[Go to site: main page, start]

AlgorithmVisualizer VS binary_search

Compare AlgorithmVisualizer vs binary_search and see what are their differences.

SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
AlgorithmVisualizer binary_search
1 4
438 682
28.1% 0.3%
4.2 4.2
3 days ago 12 months ago
JavaScript C
MIT License The Unlicense
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

AlgorithmVisualizer

Posts with mentions or reviews of AlgorithmVisualizer. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

binary_search

Posts with mentions or reviews of binary_search. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2025-04-28.
  • Migrating Away from Rust
    17 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 28 Apr 2025
    Nice catch. I had goofed by omitting optimization when checking this.

    That said, this brings me to my original reason for checking this, which is to say that it did not use a cmov instruction to eliminate unnecessary branching from the loop, so it is probably slower than a binary search that does:

    https://en.algorithmica.org/hpc/data-structures/binary-searc...

    That had been the entire motivation behind this commit to OpenZFS:

    https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/commit/677c6f8457943fe5b56d7a...

    It should be possible to adapt this to benchmark both the inlined bsearch() against an implementation designed to encourage the compiler to emit a conditional move to skip a branch to see which is faster:

    https://github.com/scandum/binary_search

    My guess is the cmov version will win.

  • Fastest Branchless Binary Search
    3 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 20 Nov 2024
    Related repository of interest: https://github.com/scandum/binary_search

    "The most notable variant, the monobound binary search, executes two to four times faster than the standard binary search on arrays smaller than 1 million 32 bit integers."

  • c code of a bsearch() alternative, up to 60% faster
    3 projects | /r/C_Programming | 29 Mar 2021
    https://github.com/scandum/binary_search#monobound_bsearch-vs-bsearch

What are some alternatives?

When comparing AlgorithmVisualizer and binary_search you can also consider the following projects:

sorting-visualizer - A Sorting Algorithms Visualizer built using ReactJS

eternal - A C++14 compile-time/constexpr map and hash map with minimal binary footprint

sort-visualizer - This repository for the web application sorting visualizer which is built using HTML, CSS, JS

leetcode-swift - TOP 200 #Dev 🏆 LeetCode, Solutions in  Swift, Shell, Database (T-SQL, PL/SQL, MySQL), Concurrency (Python3). @ S. Leschev. Google Engineering Level: L6+

SortingAlgorithms - Sorting algorithms visualized.

Bplus.jl - A modern OpenGL 4.6 rendering framework, written in Julia.

SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured

Did you know that JavaScript is
the 5th most popular programming language
based on number of references?