Remittix Bewertungen 

Antwort von Remittix

8. Sept. 2026

That’s a very outdated and one-sided take on Remittix.

You can question the project, the presale structure and the delays that’s fair. But claiming there has been “absolutely nothing” happening, “no working product” and “no results” simply doesn’t reflect where the project is today.

The PayFi model has been developed and tested and Remittix Markets is now live. So the blanket statement that there is no working product is demonstrably outdated.

You can also criticise the fact that RTX itself has not yet reached the full exchange-listing stage but that is very different from declaring the entire project a scam as though that has been proven.

If you're going to warn people away from a project, at least use current facts rather than repeating claims that were made when the project was in a completely different stage.

By all means, scrutinise Remittix but “I don't trust it” is an opinion; “it's a scam because nothing has happened” is a claim that the current evidence simply doesn't support.

Antwort von Remittix

8. Sept. 2026

We take reports of missing tokens and poor customer support seriously, but simply stating “scam” does not establish that a fraud has occurred.

If your tokens were genuinely not received, please provide the relevant transaction details, wallet address, transaction hash and date so the issue can be properly investigated. Without those details, it is impossible to determine whether this was a technical issue, a transaction error, or something else.

We welcome genuine complaints and will investigate specific, verifiable issues. However, serious accusations such as fraud should be supported by evidence rather than presented as established fact.

Antwort von Remittix

8. Sept. 2026

Calling Remittix a “classic presale scam” is a serious accusation, but the rest of this review presents assumptions as if they were established facts.

You are absolutely right that investors should examine the underlying business model, partnerships, regulatory position and evidence before investing. We encourage exactly that. However, saying that banking partnerships are “zwingend erforderlich” (absolutely required) without explaining the specific regulatory or operational basis for that claim is not enough to prove that a project is fraudulent.

If you believe Remittix has no legitimate partnerships, provide the evidence supporting that claim. Likewise, if you believe the business model is impossible or non-compliant, explain specifically why and provide the relevant regulatory basis.

Investors should question everything including negative reviews. Calling a project a scam without substantiating the allegation doesn't help anyone make an informed decision.