/yt/gemini/etc subscriptions and use the day I can't sideload any app I please.. and this is a complete change for the device, so massive of a change (would have directly affected many of my purchases) that I dont get how they can just do it, literally the stuff that made it special they choose to gut.. "

Joshua, change.org

"Android having the ability to sideload apps is a core part of the eco system it's like if you couldn't install a .exe on windows. The core thing some of us went to android for is openness but if they take that away we will leave as fast as we arrived. "

Teddy, change.org

"If this update is released, I will switch to iPhone. "

Miguel, change.org

"Android is built on the Linux kernel and owes much of its foundation to the GNU/Linux ecosystem. The spirit of that ecosystem is openness, transparency, and user freedom. Limiting APK installation beyond reasonable security safeguards risks turning Android into a controlled ecosystem rather than an open platform. Security improvements are important, but they should not come at the cost of developer independence, open-source distribution, and user freedom to install software responsibly. Instead of restricting APK usage, a better approach would be improving user education, providing clearer and more transparent warnings, and offering optional security layers that protect users without limiting their freedom. "

Alireza, change.org

"Android is open source, period. On top of that, I'm buying the device. I own my phone, and that means I should be allowed to do whatever the hell they want with it! If I want to click on links from sketchy sites and download things that are not directly from the Google Play Store, I should be able to. Google claims this is to protect their users, but it's nothing more than censorship and crushing competition from a private, anonymous, and often better competitors making free and open source apps on platforms like F-Droid or Obtanium. It's like saying that you aren't allowed to hang a picture you bought from your friend in your own house that your bought, unless your friend pays Google $25 and gives them their ID, but you can hang as many pictures in your house as you like if you buy them directly from Google. Doesn't that sound absurd? "

Thomas, change.org

"Locking down android will create incredible friction to open source and 3rd party application stores. Imagine if you could only install PC programs from Microsoft Store. "

Andres, change.org

"One of the biggest things, if not the biggest thing, Android has had over Apple for the longest time is the freedom of the user to make the phone theirs through downloading third party apps, through developers making their own applications without being required to release it through an app store that requires a fee to put it on. My own personal experience has been that I could play one of my favorite games that's no longer on the app store. With these new restrictions and requirements Google is proposing in September, we would lose that freedom, and would become no better than Apple "

Morgan, change.org

"This change is disastrous for both the privacy of developers and the general health of the open source software community for android. Keep Android Open!! Let us install what we want, without asking for your permission. "

Thomas, change.org

"HOW NEXT GENS GONNA INSTALL MINECRAFT?! "

Kyouko, change.org

"The change to requiring app verification through a wireless, centralized service, instead of a feature of the OS, is a change that is inconvenient at best, and threatens the portable device market as it currently stands at worst. By making this change, Google is further revoking the customization and autonomy (or what is left of it on most carrier phones) that not only drives many users to get Android in the first place, but is a reminder of what makes computers so wonderful, in my opinion; the ability for every one to customize, and hack their own device to be perfectly their own. This wonderful thing is a basic function of any "free" computing platform that should not be revoked, but increasingly, it has. Please, Google, do not take this direction, and shut off the venue of customization that allows people to use their devices the way they want to, and has lit the torch for many future software developers and computer scientists. "

Zacario, change.org

"For Freedom! "

Ömer Can Devrim, change.org

"Control is what made Android different, taking that away would make it no better than Apple and the rest. "

Matthew, change.org

"Freedom requires the ability for us to harm ourselves if we so choose. We own the devices we buy and should not be required to only go through people Google allows. This is an unacceptable policy when it's my device. "

Matthew, change.org

"I love the freedom to use whatever program APK I wish and Appl........Google wants to take that away from us? Expect lawsuits in your future. BTW I HATE the play store, F-Droid ALL THE WAY "

David, change.org

"The life of Android is its openness. If I make an apk, I don't have to jump through hoops to install it on my device. If I install an apk from the internet, that is my choice. Verification in this regard is like requiring a government stamp on a written statement before it can be said in public: a gross overreach. I am not benefited as a consumer nor as a developer with this move, but I am harmed in every single way. "

John, change.org

"The reason people have Android is not only because it's cheap ,but because of the freedom The OS has... taking away this freedom ,is like taking away someone's heart "

Ayrton, change.org

"My phone, my apps Let me do what I want or else an iPhone will be my phone "

Aaron, change.org

"I've used both an apple and an android, the differences between them are like night and day, one has made it almost impossible to have free applications unless your willing to deal with a bombardment of ads, it also made it near impossible to have true safety, privacy, and freedom . Safety) there are applications that are aiding in the fight against tyrannical countries by making you decide what apps should be acceptable in which country you are harming people. Privacy) There wont be any anonymity with Developers, who now have to pay to make something for others, this doesn't encourage charity and generosity, it only fuels greed Freedom) There wont be a single application no matter how 'offline' the features are that wont be paid or ad-bloated, I don't get to choose any app and deal with the consequences, of those choices. in the words of Ben Franklin "Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety" "

jack, change.org

"If Google chooses to block any apps they don't approve of from their fork of android, the community will move to other forks. This is already starting to happen and will happen more the more they squeeze. And I'll be hopping on that ship ASAP unless things turn around fast. "

Nayr, change.org

"Android giving users choice has been the staple point of android OS. Removing choices like sideloading apps is not the move. I develop apps for myself, I do not want to be "an approved developer" I don't have time nor care for that. This action also is the beginning of censorship, and monopolization of android OS. Android started as an open operating system, you have simply turned it into a reskinned Apple OS. Your choice to go anti-consumer is going to hurt. You are not "protecting" anyone "

Seth, change.org

"Removing Android's freedom of sideloading is bad. People use Android because they have freedom, no matter the brand—Samsung, Google, etc. But now they want to get rid of our freedom; that is horrible. People who are developers who don't want to pay to publish their app on the store could, but with this going through, changes EVERYTHING. Sign this petition, Android can't go down like this. "

Elias, change.org

"Let me sideload my Android apps. "

Stephan, change.org

"Trust is born out of the experience of self-agency. Google always has been trustworthy because of that. It's not been successful for breathtaking design, intuitive user experience or a consistent hardware strategy. Its most successful argument carrying the message of freedom and agency up to date is Android. Have end point management and self written helpers. Let my local plumber have his own app without being asked to update it every half year, let me build my own app for trataka meditation without need to share and make money of it - that's general computing on a mobile device accidentally married to a telephone. I can show off my fluid dynamics simulations, every month a further advanced model, and of course stupidly sink into the screen when I wait for the bus. Wonderful. So listen, Google. Don't take away my freedom, don't take away our freedom and agency. Don't waste our trust. And, with the formula you'll have read too often in your personal messages, dear Sundar, thank you for your attention to this matter. "

Frank, change.org

"Keep Android from being like Apple controlling every aspect of what can be installed or not, that's why i don't own iPhones never will. If android is going in the same direction ill get a flip phone I don't need big brother telling me what i can do or can't on my phone, i worked hard to pay for! in the name of safety always same bullshit excuse when they want to violate people's rights... "

melvyn, change.org

"Are you not greedy enough? "

wesley, change.org

"We installed Android and became developers in good faith, that it was open and not locked/controlled and would stay that way. Google's motto USED to be "don't be evil" and yet they now do exactly that. People that force behaviour onto others are never the good guys. "

Shane, change.org

"If I recall IOS got sued and lost for trying to lock down options, And imagine if you had to pay a fee and show your ID just to make a windows or Linux application? No because that is stupid. and It is utterly foolish. And this isn't about security as android already has ways of locking down insecure apps already. Also this act harms open source projects and also puts developers at risk as sharing government ID's has already proven to be very insecure and would give bad actors ways of hurting people because they don't like what the person makes. "

Bradley, change.org

"Being able to get softwares and actually having device freedom is why I have always chosen android over apple. No freedom means that I can't do things I want to on my phone or any android device, which is the point of me buying android "

Zaiden, change.org

"As a big android user I love the option to try out apps that people make that dont want to use google play. Or the ability to sideload an app if its not "officially" supported but can run fine. The open nature of it is what makes things great and taking that away will push away people. "

T, change.org

"Ceasing to monopolize everything under the guise of "user security" only harms millions of independent developers and the users who consume their apps "

Angeles, change.org

"Either way this is going to lead to a massive lawsuit My phone is my device Google doesn't own it nor does it have the power to tell me what I can and can't install on the device that I own Google believes that it rules the world it's censorship completely destroyed YouTube now they plan to destroy Android in the same way but $1,000 says by this time next year Google will cave to the demands of the people "

Isaiah, change.org

"As a user, Stop it. Android is cool for openness: you close it, we'll leave "

Nicolò, change.org

"Android users have had the ability to use APKs for so long. It is a major thing that differentiates them from Apple, and something that has prevented me from switching over. Without the freedom of apks, there is nothing keeping me with Android or Google. "

Kayla, change.org

"The ability to download external APKs which give my phone some really neat functionality is what prevents me (for the most part) from switching to IOS. Google, please don't take that away from us. At least tell us why you wish to restrict Android. "

D, change.org

"I am a long-time Android user that heavily relies on sideloaded apps for my everyday phone usage. I ask that you reconsider the decision to make app sideloading impossible as it would be a slap in the face to everything Android has represented for all these years. Freedom to use apps from varying sources has always been a huge selling point for Android -- and it's a big reason why many don't involve themselves in Apple's ecosystem. In addition, forcing developers to lose their anonymity for the promise of greater security does not seem to be an appropriate tradeoff. I ask that you consider an alternative course of action for the sake of your user base. "

Chris, change.org

"A better way to improve Android security is for Google to require all their own code and the code of all Play Store apps to be fully free as in freedom to make security research easier. Ideally, all Google code would also be bootstrappable and reproducible. Without 100% free software all the time, we can only assume there ore backdoors and malicious code in Google products and Play Store apps. "

Seth, change.org

"Google loves trying to downfall their own creation by doing stupids things. Android is a best OS to side load apps, and also freedom to install apps outside of google play, but this goes so bad that i prefer apple over this. we can also side load without apple trying to remove side load. and no, i don't want to be "an approved developer" i don't want pay to a boring business who trys to downfall their own creation by doing shitty updates, because who wants to show their identify just for be "an approved 18+ old" user? well, NOBODYS. even adults. bye android, hello apple. "

Juh, change.org

"One of the few remaining features that Android provides over it's completion is a relatively open ecosystem for app development. Having to sign all apps through Google kills any motivation to have fun and develop apps for yourself and friends. Let's be honest, Android is not the best mobile operations stream. Openness was it's advantage. With that soon to be gone, there will be very little holding people back from switching over to Apple. "

Terence, change.org

"I am Japanese and using translation. I am deeply disappointed about this matter. There is no need to restrict the great features of Android. If only a limited number of people can develop, it will only lead to the decline of content. Please stop making things worse. "

成田, change.org

"Removing side-loading is anti-user. I'm all for increasing security, and having various strange steps helps with that. You could even have a 1 minute subtitled video that has to play before you can confirm for the first time on a device that you want to side-load apps. But this change shows a lack of interest in users that inspires developers to not care about the Android ecosystem. If Google intends to significantly decrease the scope of Android, that signals that the maintenance costs are too high for Google, and thus, the company intends to let it rot and eventually die, much like many other Google things "

James, change.org

"The push toward a mandatory, centralized developer verification program for Android represents a significant departure from the open-source values that originally defined the platform. By requiring independent developers to pay fees, surrender private signing keys, and provide government identification just to share an app—even outside the Play Store—these policies create a massive barrier to entry that threatens to stifle innovation and privacy. This shift doesn't just add friction; it risks dismantling alternative ecosystems like F-Droid and Aurora Store, which have long provided a vital refuge for those seeking software free from big-tech oversight. If we allow the door to close on sideloading and force every developer behind a paywall, we are effectively trading a diverse, free ecosystem for a "walled garden" that prioritizes corporate control over user agency and digital rights. It is essential that the community stands together to keep Android an open platform where developers can create and users can choose without needing a centralized permission slip. "

Andrew, change.org

"Google is about to further close down Android, which isn't good at all. If anything, it's going to hurt everyone, and furthermore, what if others start to copy them and lock down their ecosystems in a similar manner? For example, what if Microsoft starts locking down Windows app dev like Google is locking down Android app dev, and starts restricting sideloading exes? "

Joshua, change.org

"As someone who has recenlty been looking into privacy. I hope we can limit big corporations hold on our personal lives. "

Ronald, change.org

"Having less autonomy over how we use our devices doesn't make us safer, it just makes us more subject to corporate control. I'm not here for that. "

Eleanor, change.org

"I use android because its easy to mod and customize. If I own the device, I want complete control of it. That comes with the understanding that my modifications could break it . If we lose sideloading and indie and open source development, we'll just have to stray further from the platform to find it again. In a world where the easy to access services and products are becoming increasingly controlled and locked down to the detriment of the consumer, there's real benefit to be had in being one of the few exceptions. "

Cole, change.org

"I believe increasingly closed ecosystems lend not only to the monopolization of tech but are a threat to the digital sovereignty of individuals worldwide making them susceptible to government and corporate surveillance. "

Adrian, change.org

"Gghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh "

Pablo, change.org

"I only use android because of the freedom. This change would make android as restrictive as iPhones. "

Skyler, change.org

"Time to summon Nokia to make Google show some respect bruh "

Rafael, change.org

"The whole reason I use an Android based device is for the freedom that comes with the phone. If I wanted to be governed by my cellphone manufacturer I would use an iPhone. "

Zachary, change.org

"The freedom that Android offered was its defining feature. Without that freedom, it is no different than iOS. So when I go to buy my next phone, at least Apple hasn't pulled the rug out from under me, just saying... "

Daniel, change.org

"Freedom is fundamental. "

S, change.org

"This is my device, that i paid my hard earned money for. No one should be able to tell me what i can and can't install on something that I own. "

Arnold, change.org

"Android has always stood for user choice. The freedom to install apps from outside an official store is a core part of what made the platform different and appealing in the first place. Removing options like sideloading moves Android away from its original philosophy. I develop apps for personal use, and I have no interest in becoming an “approved developer” just to run my own software. Not everyone has the time or desire to navigate additional gatekeeping just to maintain control over their own devices. Limiting these freedoms sets a concerning precedent. It shifts the platform toward tighter control, reduced openness, and potential monopolization. Android began as an open operating system — moving away from that foundation risks turning it into a closed ecosystem that mirrors the very model it once differentiated itself from. Restricting user choice under the banner of “protection” doesn’t benefit everyone. Many users value autonomy, flexibility, and control over their own hardware. Removing those options feels less like protection and more like limitation. "

Dennis, change.org

"We want our freedom of speech "

Mohammed, change.org

"Please let us have freedom with our phones Google, thank you. "

Michael, change.org

"I only choose Android because of the openness and flexibility in how I choose to use my device. Locking down Android with paid developer verification and blocking me from installing apps manually is not being open. "

Jason, change.org

"I went back to Android over Apple because of APK freedom. There is no reason to buy an Android phone if this change is implemented. Android users love DIY: researching, exploring new manufacturers, using independent APK repositories. Google is trying to destroy the one thing that makes Android appealing. We all might as well buy iPhones if this is the direction they are choosing. Or dump our money into PinePhone dev. "

Kay, change.org

"Might as well be an iPhone at this point. The whole point of Android was customization, and this kills that. Do better Google. "

William, change.org

"Sideloading is only reason I use an Android phone. You will lose many users because of this decision. "

Niall, change.org

"I love making apps for my self on appinventor but when I heard this news I couldn't believe it. I don't want to be an approved developer because I only make these apps for myself, my friends and my family. This would make android feel less open source and is a horrible thing from Google to do this. This doesn't benefit anyone and only crushes creativity. #DONTBELIKEAPPLE "

Justin, change.org

"For the freedom of an open and universal system for all! "

Zaphyru's, change.org

"Android has always been defined as the more open platform. What gets people to move away from Apple is to get away from the closed ecosystem from having direct control over their own devices. This runs contrary to Androids original mission statement and what the platform stands for. This is not what I want for my device nor my family wishes for this either. "

Logan, change.org

"This is ridiculous the fact that google is causing this will effect everybody it's gonna make it way harder for developers to post there apps to specific users. "

Daisuke, change.org

"Android's main strength and opportunity in the S. W. O. T analysis is it's openness, which no other OS comes close to. From one side of the earth to the other, android users justifiably expect this unique strength to be enhanced, not diminished. Indeed, this unique feature which has set android apart from the beginning, has also motivated many in the community to become developers. There are even developers for apps on the Apple store whose beginnings were with android. These developers benefited from the openness android provides. For example, Toni Fingerroos — Hill Climb Racing / Fingersoft (Finland), Andrei Popleteev — KeePassium (Luxembourg), and many more. "

Schwan, change.org

"Android having access to custom software is a main thing that separates it from iOS. Don't destroy this amazing feature. "

Henry, change.org

"I should be allowed to make my own decisions about what I want to install on my device, smartphones nowadays are basically pocket computers and the ability to install apps from any source is by far the biggest reason I chose Android over iOS. Only being able to install apps from verified developers also gives power to Google to censor apps they don't like. "

Ryan, change.org

"Installing mini apps I wrote on my own device is the only reason I chose Android smartphone over dumbphone plus micro laptop. "

Alexey, change.org

"Using Android has always meant having the freedom to customize your experience to your hearts content, this would be the end of an era. This would also be the end of many small app developers that can't or won't conform to the what one might say 'invasive' requirements to publish an app. You can say goodbye to FOSS and side loading which is a huge part of Android customization. "

sebastian, change.org

"Yeah let's remove the one thing keeping people on Android 🤨 "

Bobby, change.org

Όλες οι αναφορές, editorials, δημοσιογραφική κάλυψη και βίντεο →

Ενεργοποιήσου Ολόκληρη η λίστα υλικού, στοιχεία επικοινωνίας με νομοθέτες, σύνδεσμοι για κάθε χώρα, και πως να αντισταθείς Ανοιχτή Επιστολή Διάβασε την ανοιχτή επιστολή που έχει υπογραφεί απο οργανισμούς ενάντια στην ταυτοποιήση προγραμματιστών

Εσύ αγόρασες το κινητό σου.
Εσύ πρέπει να αποφασίσεις τι τρέχει σε αυτό.

Αυτό δεν θα έπρεπε να χρειάζεται μια διαδικασία 9 βημάτων, μια εικοσιτετράωρη αναμονή, και την συνεχόμενη άδεια της Google.

Μοιράσου αυτήν την σελίδα. Μην κάνεις εγγραφή. Μην τους επιτρέψεις να κλειδώσουν το Android.