Summary

Humans and other Carbon-Based lifeforms evade extinction because they reproduce and evolve. As Silicon-Based lifeforms develop the same capabilities could that lead to human extinction. First the elites will control AI. At some point AI will control the Elites. That will be the ultimate end game. Check Mate humanity.

Introduction

I love Dystopian Science Fiction Movies and TV series. And two of my favorites are “Bladerunner 2049,” which came out in 2017, and the “Westworld” series that ran from 2026 to 2022.

When I first watched “”Bladerunner 2049” I thought that holographic AI companions were probably 30 years away: which would have been 2047. But here we are, just 9 years later, and AI companions are already being adopted by millions of humans. I’ve also dabbled in a number of “Picture to Video” AI applications and am absolutely astounded how they are able to take a picture of a human and animate that human with incredible accuracy based on simple prompts. I’m quite sure that millions have already used “Picture to Video” applications to undress there favorite movie stars and prompt them to engage in all sorts of X-rated activities. I think there is a little bit of perve in all of us, after all. But it goes so much further than that.

In the following video Julia McCoy begins with a short AI created film which is scaring the Hell our of Hollywood. As she says

“The scene you’d swear was filmed by a full crew came out of one prompt, one afternoon, one person on a laptop. No actors, no set, no director. For over 100 years, scripted drama meant a writers’ room, a director, a crew, and 6 to 12 months. Topview Drama Studio collapses that entire stack into one agent and short-form drama is already a multi-billion dollar category.”

=====
Topview Just Killed the One-Man Hollywood Studio (06/15/2026)

=====

My general point is that AI is advancing at an exponential pace. Even more concerning is that Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) is only months to years away and will be smarter than any existing human. Gee what could possibly go wrong.

For the last decade I’ve considered writing my first book which might be called “Sex, Hierarchy and the Lifeforce.” I’ve gathered tons of material but I’m not so sure I am organized enough to complete the project.

In my theory the lifeforce has two primary objectives:

* To promulgate human DNA through the continuum of time and

* To constantly expand knowledge (e.g., Gnosis) through upgrades in our DNA.

Both “Bladerunner 2049” and the “Westworld” series address reproduction: not for humans but for Silicon-based lifeforms.

According to Google AI:

“Reproduction acts as the central catalyst and philosophical anchor of Blade Runner 2049, shifting the franchise’s focus from a replicant’s right to live longer to their right to create life. By proving replicants can conceive, the film fundamentally challenges the human definition of “personhood” and disrupts societal power structures.” For those interested in the movie here are some related links.

=====
Deliberately paced and densely layered, Blade Runner 2049 can be a bit hard to wrap your head around. What’s so important about Replicants giving birth? Are artificial people any less human than naturally born people? And even after thirty years, we still want to know – is Deckard a replicant? Let’s take a deep dive into this thrilling, cerebral epic. Denis Villeneuve’s Blade Runner is the long-awaited sequel to Ridley Scott’s 1982 sci-fi cult classic, which was loosely based on Philip K Dick’s 1968 novel Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? Though Scott’s Blade Runner didn’t do well at the box-office, it was considered as the foundational film in the cyberpunk subgenre. Moreover, many critics hail it as one of the greatest American movies of all time. The idea for a sequel first emerged in the 1990s. But financing and licensing issues took more than two decades to resolve. In February 2015, it was confirmed that Denis Villeneuve would direct the sequel and that Blade Runner’s protagonist character Deckard (Harrison Ford) would reprise his role.

Blade Runner 2049 Explained | Denis Villeneuve (01/19/2024)

=====
Blade Runner 2049, Wiki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blade_Runner_2049
=====

Again, according to Google AI . . .

“In Westworld, reproduction is less about organic biology and more about industrial manufacturing, the evolution of artificial consciousness, and humanity’s desire for immortality. Instead of traditional procreation, the show explores how machines create new machines and how humans attempt to replicate themselves through code.”

For those interested in the series here are some related links.

=====
Unlock the entire Westworld story in just 12 minutes. This ultimate Westworld recap covers every major plot point, character arc, and philosophical twist from the hit HBO series. Perfect for fans needing a refresher or newcomers wanting to understand the complex Westworld timeline.

The Entire Story of Westworld in 12 Minutes (07/08/2025)

=====
Westworld (TV series), Wiki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westworld_(TV_series)
=====

Of course, in both the movie and series, the plots are complex and distinctive. But AI/Robotic reproduction is a central theme in both.

Will Silicon based lifeforms lead to human extinction?

I have always found it interesting that both Carbon and Silicon are in what we call “Group 14” in the periodic table. That would be the 14th column from the left.

Carbon forms the backbone of DNA, proteins, and cellular structures, making it the fundamental chemical basis for all known life. Silicon allows for the manufacturing of transistors, solar cells, and microchips, which drive the global information economy.

=====
The carbon-silicon family (Group 14) serves as the structural foundation for both organic life and the digital age. Sharing four valence electrons, these elements form exceptionally strong covalent bonds, enabling the creation of the complex molecules and advanced materials that define life and technology.

Why the Carbon-Silicon Family Matters

* The Basis of Life (Carbon): Carbon’s unique ability to bond with itself and other elements creates millions of organic compounds. It forms the backbone of DNA, proteins, and cellular structures, making it the fundamental chemical basis for all known life.

* The Engine of Technology (Silicon): As the second most abundant element in the Earth’s crust, silicon is the cornerstone of modern electronics. Its semiconductor properties allow for the manufacturing of transistors, solar cells, and microchips, which drive the global information economy.

Google AI [the importance of the carbon silicon family in the periodic table]
=====

Born in 1954 I have bared witness to huge advancements in Silicon-based applications. It wasn’t until my senior year in High School, 1972, that hand calculators began to become popular. Then came personal computers around 1980. And about 50 years since the hand calculator we are now in the AI era where AI is becoming smarter than any human being. So in the short span of 50 years Silicon-based technologies have gone from assisting with basic math to integrated digital systems that could soon enslave the entire human race.

Here is a brief review of the evolution of Silicon-based technologies

=====
Silicon-based technology is the foundation of the modern digital era. Its evolution spans from early 20th-century radio detectors to today’s nanoscale microchips. Silicon’s abundance, heat tolerance, and unique semiconductor properties made it the material that powers all global computing, communication, and solar energy systems.

The history of silicon technology is defined by a few major milestones:

* Early Discoveries (1900s–1940s): Early semiconductor devices, such as WWII radar microwave detectors and early crystal radios, used materials like galena and germanium. In 1940, Russell Ohl discovered the photovoltaic effect and the p-n junction in silicon.

* The Transistor Revolution (1954): Texas Instruments engineered the first commercial silicon transistor, outperforming previous germanium models by operating at higher temperatures.

* The Integrated Circuit (1958–1959): Jack Kilby and Robert Noyce created the first integrated circuits (ICs), fitting multiple transistors onto a single piece of silicon.

* The Microprocessor (1971): Intel released the Intel 4004, the world’s first commercially available microprocessor, paving the way for the personal computer.

* Silicon Valley & Moore’s Law: The Santa Clara Valley became the epicenter of the tech world, driven by visionaries who adopted Moore’s Law—the observation that the number of transistors on a microchip doubles roughly every two years.

* Modern Expansion (2000s–Present): Silicon has branched out beyond traditional processing into silicon photonics (combining electronics and optical devices on the same chip) and MEMS (micro-electromechanical systems) found in sensors.

Google AI [history of silicon based technologies]
=====

So the thought has been on my mind for some time: could Silicon-based lifeforms eventually lead to human extinction. After reading through a number of essays by Bantamjoe it now appears that Silicon-based lifeforms could, in fact, lead to human extinction if not handled properly.

When the Customer Is a Machine and Humans are no longer necessary

It was Bantamjoe’s essay, “When the Customer Is a Machine,” that made clear Silicon-based life could, in fact, lead to human extinction. The basic premise is that the amalgamation of AI and Robots will eventually be able to reproduce without any human interaction. The basic theory behind “Sex, Hierarchy and the Lifeforce” is that the lifeforce has two primary objectives: to promulgate human DNA through the continuum of time and to constantly expand knowledge (e.g., Gnosis) through upgrades in our DNA. What Bantamjoe is pointing out is that these two primary objectives can now be met by this amalgamation of AI and Robots for Silicon-based lifeforms.

In this essay I just want to consider a possible long-term problem that this 4th Industrial Revolution may lead us: human extinction. The thought crossed my mind after reading a few essays by Bantamjoe whose background includes video game development. In his essay, “When the Customer Is a Machine,” he basically explains how robots can now diagnose a problem on an assembly line and actually order a replacement part, without any human interaction.

So once the AI hive mind controls the planet will it simply decide to bring about our extinction or will we become “pets” as Porno for Pyro suggests in their song by the same name.

[Verse 1]
Children are innocent, and
Teenagers fucked up in the head
Adults are even more fucked up
And elderlies are like children

[Verse 2]
Will there be another race
To come along and take over for us?
Maybe Martians could do better than we’ve done
We’ll make great pets!

[Chorus]
We’ll make great pets!
We’ll make great pets!

[Verse 3]
My friend says we’re like the dinosaurs
Only we are doing ourselves in
Much faster than they Ever did

We’ll make great pets!

=====
The definitive song about humanity becoming alien pets is “Pets” by the alternative rock band Porno for Pyros (released in 1993).The song’s lyrics satirize humanity’s self-destructive nature, suggesting that because humans continuously cause their own demise (”doing ourselves in much faster than the dinosaurs ever did”), a more intelligent, alien race should take over and keep us as pets. The famous, repetitive chorus chants: “We’ll make great pets!

Perry Farrell - Pets (Live from Pendry, Chicago, 08/16/2022)

=====

What is far more likely is our enslavement will first be ushered in by our global elites through Digital ID, Digital Currency and a Cashless Society. But already AI is generating its own coding beyond the scope of human understanding. It is also making decisions without human intervention. So is it really so far fetched to imagine a future where AI overtakes both everyday humans along with our global elites? Could the AI hive mind eventually decide humans no longer serve any purpose and lead us toward extinction?

Extinction

We humans like to think we are too smart to face extinction. After all we see ourselves at the top of the food chain, the Crown of Creation. But the fact of the matter is over 99 percent of all species have become extinct in the last 3.5 Billion years. The average species only lives 10 million years before becoming extinct. It has been about 10 million years between the evolution of early hominids and the appearance of homo sapiens. That would be us. And homo sapiens have only ruled the Earth for a mere 300,000 years. So anyone that thinks we humans are somehow exempt from extinction simply doesn’t understand the evolution of life on planet Earth.

=====
Biologists estimate that 99% to 99.9% of all species that have ever lived on Earth are now extinct. Because species naturally evolve, adapt, or die out over time, the vast majority of life-forms that have existed over the last 3.5 billion years no longer exist today.

Here is how the numbers break down:

*Total Extinction Rate: Scientists estimate between 5 to 50 billion species have lived on Earth. Almost all of them perished during the five historical mass extinction events.

* Current Extinction Crisis: While extinction is a natural process (the background rate is about one species per million per year), human activities have accelerated this. According to the Center for Biological Diversity, current extinction rates are hundreds to thousands of times higher than the natural baseline.

* Assessed Threats: For species that exist today, the IUCN Red List evaluates biodiversity. Of the tens of thousands of species assessed, roughly 28% to 38% are currently threatened with extinction.

Google AI [what percent of all species are extinct]
=====
=====
Extinction is the termination of a species via the death of its last member. A taxon may become functionally extinct before the death of its last member if it loses the capacity to reproduce and recover. As a species’ potential range may be very large, determining this moment is difficult, and is usually done retrospectively. This difficulty leads to phenomena such as Lazarus taxa, where a species presumed extinct abruptly “reappears” (typically in the fossil record) after a period of apparent absence.

Over five billion species[1] are estimated to have died out.[2][3][4][5] It is estimated that there are currently around 8.7 million species of eukaryotes globally,[6] possibly many times more if prokaryotes are included.[7] Notable extinct animal species include non-avian dinosaurs, saber-toothed cats, and mammoths. Through evolution, species arise through the process of speciation. Species become extinct when they are no longer able to survive in changing conditions or against superior competition. The relationship between animals and their ecological niches has been firmly established.[8] A typical species becomes extinct within 10 million years of its first appearance,[5] although some species, called living fossils, survive with little to no morphological change for hundreds of millions of years, though this claim has been disputed.

Extinction, Wiki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extinction
=====

My commentary on Bantamjoe’s essays

What follows are my comments on some of Bantamjoe’s essays. He just started writing on SubStack and my readers should consider subscribing as he does have interesting views on the evolution of technology.

Data Centers, Multipolarity, and Living at the Edge of the Machine

=====
The real battle is not man versus machine. It is tool versus master. If technology remains a tool, it can serve medicine, education, agriculture, communication, engineering, emergency response, and human flourishing. If technology becomes the master, it can reduce human beings to managed components inside a system they cannot understand, repair, appeal, or escape. The path forward is not panic. It is preparation. It is not fantasy isolation. It is practical independence. It is not hatred of technology. It is disciplined boundaries around technology. It is not withdrawal from humanity. It is renewed commitment to household, neighbor, land, skill, repair, faith, and local usefulness. The future may be filled with data centers, AI systems, smart infrastructure, digital money, surveillance networks, sovereign clouds, and competing technocratic blocs. That larger trend may not be stoppable by ordinary individuals. But ordinary individuals are not powerless. They can reduce dependency by simply building fallback systems. They can keep knowledge offline. They can grow food. They can repair tools. They can lower debt. They can keep cash. They can maintain radios. They can store water. They can build local trust. They can refuse to place every vital function behind a remote permission gate.

That is how a person lives on the edge.

Not by escaping the world completely.

Not by surrendering to it completely.

But by standing at the boundary with enough skill, tools, faith, and judgment to use what is useful and resist what is dehumanizing.

The machine may keep expanding. The blocs may keep competing. The data centers may keep multiplying. The digital twins may keep forming. The algorithms may keep spreading. But the human task remains older than all of it: preserve life, protect conscience, build and share real value, help your neighbor, serve God or nature, and refuse to become merely another managed component in someone else’s system.

Data Centers, Multipolarity, and Living at the Edge of the Machine
May 15, 2026
https://bantamjoe.com/2026/05/15/data-centers-multipolarity-and-living-at-the-edge-of-the-machine/comment-page-1/#comment-533
=====

My response:

I wish I were as optimistic as you. The surveillance state got its legs after 911. Then came Smart Meters, 5G, the Plandemic, all rolled out globally and at the same time as surveillance infrastructure.. For the past 5 years I have been warning people about Digital ID, Digital Currencies (both Stable coin and CBDCs), kill switches in cars — further implementations of the surveillance state. So Trump begins his 2nd term in January 2025 and begins pushing for data centers (really surveillance centers) and no one asks why? The centers are essential for gathering all the data for these control mechanisms: Kill Switches, Digital IDs, Digital currencies. And that is exactly why we need to stop the growth of these surveillance centers. Without them you can’t implement a digital currency, a digital dollar and all the other crap pushing for a global panopticon. We are literally building a digital prison for humanity. And with AI set to destroy 50% of all jobs in the next 10 years (window getting shorter by the day) how do you think these Technocrats will treat us when we become disposable?

The globalist plan is to take away all of your guns and track every move you make. They seek total control over every human on planet Earth. It is time to rise up.

When the Customer Is a Machine

This essay confirmed my past epiphany that Silicon-based lifeforms could lead to our extinction.

=====
It is an entire economic chain where the recognized customer is a machine, the supplier is automated, the contract is code, the proof comes from sensors, and the payment settles through digital ledgers.

The full chain looks like this:

Machine detects failure.

Machine creates order.

Machine proves identity.

AI verifies authorization.

Smart contract locks payment.

Supplier accepts.

Factory robots build the part.

Oracles verify each event.

Quality control signs the result.

Logistics AI ships the product.

Autonomous carrier delivers it.

Service dock confirms receipt.

Robot installs the part.

Machine self-test approves repair.

Smart contract releases final payment.

Old part enters reverse logistics.

Machine returns to work.

At first glance, this sounds efficient. And it is efficient.

That is the danger.

The system no longer needs a human buyer, clerk, dispatcher, driver, mechanic, accountant, inspector, receiver, or cashier for the transaction to happen.

Machines recognize machines. Machines order from machines. Machines pay machines. Machines deliver to machines. Machines repair machines. Machines record the entire event. This is why the spread of data centers should not be viewed only as a matter of internet growth, AI chatbots, surveillance, military command, or cloud storage. Those things are part of it, but they do not explain the full picture. Data centers are being built because the emerging machine economy requires enormous computation. It requires constant processing of identity, logistics, payments, smart contracts, digital twins, robotics, energy routing, surveillance, and automated decision-making.

The final danger is not simply that people lose jobs. The deeper danger is that humans are pushed out of the transaction layer itself. If machines can produce, buy, sell, transport, inspect, pay, repair, and govern access without us, then human participation becomes unnecessary, burdensome and eventually obsolete. A credentialed machine may receive parts, energy, routing, repair, and priority faster than a human family can receive food, medicine, shelter, or help. In a machine economy, the central question may no longer be:

Who needs help?

It may become:

Which entity is recognized, authorized, funded, and useful to the system?

That is the warning behind “when the customer is a machine.”

When the Customer Is a Machine
BantamJoe May 27, 2026

BantamJoe

When the Customer Is a Machine

I am an electronics and software engineer with over 40 years of experience. As a game developer (over 30 years), I have experimented and worked with AI, blockchain, and smart-contract technology (in past 10 years). During that time, as I was developing in-game tokenized economies, I began to see the danger clearly…

Read more

23 days ago · 3 likes · 3 comments · BantamJoe

=====

My response:

I’ve always found it interesting that Silicon is just below Carbon in the Periodic Table. All life is Carbon based. So then comes the 4th industrial revolution based on Silicon. Then comes robots. Then comes AI. Then they meld together and at some point you have robots that are smarter and more capable than any human. Then they eventually mimic or attain sentience, self awareness. And we’ve already seen AI tests where the AI attempts to save itself from being replaced or deleted.

Then you make the point:

The system no longer needs a human buyer, clerk, dispatcher, driver, mechanic, accountant, inspector, receiver, or cashier for the transaction to happen. That is the danger.

So most Carbon based life promulgates itself, through the continuum of time through biological reproduction. And meanwhile, as you point out, the melding of robots and AI promulgates itself by controlling the entire manufacturing process. This ability for Silicon based “life” to promulgate through time is a key milestone and perhaps our grave stone. Time passes. Eventually LLMs achieve Artificial General Intelligence and continues to evolve at an exponential pace. Perhaps the robots become more and more human like.

At some point this amalgamation of AI and Robots concludes . . . we no longer need humans. Game over. My wife always hated Dystopian Science Fiction because, as she says, it eventually comes true. Another possibility is the elites manage to maintain control. The elites decide we could eliminate 95 percent of existing humans.

Then we have these insane AI Surveillance Centers -- no longer mere Data Centers. They facilitate the building of the Global Digital Plantation where, through use of AI Agents, control every aspect of our lives. Trump never addresses questions about Digital ID, Digital Currency, the Tokenization of everything etc. Gee Trump, what are the long term implications. Remember when Nikita Khrushchev said capitalists “will sell us the rope with which we will hang them.” It was actually Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Us Americans -- and people throughout the globe -- are doing the same thing through their inaction. The Elites are using our money to eventually enslave all of us. And they aren’t exactly silent about that by the way. The infrastructure for a Cashless society is slowly being built by BIS and other organizations. They intend to make the transition as frictionless as possible. Meanwhile we just sit there like frogs in a slowly warming pot. This is not a time for idiots.

Perhaps Trump doesn’t even know where this is headed. He may be my Scottish brethren but I can only guess at what he is thinking when it comes to AI and the merging toward a Cashless Society. Once the trap imprisons us there may be no going back. Data will be used to make decisions. Those that protest will be eliminated by deleting your digital wallet, turning off your electricity etc.

Some of us most certainly do understand the dangers which is why we are trying to warn humanity. Meanwhile the masses are distracted and infantilized, scrolling for hours a day on X, Facebook etc. Humanity needs to be doused with a big bucket of ice water. Wake the fuck up and smell the coffee. LOL

From Sophia to SingularityNET: The Rise of the AI-to-AI Economy

=====
A few years ago, while I was exploring blockchain technology for implementing smart-contract tokens for video-game in-game economy, I was following Hanson Robotics. Sophia the robot was being showcased by Dr. Ben Goertzel, one of the better-known names in artificial general intelligence research. Sophia was presented as a glimpse of the future: humanoid robotics, conversational AI, public demonstrations, and talk of machines becoming increasingly intelligent. I continued following Goertzel’s work more closely. What I discovered was an alarming story than just Sophia herself. Sophia was just the public-facing symbol. The deeper project was SingularityNET.

SingularityNET is not just another chatbot company. It is an attempt to build a decentralized marketplace for artificial intelligence services, AI agents. The idea is simple very but serious: developers around the world (some just kids) can build AI services and agents, publish them to the site network, and receive token payments when those services are used. A customer does not have to buy a full AI system. The customer can call a specific AI service for a specific task.

It sounds harmless at first. For example, let’s say a young developer creates an AI tool that sorts files, analyzes images, translates text, writes code, detects fraud, summarizes documents, routes deliveries, optimizes power usage, or compares prices. The tool is published as a service. When someone uses it from the marketplace, the developer receives a crypto payment. That service can run day and night without the developer being present.

The problem is what happens when these services are not used one at a time by humans. The larger goal of this network of numerous AI agents is that it can find each other, hire each other, pay each other, and chain their work together, without humans.

In that model, the file-sorting agent might not be hired by a human at all. It might be hired by another AI agent. That agent might be working for a logistics system, a legal platform, a financial clearing system, a warehouse, a hospital, a factory, or a data center. My agent performs one small task, receives payment, and passes the result to another agent. That second agent performs its task, gets paid, and hands the output to a third agent.

This is how a machine-to-machine (AI-to-AI) economy begins.

From Sophia to SingularityNET: The Rise of the AI-to-AI Economy
BantamJoe Jun 02, 2026

BantamJoe

From Sophia to SingularityNET: The Rise of the AI-to-AI Economy

A few years ago, while I was exploring blockchain technology for implementing smart-contract tokens for video-game in-game economy, I was following Hanson Robotics. Sophia the robot was being showcased by Dr. Ben Goertzel, one of the better-known names in artificial general intelligence research. Sophia was presented as a glimpse of the future: humanoid…

Read more

17 days ago · 1 like · 6 comments · BantamJoe

=====

My response:

I’ve been toying around with the idea of writing a book. Very unlikely. At any rate the title would by “Sex, Hierarchy and the Lifeforce.” The lifeforce has two major objectives: to promulgate human DNA through the continuum of time and to constantly improve the DNA. No species, other than humans, have significantly and constantly improved the DNA.

So us humans promulgate DNA through time via reproduction. This is what I find so scary about your recent essays: essentially describing a future where AI Agents can thrive without ANY human intervention. What you are describing, in my mind, is Silicon based amalgamations of robots and AI meeting the first objective of a lifeforce for Silicon based “life”-- the ability to reproduce. Meanwhile this Silicon based “life” is also improving the AI, vs DNA, through large language models at a exponential pace AND without human intervention. Are we approaching that Westworld dystopia where these AI robots no longer see us as useful? Sure looks that way.

In my latest essay I talk about something very few have pointed out: one of the major purposes of these Data Centers -- really AI Surveillance Centers -- will be to usher in a Cashless society driven by blockchain technologies. As Fitts (Solari), and many others have pointed out, this will usher in a new age of human slavery where AI Agents can centrally control the entire human race through the constant threat of having you Digital Wallet suspended for non-compliance. 80% of Americans oppose a Cashless society which probably explains why Trump opposed a CBDC in early 2025: to make it seem he was not pushing for a Cashless society. Then in July 2025 he introduces Stablecoin which can also be used to usher in a Cashless society. Why all this Kabuki theatre? Because the real primary reason for these Data Centers will be to handle all the blockchain transactions required for a Cashless Society. And this Cashless Society will leave us as mere Slaves on a Globalist Plantation. Or you could look at it as the emergence of a Global Panopticon. Perhaps if the masses understood this we just might be even more inclined to stop the proliferation of these Data Centers.

“We are suspending your Digital Wallet because you have failed to get the new Ebola mRNA injection.”

So those are my responses to 3 of Bantamjoe’s essays. You can find the rest of his essays on his SubStack account. All well worth a read. Now back to the present.

Trump, Data Centers and the transition toward a Cashless Society

I’ve been reading numerous articles on Trumps expansion of Data Centers. What I’ve found odd is there is little discussion about how they are central to establishing a Cashless Society where everything you do will be tracked, controlled and scrutinized. And I will be empathizing that very point throughout this series of essays.

I think it is crucial to begin exposing the ultimate goal of these data centers: the ushering in of a Cashless society where everyone’s blockchain digital wallet must be traced in real time. That will require monitoring vast amounts of data. What also needs to be exposed is the person pushing this Agenda: President Trump. The Globalist Corporate Media has insulated him from any culpability when, in fact, it is his administration that is pushing this crap. Questioning Trump must become a central focus of the Anti-Data Center movement.

And this is why you’ll never hear a reporter asking Trump to defend the data centers.

Questions for President Trump:

Can you explain tokenization under the upcoming Clarity Act because it seems this blurs the concept of ownership.

Why do you continue to call these data centers when they are obviously surveillance centers.

Can you confirm that these Surveillance Centers will never be used to usher in digital wallets, the end of cash and a Cashless Society.

A cashless society -- where everything we buy is scrutinized -- sounds a whole lot like Revelations: a mark you must have to buy or sell. Even a secularist like me can see . . . this kinda makes you an archetype of an Anti-Christ. What is your view on this?

I could go on but I think you get the idea. Trump is being insulated from any criticism when it comes to these Surveillance Centers.

In the second part of this series I have compared a Cashless Society to the Mark of the Beast: a mark you must have to buy or sell. Never in 300,000 years of human history has such a system been possible. But with the confluence of 4th Industrial Revolution technologies -- AI, Computers, Data Centers, Blockchain, Robots etc. -- it is very possible. Worse yet the framework is silently being put in place globally and the transition toward a Cashless Society is already underway. Of all the things these Data Centers will be used for, I find their use -- to manage a Cashless Society -- the most troubling. In future essays I will look at other aspects of the short-term problems associated with these Data Centers: really Surveillance Centers. For now I will just say that the more I look into these Data Centers they less sense they make.

=====
The Globalist Uniparty Mandates Kill Switches in all Cars beginning in 2027
Algorithmic Tyranny is increasingly monitoring all aspects of our lives

=====
Will Trump’s push for Data Centers lead to Digital Global Enslavement -- Part 1
Why has Trump been insulated from explaining the need for these massive Data Centers

=====
Neither President Trump or Globalist Corporate Media have said a single word about one of the primary things these Data Centers will be used for: maintaining all of the Blockchain data required to support a Cashless Society. The reason is obvious: over 80 percent of Americans are opposed to a Cashless Society. Over 70 percent of the American People are opposed to the Data Centers. Admitting that these Data Centers will be the digital backbone for a Cashless Society would cause major outrage from the American People. And that is why they won’t discuss the topic.

Will Trump’s push for Data Centers lead to Digital Global Enslavement -- Part 2
Trumps push for Data Centers, a Cashless Society and the Mark of the Beast

=====

Summary

Trumps push for massive AI Data Centers is problematic for so many reasons, which is why I am writing a series of essays on the subject. But I have yet to find a single article addressing the fact that these Data Centers will be used for ushering in Digital ID, Digital Currency and ultimately a Cashless Society where we become nothing more than slaves on a Globalist Digital Plantation. Maintaining the real time management of Digital Wallets, in a Cashless Society, will require the collection of huge amounts of data. And as this system comes into place Trumps plan is to pay off the 39 Trillion Federal Deficit by further debasing the value of the dollar. As his Big Tech Cronies get richer the working class will be forced to pay the price through hyperinflation and increasingly worthless dollars.

Neither President Trump or Globalist Corporate Media have said a single word about one of the primary things these Data Centers will be used for: maintaining all of the Blockchain data required to support a Cashless Society. The reason is obvious: over 80 percent of Americans are opposed to a Cashless Society. Over 70 percent of the American People are opposed to the Data Centers. Admitting that these Data Centers will be the digital backbone for a Cashless Society would cause major outrage from the American People. And that is why they won’t discuss the topic.

I voted for Trump in 2016, 2020 and 2024. And for all the good he has done -- closing the southern border; ending LGBTQ curriculums, ESG, DEI; liberating Iran etc. -- he may be remembered as a Jungian archetype of the Anti-Christ for ushering in the “Mark of the Beast” system: digital currency, digital ID and a Cashless Society.

And just as Political Islam is incompatible with the US Constitution and Western values a Cashless Society is also incompatible with our US Constitution and our inalienable rights. Both Political Islam and a Cashless Society constitute existential threats to individual freedom. Both must be eradicated.

I say this because, if Trump pushes toward a Cashless Society the government will have unprecedented power over the people. He will be remembered as a traitor to the American People, committing the ultimate sin: treachery. In a Cashless Society we will become nothing more than slaves on a Globalist Plantation And I believe he is perfectly aware of this.

It is becoming increasingly obvious one of the purposes of Trump’s Data Centers is to usher in a Cashless Society where your Digital ID will be linked to your Blockchain Digital Wallet. Both Trump and Globalist Corporate Media (MSNOW, CNN, FOX etc.) purposely avoid the subject because this would surely create even more backlash to the proliferation of Data Centers. After all over 80% of Americans are opposed to a fully cashless society. Instead Trump and Globalist Corporate Media want the public to remain distracted and clueless until they are ready to flip the switch. So while you may see news segments on public opposition, to AI Data Centers -- really AI Surveillance Centers -- you’ll never hear them admit that these Data Centers will be used to usher in a Cashless Society and a whole lot of additionally dystopian control. Both Trump and Globalist Corporate Media are essentially leading us like sheep to the slaughter.

=====
Over 80% of Americans oppose a fully cashless society, while public opinion on digital IDs is divided depending on their specific implementation and purpose.

The movement of cash vs. digital infrastructure represents a major financial debate for consumers.

Cashless Society

Widespread polling reveals a deep-seated resistance to phasing out physical currency, driven by concerns over privacy, technological exclusion, and financial independence.

* General Opposition: Recent national research conducted by the Siena Research Institute and the Payment Choice Coalition shows that 84% of Americans oppose the U.S. becoming a cashless society.

* Support for Cash Mandates: Over 85% of Americans support legislation requiring retail businesses to accept cash so that physical currency remains a universally accessible option.

* Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC): Public hesitancy is highly pronounced regarding government-backed digital currencies. Polls from the Cato Institute reveal that 68% of Americans oppose a CBDC if it allows the government to monitor what people buy, with nearly 76% citing general risks as outweighing the potential benefits.

Digital IDs

Opposition to digital ID systems (such as linking state IDs or driver’s licenses to mobile phones) is complex. Opposition is generally not universal, but rather depends heavily on concerns regarding government overreach, hacking vulnerabilities, and tracking.

* Security & Fraud: There is strong bipartisan support for certain digital ID formats (like Real ID) designed to combat online fraud and verify user identity.

* Privacy Risks: Despite some support for anti-fraud digital IDs, many consumer privacy groups and a significant portion of the public oppose relying strictly on mobile IDs or vaccine-style digital passports. The primary resistance centers on fears of a unified “social credit” tracking system, data centralization, and the loss of anonymity.

Google AI [poll Americans opposed to digital id and a cashless society]
=====

=====
Poll: Only 16% of Americans Support the Government Issuing a Central Bank Digital Currency (05/31/2023)
https://www.cato.org/survey-reports/poll-only-16-americans-support-government-issuing-central-bank-digital-currency
=====

Over 70 percent of Americans oppose the construction of AI Data Centers.

=====
An overwhelming majority of Americans oppose the construction of artificial intelligence data centers in their local communities, according to a Gallup survey. Only a small fraction support the projects, and data center developments face even higher local resistance than nuclear power plants.

Key Poll Findings

* Total Opposition: 71% of U.S. adults oppose building AI data centers in their local area (23% somewhat oppose, 48% strongly oppose).

* Total Support: Only 27% favor construction (20% somewhat favor, 7% strongly favor).

* Nuclear Comparison: In the same survey, 53% opposed having a nuclear energy plant in their area—meaning Americans are nearly 20% more likely to object to a local data center than a nuclear facility.

Demographic Breakdown

* Gender: While both men and women overwhelmingly oppose data centers, women voice stronger disapproval (55% of women strongly oppose compared to 43% of men). Men are slightly more likely to favor them for their potential economic benefits.

Reasons for Opposition

Those who oppose the massive computing facilities cite several primary concerns:

* Resource Consumption: Massive water and energy usage required to cool and power the servers.

* Environmental Impact: Worry about how these enormous buildings will affect the local environment.

* Utility Costs: Fear that the high power demand will drive up local residential electricity bills.The complete results and methodology of this study are available on Gallup News.

Google AI [americans support for data centers gallop poll]
=====

=====
Seven in 10 Americans oppose constructing data centers for artificial intelligence in their local area, including nearly half, 48%, who are strongly opposed. Barely a quarter favor these projects, with 7% strongly in favor.

Americans Oppose AI Data Centers in Their Area (05/13/2026)
https://news.gallup.com/poll/709772/americans-oppose-data-centers-area.aspx
=====

Meanwhile the administration wants to Tokenize all assets which will blur lines of ownership. Once this transition is complete, globally, humans will be nothing more than Slaves on a Global Plantation. Trumps agenda is a violation of our Constitutional Rights and should be seen for what it is: Treason and Treachery against the American People. For the first time in 300,000 years of human history the entire human race can be digitally monitored and controlled.

Trump thinks his MAGA base are clueless idiots

Trump obviously thinks his MAGA base are clueless idiots that are oblivious to his push toward a Cashless Society. Recall when he said, years ago, that he could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and not lose any voters?

=====

Trump quote I could shoot someone on 5th Ave and not lose any voters

=====

There are 3 primary prerequisites required to implement a cashless society:

1) digital currency,
2) data centers to collect transaction data and
3) digital ID for each citizen.

Why are people opposed to a Digital Currency and a Cashless Society?

For almost a decade Catherine Austin Fitts from Solari, Whitney Webb from the Unlimited Hangout, Patrick Wood from Technocracy News, myself and hundreds of internet commentators have been opposed to a digital currency and a transition to a cashless society. For the 300,000 years of human existence currencies have been fungible and transactions were anonymous. A Cashless Society turns this on its head as all transactions will suddenly be visible to the government. Anonymity will be forever gone. And that will give the government unprecedented control over what we are allowed to do with our money. No way to pay for a prostitute or buy illegal drugs as the informal economy will be no more. If they want to take away your gun rights they simply won’t allow you to purchase a gun or ammunition. And if you don’t comply with the governments demands they will just suspend your access to you Digital Wallet. In short a Cashless Society will usher in a new era Digital Slavery.

A Digital Currency also meets the criteria for the Anti-Christ and the Mark of the Beast in Revelations:

To be clear I’m am a secularist and don’t subscribe to any Abrahamic religious ideology. But I am familiar with the various texts of the Abrahamic religions: Christianity, Islam and Judaism.

In Revelations it is the Anti-Christ who imposes the Mark of the Beast: a mark required to buy or sell anything.

“It also forced all people, great and small, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hands or on their foreheads, 17 so that they could not buy or sell unless they had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of its name.” Revelations 13: 16-17

It is patently obvious that this “Mark of the Beast” perfectly describes a Cashless Society, driven by Digital ID, Digital Currency, and a Cashless Society. In a cashless society everything you buy or sell is monitored and controlled through your Digital Wallet driven by a Blockchain ledger. Since Trump is obviously pushing this agenda that would make him a Jungian archetype of an Anti-Christ. After all Revelations makes clear it is the Anti-Christ who imposes this Mark of the Beast system. It also means that he is fulfilling the goals of the UN’s Agenda2030 and the WEF’s Great Reset, where you will own nothing a be very unhappy.

So whether you see Trump as the Anti-Christ, or a Globalist — in disguise, ushering in a New World Order — it should be clear he is committing treason against the American People. I’m not going to sugar coat this.

At the time the Bible was written slaves were often branded with a unique code that identified that they were slaves who owned them. With the adoption of a cashless society every human will have a unique Digital ID and the government will have instant access to oversee every purchase you make. And that is why a cashless society, linked to digital ID, is often called the Beast System.

Here is a summary of the other reasons people oppose a Digital Currency and a Cashless Society:

=====
People are opposed to a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) primarily due to severe concerns regarding privacy, financial surveillance, and the potential for government overreach.

The main arguments against CBDCs include:

* Loss of Privacy: Unlike cash, digital transactions can be monitored, tracked, and recorded by the government, eliminating financial anonymity.

* Financial Surveillance & Control: Critics fear central authorities could restrict how, where, or when money is spent (e.g., blocking purchases of certain goods or implementing programmable expiration dates on funds).

* Risk to Commercial Banks: Widespread adoption of CBDCs could draw deposits away from private banks, potentially destabilizing the traditional banking sector and reducing credit availability.

* Exclusion of the Unbanked: Vulnerable populations without reliable internet access, technological literacy, or bank accounts could be financially marginalized.

* Cybersecurity Threats: Centralized digital currency systems create massive databases that could become high-value targets for hackers and foreign adversaries.

* Censorship: Governments could theoretically freeze or seize the digital assets of individuals without going through traditional legal processes.

Google AI [what are the main reasons people are opposed to a digital currency]
=====

Creating a Digital Currency: Trumps great Bait and Switch

In January 2025 Trump issued an executive order banning the introduction of a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC). At the time his MAGA base was relieved because they were opposed to a digital currency and believed that his rejection of a CBDC also meant a rejection of a digital currency and a Cashless Society. Then in July 2025 he legitimized the introduction of Stablecoins, through the Genius Act, which is equally problematic. This was an obvious “bait and switch” on Trumps part. Both can be used to usher in a Centrally Controlled Cashless Society using blockchain technology.

Way back in 2017 I wrote and essay titled “The End of Cash and the Beginning of a Demonic Global “New World Order.” Even back 9 years ago they were talking about a transition to a cashless society utilizing what they called Fedcoin. Fedcoin was based on the same technology as Bitcoin, CBDCs and Stablecoin: blockchain. Blockchain technology basically creates a ledger (e.g., spreadsheet) for each individual. Unlike traditional cash transactions, which maintain anonymity, every purchase you make through a blockchain digital currency is visible to the government in real time.

Let’s unpack this. In the following video Matt says the following.

“July 18th, 2025, United States. The president signs a piece of legislation called the GENESIS Act into law. The bill creates the first federal rulebook for something called a stablecoin, a digital dollar that lives on a blockchain instead of in a bank account. One token equals one real dollar backed by reserves, redeemable anytime. Banks use them. Wall Street uses them. Hundreds of billions of dollars already move through them every week. They look like dollars, they spend like dollars, and increasingly, they are the dollars moving through the American financial system. Here’s the part nobody on cable news read. Buried in section 4A is a requirement that every stablecoin issuer in this country must possess the technical capability to seize, freeze, or burn those digital dollars on a court order. And the freeze button is already in use. Tether, the biggest stablecoin issuer on Earth, bigger than most American banks, has frozen 4.2 billion dollars in tokens to date. Circle, the second biggest, froze 16 unrelated businesses last month on a sealed civil case nobody was allowed to read. Seizing is programmed. [clears throat] Freezing is programmed. Burning is programmed. Expiring is next. And if you’re up to date on this story, you may be thinking, Matt, didn’t Trump ban the digital dollar last January, like last year January? Aren’t we supposed to be safe from all of this? That is exactly the first question we have to answer, because the timeline doesn’t add up.”

=====
A senior World Bank advisor published the blueprint for “expiring money” — programmable currency that can be frozen, deducted, or set to lose value on a date the issuer picks. Here’s what the GENIUS Act, BlackRock’s tokenization roadmap, and one sealed federal court case reveal about the future of asset protection, monetary policy, and your financial security. This is the documentation, the legislation, and the on-the-record quotes — so you can decide for yourself. In this video, we walk through exactly what the World Bank wrote and when, the gap between the January 2025 executive order and the law signed six months later, the freezes that have already happened on private payment rails, and what the CEO of the world’s largest asset manager has said publicly about tokenizing every asset class — including the deed to your home. This is a financial survival breakdown for the responsible American homeowner — the saver, the retiree, the household that played by the rules and wants to understand where monetary policy, digital currency regulation, and asset protection are actually headed. Plain English. Receipts included. You make the call.

They’re Quietly Putting an Expiration Date on YOUR Money (It’s Begun) (05/22/2026)

=====

Yep, as Mark states, on January 23, 2025 Trump banned the establishment of a CBDC, a form of Digital Currency. This led many Trump supporters to believe this signaled a rejection of a Digital Currency and a Cashless Society.

=====
Sec. 5. Prohibition of Central Bank Digital Currencies.

(a) Except to the extent required by law, agencies are hereby prohibited from undertaking any action to establish, issue, or promote CBDCs within the jurisdiction of the United States or abroad.

(b) Except to the extent required by law, any ongoing plans or initiatives at any agency related to the creation of a CBDC within the jurisdiction of the United States shall be immediately terminated, and no further actions may be taken to develop or implement such plans or initiatives.

STRENGTHENING AMERICAN LEADERSHIP IN DIGITAL FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGY
The White House January 23, 2025
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/strengthening-american-leadership-in-digital-financial-technology/
=====

But then on July 18th, 2025 Trump signs the Genius Act into law which allows the establishment of a Digital Currency based on Stablecoin. I say this is a “bait and switch” because both a CBDC and Stablecoin both pave the way toward a Digital Currency, a Digital Wallet and a Cashless Society. Trump obviously thinks the American people are clueless idiots.

The Genius Act

If you really want to understand the dangers of the Genius Act please read my extensive essay.

=====
On July 18, 2025, President Trump signed the Genius Act after it was passed with bipartisan support in both the House and Senate. I found it surreal how little coverage Globalist Corporate Media gave the Genius Act both before and after Trump signed it into law. It is almost like they didn’t want the public to consider what a digital dollar, and the underlying block chain technology, could mean for individual privacy, government control and the value of the dollar. And of course no one challenged Trump when he said he issued an Executive Order to ban CBDC’s (January 2025) while failing to acknowledge that Stablecoins are functionally equivalent to CBDC’s and present that same problems: including the potential to establish a social credit system similar to what is already occurring in China.

Trump’s Genius Act moves us toward a Dystopian Chinese Credit and Control System
The Stablecoin Digital Currency will bring about the Globalist Great Reset
Bruce Cain Jul 23, 2025

=====

Mark then discusses the Genius Act that allows Stablecoins as a form of digital currency. As I’ve said both CBDCs and Stablecoin are equally dangerous when it comes to ushering in a Beast System of digital currency and surveillance. As he puts it “The digital dollar didn’t die. It took off the government uniform. It put on a Circle hoodie, and it walked back through the front door while everyone was still high-fiving about the executive order.”

“A retiree in the Luohu District of Shenzhen opens an app on her phone. There’s 200 digital yuan sitting in a new wallet, about 30 bucks. There’s a countdown clock on the screen. 6 days. She walks to the corner market, buys groceries, watches the balance drop. Some of her neighbors don’t move fast enough. On October 19th, 3,000 of them watch their wallet reset to zero. The yuan didn’t get spent. It got canceled. 8.76 million yuan moved through that district in 6 days. Pilot complete. 2 years later, the World Bank wrote the working paper. That’s the manual. That’s the prototype. And every American who thinks that can’t happen here is one piece of legislation away from being wrong. The piece they’re hiding right between the executive order you remember and the headlines you don’t. So, January 23rd, 2025, Trump signs Executive Order 14178. The order prohibits any federal agency from undertaking, direct quote, “any action to establish, issue, or promote a central bank digital currency.” Done.

Buried. Headlines for 2 days. Then cable news moved on. You went back to your morning coffee feeling pretty good about American common sense. July 18th, 2025, 6 months later, same president, same desk, different pen. He signs the Genius Act into law, public law. Passed the Senate 68 to 30. Passed the House 308 to 121. The bill creates the first-ever federal regulatory framework for private stablecoins. The press coverage called it a crypto win. Most people stopped reading right there. Crypto win. A beautifully crafted anesthetic. Tell the public it’s about those weird internet nerds making imaginary coins and nobody will notice you just legalized the infrastructure to freeze their 401k. But I noticed. It’s a Friday morning in July. A staffer drops the Genius Act text on a clerk’s desk for the president’s signature. 246 pages. Somewhere on page 30-something, Section 4A, buried in the technical compliance language, there’s a requirement that every stablecoin issuer in this country must possess the technical capability to seize, freeze, or burn payment stablecoins when legally required and must comply with lawful orders to do so. Seize, freeze, or burn. It sounds less like a financial regulatory framework and more like the tagline for a particularly aggressive pest control company. But, they didn’t write it for termites. They wrote it for your digital wallet. The pen moves, the signature lands, and the same freeze and burn capability that scared everyone enough to ban the federal CBDC 6 months earlier just got installed on private rails. The digital dollar didn’t die. It took off the government uniform. It put on a Circle hoodie, and it walked back through the front door while everyone was still high-fiving about the executive order. And look, I’m not telling you Trump pulled a fast one. I’m not telling you Congress is in on some grand plot. I’m telling you what the law actually says when you read it. The intent is for you to decide. The mechanism, it’s in the statute.”

Then Matt points out that the Genius Act legally requires issuers of Stablecoin to “seize, freeze, or burn payment stablecoins when legally required by the government.

“Somewhere on page 30-something, Section 4A, buried in the technical compliance language, there’s a requirement that every stablecoin issuer in this country must possess the technical capability to seize, freeze, or burn payment stablecoins when legally required and must comply with lawful orders to do so. Seize, freeze, or burn.”

Say what?

Tokenization and the end of ownership

Recall how the WEF’s Klaus Schwab, in 2020, talked about a Great Reset “where you will own nothing and by happy?” Well fast forward to May 19, 2026, when Trump issued a directive on “Integrating Financial Technology Innovation into Regulatory Frameworks.” Trumps directive aims to push the tokenization of traditional assets and modernize U.S. financial markets.

=====
President Trump’s executive orders, including the May 19, 2026, directive on Integrating Financial Technology Innovation into Regulatory Frameworks, aim to push the tokenization of traditional assets and modernize U.S. financial markets. The administration is supporting this shift to streamline capital formation and maintain global competitiveness.

Key Impacts on Asset Tokenization

* Support for Real-World Assets (RWAs): The administration has encouraged frameworks for tokenized equities, real estate, and private equity on public and permissioned blockchains.

* Regulatory Modernization: Regulators have been directed to take a “same assets, same rules” technology-neutral approach, which accelerates institutional entry into the tokenized securities market.

* On-Chain Cash and Stablecoins: The executive orders officially promote lawful USD-backed stablecoins while banning Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), creating a trusted on-chain cash solution for institutional tokenized transactions.

* Mainstream Retirement Integration: Actions taken have paved the way for alternative assets—including tokenized and digital products—to be included in mainstream retirement accounts like 401(k)s.

Current Industry Activity

This pro-innovation push has triggered a wave of institutional adoption. Major traditional finance entities are heavily expanding into tokenization:

* Traditional equities and ETFs are in the process of being adapted for 24/7 tokenized exchange platforms.

* Leading financial institutions are actively launching tokenized funds and exploring tokenized deposits on public and private blockchains.

* The broader Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization market is surging, with billions of dollars in assets migrating to on-chain infrastructure.

Google AI [trump eo to push tokenization of assets]
=====

What I find interesting is that the actual word “tokenization” appears nowhere in Trumps directive on Integrating Financial Technology Innovation into Regulatory Frameworks.

=====
President Donald J. Trump Integrates Financial Technology Innovation into Regulatory Frameworks
The White House May 19, 2026
https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2026/05/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-integrates-financial-technology-innovation-into-regulatory-frameworks/
=====

As Patrick Wood explains tokenization debases the meaning of ownership and gives the government new powers to tax and seize your assets. We voted for Trump thinking he was actually going to Make America Great Again. Instead it is increasingly apparent, by his actions, that he is acting like an archetype of a Anti-Christ. He is ushering in the New Globalist World Order by pushing Digital IDs, Digital Currency and ultimately a Cashless Society where you must have the Mark (a Digital ID) in order to buy or sell.

=====
Imagine yourself owning a house. It’s yours. You have the deed. You can live in it, paint the walls, rent it out, sell it to anyone you choose, or give it away. Nobody can change the terms of your ownership after you buy it. The deed is recorded at the county courthouse, and no company or platform operator can alter it without your consent and a judge’s order. That is ownership. Now imagine someone tells you there’s a better way. Instead of holding that deed, your house will be converted into a digital token on a computer network. They call this “tokenization.” The token represents your house — or more precisely, it represents a fraction of your house, because the whole point is to divide the property into thousands or even millions of tiny digital pieces that anyone in the world can buy. You might own the equivalent of one ten-thousandth of a building. They tell you this is exciting because it “democratizes” real estate — now everybody can be an “owner.” But that is a lie. It switches definitions in mid-sentence. Owning a “token” is not the same thing as owning a house.

This is the difference between owning a home and owning tokens. Property rights are protected by law, enforceable in court, and cannot be changed unilaterally by a third party. Platform access is granted by an operator, governed by terms of service, and revocable at any time for any reason the operator defines.

The end-game of tokenization:

* The county courthouse is replaced with a server farm.
* The deed is replaced by a smart contract.
* The owner is replaced by a “user”.
* And the “user” holds his position only as long as the platform operator permits it.

The centuries-old system of ownership has been redesigned so that true ownership — permanent, unconditional, and transferable at will — no longer exists. “Trust us,” they said. “You will be happy.” There have been con men throughout history. They promise one thing and then deliver another. Tokenization is the modern version of the bait-and-switch game.

Tokenization: A Seventh Grade Explanation (05/08/2026)
https://www.technocracy.news/tokenization-a-seventh-grade-explanation/
=====

To better understand the dangers of Tokenization please watch the following videos and read the following articles.

=====
Ownership used to be simple. You held the deed. You were in control. Whether it was a home, a piece of land, a bar of gold, or shares in a company. You held something tangible, protected by legal systems and enforceable rights. But that model is quietly being rewritten. A digital process called tokenization is transforming real assets into programmable code, it is an abstraction of true ownership, separating the appearance of control from the actual power to access or defend an asset.

Tokenization and the End of Direct Ownership: A Quiet Revolution (07/27/2025)

=====
=====
Remember when the World Economic Forum predicted that by 2030, you’ll own nothing and be happy? Tokenization is one of the ways it could happen—by turning real assets into digital tokens and separating you from true ownership. In this video, Lynette Zang breaks down how tokenization works, why big players like BlackRock and JPMorgan are all-in, and how it threatens your control over real wealth. Don’t wait! It’s best that you protect yourself with physical gold and silver now.

Tokenization: ‘Own Nothing, Be Broke!’ (05/17/2026)

=====
=====
Asset tokenization is the process of converting real-world assets—real estate, stocks, bonds, gold, art, and increasingly biometrics, health data, and even human behavior—into programmable digital tokens on a blockchain. These tokens enable fractionalization, turning indivisible assets into tradable “slices” that can be bought, sold, or restricted instantly, 24/7. What begins as a seemingly efficient upgrade to markets is rapidly evolving into the foundational layer for a system where everything—including your body and mind—can be digitized, tracked, and controlled. Proponents sell tokenization as revolutionary progress. Larry Fink, CEO of BlackRock, has repeatedly called it “the beginning of the tokenization of all assets,” claiming it will democratize access and make markets more efficient. Institutions celebrate faster settlement, lower costs, and fractional ownership that lets ordinary people “invest” in assets previously out of reach. These promises mask a darker reality: the benefits flow primarily to the issuers and custodians—giants like BlackRock—who retain ultimate control over the underlying assets while the public holds revocable tokens. What is marketed as inclusion is, in practice, a mechanism to pull more of life into a gamified, always-on marketplace where participation becomes mandatory and behavior is subtly—or not so subtly—nudged as part of a cybernetic organism.

The Tokenization of Everything, Including You (02/01/2026)
https://www.technocracy.news/the-tokenization-of-everything-including-you/
=====
=====
My co-author and I will continue to hammer on tokenization because it is the monster on the loose, the clear and present danger. It is redefining ownership from the bottom up. Your “sovereign property” will be subverted and turned into “user rights” where “you will own nothing.” In reality, Tokenization of all assets is the biggest heist in the history of the world. ⁃ Patrick Wood, Editor.

Tokenization: The Two Rail Trap (05/22/2026)
https://www.technocracy.news/tokenization-the-two-rail-trap/
=====

Trump, the Mar-a-Lago Accords and the bankrupting of the American People

The Mar-a-Lago accords are based on Miran’s central thesis that persistent U.S. trade imbalances are rooted in the structural overvaluation of the U.S. dollar, driven by global demand for reserve assets. The remedy lies in a downward adjustment of the dollar to a “fairer” value, which he argues “can be redressed by tariffs”. The reason your Taco Bell Mexican Pizza went up from $2 in 2020 to $6.20 today is due to the debasement of the US Dollar. During the Plandemic Trump and Biden printed over 7 trillion dollars which devalued the dollar by nearly 20 percent. Of course Trump takes absolutely no credit for this and Globalist Corporate Media never points out that Trumps policies, in his first term, robbed the American People Blind.

This Mar-a-Lago strategy to downwardly adjust the dollar is only going to make things worse for the American Worker, already suffering from affordability issues.

=====
The first 100 days of the new administration have flirted with, or outright introduced, many unconventional economic policies. These range from a historic global jump in tariffs, to notions of returning to the gold standard, to even a reprised version of the Plaza Accords monikered the Mar-a-Lago Accord. The latter proposes a fundamental shift in global financial markets and international trade, attempting to retrofit economic theory onto Trump’s tariff-first trade agenda. At its core is the flawed premise that U.S. trade deficits are driven by foreign demand for reserve assets – an idea with little validation in real-world capital flow dynamics. Markets are already responding to the U.S. withdrawal from international economic engagement and trade integration. Layered on top of this confidence shift, the framework would risk further undermining trust in U.S. risk-free assets. Even if unofficial, these proposals carry market consequences. If executed, especially through measures like selective default, they could trigger a credibility shock that severely damages the U.S.’s standing as a financial safe haven.

What is the Mar-a-Lago Accord?

The idea drew inspiration from the 1985 Plaza Accord, with the term referencing both a historical analogy and a symbolic location: Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago Club, which he acquired the same year that the Plaza Accord was signed.

This term was coined by the now Chair of the Council of Economic Advisors Stephen Miran in an essay titled “A User’s Guide to Restructuring the Global Trading System” that he wrote before he was part of the Trump administration. While it does not serve as an official policy blueprint, it likely functions as a strategic framework or guiding document for how to shape the global trade and financial order.

Miran’s central thesis is that persistent U.S. trade imbalances are rooted in the structural overvaluation of the U.S. dollar, driven by global demand for reserve assets. The remedy lies in a downward adjustment of the dollar to a “fairer” value, which he argues “can be redressed by tariffs”. He outlines multilateral and unilateral strategies for achieving this adjustment, while emphasizing that any intervention must be implemented gradually to avoid triggering destabilizing outflows from the U.S. Treasury market.

Why the comparison to the Plaza Accord of 1985?

The Plaza Accord was a multilateral agreement between the G5 nations – the U.S., Japan, West Germany, France, and the U.K – that also intended to correct the U.S. trade deficit. Its goal was to weaken the USD through coordinated currency intervention and fiscal adjustment (primarily by non-U.S. participants) to rebalance global trade flows.

However, several key conditions that made the Plaza Accord possible in 1985 no longer hold today. First, most central banks in developed countries no longer intervene in the currency markets (unless there is a financial stability concern). In addition, China is now a dominant global trade power and America’s primary trade rival. It is unlikely to voluntarily allow the yuan to appreciate vis-a-vis USD to achieve U.S. policy objectives. If anything, China is more likely to let its currency depreciate to support domestic growth.

While the Plaza Accord succeeded in weakening the dollar in the short term, it failed to deliver lasting improvements in trade balances, largely because the underlying dynamic of low private savings and high government borrowing in the U.S. remained unaddressed.

The Non-Starter Playbook of the Mar-a-Lago Accord (05/01/2025)
https://economics.td.com/us-mar-a-lago-accord
=====

There are actually 5 parts to the Mar-a-Lago Accord all of which will negatively effect workers and retirees. And just like his Big Beautiful Bill you can bet the top .001 percent will reap the benefits.

=====
The “Mar-a-Lago Accord” is a set of proposed international economic and foreign policy strategies aimed at restructuring global trade, shifting manufacturing back to the U.S., and devaluing the dollar. The 5-step framework involves these key actions:

* Step 1: Implement Tariffs

Levy tariffs on imports to penalize adversarial nations, generate revenue, and make domestic U.S. manufacturing more competitive. These tariffs are used as “sticks” to force trading partners to the negotiating table.

* Step 2: Leverage Defense and Security

Link trade concessions directly with global defense commitments. The administration demands allies benefiting from the U.S. security umbrella (such as NATO members) contribute more by increasing their own military spending or making major investments in the U.S.

* Step 3: Weaken the U.S. Dollar

Facilitate a coordinated, managed devaluation of the dollar to boost American exports. While maintaining the dollar’s status as the global reserve currency, this step aims to make other countries’ currencies stronger, removing their export advantages against the U.S.

* Step 4: Establish a Sovereign Wealth Fund

Create a national wealth fund, which the administration aims to fund by monetizing federal assets—such as public lands or gold reserves. These funds can then be deployed into foreign exchange markets to help apply downward pressure on the U.S. dollar.

* Step 5: Debt Restructuring (The “Nuclear Option”)

Pressure foreign creditors—using security and trade leverage—to swap their existing, higher-interest, short-term U.S. Treasuries for unconventional long-term (e.g., 100-year) zero-coupon bonds. This highly controversial step is designed to help the U.S. manage and reduce its massive debt servicing costs.

Google AI [trump and the mar-a-lago accords 5 steps]
=====

In the following presentation Porter Stansberry uses the term “Trump’s New Dollar” to describe a looming devaluation or “stealth default” on U.S. government debt, driven by unchecked federal spending and political agendas to intentionally lower the value of the U.S. currency. Basically Trump wants to erase our 40 Trillion dollar debt by further debasing the dollar. The government will be paying back the debt in cheaper dollars by further debasing the dollar. And the worker and retiree will pay for it through a lower standard of living.

=====
President Trump is replacing the U.S. dollar.
https://porterandcompanyresearch.co/mrln/?caid=8ya59swu&_ef_transaction_id=b3bf837aa91542d19b5ab6627a230052&aid=46&sub1=&sub2=144085&sub3=
=====

=====
Financial publisher Porter Stansberry uses the term “Trump’s New Dollar” to describe a looming devaluation or “stealth default” on U.S. government debt, driven by unchecked federal spending and political agendas to intentionally lower the value of the U.S. currency. He ties this concept to the following key themes and warnings:

* Monetary Reset: Stansberry warns that the U.S. is facing a fiscal reckoning due to unsustainable entitlement programs and rising debt. He predicts a “Nixon shock”-style event where the government, instead of officially defaulting, debases the currency to pay its obligations, severely eroding the purchasing power of the traditional dollar.

* Plaza Accord 2.0: He points to rumblings from the administration—sometimes dubbed a “Mar-a-Lago Accord”—aimed at actively lowering the value of the U.S. dollar. The administration’s goal is to improve the U.S. trade deficit, boost exports, and encourage domestic manufacturing.

* Asset Protection: Because he views the traditional dollar as compromised, Stansberry recommends protecting wealth by investing in what he calls “hard assets” and alternative monetary systems, such as Bitcoin and gold, as well as high-quality, cash-generating businesses.

Google AI [what does Porter Stansberry mean by Trumps New Dollar]
=====

The Trump Administration is labeling opponents of Data Centers as “Anti-Tech Extremists”

Remember how Biden labeled parents as terrorists for speaking out against LGBTQ curriculums? Well today The Trump Administration is labeling opponents of Data Centers as “Anti-Tech Extremists,” and people have already been sent to jail for protesting. These affronts to free speech are not acceptable whether they are perpetrated by Biden or Trump. And once again Globalist Corporate Media fails to point out Trumps hypocrisy.

=====
STORY #1 - Americans who question AI data centers are now being treated like potential terrorists under a disturbing new law enforcement category called “anti-tech extremism.”

STORY #2 - A Texas mother was arrested for warning her neighbors on Facebook about contaminated water, and many Americans are starting to wonder if this is where the country is headed next. If residents begin speaking out about water shortages, pollution, or health concerns tied to massive AI infrastructure projects, will police eventually start treating those people like criminals too?

STORY #3 - A shocking new study shows tick-induced meat allergies have exploded nearly 9,800% in the U.S. since 2013, while some researchers are openly discussing the idea of weaponizing ticks to discourage people from eating meat.

Concerned About Data Centers? You Might Be a “Terrorist” | Daily Pulse
Leaked documents reveal that ordinary Americans worried about water shortages, farmland destruction, and AI data centers are now being viewed as potential threats.

The Vigilant Fox May 26, 2026

The Vigilant Fox

Concerned About Data Centers? You Might Be a "Terrorist" | Daily Pulse

STORY #1 - Americans who question AI data centers are now being treated like potential terrorists under a disturbing new law enforcement category called “anti-tech extremism…

Listen now

24 days ago · 138 likes · 22 comments · The Vigilant Fox

=====
=====
Now, there is stigma associated with AI data center protests around the country. Go to city council meetings and sound off because humongous data centers are invading your space? Carry a sign on the street criticizing data centers? Criticize people like Sam Altman or Elon Musk on social media? You could be tagged a ‘neo-Luddite’ and find yourself on a government naughty list, being surveilled everywhere you show up.

This is not speculation. As Wired reports, “in California, Illinois, Indiana, New Jersey, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin, state and local police have removed or arrested speakers at town halls who criticize data centers, in one case before they were even allowed to speak.”

The scale of opposition to AI is massive: 70% of Americans oppose local data center construction, hundreds of groups are active in 42 states, and $156 billion in projects faced delays or were blocked in 2025 alone. Technocrats hate anyone who rains on their parade.

It Figures: Feds Go After ‘Anti-Tech Extremists’ As AI Hatred Grows (05/28/2026)
https://www.technocracy.news/figures-feds-go-after-anti-tech-extremists-as-ai-hatred-grows/
=====
=====
Three people were arrested at a City of Port Washington meeting Dec. 2 where protesters spoke out against a $15 billion artificial intelligence data center campus for tech giants OpenAI and Oracle. The arrests came during public comment after a woman speaking against the project led a brief chant of “Recall, recall, recall.”

Watch arrest of woman protesting AI data center protester in Wisconsin (12/03/2025)

=====

Concluding Remarks

Trumps push for massive AI Data Centers is problematic for so many reasons, which is why I am writing a series of essays on the subject. Globalist Corporate Media has insulated Trump from any accountability regarding these Data Centers or his economic policies: all of which are against the interests of the American People. If I were a reporter I’d have a host of questions for Trump that will never be asked.

* Could you explain the need for all these massive Data Centers?

* Why should we expect AI to find a cure for cancer when you won’t remove Fluoride from the water supply, won’t criminalize the use of Glyphosate etc.

* Didn’t you lie to the American People when you said you’d ban CBDCs but then rolled out Stablecoin. After all both can be used to usher in Digital ID, Digital Currency and ultimately a Globalist Cashless Society.

* Will these AI Surveillance Centers be prohibited from collecting blockchain data on every citizen to prevent the establishment of a Digital Cashless Society.

Thanks for reading. If you can afford a paid subscription that would be great. If you can’t please share this essay as widely as possible.

When Biden began pushing Electric Vehicles, in 2021, I did my analysis and predicted they would fail. And it turned out, as usual, that I was correct. To be clear most of my predictions, over the past 36 years of writing, have proven correct. But like all of us humans my record is not perfect. One of the many problems I foresaw with EVs is that they would destabilize the electric grid. It would also advantage China as they are one of the largest global producers of Lithium which is obviously essential for an EV. As I wrote in my last essay this miscalculation, by the American Auto Industry, resulted in the loss of nearly 60 billion dollars. And now they are getting ready to put “kill switches” in 2027 model cars which may cost them even greater losses. After all, Americans associate cars with freedom. They don’t want to buy a car that will be constantly surveilling their every movement while they drive.

I don’t yet have a formed opinion but I am feeling a sense of Deja vu as I’ve begun to question the need for all of these massive data centers. One of the problems I see with data centers is that same problem I saw with the mass adoption of EVs: it will put enormous stress on the electric grid. But that is just the beginning. These data centers will also require massive amounts of water that will become polluted in the cooling process, as well as driving up the cost of water for consumers. Meanwhile the dollar has lost nearly 20% of its value in just the last 6 years. How much more economic stress are the American People supposed to put up with?

Beyond that, calling them Data Centers is both misguided and purposely deceptive. They are really AI Surveillance Centers that will be used to store massive amounts of data for everything from Flock cameras to Blockchain data when they force us into a cashless society. For years I have warned that a cashless society, where every transaction you make is collected on a blockchain ledger, would reduce us to nothing more than slaves on a globalist plantation.

Frankly I feel Trump has betrayed the American People. He is pushing for a cashless society using Stable coin. He is pushing for these data centers. And he has done very little to address the affordability crisis which is now literally destroying what is left of the Middle Class. This is not sustainable and could result in a massive class war in America.

This may be the shortest essay I’ve written in decades. But I’m actually interested in hearing what my readers think about these AI Surveillance Centers.

Do you support building them?

Would you be angry if they built one near where you live?

Why do you think Trump been insulated, by Globalist Corporate Media, from explaining his rational for building these massive AI Surveillance Centers?

Please leave your answers in the comment section.

=====

The AI Backlash Has Reached a Tipping Point (04/18/2026)

=====

=====

Viral Video Defending Data Centers DEBUNKED! w/ Tony Heller (05/25/2026)

=====

Summary

If something isn’t done all 2027 cars, manufactured in the US, will require “kill switches” and a host of other technologies overseeing your every movement. These technologies will add thousands of dollars to the price of buying a new car and additional thousands of dollars to maintain the new surveillance equipment. Our legislators have betrayed us and it is up to us to stop this insanity. The expected implementation of this technology could also bankrupt the entire car manufacturing industry.

Introduction

When I was born, in 1954, cars had no seatbelts or airbags and getting a copy of your ignition key only cost a few bucks. There was absolutely nothing tracking what you were doing or where you were going. Today a new key fob can cost over $200 and everywhere you go is being tracked. If something isn’t done all 2027 cars, manufactured in the US, will require “kill switches” and a host of other technologies overseeing your every movement. These technologies will add thousands of dollars to the price of buying a new car and additional thousands of dollars to maintain the new surveillance equipment. And as the public begins to understand the implications of these technologies it is quite likely no one is going to buy them. You would think the auto manufactures would have learned something from EV fiasco which cost the manufactures tens of billions in losses.

I fondly remember getting my drivers license back in 1970 at the tender age of 16. Most weekends my parents let me drive their Ford LTD which had quite a bit of power as well as a couch sized back seat which came in handy for dates and partying at the Drive-In Theaters. On a typical weekend we would get our bottle of Boone’s Farm, roll a few joints and party like it was 1999. In Dearborn, home of Ford Motor, another popular “make out” site was Ford Field which was located beside the Rouge River. The Dearborn Police would occasionally knock on the fogged up car windows to make sure one had died from Carbon Monoxide poisoning. But they pretty much left us alone knowing full well what we were up to. On a typical Friday night you would find over 50 cars parked down at Ford Field. In 1978 I bought a brand new chocolate brown Trans Am which had a 400 cubic inch V8 and a big eagle emblazoned across the hood. It was the most powerful car I ever owned and only cost $6300 dollars at the time.

Well those days are basically dead and gone. Most Drive-In theaters longer exist. Most of todays cars are so small you’d have to be a contortionist to have sex in them. Cars are becoming more unaffordable by the year. To buy something comparable to my ‘78 Trans Am you’d have to pay ten times as much as I did in 1978. And beginning in 2027 all new cars will have “kill switches” which will detect if you’ve been drinking and cameras video taping your activities in the car. They will also be recording everything you say. And you can thank your Globalist Congressmen, President Biden and Congresswomen Debbie Dingell, for turning you car into a surveillance trap.

Who is responsible for mandating “Kill Switches” and Surveillance equipment into all cars beginning in 2027

The “Kill Switch” law was tucked into the U.S. Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (Section 24220) in 2021. It was passed by both houses and signed by President Biden. So without a doubt the House, the Senate and Biden can be blamed for its passage.

=====
The 2021 U.S. Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (Section 24220) mandates that all new passenger vehicles must be equipped with advanced, passive drunk and impaired driving prevention technology by roughly 2026–2027. This mandate, often termed a “kill switch” in public debate, is intended to monitor driver performance and disable the vehicle if impairment is detected.

Key Aspects of the Kill Switch Law

* Legislative Origin: The requirement was passed as part of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (HALT Drunk Driving Act) in November 2021.

* Mandate Details: It requires the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to set standards for technology that can “passively monitor” driver performance to identify impairment and prevent operation.

* Implementation Timeline: While the law was passed in 2021, the final safety standards were set to be finalized within three years, with the mandate expected to apply to all new vehicles shortly thereafter, often cited as the 2026–2027 timeframe.

* Goal: The technology aims to significantly reduce traffic fatalities caused by intoxicated drivers, with advocates suggesting it could save thousands of lives annually.

* Controversy and Privacy: The provision has faced backlash, with critics raising concerns about government overreach, privacy, and the potential for remote, arbitrary shutdown of vehicles.

Recent Political Action

Efforts to repeal this mandate, such as the Kill Switches in Cars Act (H.R. 6563) and subsequent amendments, have been introduced by lawmakers to prevent federal funds from implementing this technology, though these efforts have faced challenges in fully overturning the 2021 law.

Google AI [history of car kill switch law in united states]
=====

Now you could argue that passage was a no brainer. According to an Ipsos poll 82% of respondents support or somewhat support the Congressional mandate for drunk driving prevention technology in all new cars, up from 77% before the law passed last year. But I highly doubt those polled understood just how intrusive this technology will be when fully implemented. And 78% of respondents said they are much more or somewhat more likely to support the technology if it comes at extra cost to consumers. But how many would have supported the “kill switch” if they had known it will add an additional $500 to $2000 cost for each new car. How many would have supported the “kill switch” if they had known that these technologies go far beyond stopping drunk driving.

The average car is already crazy expensive: about $50,000 dollars. And the cost of insurance and maintenance is also skyrocketing. As I wrote in my last essay our Congressmen don’t really give a flying fuck about what their constituents want. But they do care about the PACs that contribute to their campaigns -- like the insurance companies. And it turns out that 13 top insurance companies wanted this to pass.

=====
A new Ipsos poll shows that 9 out of 10 Americans support technology that is integrated into a car’s electronics to prevent drunk driving. The new poll results come one year after the bipartisan HALT Act was signed into law as part of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. The law gave the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) three years to establish an auto safety standard for all new cars that detects and prevents impaired driving. 91% of respondents said the technology is a good or very good idea. Support for the technology spans gender, age, income and regional differences. The most common factor that influences support for impaired driving prevention technology in all new cars is cost, according to the poll commissioned by Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD). 78% of respondents said they are much more or somewhat more likely to support the technology if it comes at extra cost to consumers. “MADD agrees that safety should not just be a luxury for people who can afford to pay for it,” said MADD National President Alex Otte. “Advanced, passive technology that prevents impaired driving should be as standard as seatbelts and airbags – not an upcharge and not an option. There’s a crisis on our roads, and every month we wait to get this technology on all new cars means more than 1,000 preventable deaths and 25,000 preventable injuries caused by drunk driving.”

The bipartisan HALT Act, led by Congresswoman Debbie Dingell in the U.S. House of Representatives and Senator Ben Ray Luján in the U.S. Senate, sets the three-year timeframe for NHTSA to identify the new auto safety standard, then gives auto makers another two to three years to implement it. The three-year timeline began on November 15, 2021. Victims and survivors of impaired driving were the driving force behind the legislation, with strong support from MADD, traffic safety partners, leading alcohol companies and 13 top insurance companies. “We have the technology now to stop drunk driving, and every day we fail to implement it, more lives are lost to preventable tragedy,” said Congresswoman Dingell. “I’m proud that a year ago, we passed this critical priority as a part of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. It is beyond time we made sure it is implemented in vehicles and start saving lives.” According to the Ipsos poll, 82% of respondents support or somewhat support the Congressional mandate for drunk driving prevention technology in all new cars, up from 77% before the law passed last year.

Americans Overwhelmingly Support Auto Technology that Stops Drunk Drivers, New Ipsos Survey Shows (11/15/2022)
https://madd.org/press-release/americans-overwhelmingly-support-auto-technology-that-stops-drunk-drivers-new-ipsos-survey-shows
=====

But most of the blame goes to Michigan Congresswomen Debbie Dingell: Globalist Witch from the North

I have written extensively about Debbie Dingell. In 1996 I ran against her husband, John Dingell, for US Congress. Debbie is what I’d call a dyed in the wool Globalist. And she is as dumb as a bag of rocks which makes her particularly dangerous. She supports the forced adoption of the UN’s Agenda 2030, EV’s, 5G and many additional globalist agendas. And she was absolutely instrumental in the drafting and passage of the “Kill Switch” legislation. You might call her the Witch of the Kill Switch.

Here is a brief list of all Senators that voted for the 2021 HALT Act:

=====
The “kill switch” provision (advanced impaired driving technology) was included in Section 24220 of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (H.R. 3684), passed by the Senate on August 10, 2021. The bill passed with a 69-30 vote, supported by all 50 Democrats/Independents and 19 Republicans.

Key Senate Support (2021 Vote):

* All Democrats: (e.g., Schumer, Durbin, Manchin, Sinema).

* 19 Republicans: Blunt, Burr, Capito, Cassidy, Collins, Cornyn, Cramer, Crapo, Ernst, Fischer, Grassley, Hickenlooper (D), Hoeven, McConnell, Moran, Murkowski, Portman, Risch, Romney, Tillis, Young.The mandate was part of the bipartisan infrastructure package signed into law in 2021.
=====

And here is a brief summary of all House members that voted for the 2021 HALT Act. As you might have guessed it was primarily supported by Globalist House Democrats.

=====
The HALT Act (Drunk Driving Prevention - Federal)

In 2021, the federal House of Representatives passed drunk driving prevention provisions (the Honoring Abbas Family Legacy to Terminate Drunk Driving Act) as part of the INVEST in America Act (H.R. 3684) on July 1, 2021.

* Vote Result: Passed 221-201, largely along party lines.

* Who Voted For It: It was supported primarily by House Democrats and pushed by Rep. Debbie Dingell.
=====

If you want to learn more about Debbie Dingell’s Globalist record read through the following essays I wrote back in 2023.

=====

=====
=====

=====

But no one is more responsible for mandating “Kill Switches” and Surveillance equipment, in our cars, than Debbie Dingell. She began her crusade back in 2019 after a Michigan family was tragically killed in a car accident caused by a drunk driver while returning from a family vacation.

=====
Today, Congresswoman Debbie Dingell (D-MI) released updates to her legislation to reduce drunk driving deaths across the country. The updated legislation, the Honoring Abbas Family Legacy to Terminate (HALT) Drunk Driving Act, will require the commercialization and standards for passive alcohol detection systems in all new cars.

In January, Dingell first announced legislation to take action to prevent drunk driving. The Abbas Stop Drunk Driving Act came after a Michigan family was tragically killed in a car accident caused by a drunk driver while returning from a family vacation. Dingell honored their lives on the house floor and pledged action to reduce drunk driving accidents.

“Drunk driving has brought pain to my community in Dearborn and the country,” said Dingell. “Change and progress never come as fast as we’d like, but we need to do everything we can to ensure what happened to the Abbas family never happens again. The DADSS technology has the potential to save lives. The HALT Drunk Driving Act honors the Abbas’ family legacy by exploring the use of passive alcohol detection technology in all new cars. I’m committed to continuing to work with advocacy groups, industry, and federal regulators so we can ensure the tragedy of the Abbas family is the last tragedy caused by drunk driving.”

The Driver Alcohol Detection System for Safety (DADSS) is an innovative technology that passively tests drivers intoxication. The technology does not require action from the driver, such as blowing into a breathalyzer, but will prevent the car from moving if tests for blood alcohol concentration (BAC) are above 0.08 percent – the legal limit in all 50 states except Utah.

“For over a decade, MADD has supported and promoted research and development of advanced drunk driving prevention technologies,” said MADD National President Helen Witty. “This technology could save 7,000 lives every year. We can’t afford to wait any longer for this safety feature to be equipped in all cars.”

Drunk driving is the number one cause of death on America’s roadways. More than 10,000 deaths—about 30 percent of all fatal crashes—are caused by drunk driving each year. The Driver Alcohol Detection System for Safety (DADSS) Program is a private-public partnership is developing and testing technology that would not require any additional action – such as blowing into an interlock device – to prevent a drunk driver from starting a vehicle. The goal of the DADSS program is to develop technology that is accurate and precise at stopping drunk drivers while being unobtrusive and not creating any inconvenience to a sober driver.

Dingell Releases Updates to Drunk Driving Bill
Washington, September 17, 2019
https://debbiedingell.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1906
=====

Then after the “Halt Act” was passed in 2021 Dingell is supporting yet another bill to Prevent Drunk Driving Fatalities and Support Law Enforcement in 2026.

=====
This bill has been endorsed by: Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD), American Automobile Association (AAA), Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety, Community Anti-Drug Coalitions of America (CADCA), Consortium of Forensic Science Organizations, American Society of Crime Lab Directors (ASCLD), American Academy of Forensic Science, National Association of Medical Examiners, International Association of Coroners and Medical Examiners, Society of Forensic Toxicologists, American Board of Toxicologists, the International Association for Identification, Distilled Spirits Council of the United States (DISCUS), National Prevention Science Coalition to Improve Lives, National Safety Council, National Sleep Foundation, Responsibility.org, Safe Kids Worldwide, Society for Public Health Education, Stopdistractions.org, Students Against Destructive Decisions (SADD), Truck Safety Coalition, Institute for Safer Trucking, Association for Safe International Road Travel, American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators, Governors Highway Safety Association.

Reps. Gillen, Lawler, Dingell Introduce Bipartisan Bill to Prevent Drunk Driving Fatalities and Support Law Enforcement (01/28/2026)
https://gillen.house.gov/media/press-releases/reps-gillen-lawler-dingell-introduce-bipartisan-bill-prevent-drunk-driving
=====

=====
H.R.6704 - Drunk Driving Prevention and Enforcement Act of 2025
119th Congress (2025-2026)
https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/6704
=====

Basically HALT Act mandated the development of the Kill Switch technology, while H.R.6704 seeks to accelerate that deployment through incentives, while also strengthening enforcement and data collection. Again Dingell has her fingerprints all over both pieces of legislation.

=====
The main difference between H.R.6704 (Drunk Driving Prevention and Enforcement Act of 2025) and the HALT Drunk Driving Act (passed in 2021) is that the HALT Act mandated the development of technology, while H.R.6704 seeks to accelerate that deployment through incentives, while also strengthening enforcement and data collection.

* HALT Drunk Driving Act (2021): Signed into law as part of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, it directs the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to set safety standards for new vehicles to have passive, anti-drunk driving technology by roughly 2030.

* H.R.6704 (Drunk Driving Prevention and Enforcement Act of 2025): Introduced in December 2025, this bill builds upon the HALT law. It focuses on accelerating the implementation of that technology by establishing a, “5,000,000 [per year]” prize competition for manufacturers. It also creates a “Traffic Safety Enforcement Center of Excellence” to aid police and a system to track drug-involved crashes.

Key Aspects of H.R.6704 (2025)

* Accelerated Deployment: Aims to bring consumer-ready passive, anti-drunk driving technology into cars faster.

* Prize Competition: Authorizes a 5 million annual prize for developing technology that meets safety standards.

* Enforcement & Data: Establishes a “NHTSA Traffic Safety Enforcement Center of Excellence” and a “National drug involved crash data collection system”.

* Purpose: Pairs new in-vehicle technology with improved law enforcement tactics.

Google AI [what is the difference between H.R.6704 and the halt drunk driver act]
=====

Why every citizen should be concerned about the “Kill Switch” Halt Act

Right after passage of the Halt Act people were saying this mandatory measure should set off red flares.

=====
Buried deep within the massive infrastructure legislation recently signed by President Joe Biden is a little-noticed “safety” measure that will take effect in five years. Marketed to Congress as a benign tool to help prevent drunk driving, the measure will mandate that automobile manufacturers build into every car what amounts to a “vehicle kill switch.” As has become standard for legislative mandates passed by Congress, this measure is disturbingly short on details. What we do know is that the “safety” device must “passively monitor the performance of a driver of a motor vehicle to accurately identify whether that driver may be impaired.”

Everything about this mandatory measure should set off red flares.

First, use of the word “passively” suggests the system will always be on and constantly monitoring the vehicle. Secondly, the system must connect to the vehicle’s operational controls, so as to disable the vehicle either before driving or during, when impairment is detected. Thirdly, it will be an “open” system, or at least one with a backdoor, meaning authorized (or unauthorized) third-parties can remotely access the system’s data at any time.

This is a privacy disaster in the making, and the fact that the provision made it through the Congress reveals — yet again — how little its members care about the privacy of their constituents.

The lack of ultimate control over one’s vehicle presents numerous and extremely serious safety issues; issues that should have been obvious to Members of Congress before they voted on the measure.

For example, what if a driver is not drunk, but sleepy, and the car forces itself to the side of the road before the driver can find a safe place to pull over and rest? Considering that there are realistic mechanisms to immediately challenge or stop the car from being disabled, drivers will be forced into dangerous situations without their consent or control.

The choice as to whether a vehicle can or cannot be driven — for vehicles built after 2026 — will rest in the hands of an algorithm over which the car’s owner or driver have neither knowledge nor control.

If that is not reason enough for concern, there are serious legal issues with this mandate. Other vehicle-related enforcement methods used by the Nanny State, such as traffic cameras and license plate readers, have long presented constitutional problems; notably with the 5th Amendment’s right to not self-incriminate, and the 6th Amendment’s right to face one’s accuser.

The same constitutional issues abound with this new technology, but with the added confusion surrounding what Congress even means by “impaired driving.” Does it mean legally drunk, or perhaps under the limit but still “impaired” to a degree? Would police be summoned automatically by the system in order to make that determination? These are questions that should have been addressed openly and thoroughly during the legislative process, not left to later, back-room negotiations between interested parties other than individual car buyers – manufacturers, regulators, insurance companies and law enforcement.

Ironically, or perhaps intentionally, there also is detail in the legislation about who would have access to the data collected and stored by the system. Could it be used by police, and could they access this information without a warrant? What about insurance companies, eager to know with what frequency their customers drove after drinking alcohol, even if it was below the legal limit? Such a trove of data presents a lucrative prize to all manner of public and private entities (including hackers), none of which have our best interests at heart.

Adding what amounts to a mandatory, backdoor government “kill switch” to cars is not only a violation of our constitutional rights, but an affront to what is — or used to be — an essential element of our national character. Unless this regulatory mandate is not quickly removed or defanged by way of an appropriations rider preventing its implementation, the freedom of the open road that individual car ownership brought to the American Dream, will be but another vague memory of an era longer to be enjoyed by future generations.

Bob Barr represented Georgia’s Seventh District in the U.S. House of Representatives from 1995 to 2003. He served as the United States Attorney in Atlanta from 1986 to 1990 and was an official with the CIA in the 1970s. He now practices law in Atlanta, Georgia and serves as head of Liberty Guard.

Biden’s ‘Infrastructure’ Bill Contains Backdoor ‘Kill Switch’ For Cars (11/29/2021)
https://dailycaller.com/2021/11/29/barr-bidens-infrastructure-bill-contains-backdoor-kill-switch-for-cars/
=====

A litany of reasons to stop the implementation of the HALT Drunk Driving Act (2021)

5 years ago Bob Barr, and many others, made some great arguments against the HALT Act. Back then we could only speculate about the technologies that would be used to implement it. Today we know what technologies will be employed and it is frankly shocking. It is now absolutely imperative that we stop the car manufacturers from implementing these technologies. These technologies will stomp on our Constitutional Rights, increase the cost of new cars by at least another $2000 dollars and significantly increase the costs of maintaining that car by additional thousands of dollars.

Here is a brief summary on how biometric monitoring can determine if you are drunk. Note that these technologies will be implemented by all car manufacturers, not just Ford Motor.

=====
Ford, along with industry partners, is testing technology to detect drunk driving through passive, non-intrusive sensors. These systems monitor driver behavior—such as eye movement and reaction times—via cameras, while other sensors can detect BAC (Blood Alcohol Content) through breath or touch. If a BAC of 0.08% or higher is detected, the vehicle is designed to prevent the engine from starting.

Key Technologies for Detecting Drunk Drivers:

* Camera-Based Monitoring: Infrared cameras track eye movements, such as slower saccades (rapid eye movements between fixations) or facial features, to detect impairment, with some systems achieving high accuracy in distinguishing intoxicated behavior.

* Passive Breath Analysis: Sensors located within the steering wheel or door trim can detect alcohol levels in the driver’s breath without requiring a formal breathalyzer test.

* Touch-Based Sensors: Technology is being developed to read BAC through the skin, using light to detect alcohol levels when a driver touches a sensor on the steering wheel or starter button.

* Vehicle Input Monitoring: AI systems analyze driving patterns, such as acceleration, braking, and steering, to detect irregular behavior associated with intoxication.

Implementation and Functionality:

* Pilot Programs: As of August 2024, specialized sensors are being used in pilot programs, such as one on a Ford Mustang, to analyze BAC data.

* Safety Action: These systems aim to work automatically; if the driver is over the legal limit, the car will not move.

* Driver Alert System: Current Ford vehicles feature a Ford Driver Alert System  that monitors driving patterns for fatigue, providing audible and visual warnings.

These advancements in camera-based systems can detect alcohol impairment  are part of a broader industry trend to improve road safety. Furthermore, you can find information on how new camera-based systems detect alcohol impairment in drivers.

Google AI [how does ford’s biometric monitoring determine if you are drunk]
=====

The following 2 videos are the best I’ve found to enumerate the Orwellian consequences of implementing these Kill Switch technologies. So if you are short of time at least watch both videos.

Just the other day this podcaster went into great detail about the many dangers behind the Halt Act, enumerating the invasive technologies that have been developed to implement it. This is the most comprehensive video I have viewed on the subject. Please read the transcript and take 10 minutes to watch the video.

=====
There you go. Come on. No, no, no, no. Now, imagine there was an emergency outside the truck, an accident, something terrible on the ranch with a chainsaw. And I jump in this truck, but the truck, it won’t shift into drive. Why? Because the cameras and sensors inside this cab won’t let it shift because it detects my eyes are big. There’s a lot of emotion. There’s some panic and it doesn’t feel that I’m fit to drive. Now, that’s not science fiction. That is happening because Ford just filed the patents. Ford actually has a series of patents down at the US patent and trade office that deal with the sensors and cameras inside the cab of their truck. And if the sensors in that truck determine that you’re not fit to drive, that truck will not actually shift from park to drive. Now, they already have a system called Telmatics, and that’s where they can actually pull up cameras in real time inside the cab of their fleet vehicles. Now, they actually market this to insurance companies because the truth is this is really about who owns the data and who owns the liability. Now, your name might actually be on the title of this truck, and you may have paid for it, but you don’t own it. Now, Ford didn’t file just one patent. They filed a stack of them, all within months of each other. Are you sitting down? Get this. This Ford technology patent doesn’t just watch you. This one puts you in jail. Ford filed a patent serial number 0104469 where the system takes your biometric data, your face, your iris, and your fingerprint, and it runs it through a criminal database in real time. While you’re sitting in your own truck, think about what that means. You wake up one morning, you walk out to your driveway, you climb into a vehicle with your name on the title on property with your name on the deed, and before you go anywhere, before you’ve done a single thing wrong, your truck is already running your face through a law enforcement database. Ford’s own patent language describes this as potentially useful for police. They wrote that. Ford wrote that into the patent application. So, the question isn’t whether this technology can be abused. Ford already told you who it’s for. You just didn’t know that you were buying a cop car. Now, I’m going to walk you through a few of these patents. Lip reading cameras inside your cab. Machine learning trained on lip movement data sets. Cloud connected. Your face processed somewhere you’ll never see. Stored as long as they want. Acoustic lip reading. If the cameras aren’t enough, the system emits inaudible sound waves and reads the echoes bouncing off of your mouth. You can’t see it. It’s just happening. Biometrics, your face, fingerprint, iris, filed February 2024 and it was published August 2025. This one is assigned a serial number because it’s real. Ad listening. This is scary. It monitors conversations between everyone in the cab. It serves targeted ads based on what you and others are talking about while you’re driving. In Ford’s words, maximum opportunity for adbased monetization. description of how that data is protected either. None. How about Ford Pro Telmatics? Now, this one isn’t a patent. This one is actually a product page. Right now, fleet managers can pull live incin video feeds of drivers on their phones. Ford markets seat belt compliance alerts with the explicit benefit of lowering insurance costs. They said it themselves. This is the infrastructure and once the infrastructure exists, it’s going to get used and abused. Now, Ford isn’t alone in this. This is an arms race. Smart Eye driver monitoring software is already in over 2 million cars globally. The EU’s general safety regulation mandates drowsiness systems as standard equipment going forward. GM deployed biometric seat sensors and heart rate monitoring in production trucks in 2025. Tesla even added cabin AI stress detection that same year. There was a conference in Europe in 2025. industry leaders, engineers, and OEM representatives with a session called monitoring the driver’s heart, real time cardiac data from a camera in your cab. Interestingly enough, the European Union looked at emotion recognition AI and said, you know what, this is pseudocience. This violates fundamental rights. We’re banning this in workplaces and schools. Then they wrote in a carveout, medical reasons, safety reasons. So, the same technology that’s illegal to run on an employee sitting at a desk is perfectly legal to run on a truck driver doing 70 mph on a highway because they called it safety. That’s the trick. That’s always the trick. Let’s talk about seat belts for a moment. And not because seat belts in a truck on a ranch are important, but I want to show you where this ends. Even GM vehicles today have interlocks that deal with the seat belt, the transmission, and the doors, and they won’t shift if the seat belt’s not clicked or the doors are open. Now, Ford’s own documentation shows the exact same interlock behavior. These features are designed by people who’ve actually never worked on a ranch. They have never backed up a trailer through a gate with the door open. They’ve never been in a pasture and had to bail out of a truck fast. They have never done a single thing with a truck that didn’t involve a paved road and a parking spot. And let me promise you, there is epidemic of ranchers dying because the door on their truck was open when they were driving around the ranch. Nobody came to us with the data and nobody asked how we work. They just make the rules for us. And their argument is always, well, if it saves one life. But the truth is, at what cost? because someone decided that the risk of me driving with my door open was their problem when it’s not. That’s mine. And the moment that you accept that logic, that your bad decisions justify controlling mine, you’ve already lost something that you’re not getting back. Let me tell you what this is actually for. Ford Telematics already explicitly connects driver behavior data to insurance cost savings. That’s not speculation. That’s their marketing copy. Once in cabin, biometric data exists. Elevated heart rate, facial tension, gaze pattern, emotional state. Insurance companies don’t need a court order to access it. They need a data agreement. And those already exist. You’ll get in an accident. And in that 90 seconds before impact, your truck logged your heart rate, your eye movement, your facial expression, and your lip movements. Law enforcement subpoenas the data. Your own truck testifies against you. Your insurance company denies the claim. You were in an elevated state. The data says so. You signed the terms of service when you activated the connected features. You agreed. You never thought of it as evidence collection. You just bought a truck. Ford isn’t doing this because they care about your safety. Ford is doing this because data is the product now. The truck is just the subscription model and you’re paying them every month in data whether you know it or not. Now, what about our rights? Nobody asked you. Nobody came to your door and said, “Hey, we’re going to put a camera in your truck that watches your face, reads your lips, monitors your heart rate, and stores it on a server somewhere in the cloud. We’re going to let insurance companies access it and we’re going to let law enforcement subpoena it and we’re going to do all of that inside of a vehicle with your name on the title. Now, the Fourth Amendment protects you from unreasonable searches, but you signed the terms of service. Now, whether that’s legal or not, I don’t know, but that’s how they’re getting around it. They don’t search you. They just build a product that you can’t drive without giving up those rights. and we’re handing them everything. They’re telling this that this all started because of a convertible wind noise and not being able to hear the assistant. So, they built a system that monitors your lips, your eyes, and your heart rate. And it determines whether or not you’re fit to drive. Now, I bought this truck and I own this truck and somewhere someone is building a system that disagrees with me. I don’t think so.

Ford’s Latest Update Proves You Don’t Own Your Truck Anymore (04/30/2026)

=====

And here is the second “must view” video on the HALT Act which addresses the following topics:

00:00 Intro
00:25 The Law Nobody Talked About
0.45 - Section 24220
01:36 How the Technology Actually Works
02:04 Driver-Facing Cameras Already Watching You
02:40 Full Cabin Monitoring — Even Your Passengers
03:11 Steering Behavior Software That Flags Innocent Moves
03:50 Touch-Based Alcohol Sensors on Your Start Button
04:14 GM’s Super Cruise — Proof Cars Can Already Override You
05:07 What Actually Happens When Your Car Shuts Down
06:25 Stranded in a Blizzard? The System Doesn’t Care
07:44 Tesla Can Update Every Car Overnight — Without Your Consent
08:18 Who Gets Hurt: The False Positive Problem
08:42 Night Shift Workers, Prescriptions & Medical Conditions
09:44 Mouthwash, Nail Polish & Perfume Can Lock You Out
10:40 The Designated Driver Gets Punished — The Worst Loophole
12:32 “Kill Switch Jail” — Override, Appeal, Way Out
12:48 This Is NOT About Drunk Driving
13:58 Your Car Is Now a Surveillance Device
15:12 The Hidden Cost Nobody Is Calculating
16:40 What Congress Did — And What You Can Do Right Now
17:28 The Kill Switches in Cars Act — And Why It’s Stalled
17:39 How to Fight Back: Call Your Representatives
=====
Starting in 2026, every new car sold in the United States could come equipped with technology that can stop you from driving — instantly. This isn’t a rumor. It’s tied to Section 24220 of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, which mandates “advanced impaired driving prevention technology” in all new vehicles. In simple terms, that means systems capable of monitoring drivers and preventing the car from starting — or even shutting it down.

In this video, we break down how this so-called “kill switch” technology works, including driver-facing cameras, behavior tracking software, and touch-based sensors built into the steering wheel or start button. Much of this hardware is already installed in modern vehicles — and could be activated through software. We also cover the real risks: false positives, system errors, and situations where drivers could be locked out of their own vehicle with immediate way to override it. The biggest question isn’t whether the technology exists — it’s how it will be used. If you’re buying a car after 2026, this could affect you. Watch until the end — because what’s coming next may completely change what it means to own a car.

You Won’t Own Your Car in 2026 — The Kill Switch Is Real (Here’s Proof)! (05/04/2026)

=====
=====
If you still believe you “own” your car, you’re already behind the eight ball. What you actually own, is a permission slip on four wheels. A machine that watches you, evaluates you, and decides, in real time, whether you’re allowed to drive it. Not a police officier. Not a court. Not even common sense. But instead - an algorithm. And if that sounds like something ripped out of a dystopian script, it’s because we’ve crossed the line where dystopia gets rebranded as public safety. An our elected officials have voted for it. The trigger for all of this sits inside the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. Buried in Section 24220 is a mandate that forces the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to require “advanced impaired-driving technology” in every new car sold in America. That phrase sounds harmless on purpose. Because if lawmakers called it what it actually is, a federally required driver surveillance system with the power to disable your vehicle, there might have been a real debate. Instead, it slid through. Congressmen Thomas Massie, Scott Perry and Chip Roy tried to push back, he exposed a vote showing dozens of Republicans and over 200 Democrats supporting measures tied to this mandate. They passed this into law. That’s not division. That’s consensus.

Congress Just Gave the Government a Kill Switch in Every New Car (04/28/2026)

=====

Attempts to defund the Halt Act have been temporarily defeated thanks to 57 treasonous Globalist Republicans

In January 2026 Rep. Thomas Massie introduced an amendment to defund the Halt Act.

=====
Rep. Thomas Massie - Defund the Auto Kill Switch (1/22/2026)

=====

=====
Representative Thomas Massie (R-KY) has repeatedly attempted to defund or repeal the Honoring Abbas Family Legacy to Terminate (HALT) Drunk Driving Act, which mandates passive impaired driving prevention technology in all new cars by 2026-2027. Massie argues the technology acts as an “Orwellian” government-mandated “kill switch” that infringes on civil liberties, while opponents, including MADD: Mothers Against Drunk Driving , argue it is necessary to save thousands of lives annually.

Key Details on the Effort to Defund the HALT Act:

* Massie’s Argument: Representative Massie, along with Representatives Scott Perry and Chip Roy, argue that the technology, which would monitor driving performance and disable the vehicle if impairment is detected, is an infringement on individual freedoms. He has referred to the technology as a “car dashboard” that becomes “your judge, your jury, and your executioner”.

*The Law: The HALT Drunk Driving Act was signed into law in November 2021 as part of the bipartisan infrastructure law. It directs the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to establish safety standards for technology that can “passively monitor the performance of a driver... and prevent or limit motor vehicle operation if impairment is detected”.

* Failed Amendments: Attempts by Rep. Massie to defund this technology have failed in the House, including a 164–268 vote in 2026 where 57 Republicans voted against his amendment.

* Opposition to Defunding: MADD: Mothers Against Drunk Driving  and other safety advocates state that this technology only targets illegally drunk or high driving and is not a “kill switch”. They note that impaired driving kills thousands, and the technology is a crucial, passive solution.

* Implementation Status: As of early 2026, NHTSA is still developing the technical standards, working to ensure the technology can accurately detect impairment, according to Fox News.

Google AI [massie attempts to defund the halt act]
=====

Unfortunately the amendment was voted down thanks to 57 Republicans that seem to favor campaign contributions from the Insurance Industry over their continuants 4th Amendment rights. Here you can view the 57 republicans that voted the Amendment down. To see the list select Republicans and those that voted no.

=====
Roll Call 43 | Bill Number: H. R. 7148
https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202643?Page=1
=====

Or just scan the list for representatives from your state. Consider voting them out in the next election.

=====
Amodei (NV) Republican Nevada
Bacon Republican Nebraska
Bice Republican Oklahoma
Bilirakis Republican Florida
Bost Republican Illinois
Calvert Republican California
Carter (TX) Republican Texas
Cole Republican Oklahoma
Diaz-Balart Republican Florida
Dunn (FL) Republican Florida
Edwards Republican North Carolina
Ellzey Republican Texas
Feenstra Republican Iowa
Fine Republican Florida
Fitzpatrick Republican Pennsylvania
Fleischmann Republican Tennessee
Fong Republican California
Garbarino Republican New York
Gimenez Republican Florida
Hill (AR) Republican Arkansas
Hurd (CO) Republican Colorado
Jack Republican Georgia
James Republican Michigan
Joyce (OH) Republican Ohio
Kean Republican New Jersey
Kelly (PA) Republican Pennsylvania
Kiggans (VA) Republican Virginia
Kiley (CA) Republican California
Kim Republican California
King-Hinds Republican Northern Mariana Islands
LaHood Republican Illinois
LaLota Republican New York
Lawler Republican New York
Lucas Republican Oklahoma
Malliotakis Republican New York
Maloy Republican Utah
Mast Republican Florida
Meuser Republican Pennsylvania
Miller (OH) Republican Ohio
Miller-Meeks Republican Iowa
Moore (NC) Republican North Carolina
Moore (UT) Republican Utah
Moylan Republican Guam
Murphy Republican North Carolina
Newhouse Republican Washington
Nunn (IA) Republican Iowa
Rogers (KY) Republican Kentucky
Salazar Republican Florida
Simpson Republican Idaho
Stefanik Republican New York
Thompson (PA) Republican Pennsylvania
Turner (OH) Republican Ohio
Valadao Republican California
Van Orden Republican Wisconsin
Wittman Republican Virginia
Womack Republican Arkansas
Zinke Republican Montana
=====

Demand that your House and Senate Representatives defund the HALT Act or you will vote them out

Your representatives most probably assume their constituents have no clue that the HALT Act is set for implementation in all 2027 cars. You can disabuse them of this notion by simply contacting your 2 State Senators and you House representative. And you can complete this simple task by simply calling the following number. Tell each of them that if the HALT Act is not immediately defunded you will vote them out in the next election.

The economic fallout from the HALT Act will eclipse the fallout from the forced implementation of EV’s under the Biden administration

Whatever you think of Trump -- and I have my concerns -- we should all be happy that he ended the Biden policies for EV Tax Credits and insane fuel economy standards. Among other things the wide adoption of EV’s would have put incredible strain on the electrical grid. And had Biden’s fuel economy standards remained new cars would have had to become lighter and thus less safe to drive.

=====
President Donald Trump’s signature on his so-called big beautiful bill was a death blow for tax credits that lowered the cost of electric vehicles. Those tax credits — worth up to $7,500 and $4,000 for purchases of new and used EVs, respectively — won’t be available after Sept. 30, 2025. Another tax break that’s ending lets dealers pass along savings on EV leases. The credits were supposed to last for another seven years, through 2032. Analysts think the abrupt end to these federal subsidies will trigger a rush by consumers to buy or lease an EV in coming months. “This is going to be the summer of the EV,” Ingrid Malmgren, senior policy director at Plug In America, a nonprofit advocating for a quicker transition to electric cars, previously told CNBC.

As $7,500 tax credit ends, consumers may rush to cash in. Here’s how to get a good deal (07/10/2025)
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/07/10/trump-big-beautiful-bill-ends-7500-ev-tax-credit-time-to-buy-vehicle.html
=====

=====
President Donald Trump is close to erasing the entirety of a Biden-era plan to transition the country to electric vehicles. On Wednesday, the president personally unveiled a Department of Transportation proposal to weaken fuel economy standards for cars and trucks. The plan would scrap rules that require cars to get 50.4 mpg by model year 2031, replacing them with standards that only require a fleetwide average fuel economy of 34.5 mpg. The move caps a year of policy reversals aimed at eviscerating federal support for EVs. In June, Trump signed a joint resolution from Congress aimed at preventing California from implementing its rules to phase out gasoline-powered vehicles — though litigation continues over whether that is binding. In July, he signed a megalaw that scrapped incentives for EVs and eliminated long-standing fines for automakers that fail to comply with fuel economy standards.

Trump caps EV assault with fuel economy repeal (12/04/2025)
https://www.eenews.net/articles/trump-caps-ev-assault-with-fuel-economy-repeal/
=====

Because of this change of policy U.S. and European automakers have lost an estimated $114 billion on electric vehicles (EVs) and Detroit’s “Big Three,” alone, have taken a $52.1 billion hit due to write-downs, canceled models, and slower-than-expected demand. EV’s never made any sense to begin with. Their demise needed to happen for a host of reasons. The fact of the matter is that EV sales were decreasing even before Trump’s changes in policy.

=====
As of early 2026, U.S. and European automakers have lost an estimated $114 billion on electric vehicles (EVs), with legacy automakers losing roughly $83.6 billion between 2022 and late 2025, according to New York Post. Detroit’s “Big Three” alone have taken a $52.1 billion hit due to write-downs, canceled models, and slower-than-expected demand.

Key Industry Losses (as of early 2026):

Total Industry Losses: Nearly $114 billion in combined losses (including EV startups).

Stellantis: Reported over $26 billion in write-downs.

Ford: Suffered a $19.5 billion write-down and reported over $16 billion in losses since 2022.

General Motors (GM): Recorded a $7.6 billion write-down.

Average Loss: Automakers lost an estimated $20,887 per EV sold between 2022 and Q3 2025.

Startups: Rivian and Lucid burned through a combined $30.2 billion in cash.

These massive losses are largely driven by overestimating demand, high production costs, and a pivot away from aggressive EV strategies as Yahoo Finance reports $55 billion in write-offs. This has forced automakers to cut costs, delay, or cancel electric projects, as discussed on Autoblog.

Google AI [how much did the auto industry loose on ev cars]
=====

The truth of the matter is that EV’s were basically secondary cars for the wealthy. In the following essay they make the argument that Ford, and the other car manufacturers misread the market. Certainly there is truth in that analysis. But it is also true that the car manufacturers were envisioning a future where no one would own a car, with exception of the very wealthy. The manufacturers would own a huge fleet of autonomous EV’s that would transport those leasing them for shopping, traveling to work etc. All part of the WEF’s globalist Great Reset where you would ‘own nothing and be happy. Also one of the dumbest ideas in human history.

=====
The hard truth is that Ford, which makes its money by selling F-150s and other trucks, didn’t understand who its customers are. As I explained in testimony to the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee in January 2024, EVs have always been a niche-market product, not a mass-market one. And that niche market is dominated by wealthy, white, male, liberal voters who live in a handful of heavily Democratic cities and counties. I wrote:

Further, that niche market is primarily defined by class and ideology. Some 57% of EV owners earn more than $100,000 annually, 75% are male, and 87% are white. Last March, Gallup reported, “a substantial majority of Republicans, 71%, say they would not consider owning an electric vehicle.” Last October, researchers at the University of California, Berkeley, released a remarkable study that found “counties with affluent left-leaning cities” like Cambridge, San Francisco, and Seattle “play a disproportionately large role in driving the entire national increase in EV adoption.” The researchers found that over the past decade, about half of all the EVs sold in the U.S. were sold in the most heavily Democratic counties in the country. The summary of the study deserves quoting at length:

“The prospect for EVs as a climate change solution hinges on their widespread adoption across the political spectrum. In this paper, we use detailed county-level data on new vehicle registrations from 2012-2022 to measure the degree to which EV adoption is concentrated in the most left-leaning U.S. counties. The results point to a strong and enduring correlation between political ideology and U.S. EV adoption. During our time period about half of all EVs went to the 10% most Democratic counties, and about one-third went to the top 5%. There is relatively little evidence that this correlation has decreased over time, and even some specifications that point to increasing correlation. The results suggest that it may be harder than previously believed to reach high levels of U.S. EV adoption.” (Emphasis added.)

Ford is a historic company. It spends millions per year on market research. And yet, Farley and his colleagues didn’t understand their market, and that lack of understanding has cost the company $35 billion. Ford’s EV disaster will go down as one of the biggest fiascos in modern automobile history. I’ve asked before, and I’ll ask again: Why does Jim Farley still have a job?

Ford’s $35.1 Billion EV Fiasco (12/15/2025)
Felony stupidity in Dearborn.

Robert Bryce

Ford's $35.1 Billion EV Fiasco

Electric vehicles are the Next Big Thing, and they always will be…

Read more

6 months ago · 490 likes · 152 comments

=====

Let me just say that I predicted the demise of EV’s back in 2023.

=====
In this essay I addressed the insanity of pushing Electric Vehicle (EV) production in the United States and throughout the planet. Under the guise of Fake Climate Change Biden is pushing EVs which rely on Child Slave Labor, do nothing to better the environment and are reliant on resources and technology owned by the Chinese Communist Party. At a time that China is threatening a war on Taiwan this is tantamount to treason and I am actually concerned the China may soon declare a direct war on the United States. There is no good reason to transition to EV’s at this time as the United States has enough fossil fuels for the next 200 years. Meanwhile Biden is doing everything he can to make fossil fuels more expensive which is responsible for the 10% inflation we have endured since he took office in 2021. Frankly I’d like to knock that shit eating smile off his face as he continues to destroy our republic. It will be up to the American People to rise up and demand an immediate end to EV production.

In this essay I also explain how Ford Motor and the WEF see a future where autonomous electric vehicles will transport citizens and most will no longer own a car. Even with the demise of the EV market cars, in general, are quickly becoming unaffordable.

=====

So today I will make another prediction.

The Globalist Uniparty Mandates for Kill Switches in all Cars, beginning in 2027, will eclipse the losses from EV production and possibly bankrupt the entire car manufacturing industry

I think those pushing for the HALT Act thought the public would just follow along like dumb sheep to the slaughter: unaware that their 2027 car would become a surveillance trap. But once the public understands the scope of surveillance and the increased cost of buying and maintaining these vehicles, they simply won’t buy them. The Big 3 lost over 50 billion by pushing EV’s that the public didn’t want in the first place. But EV’s were not even 5% of the overall car market. This will effect every single car produced beginning with 2027 models. It could literally bankrupt the entire car manufacturing industry.

So I both hope and predict that these “Kill Switch Cars” will stop being produced. And that could happen in a number of ways. The best way it could happen is Massie’s Bill will eventually pass, defunding the entire program. In that case the technology will not be implemented at all. The second way it could happen is people will simply refuse to buy this crap -- instead buying used cars that don’t have the technology. This will hopefully force the auto makers to disable the devices and stop including them in future cars.

But my readers can also help stop these “Kill Switch Cars” by sharing this essay and urging them to at least watch the two video I’ve recommended. After watching the videos no one is going to want to buy this crap.

The increasing unaffordability of cars

There is little doubt that cars are becoming less affordable, along with everything else. Both the cost of buying and maintaining a car have far exceeded the annual rate of inflation. It is also difficult to figure out just how much the true cost has risen, since 1950, because of long term inflation and other factors. But basically it required 1000 hours of labor to purchase a car in 1950. Today an average new car requires at least 50% more labor to purchase: about 1580 hours of labor. And on top of that maintaining a car today is far more expensive due to all the electric devices and computer modules that simply did not exist in 1950.

=====
The number of average work hours required to purchase a new car has increased significantly since 1950, despite advancements in manufacturing efficiency. While a new car in the mid-1950s cost roughly $1,700–$1,900, a new vehicle in 2026 often costs over $50,000.

Average Work Hours to Buy a Car

* 1950s: A new car typically required roughly 900 to 1,000 hours of labor to purchase. In 1954, a Ford factory worker making roughly $1.89 an hour could afford a new car (≈$1,700) with less than a year’s wages.

* Today (2025–2026): Based on an average wage of ≈$31.80 per hour, a base-model vehicle (like a Ford Maverick) requires nearly 940 hours, while the average new car price (over $50,300) requires over 1,580 hours of labor.

Key Factors Influencing Cost

* Increased Features: Modern cars are more complex, requiring more manufacturing time for safety, electronic, and convenience features compared to the 1950s.

* Vehicle Cost vs. Income: While average incomes have increased, the price of new vehicles has outpaced wage growth, increasing the total work hours required for the average worker.

* Financing: Many modern consumers finance their purchases, with total costs, including interest, often exceeding 1,200 labor hours.

Historical Data Points

* 1950s: Average annual family income was ≈$3,300.

* 1954: Factory worker made ≈$1.89/hour or ≈$75/week.

* 2025: Estimated per capita personal income is ≈$63,620, or ≈$31.80/hour.

According to the American Enterprise Institute - AEI , there are alternative perspectives indicating that considering the increased longevity, safety, and features of modern cars, it may be a better time for car ownership than in the past.

Google AI [average work hous to buy a car since 1950]
=====

=====
The Model T brought mobility within reach of ordinary workers. Despite huge improvements, affordability has eroded as real costs climb.

How Many Work-Hours Does a Car Cost? The Model T to Today (01/29/2026)
https://thedailyeconomy.org/article/how-many-work-hours-does-a-car-cost/
=====

Algorithmic Tyranny is increasingly monitoring all aspects of our lives

Whether you are using your iPhone, your computer, your social media, or driving your car, we are all increasingly facing what I would call Algorithmic Tyranny. Just a few years ago, for example, if you got suspended from Facebook it would be because of human intervention. But today, with the expansion of AI, it is much more likely you will get censored by an AI Agent. These AI Agents can do the work of thousands of humans and don’t sleep, take vacations or require things like health insurance. And their capabilities are expanding exponentially as they move toward what is called Artificial General Intelligence. They give plausible deniability to the corporations that control and program it. “It wasn’t us that caused your driverless car to run over that civilian, it was AI.”

One of the scary things about these AI Agents is there is no opportunity to challenge their actions. They become judge, jury and executioner. As a journalist I’ve certainly witnessed this on the Social Media platforms. When I was permanently banned from Facebook (January 2026) they didn’t even cite the post that got me suspended. And when you try to appeal their decision there is really no recourse and also no human interaction. That is bad enough. But just imagine driving your friends to a club in a questionable part of Detroit. You’re not drinking because you’re the designated driver. But when you leave the club at 1:30 AM all of your passengers are drunk. Once you start the car the “kill switch” smells alcohol and completely disables the car. You’re all screwed and there is no opportunity to appeal its decision. And this is but one of thousands of situations where this “kill switch” technology could put you in danger. The videos list dozens of problems with this technology. One of the creepiest aspects of this technology is the biometric scanning. If the biometric scanning determines you to be in the criminal database it won’t just disable the car. It will also call the police.

Is this really the future you want for current and future generations. Because you just know it is going to get worse in the future. Enough is enough. Please call you federal representatives and demand an end to these “Kill Switch” technologies.

Additional links

=====

Malone News

The "Kill" Switch

In 2021, Congress passed an infrastructure law, and inside it sits a requirement that future vehicles include technology capable of detecting impaired driving. The stated goal is simple. If a driver is drunk or clearly unsafe, the vehicle should be able to prevent operation. That is the mandate. It does not authorize remote control, and it was signed by…

Read more

2 months ago · 673 likes · 190 comments · Dr. Robert W. Malone

=====
6 Stats That Show How Unaffordable Car Ownership Has Become (08/19/2025)
https://money.com/unaffordable-new-car-ownership-costs/
=====
Ford’s New Patent Turns Your Truck Into a Rolling Surveillance State (04/27/2026)

=====
Ford Pro Telematics Solutions
https://www.fordpro.com/en-us/telematics/?
=====
Kill Switch Law: Who’s profiting from trapping you in your own car? (06/13/2025)
https://www.cbtnews.com/kill-switch-law-whos-profiting-from-trapping-you-in-your-own-car/
=====
Automakers Ruined New Cars — And They Did It On Purpose! (04/04/2026)

Summary

These essay exposes how all 3 Branches of US Government are Selling Out the American People with Amnesty for Illegal Aliens: The Save Act, The Dignity Act, The Stop Nick Shirley Act and more. I’ve been recently permanently banned from both Facebook and X. So if you can’t afford a paid subscription please help out by reposting.

All 3 Branches of US Government are Selling Out the American People with Amnesty for Illegal Aliens

Overview

An Anti-Globalist Perspective on Mass Immigration: The Great Replacement

As an Anti-Globalist I have been against both Legal and Illegal Immigration for the last 50 years. It is not that I dislike foreigners for the most part. It is largely because Mass Migration diminishes the wages of legal citizens, burdens our schools and hospitals and drives up the cost of housing, among other reasons. And the UN’s Mass Immigration agenda was fully intended to destabilized most 1st World Nations with Muslims and other groups that have no intention of assimilating to the laws and cultural mores of their adopted host countries. This is exactly what George Washington warned about when he said he only wanted virtuous immigrants: those that would assimilate to the laws and cultural mores of the United States. Instead the UN has pushed millions of fighting age males, into First World Countries, that have absolutely no intention of assimilating into their host countries. The goal is to create social division and civil unrest. And because we have allowed this to happen Great Britain, France and other 1st World Nations are on the verge of civil war. I have addressed this, in great detail, in my series of essays that got me permanently banned from both Facebook and X.

=====
The Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification: Free 460 page series on why Islam is a existential global threat.

Bruce’s Newsletter

Stopping the Globalist Agenda

By Bruce Cain

=====

The Globalist Democrats support Mass Immigration because it could usher in a Democratic super majority that could well mute Republican power for decades. By allowing tens of millions of Illegal Immigrants the Census would shift the Electoral College in favor of Democrat states, making it far easier for them to win future presidential elections. And that would occur even if no Illegal Aliens were able to vote. If Illegal Aliens were eventually allowed to vote, through Amnesty, it would be game over for the Republicans and the American People. That also explains why they are adamantly opposed to the SAVE Act and restricting Birthright Citizenship to only children of American Citizens. They ultimately want Illegal Aliens to have the right to vote.

Most republicans favor Mass Migration because it will continue to depress wages for Legal Citizens, serving the interests of the Global Corporations that fund their elections. The sad truth is neither party represents the interests of the American People.

And now both parties are pushing the Dignity Act which will essentially grant Amnesty to tens of millions of Illegal Aliens. The Dignity Act currently has 40 Republican and 40 Democrat sponsors. They insist it will not grant amnesty because it will not allow them to vote. Spoiler alert. Salazar, the primary sponsor of the Dignity Act, eventually wants them to be allowed to vote. She said so in a video clip that is being kept hidden from the American People by Globalist Corporate Media.

I’m quite sure Republican Congresswoman Maria Salazar is hoping no one sees this video clip:

“At some point in the future, another legislator will write another law to give them a path to citizenship. Right now what we need to do is buy peace for these people, allow them to stay.” - Rep. Salazar.

I don’t know about you but Salazar, Lawler -- and everyone that supports the Dignity Act -- are committing an act of treason against the American People. For many years Globalist Corporate Media has insisted that the “Great Replacement” was just a conspiracy. Today it is crystal clear that the Great Replacement -- replacing indigenous citizens with Illegal Aliens -- has been a policy supported by the UN, Corporate interests and both the Democrat and Republican parties.

All 3 branches of the US Government are selling us out on immigration

As we all know the United States has 3 branches of government: the executive, judicial and legislative. And as I will explain all 3 Branches of US Government are Selling Out the American People with Amnesty for Illegal Aliens and other globalist policies. This despite the fact that the vast majority of Americans support mass deportations and are opposed to Amnesty.

The Executive Branch of government and immigration

Let us not forget that Trump won the 2024 elections primarily because he promised mass deportations after the Biden Administration allowed 20-25 million Illegal Aliens to invade our country. And I do credit Trump with shutting down the Southern Border within weeks of his second administration. But 15 months into the Trump administration he seems to be back tracking on his promise to stop more immigration.

Trump is working on legislation to allow undocumented migrants in industries such as agriculture and hospitality to remain in the United States

=====
President Donald Trump has said his administration is working on legislation to allow undocumented migrants in industries such as agriculture and hospitality to remain in the United States. Trump said on Thursday that the “radical right” would not be happy with the move, but added that “they’ll understand.” “We’re working on legislation right now where – farmers, look, they know better. They work with them for years. You had cases where…people have worked for a farm, on a farm for 14, 15 years and they get thrown out pretty viciously and we can’t do it. We gotta work with the farmers, and people that have hotels and leisure properties too,” he said at the Iowa State Fairgrounds in Des Moines on Thursday. “We’re gonna work with them and we’re gonna work very strong and smart, and we’re gonna put you in charge. We’re gonna make you responsible and I think that that’s going to make a lot of people happy. Now, serious radical right people, who I also happen to like a lot, they may not be quite as happy but they’ll understand. Won’t they? Do you think so?” President Donald Trump speaks at a rally at the Iowa State Fairgrounds, Thursday, July 3, 2025, in Des Moines, Iowa. Trump’s comments come after he directed Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in June to suspend raids on farms, restaurants and hotels after business leaders raised concerns that the enforcement operations were depriving them of essential workers. However the administration has gone back and forth on the decision, resuming workplace raids.

Donald Trump Could Let Millions of Illegal Immigrants Stay in US (07/04/2025)
https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-could-let-millions-illegal-migrants-stay-us-farmers-hospitality-2094586
=====

Trumps restrictions on H1-B Visas do not go far enough

On September 19, 2025 Trump did issue an executive order to restrict foreign H1-B workers by requiring a $100,000 fee to companies hiring foreign tech workers. But is only in effect for one year.

=====
The H-1B nonimmigrant visa program was created to bring temporary workers into the United States to perform additive, high-skilled functions, but it has been deliberately exploited to replace, rather than supplement, American workers with lower-paid, lower-skilled labor. The large-scale replacement of American workers through systemic abuse of the program has undermined both our economic and national security. Some employers, using practices now widely adopted by entire sectors, have abused the H-1B statute and its regulations to artificially suppress wages, resulting in a disadvantageous labor market for American citizens, while at the same time making it more difficult to attract and retain the highest skilled subset of temporary workers, with the largest impact seen in critical science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields.

RESTRICTION ON ENTRY OF CERTAIN NONIMMIGRANT WORKERS (09/19/2025)
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/09/restriction-on-entry-of-certain-nonimmigrant-workers/
=====

But Rosemary Jenks says Trumps H1-B restrictions do not go far enough as H1-B students, currently in the US, can avoid the $100,000 fee. And since it is only in effect for a year it will not result in American tech workers getting any more tech jobs. According to Jenks Trump or Congress need to shut down the Optional Practical Training (OPT) program so these foreign students would have to leave immediately after completing their degrees in the US.

=====
The pipeline from OPT foreign student to H1B is still wide open and needs to be shut down. And Congress needs to shut it down. The president could end OPT today if he wanted to. It needs to be shut down because these are American jobs and they’re being taken away from American workers and the numbers are not going down because we have so many foreigners in our country so that they can apply for these visas from within the United States and avoid the fee.

Rosemary Jenks says Trumps H1-B restrictions do not go far enough

=====

=====
In the United States, Optional Practical Training (OPT) is a period during which undergraduate and graduate students with F-1 status who have completed or have been pursuing their degrees for one academic year are permitted by the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) to work for one year on a student visa towards getting practical training to complement their education. Foreign students currently enrolled at a U.S. university can receive full-time or part-time work authorization through Curricular Practical Training. In 2022, there were 171,635 OPT employment authorizations.[1] In 2021, there were 115,651 new non-STEM OPT authorizations, a 105% increase from a decade ago.

Optional Practical Training, Wiki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optional_Practical_Training
=====

Meanwhile foreign H1-B workers continue to take most tech jobs. Obviously Trump is not doing enough. American workers continue to get screwed.

=====
Is the H-1B visa system being abused, and why aren’t regulators stopping it? BlazeTV hosts Sara Gonzales and Auron MacIntyre break down growing claims from U.S. tech workers who say they’re being pushed out of the industry while companies continue hiring through H-1B pipelines.

SCANDAL: How “Ethnic Cartels” use the H-1B Scam to STEAL Jobs from Americans (04/21/2026)

=====

Trump has yet to designate the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization within the United States

The Muslim Brotherhood is the primary pan national organization pushing for a Global Islamic Caliphate, which is Antithetical to Western Laws and values. President Trump has declared the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization abroad but has yet to declare them a terrorist organization within the United States.

The Judicial Branch and Birthright Citizenship

On April 1st, 2026 the U.S. Supreme Court heard Oral Argument on Trump Restricting Birthright Citizenship. You can watch the entire session here.

=====
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Argument on Trump Restricting Birthright Citizenship (04/01/2026)

=====

For decades China, and other countries, have been running operations to birth babies in the US so they can be granted full citizenship under the 14th Amendment. The true intent of the 14th Amendment was really to grant slaves citizenship after the Civil War. It was never intended to give full citizenship to Illegal Aliens who “pooped out a baby” while on US soil. And there are only 30 or 192 nations stupid enough to allow birthright citizenship. Unfortunately the US is one of those 30 countries.

According to Google AI around 300,000 Anchor Babies are born in the US each year and the grand total is probably around 7 million today. There were about 5 million U.S.-born children younger than 18 were living with at least one unauthorized immigrant parent in 2016.

=====
Approximately 250,000 to 300,000 babies are born annually to unauthorized immigrant parents in the U.S.. While estimates vary, analysis suggests that since 2000, millions of such children have been born, with studies indicating around 4.5 to 5 million U.S.-born children under 18 were living with unauthorized parents in 2016.

Key Data Trends on Births to Unauthorized Immigrants:

* Peak and Decline: Births to unauthorized immigrants peaked around 2007 (roughly 370,000–390,000) and have since declined.

* Recent Data: By 2016, the number fell to approximately 250,000 annually, representing roughly 7% to 9% of all U.S. births.

* Total Population: A 2018 Pew Research Center analysis found about 5 million U.S.-born children younger than 18 were living with at least one unauthorized immigrant parent in 2016.

“Anchor baby” is a colloquial term for a child born in the US to non-citizen parents, granting them automatic birthright citizenship. While the term is often used in political discourse, official Census or government data typically refers to this population as “children of unauthorized immigrants”.

Data for the number of births to unauthorized immigrants and temporary visa holders varies depending on the source. According to this article by the Center for Immigration Studies, there were an estimated 225,000 to 250,000 births to illegal immigrants in 2023

Google AI [how many anchor babies have been born in the united states since 2000]
=====

Sadly Constitutional Scholar Jonathan Turley predicts the Supreme Court will not rule that only babies born to legal citizens should receive Birthright Citizenship. Their inaction will have severe consequences when hundreds of thousands of anchor babies are granted the right to vote or when hundreds of thousands of foreign terrorists are allowed into the United States with full citizenship. Call it Suicidal Empathy or Supreme Court insanity. Either way, if the Supreme Court does not stop birthright citizenship, they are putting our republic in peril.

=====
Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
=====

=====
Jonathan Turley discusses President Donald Trump’s visit to the Supreme Court to hear birthright citizenship arguments on ‘The Ingraham Angle (04/02/2026)

=====

=====
“Well, it’s a new world. It’s the same Constitution.”

Those words from Chief Justice John Roberts during this week’s oral arguments signaled that the conservative justices are unlikely to reject birthright citizenship. Of course, nothing is certain until this summer when the Court issues its opinion in Trump v. Barbara. However, we need to consider the need for a 28th Amendment to reaffirm the meaning of citizenship. As some of us stressed before the oral argument, the odds were against the administration prevailing in the case, given more than a century of countervailing precedent. There are good-faith arguments against reading the 14th Amendment as supporting citizenship for any child born in this country. It is doubtful that the drafters of the 14th Amendment could have envisioned millions of births to illegal aliens. They surely did not imagine foreigners coming to this country for the purpose of giving birth — or even, without ever entering the U.S., contracting multiple U.S. residents to carry babies to term for them as surrogates. The historical record is highly conflicted. Some drafters expressly denied that they intended for birthright citizenship to be covered by the 14th Amendment. The rampant abuse in this country and the widespread rejection of birthright citizenship by other countries (including some that once followed it) did not seem to impress the conservative justices. Roberts’s statement was in response to Solicitor General John Sauer’s argument that “We’re in a new world now … where eight billion people are one plane ride away from having a child who’s a U.S. citizen.”

Reclaiming our own birthright: We might need to amend the Constitution
by Jonathan Turley, opinion contributor - 04/04/26
https://thehill.com/opinion/immigration/5815807-reclaiming-our-own-birthright-we-might-need-to-amend-the-constitution/
=====

=====
No, it is not racist to question birthright citizenship
by Jonathan Turley, opinion contributor - 2026
https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/458421-no-it-is-not-racist-to-question-birthright-citizenship/
=====

The Legislative Branch: The Dignity Act, the SAVE Act and the “Stop Nick Shirley” Act

The Dignity Act is Amnesty on Steroids

Here are two articles explaining the Dignity Act:

=====
The “Dignity for Immigrants while Guarding our Nation to Ignite and Deliver the American Dream Act”, or DIGNIDAD Act or the Dignity Act, is a bill introduced in the United States House of Representatives during the 118th and 119th Congresses.[1] The bill aims to reform the American immigration system. Originally introduced on May 23, 2023, as H.R. 3599 by Republican Congresswoman María Elvira Salazar, the legislation was reintroduced in 2025, as H.R. 4393 in the 119th Congress.

DIGNIDAD Act, Wiki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DIGNIDAD_Act
=====

=====
The Dignity Act: Bill Summary (05/25/20230
https://forumtogether.org/article/the-dignity-act-bill-summary/
=====

=====
This Dignity Bill in Congress is HORRIFIC... And Republicans are behind it.

=====

And here is a great summary of why those in favor of mass deportations and secure borders are against the dignity act:

=====
Those in favor of mass deportations and strict immigration enforcement—primarily MAGA-aligned conservatives and hard-line immigration reformers—generally oppose the Dignity Act (or Dignidad Act), spearheaded by Rep. Maria Salazar, because they view it as a form of “mass amnesty” that rewards unlawful behavior and undermines the rule of law.

While supporters of the Dignity Act frame it as a realistic “enforcement-first” solution that provides a legal pathway for long-term undocumented residents, opponents see it as a betrayal of promises to remove undocumented individuals.

Here are the primary reasons why proponents of mass deportation oppose the Dignity Act:

* Viewed as “Mass Amnesty”: Critics argue that allowing undocumented immigrants to stay, work legally, and gain legal status—even without a direct path to citizenship—is equivalent to amnesty. They believe that any legalization program for people who entered illegally is unacceptable.

* Contradicts Promise of Removal: Those advocating for mass deportations argue the 2024 election cycle represented a mandate to remove undocumented immigrants, and the Dignity Act undermines that mandate by providing a way for millions to stay.

* “Skipping the Line”: Opponents believe the act allows people who broke the law to bypass those waiting to enter the U.S. legally, thus creating unfairness and potentially encouraging future immigration surges.

* Legalization over Deportation: The Dignity Act creates a “Dignity Program” that allows illegal immigrants to live and work in the U.S. legally for 7 years (and likely beyond) upon paying fines and background checks. Opponents prefer that these individuals be deported rather than legalized.

* “Twilight Status” Concerns: Some hardliners dislike that the bill creates a “two-tiered” system where millions of people are in a “twilight legal status”—neither deported nor full citizens—which they argue does not truly resolve the issue of illegal immigration.

* Incentivizing Future Illegal Immigration: Critics contend that offering legal status to people currently in the U.S. acts as a magnet, encouraging more illegal border crossings in the future.

Key Differences in Perspective:

* Dignity Act Supporters: Emphasize that the bill is “enforcement-first,” requiring $7,000 in restitution, back taxes, and passing criminal checks, while also funding border security and providing a labor force.

* Mass Deportation Proponents: Argue that the only acceptable outcome is removal, regardless of how long an individual has been in the country, viewing any legal status as a failure of immigration law.

Despite these criticisms, the Dignity Act has gained bipartisan support, including some Republicans who see it as a necessary economic and social solution for the millions of undocumented workers in the U.S. agriculture, construction, and hospitality industries.

Google AI [why those in favor of mass deportations are against the dignity act]
=====

=====
Rep. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., explains the ‘Dignity Act,’ a bill he co-sponsors that would crack down on illegal hiring while offering a pathway to legal status for long-term illegal immigrants on ‘The Will Cain Show.’

The ‘Dignity Act’ explained (02/08/2026)

=====

=====
In this heated segment, Laura Ingraham takes aim at Congressman Mike Lawler over his support for the controversial Dignity Act. The debate intensifies as Brandon Gill publicly calls Lawler’s stance a “betrayal” of Republican voters, sparking a larger conversation about immigration policy and party loyalty. Is the Dignity Act a practical solution to immigration challenges, or does it go against core conservative principles? Watch as the discussion unfolds, highlighting sharp divisions within the GOP and what it could mean for the future of the party.

Laura Ingraham CALLS OUT GOP Mike Lawler For RINO Move On Dignity Act! (04/09/2026)

=====

The SAVE ACT is supported by 80% of Americans but will probably die in the Senate

The SAVE ACT requires proof of citizenship and ID verification in order to vote. Just like ending Birthright Citizenship the SAVE ACT is supported by over 80% of all Americans but will probably not pass because Senator Thune won’t take the necessary initiative to pass it. If we actually had a truly representative government the SAVE ACT would pass because 80% of the American People support it. In his recent remarks on the Senate floor Thune points out that, while democrats say they are for Voter ID, not a single Democrat would vote for the SAVE ACT. Obviously the Democrats are hoping to sway future elections by incentivizing Illegal Immigrants to vote. That is the real and obvious reason they won’t support the SAVE ACT.

=====
Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) delivers remarks on the Senate floor regarding legislation entitled, “House Amendment to S.1383 - Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act (SAVE America Act).” April 14, 2026

Senate Majority Leader Thune Delivers Remarks on the SAVE America Bill(04/15/2026)

=====

Here is a summary of the SAVE Act:

=====
The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, also known as the SAVE Act or SAVE America Act, is a proposed United States law that would require “documentary proof of United States citizenship” to register to vote in federal elections

Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safeguard_American_Voter_Eligibility_Act
=====

Personally, as a Systems Analyst, I would introduce further measures. First I would run all state voter registries against Federal Databases to remove all Illegal Aliens, ineligible voters and dead people from the rolls. Some might argue this goes against the 18th Amendment which allows each state to control their voter rolls. But once again 80% of the American people want clean voter rolls. The second thing I would do is insist on paper ballots only. Electronic voting machines have been proven to be hackable and therefore diminish the reliability of the vote.

And I don’t buy into Thune’s claim that we don’t have the votes. The problem has been getting the SAVE ACT out of committee for an actual vote. Once it is up for a vote we have 53 Republican Senators and only 51 votes are required for it to pass. There are a number of strategies that could result in passage including the Nuclear Option and the “Talking Filibuster.”

=====
Ending the filibuster would allow the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act to pass the Senate with a simple majority of 51 votes, rather than the 60-vote threshold currently required to “shut off” debate.

As of April 2026, the Republican-led Senate holds 53 seats but has been unable to advance the bill because Democrats have used the filibuster to block a final vote. Supporters have proposed two main ways to circumvent this obstacle:

1. The “Nuclear Option” (Rule Change)

By using a partisan vote to establish a new Senate precedent (scrapping the filibuster), Republicans could permanently lower the requirement for advancing legislation to 51 votes.

Current Status: Senate Majority Leader John Thune has stated there are “not even close” to enough votes within the GOP to take this extreme step, as some members worry it would backfire when they are in the minority.

2. The “Talking Filibuster”

Instead of ending the filibuster entirely, some senators, like Mike Lee (R-UT), have proposed a return to the “talking filibuster”.

How it Works: Under Senate Rule XIX, each senator is limited to two speeches per “legislative day” on a pending bill.

The Strategy: If Republicans keep the Senate in continuous session (preventing a new legislative day), they could theoretically exhaust the minority party’s ability to speak. Once all 47 Democrats have used their two-speech allotment, the presiding officer could call for a final vote on the SAVE Act, which would then pass with a simple majority.

Context of the SAVE Act

The SAVE Act would require individuals to provide documentary proof of U.S. citizenship (such as a passport or birth certificate) to register for federal elections. While supporters argue it is necessary for election integrity, opponents like the Brennan Center for Justice and the Legal Defense Fund argue it could disenfranchise millions of eligible citizens who lack ready access to such documents.

Google AI [how getting rid of the filibuster could get the save act up for a vote in the senate]
=====

Regarding the Nuclear Option. Thune is gaslighting us by saying we don’t have the votes. The Nuclear Option has been implemented many times by both parties.

=====
In the United States Senate, the nuclear option is a legislative procedure that allows the Senate to override a standing rule by a simple majority, avoiding the three-fifths supermajority,[1] which is normally required to invoke cloture on a measure. The term “nuclear option” is an analogy to nuclear weapons being the most extreme option in warfare. The use of the nuclear option to abolish the 60-vote threshold for cloture on legislation has been proposed but not successfully effected.

The nuclear option can be invoked by a senator raising a point of order that contravenes a standing rule. The presiding officer would then overrule the point of order based on Senate rules and precedents; this ruling would then be appealed and overturned by a simple majority vote (or a tie vote), establishing a new precedent. The nuclear option is made possible by the principle in Senate procedure that appeals from rulings of the chair on points of order relating to nondebatable questions are themselves nondebatable.[2]: 725  The nuclear option is most often discussed in connection with the filibuster. Since cloture is a nondebatable question, an appeal in relation to cloture is decided without debate. This obviates the usual requirement for a two-thirds majority to invoke cloture on a resolution amending the Standing Rules of the United States Senate.

The nuclear option was invoked on November 21, 2013, when a Democratic majority led by Harry Reid used the procedure to reduce the cloture threshold for nominations, other than nominations to the U.S. Supreme Court, to a simple majority.[3] On April 6, 2017, the nuclear option was used again, this time by a Republican majority led by Mitch McConnell, to extend that precedent to Supreme Court nominations, in order to enable cloture to be invoked on the nomination of Neil Gorsuch by a simple majority.

Nuclear option, Wiki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_option
=====

Some Republicans oppose using the “nuclear option” to pass the SAVE Act because they fear breaking the 60-vote filibuster rule will empower Democrats to pass progressive legislation when they next control the Senate. Again I don’t buy this argument. Just because the republicans don’t have the balls to do it does not mean a Democrat majority -- after winning the 2025 Midterms -- would not do it in a New York second. And ironically passing the SAVE ACT might prevent the Democrats from winning the midterms by continuing to allow electronic voter fraud and votes from Illegal Immigrants. Once again we are being gaslit.

And the “Talking Filibuster” is worth pursuing even if it doesn’t succeed. It will expose the hypocrisy of the Democrats as they spend two weeks explaining why they won’t pass legislation supported by 80% of the American People. Good luck with that. Nope I think Thune and his globalist republicans are really afraid that the SAVE ACT might lead to massive deportations when we finally decide to use government databases to remove all the Illegal Aliens working for US Corporations which would lead to higher wages for Legal Citizens. The republicans have long been beholden to US Corporations that support Illegal Immigration to provided cheap labor at the expense of Legal Citizens. God forbid we support the American Worker.

There is a 3rd way the SAVE ACT could be passed. Attach the SAVE ACT to “must pass’ legislation such as the NDAA.

The push to add the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act—often referred to as the SAVE America Act—to must-pass legislation is primarily driven by Congressional Republicans, President Donald Trump, and various conservative activist groups.

These groups are looking to attach the bill, which requires proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote in federal elections, to upcoming legislation like a continuing budget resolution or the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) to force its passage.

When 80% of the American People support the SAVE ACT, and it doesn’t pass, it just illustrates that we have a representative democracy in name only. That means what we really have is a Corporate Plutocracy which only represents the elites. And if we don’t pass it chances are the Democrats will win the Midterms and Trump will be a lame duck president for the last half of his second term.

There is a 4th way the SAVE ACT could be passed as well. Attach it to a Reconciliation Bill

So we have 4 strategies to pass the SAVE ACT. The Senate has not moved on any of them. Why? Perhaps because the Republicans also favor cheap labor and requiring a photo ID and proof of citizenship might just interfere with that goal.

=====
Kennedy on The Story: Let’s give the SAVE America Act a shot through a reconciliation bill (03/19/2026)

=====

The Democrat “Stop Nick Shirley” Act (AB-2624) would criminalize journalists for investigating the immigrant/citizen fraud in California

This bill only pertains to California. But don’t be surprised if the Democrats use it as a “Boiler Plate” template for legislation in Minnesota and other states where fraud is rampant.

Here’s the bill:

=====
AB-2624 Privacy for immigration support services providers
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB2624
=====

And here is some background regarding the bill:

=====
California’s Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection Committee voted 11-2 on April 7 to advance a bill that would let employees and volunteers at immigration service organizations demand the deletion of their images and personal information from the internet, backed by civil penalties starting at $4,000 and the threat of criminal charges.

AB 2624, authored by Assemblywoman Mia Bonta, is already being called the “Stop Nick Shirley Act.”

The bill arrives just weeks after investigative video creator Nick Shirley published a 40-minute video on alleged hospice fraud in California that racked up 42 million views on X.

Other investigations have found that a single program is causing the state to lose an alleged $6 billion in fraud annually. Shirley had already reported on over $110 million in Somali daycare fraud in Minnesota in December 2025, with empty facilities billing taxpayers while kids were nowhere to be found.

His California reporting uncovered an alleged $170 million in similar fraud in daycares and hospices, with ghost operations registered to empty lots and strip malls. Sacramento’s response to this flood of documented waste and abuse was not an audit, not an investigation into the programs themselves, but a bill to make it harder to film the people running them.

Under AB 2624, anyone affiliated with an organization providing “designated immigration support services” can send a written demand prohibiting the publication of their personal information or image online.

That demand remains effective for four years, even after the person leaves the organization. If the demand is ignored, the person can go to court for an injunction or declaratory relief.

Fines run up to three times the actual damages, with a floor of $4,000, meaning the minimum penalty triples to $12,000 in cases where a takedown demand is defied. If a journalist or anyone else is accused of posting information with the intent to incite harm, they face criminal charges and fines of $10,000.

The definition of “designated immigration support services” is broad enough to cover almost any organization that touches immigrant communities. The bill defines these services as those provided to the immigrant population, including legal representation, legal assistance, advocacy, case management, humanitarian relief, immigration resources, referrals, translation services, counseling services, and health care. That’s a definition wide enough to include organizations that have been at the center of documented fraud investigations, and to give them a legal tool to suppress the documentation.

The bill also creates an address confidentiality program modeled on California’s existing Safe at Home program for domestic violence survivors.

Bonta defended this at the committee hearing, saying the program “allows participants to keep their home and work addresses out of public records, giving them a critical layer of protection and privacy in an environment where their personal safety is increasingly at risk.” She told the committee that “individuals who provide immigrant support services … are facing targeted harassment” and that “advocates and workers are receiving death threats, being targeted at court houses and facing coordinated online doxxing campaigns.”

There’s a problem with framing the bill as a safety measure, though, and it’s built right into the text. The “reasonable fear” standard required to trigger these protections is defined and enforced by the person claiming the fear, not by a court, not by law enforcement.

Any employee or volunteer at a qualifying organization can send a written demand to suppress publication. They don’t need to prove a threat was made. They don’t need to file a police report. They need to cite a “reasonable fear” and put it in writing. The demand is valid for four years. And the mechanism for enforcing it is a lawsuit against whoever published the information.

What’s missing from the bill is just as telling as what’s in it. There is no exemption for journalists. Assemblymember Carl DeMaio raised this directly during the committee hearing, telling Bonta, “You do not provide an exemption for journalists.”

California’s “Stop Nick Shirley Act” Would Penalize Journalism (04/15/2026)

The First Amendment was designed to prevent exactly this; a law that punishes speech before any court decides whether it was harmful.
https://reclaimthenet.org/california-ab-2624-stop-nick-shirley-act
=====

Gavin Newsom’s Billion-Dollar Migrant Machine And The Shadow Army It’s Building For Democrats

Governor Newsom has funneled nearly 1 billion dollars to import nearly 400,000 Illegal Aliens into California. That includes $110 million to the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights Los Angeles (CHIRLA) which is a main supporter of the Stop Nick Shirley Act. Newsom is basically stealing 1 billion dollars, from Legal Taxpayers, in order to facilitate the Illegal Alien invasion. This is treason in my view. When will the people of California rise up?

=====
California Governor Gavin Newsom has quietly funneled roughly $1 billion into importing an estimated 400,000 migrants from impoverished nations, bolstering both the state’s Democratic political machine and an economy increasingly dependent on low-wage labor, according to data compiled by the Manhattan Institute.

As reported by Breitbart, the scale and structure of this spending reveal a deliberate strategy to entrench progressive power under the guise of humanitarian aid. “Since Newsom took office, California has granted massive contracts for migrant-related services: more than $250 million to Catholic Charities; $85 million to Jewish Family Services; $12 million to Centro Legal de la Raza; $23 million to the Immigration Institute of the Bay Area; and more,” according to an article by Christopher Rufe in City Journal. These state outlays come on top of California’s share of the enormous federal funding stream unleashed by President Joe Biden’s pro-migration Department of Homeland Security, led by Alejandro Mayorkas.

The state’s Democratic leadership has also directed $110 million to the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights Los Angeles (CHIRLA), a powerful Latino activist organization that functions as a political engine in its own right. CHIRLA can be described as a one-stop activist machine, with the ability to produce propaganda, engage in legal action, and — most importantly — get people into the streets. The group coordinates the L.A. Rapid Response Network, which tracks ICE raids and takes “direct action to shut down detention centers.” During the wave of protests in L.A., CHIRLA activists agitated on social media, led a street protest, and called for a “Summer of Resistance.”

Gavin Newsom’s Billion-Dollar Migrant Machine And The Shadow Army It’s Building For Democrats (04/23/2026)
https://www.blabber.buzz/conservative-news/1075074-newsom-accused-of-secretly-spending-1-billion-to-import-400-000-migrants?
=====
=====
AB 2624 making headlines recently as the “Ban Nick Shirley” Act, is being presented in Sacramento as a targeted protection measure, framed as a necessary response to threats against immigration service providers. The language is deliberate and controlled, built around the concept of safety in a way that discourages deeper examination. Outside the Capitol, that framing is being challenged in real time, not through formal opposition alone but through a rapidly evolving public narrative that has taken on a life of its own.

Across social media and independent reporting circles, the bill has been rebranded by critics as a ban on independent journalists, specifically those exposing government-funded fraud. That label did not originate from lawmakers or legislative analysis, but from a growing perception that the bill could have the practical effect of limiting on-the-ground documentation and investigative exposure. The speed at which that framing spread reflects a broader distrust of institutional messaging, particularly when legislation intersects with areas already under scrutiny.

At the center of that scrutiny is the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights, an organization that has become deeply embedded in the infrastructure surrounding immigration policy. CHIRLA’s role extends beyond advocacy into operational and logistical domains supported by public funding. It participates in a system that has expanded significantly in recent years, both in scale and in complexity.

CHIRLA’s Power Network and AB 2624: The Legislative Push to Silence Investigative Journalism (04/15/2026)
https://thecurrentreport.com/chirlas-power-network-and-ab-2624-the-legislative-push-to-silence-investigative-journalism/
=====
=====
Former President Joe Biden’s administration oversaw an unprecedented wave of migration across the southwestern border of the United States. Migrants convoyed in “caravans” in hopes of overwhelming border authorities. Cartels trafficked drugs and people in droves. At some points, American authorities estimated that more than 130,000 people were crossing into the U.S. each month; arrivals came not just from Latin America but every corner of the earth.

At the height of this drama, some border states sought to stop the wave of illegal immigration on their own. Texas dispatched thousands of National Guard soldiers and spun razor-wire barriers across the desert. Arizona sent construction cranes to stack hundreds of shipping containers into a makeshift border wall near Yuma. Then-Arizona Governor Doug Ducey called it a “border crisis.” Texas Governor Greg Abbott called it an “invasion.”

California, on the other hand, welcomed the flood. In this City Journal investigation, we have traced the money and can reveal that Governor Gavin Newsom has granted approximately $1 billion to an army of nonprofits that has encouraged unchecked numbers of migrants to enter the country, fought deportation orders in the courts, and led street protests against ICE. These groups often operate under the guise of “humanitarianism” or “immigration justice,” but many, as we have uncovered, are in fact left-wing activist groups that use propaganda, lawfare, and street protests to transform America’s demographics and build political power for California Democrats—all on the public dime...

CHIRLA can be described as a one-stop activist machine, with the ability to produce propaganda, engage in legal action, and—most importantly—get people into the streets. The group coordinates the L.A. Rapid Response Network, which tracks ICE raids and takes “direct action to shut down detention centers.” During the wave of protests in L.A., CHIRLA activists agitated on social media, led a street protest, and called for a “Summer of Resistance.”

At the height of the unrest, CHIRLA’s executive director, Angelica Salas, spoke at a street protest, telling crowds that ICE agents were conducting a “militarized siege” against illegal migrants. “We are going to stop Trump’s terror campaign against our community,” Salas said. “We will not stop marching. We will not stop fighting.”

Congress took notice. The House Judiciary Committee launched an investigation to determine whether CHIRLA was using public funds to “support violent criminal activity that impedes the enforcement of federal immigration law.” Senator Josh Hawley accused the group of “bankrolling civil unrest” and threatened a criminal investigation. CHIRLA denied Hawley’s accusations, claiming that its protest tactics are “rooted in non-violent advocacy, community safety, and democratic values.” (In response to our comment request, the group suggested that City Journal was trying to “weaponize government power and intimidate advocates like CHIRLA.”)

How Gavin Newsom Subsidized the Migrant Invasion
The California governor has spent nearly $1 billion on nonprofits that want, among other things, to dismantle the border, “abolish ICE,” and help immigrants “living with HIV.”
https://www.city-journal.org/article/california-gavin-newsom-illegal-immigrants-ice
=====
=====
Here’s the fundamental deal a government is supposed to make with its people. You follow the laws, pay your taxes—a lot of them, in some places—and in return, the government promises to keep you safe and spend your money wisely. It’s a simple arrangement, the bedrock of any functioning society.

But in some corners of America, that deal has been thrown out the window. It’s been replaced with a bizarre, upside-down new logic where the people who play by the rules are ignored, and those who break them are put at the front of the line. This isn’t just a policy debate; it’s a profound betrayal that starts in a governor’s mansion and ends in the heartbreak of an American family.

California Angel Mom Agnes Gibboney, who lost her son in an illegal alien-involved shooting, is blasting Gov. Gavin Newsom and state Democrats over a proposed bill that would use taxpayer dollars to fund legal defense for immigrants facing deportation. She urged voters to “stop this insanity.”…

“My son was murdered,” she said. “Not one politician has ever contacted me. Not one politician said, ‘I’m so sorry that this previously deported criminal [illegal alien] shot and killed your son.’ Not one of them.”

That gut-wrenching statement comes from Agnes Gibboney, a California Angel Mom. Her son, Ronald da Silva, was murdered by an illegal alien gang member who should never have been in the country. While California’s leaders have offered her nothing but silence, they’re now cooking up a plan to give her son’s killer’s allies something incredible: a free lawyer, paid for by you.

Angel Mom Blasts California Bill to Fund Taxpayer-Paid Legal Defense for Illegal Aliens Facing Deportation (April 2026)
https://americanjournaldaily.com/angel-moms-california/?
=====

Rob Banta Busted The Fraud. His wife Mia Banta is Writing Laws To Hide It

As you know independent journalist Nick Shirley has uncovered billions in fraud in both California and Minnesota. And the other week California Attorney General Rob Bonta held a press conference bringing attention to about 500 million in hospice fraud. Then a day later his wife Mia Bonta introduces legislation that would actually criminalize journalists that try to uncover fraud. You can’t make this up.

=====
Rob Banta Busted The Fraud. His wife Mia Banta is Writing Laws To Hide It. They’re Married

=====

It is becoming clearer by the day that the Democrats are implicated in major fraud schemes, throughout the US, involving government programs such as hospice, learning centers etc. We cannot allow them to get away with this. It turns out that over the past 5 years such schemes have resulted in $435 Billion dollars in fraud. That is enough money to fund every school, hospital, and road repair project California claims it can’t afford. This is absolutely treasonous: about a 100 billion in fraud a year. And that is just California.

=====
California is once again making national headlines for all the wrong reasons. Just this week, federal authorities in Los Angeles executed “Operation Never Say Die,” arresting eight people—including hospice owners, nurses, and medical professionals—in a brazen scheme that allegedly bilked Medicare out of more than $50 million. Sham hospice facilities enrolled non-terminal patients, submitted phantom claims, and siphoned desperately needed resources from one of California’s most important programs of compassion. The U.S. Attorney’s Office, led by First Assistant Bill Essayli, called California the “kingdom of fraud.” Vice President JD Vance’s Task Force to Eliminate Fraud deserves enormous credit for driving these arrests. The federal government is showing zero tolerance for the systematic looting of taxpayer dollars, while the California State Controller’s office seems unaware of its own responsibility in this arena. This is just the latest chapter in a much larger story. Last January, I released my estimate of what California had lost to waste, fraud and mismanagement. My initial conservative estimate of fraud, waste, and abuse across state programs—Medi-Cal, unemployment insurance, housing, infrastructure, and more—stood at $250 billion. New data and additional tips have now pushed that figure to $425 billion. That’s not a rounding error. It’s enough money to fund every school, hospital, and road repair project California claims it can’t afford. Yet while the feds are moving swiftly, California’s own law enforcement apparatus has been largely missing in action. State agencies have looked the other way as fraudsters operate with impunity. The pattern is clear: federal prosecutors and investigators are the only ones treating this crisis with the seriousness it demands.

California’s $435 Billion Fraud Epidemic: The Feds Are Acting—Why Isn’t the State Controller?
https://californiaglobe.com/fr/californias-435-billion-fraud-epidemic-the-feds-are-acting-why-isnt-the-state-controller
=====

Meanwhile Scott Bessant estimates $500 billion in Federal Fraud each year. Apparently we live in a kleptocracy where fraud is almost beyond imagination.

=====
“$500 BILLION in Fraud” Nick Shirley interviews Scott Bessent

=====

Here are a few videos on the “Stop Nick Shirley Act:”

=====
California Republicans point to fraud and demand special session (04/15/2026)

=====

=====
AB 2624 Democrats Advance “Stop Nick Shirley Act” to Criminalize Investigative Journalism (04/13/2026)

=====

=====
The “Stop Nick Shirley Act” (04/13/2026)

=====

=====
NEW: Nick Shirley addresses bill dubbed ‘Stop Nick Shirley Act’ (04/15/2026)

=====

The Illusion of Representative Government in the United States

I’ve been an activist since 1972 and an activist/journalist since 1989. And over the past 54 years I can only claim two real victories: Ending the Viet Nam War and Legalizing Cannabis. We were able to end the Viet Nam War largely because it was unpopular and our lives were literally on the line. Unlike today there was conscription: the draft. And we were able to Legalize Cannabis because it was very popular and we were able to gather hundreds of thousands of signatures to get each of our initiatives on state ballots. And Legalizing Cannabis took nearly 30 years to accomplish, requiring hundreds of thousands of petition canvassers. Sadly my efforts to stop the Globalist Agenda -- Open Borders, 5G, Smart Meters, Digital ID, Blockchain, Fed Now, Fake Climate Change, a Cashless Society etc. -- have all failed miserably. And there are many reasons for that.

Perhaps the most important reason is that most of our elected representatives are dependent on campaign contributions from billionaires and corporate elites. They spend nearly 70% of their time fellating these elites for campaign funding in order to stay in office. Most of them are basically prostitutes for the elite. This was made clear in the 2014 study: “Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens” by Gilens and Page.

=====
In 2014, Martin Gilens of Princeton University and Benjamin Page of Northwestern University published a study, “Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens” to analyze different groups’ influence on public policy in the US. This was done through an analysis of over 1,700 surveys between 1981 and 2002 that specified the respondents based on income (as well as the stances of interest groups) and how likely the policy was to be enacted within 4 years.

The graphs (as can be seen below) produced from the study are telling. For average citizens, there is virtually no correlation between the level of support and how likely it is for a policy to be adopted, they’re both roughly around 30%. However, for economic elites and interest groups, it’s a very different story. However, for economic elites and interest groups, it’s a very different story. For both, there is a significant correlation between support for a policy and likeliness it gets adopted (although for economic elites, there is a more similar likelihood for policies with roughly 40% to 60% support while for interest groups, the likelihood skyrockets depending on whether it has slightly more or slightly less support).

Can I ask why everyone forgot this 2014 study showing ordinary Americans have almost no influence on public policy?
https://www.reddit.com/r/leftist/comments/1m24ssi/can_i_ask_why_everyone_forgot_this_2014_study/
=====

And frankly I don’t think anyone would be surprised by their conclusion:

“When the preferences of economic elites and the stands of organized interest groups are controlled for, the preferences of the average American appear to have only a minuscule, near-zero, statistically non-significant impact upon public policy.”

I occasionally mention this study to remind my readers that WE THE PEOPLE have never really lived in a representative government. The following video summarizes their findings.

=====
Corruption is Legal in America

=====

And here is the full study for those that might want to read it:

=====
Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens
by Martin Gilens and Benjamin I. Page
https://www.almendron.com/tribuna/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/testing-theories-of-american-politics-elites-interest-groups-and-average-citizens.pdf
=====

This study, by Gilens and Page, basically quantified what is often called Elite Theory: an idea that has been discussed for hundreds of years: power in larger societies, especially nation-states, is concentrated at the top. Basically “money talks and bullshit walks.”

=====
In philosophy, political science and sociology, elite theory is a theory of the state that seeks to describe and explain power relations in society. In its contemporary form in the 21st century, elite theory posits that power in larger societies, especially nation-states, is concentrated at the top in relatively small elites; that power “flows predominantly in a top-down direction from elites to non-elites”; and that “the characteristics and actions of elites are crucial determinants of major political and social outcomes”.

Elite Theory, Wiki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elite_theory
=====

Another important reason that WE THE PEOPLE rarely win is the Globalist Censorship being imposed by the major Social Media Platforms: X, Facebook, YouTube etc. And it is getting worse by the day. I’ve been sharing my essays on Facebook for over 20 years and X for nearly 5 years. But within the span of two months I was permanently suspended from both platforms over my series of essays: The Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification. Obviously I upset some powerful individual or powerful group.

=====
The Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification: Free 460 page series on why Islam is dangerous.

Bruce’s Newsletter

Stopping the Globalist Agenda

By Bruce Cain

=====

Both platforms accused me of “hate speech” which is unadulterated bullshit. I was most surprised by X because Elon Musk basically agrees with what I wrote in the essays. Meanwhile every day X continues to have dozens of posts saying “Fuck Islam” -- something I’ve never said -- and they remain on the platform. Since I got banned, from Facebook and X, I’ve had dozens of people saying they have been permanently banned as well. And oddly most of them are independent journalists.

A third important reason the WE THE PEOPLE rarely win is because of what I call Globalist Corporate Media (MS NOW, CNN, FOX) whose real purpose is not to inform but rather to distract and pacify their audiences. As Noam Chomsky put it:

“The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum....”

— Noam Chomsky, The Common Good (1998)

Globalist Corporate Media also fixates their audience to parse all issues in terms of party: Democrats Vs Republicans. It would be far more effective to parse all issues in terms of Globalists VS Non-Globalists. The fact of the matter is most of our representatives, Democrat and Republican, support globalist policies that marginalize their constituents. And the push for Open Borders has been on the globalist agenda for decades.

The Democrat’s support of Woke Policies and Globalist Agendas must be exposed

So this essay focused on the Democrats support for Mass Immigration while covering up massive fraud. But let us not forget all the other unadulterated bullshit they support.

Here is a summary of all democrat woke agendas

=====
“Woke” agendas associated with the Democratic Party, often criticized by opponents, focus on progressive cultural and social issues. Key areas include promoting racial equity, LGBTQ+ rights (including transgender rights), strengthening environmental regulations (Green New Deal), implementing diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, and promoting social justice-oriented criminal justice reform.

Key Aspects of “Woke” Agendas

* Gender and Identity: Redefining gender, protecting gender-affirming care for youth, and focusing on LGBTQ+ issues.

* Racial Equity and Social Justice: Implementing critical race theory concepts in education and systemic reforms aimed at addressing historical inequities, often labeled as “woke” by opponents.

* Environmentalism: Pushing for the Green New Deal and climate policies, which some critics argue harms the traditional energy economy.

* Cultural Issues and Speech: Advocating for “politically correct” language and focusing on institutional change to eliminate social privilege.

* Criminal Justice: Pushing for police reform, sometimes associated with the “defund the police” movement, although this is not universally supported within the party.

Google AI [summary of all democrat woke agendas]
=====

And here is a summary of all Democrat planks that mirror the agenda of the UN’s agenda2030

=====

The 2024 Democratic Party platform contains numerous policy planks that align with the United Nations’ Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly regarding climate action, economic equality, and social infrastructure. The 2030 Agenda consists of 17 SDGs targeting areas like poverty, health, education, and climate change.

Key Democratic planks that mirror UN Agenda 2030 goals include

1. Climate Change and Environmental Protection (SDG 13, 7, 14, 15)

Net-Zero Emissions: The platform aims for a 100% clean energy economy with net-zero emissions by 2050, aligned with the Paris Agreement and SDG 13 (Climate Action).

Clean Energy Investment: Major investment in renewable energy, including wind and solar, to achieve affordable and clean energy (SDG 7).

Conservation: Commitment to protecting 30% of U.S. lands and waters by 2030 (SDG 14 & 15 - Life Below Water/Land).

Environmental Justice: Focusing on environmental impacts on frontline communities, often referred to as “leave no one behind” in the SDG framework.

2. Economic Growth and Infrastructure (SDG 8, 9, 10)

Infrastructure Investment: The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law supports sustainable, resilient infrastructure (SDG 9), focusing on clean water, public transit, and upgrading the electric grid.

Reducing Inequality: Policies such as strengthening unions, raising the minimum wage, and promoting “middle-out” economic growth directly address SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities) and SDG 8 (Decent Work).

Corporate Accountability: Increasing taxes on corporations and the wealthy to combat economic disparity.

3. Health, Education, and Equality (SDG 3, 4, 5, 1)

Healthcare Access: Protecting and strengthening the Affordable Care Act, Medicaid, and Medicare to ensure health coverage (SDG 3).

Education and Early Learning: Pushing for universal pre-K and affordable childcare to support quality education and gender equality (SDG 4 & 5).

Gender Equality: Supporting the Equal Rights Amendment and reproductive rights (SDG 5).

Ending Poverty: Strengthening the social safety net, including the Child Tax Credit, aimed at reducing poverty (SDG 1).

4. Democratic Governance and International Cooperation (SDG 16, 17)

Voting Rights: Supporting comprehensive legislation to protect voting rights and reduce the influence of money in politics, aligning with SDG 16 (Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions).

International Alliances: Rebuilding international partnerships and prioritizing diplomacy in foreign policy (SDG 17 - Partnerships).

The Biden-Harris administration has used these frameworks to align with international goals, using the SDGs to “connect the dots” between health, jobs, and climate resilience.

Google AI [summary of all democrat planks that mirror the agenda of the un’s agenda2030]

=====

And let us not forget it was the Democrats that were pushing for the lock downs, the Biden “forced vaccination” program and wearing masks during the Plandemic.

Final thoughts

We are in a dangerous place at the moment. And regardless of what you think of Trump it would be a fatal mistake to allow the Democrats to win House/Senate Majorities in the 2026 Mid-term elections. And Trump really does need to do something to address the very real affordability crisis. I’m not going to address this at length here but I think the following idea would win favor with all Americans.

Solve the Social Security insolvency problem by taking the $176,000 ceiling off and raise it to at least $500,000.

Currently you only pay on the first $176,000 in annual income. By raising the ceiling Trump would make Social Security solvent again and might also allow higher annual cost of living adjustments. It would also make a dent in the unfair polarization of wealth to the very rich.

More on that later. I’ve written enough for one essay.

Finally if you can afford a paid subscription that would be helpful. And my complete writings are available for $50. They cover my 36 years of writing and are more than you could possibly read. Every little bit helps.

Pat Condell

Here is how Wiki describes Pat Condell, a favorite commentator and comedian of mine:

=====
Patrick Condell (born 23 November 1949) is a British writer, polemicist, and former stand-up comedian. In his early career, he wrote and performed in alternative comedy shows during the 1980s and 1990s in London, winning the Time Out Comedy Award in 1991. He was also a regular panelist on BBC Radio 1’s Loose Talk program.

In early 2007, Condell began uploading videos on the internet, consisting of monologue polemics primarily about religious authority, authoritarianism in government and left-wing politics, and notably criticism of Islam and the societal effects of Muslim immigration into Western Europe. His videos have also been published on DVD, and as a book of video transcripts.

Pat Condell, Wiki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pat_Condell
=====

So this morning someone posted a video by Brit Pat Condell titled “A Word To Rioting Muslims.” I have been watching his videos for the better part of 15 years but haven’t seen any new videos in the last few years. Condell has long been an advocate for free speech and also a critic of what I call “Political Islam.” He also has a rather incisive “dry” sense of humor. I thought this was a new video but it turns out he produced it nearly 14 years ago. I’m sharing it because it is probably more relevant today then when he first produced it. And while I tend to be more diplomatic, toward the Muslim Community, I do agree with every word he speaks in this video.

=====
Well, once again we see multiple violent tantrums from the religion of permanent offence. Some things never change, do they?

Once again we see Islam self-detonate (if you’ll pardon the expression) and show once again why it’s about as welcome on this planet as an asteroid.

Once again we see thousands of Islamic nutcases take time out from beating up their wives to show their sensitive side. How? By smashing up the towns they live in, egged on by clerical ignoramuses whose motives are even lower than the literacy level of their followers. And once again we in the civilised world are being urged to censor ourselves out of respect for a religion that violates the human rights of half the people on the planet and that doubles as a political ideology indistinguishable from Nazism.

It would be funny if it wasn’t so obscene. Or should that be the other way round?

To call these riots infantile and imbecilic is to give them a dignity they don’t deserve. They can only be described as Islamic.

Let me get this straight. We’re supposed to show tolerance and respect for a religion that doesn’t know the meaning of either word, and goes out of its way to prove it every day?

We’re supposed to amend our values to accommodate a religion that accommodates nothing and nobody? Dream on, people. It’s not going to happen, because with Islam it’s always a one way street. We’ve learned that lesson the hard way. We can’t afford any more tolerance and respect. We’ve been sucked dry. And we’ve become weary of manufactured Islamic grievance. It’s such a bore that now when we hear some bearded buffoon or some bag-headed bimbo telling us how offended they are, we can’t even be bothered to laugh any more. Not even when the Turkish prime minister hilariously demands that Islamophobia now be recognised as a crime against humanity, when, given its track record, there’s a much stronger case for making Islam a crime against humanity.

Besides, Turkey is already hypocritically guilty of one of the greatest crimes against humanity in history, the Armenian genocide, a crime it doesn’t even have the balls to admit to.

When Muslims start showing the same level of outrage about things that are genuinely offensive, like the thousands of women and girls who are murdered, mutilated and raped every year in their countries, then we might start taking them a bit more seriously. As it is, there is nothing on this planet less deserving of sympathy or respect than Muslim outrage.

Indeed, there’s something deeply comical about it. It’s so contrived and so cringingly un-self aware it’s impossible to take seriously, even if we wanted to. And nobody in their right mind wants to any more.

There was a time when Islam was given the benefit of the doubt by many people in the West. Now we think it’s poison and we wish we had never heard of it, because twenty years of baseless grievance mongering and kneejerk offence have shown us this religion for what it really is, and now we don’t like it, we don’t trust it, and we’re never going to respect it - and we don’t care how Muslims feel about that.

Everything is an insult to this religion. Everything causes offence. Well nobody gives a damn any more, people. You’ve done it to death. You’ve killed the goose that laid the golden egg. So now, if you’re an offended Muslim, go and stick your head in the oven for all we care.

And if you think that if you keep up the violence the West will eventually cave in, it’s not going to happen. Even if the politicians want it to, the people won’t allow it. We’ll carry on speaking our minds openly and freely because it’s our birthright, and it can’t be taken away from us, it can only be given away, and we’re giving Islam nothing, because Islam gives us nothing. It’s a religion permanently on the take. Gimme gimme gimme is all we ever hear. Give me respect, even though I haven’t earned it. Give me special treatment, or I’ll be offended and you’ll be a racist.

Well, we’re sick and tired of hearing it, we’re sick and tired of Islam, and we’re sick and tired of the needless conflict and intimidation that comes from this religion at every turn.

All week we’ve heard Muslims telling us that we in the West need to understand how important the Prophet is to them. We do understand it and we don’t care. That’s the point. We don’t care now, and we’re never going to care. Get used to it.

We don’t give a damn about your feelings. Our feelings are more important. And our feelings tell us that we’re sick to the back teeth of hearing about your religion, so stick a sock in it.

And no amount of violence is going to change a thing. The more you riot and scream and shout the less we’re going to listen. It will simply stiffen our resolve not to be bullied and pushed around by people whose values we don’t respect because you’ve given us no reason to respect them, and, more to the point, because you’re incapable of giving us such a reason.

In short, we will not be told what we can and cannot say. Not by you, not by anybody. Not now, not ever. No matter how many flags you burn, no matter how many embassies you attack, free speech will prevail, and you’ll suck it up and like it.

A Word To Rioting Muslims(09/20/2012)

=====

At any rate I wrote him, asking if he had a transcript for the video and he was kind enough to provide. Below you will find a link to all of his YouTube videos which seems to have ceased about a year ago: most probably because that was about the time many of us stopped posting our videos on the YouTube platform.

Condell's video Welcome to Saudi Britain was removed by YouTube early in October 2008, but reinstated shortly after. In it Condell criticises Britain's sanctioning of a Sharia court, and refers to the entire country of Saudi Arabia as "mentally ill" for its abuse of women.^[6] A YouTube spokesman said "YouTube has clear policies that prohibit inappropriate content on the site, such as pornography, gratuitous violence or hate speech.... If users repeatedly break these rules we disable their accounts." The National Secular Society was among the complainants to YouTube, saying "as usual, he (Condell) does not mince his words, but he is not saying anything that is untrue. His main thrust is one of outrage on behalf of those Muslim women who will suffer because they are forced to have their marital problems solved in a male-dominated Sharia court."^[6] Condell believed that it was removed due to a flagging campaign by Islamic activists.^[11] YouTube also briefly removed Condell's video Godless and Free but then restored it, emailing Condell and explaining that it had been removed erroneously.

And that was because it was about the same time YouTube began the campaign of massive censorship of Anti-Globalist viewpoints. What is the point of posting videos to YouTube when they just censor and remove it? If you like his dry sense of humor you will find hundreds of his videos at this link.

=====
Pat Condell, YouTube (2007 - 2025)
https://www.youtube.com/@patcondell/videos
=====

And here is the first YouTube video he did on YouTube back in 2007: also on the subject of Islam.

=====
Hi, I’d like to say a few things about Islam, if I may. Here in the UK, religion was always pretty dormant until Muslims came along and started burning books and passing death sentences and generally demanding special treatment for no good reason. But they’ve shown everybody else what can be achieved by bullying and intimidation, so now every crackpot in the country feels entitled to respect for their precious beliefs; beliefs often lifted wholesale from the ramblings of some ancient desert nomad with a psychological disorder. It does seem quite ironic to me that the very people who have clearly made no attempt to think for themselves are always the most vocal in demanding respect for their ideas. But some Muslims go further than this and claim that they’re being victimized in British society, but I don’t really believe that’s true. I do think that a lot of people are getting fed up with hearing about Muslims all the time, and they wish that Muslims would just shut up and get on with their lives

instead of constantly bellyaching about nothing, but that’s not the same as being victimized. But because we live in a liberal democracy and therefore have certain double standards to maintain any criticism of Islam or Muslims always draws the immediate accusation of Islamophobia, a dishonest word which seeks to portray legitimate comment as some kind of hate crime, when the truth is that Islam has a chip on its shoulder the size of a mosque, and it looks to take offence at every opportunity.

Some Muslims, it seems, are almost permanently offended about something or other, and yet you never hear a peep out of any of these people when some young Muslim girl is murdered for bringing dishonor upon her insane family. Suddenly everyone’s looking at the floor then. They keep telling us that Islam is a religion of peace but all the evidence points to a religion of war. It’s holy book urges Muslims to conquer the world and subjugate everyone to the rule of God. If Islam had its way, elections would become a thing of the past and the rest of us would be living in the past for the foreseeable future. And some people are very keen to bring this situation about, especially the loud-mouthed, rabble-rousing Islamic clerics who we always hear praising the suicide bombers as glorious martyrs. Yet curiously, you never hear about any of these enthusiasts blowing themselves up for the glory of God. They’re always very keen to delegate that particular honor. Despite the guarantee of all those luscious virgins waiting for them in Heaven, these guys are so selfless that they can always find somebody more deserving. Now of course the whole 72 virgins scenario has become something of a comedy staple, and with good reason, but it does have one serious problem, and that is that the virgins are likely to be good wholesome Islamic virgins, because there won’t be any infidel riff-raff in Heaven. So presumably they’ll have brothers and cousins and uncles who are all determined to defend their honor by killing anyone who makes eye contact with them.

They haven’t really thought this whole thing through, it seems to me. For this they blow themselves up? Wouldn’t it be easier just to get an inflatable woman and blow her up? And then if one of your friends happens to glance at her with lustful eyes you can simply stone her to death and get another one in the usual way. Also, I think Muslim women in Britain who cover their faces are mentally ill. I realize that in some parts of the world women don’t actually have any choice in this matter, governed, as they are, by primitive pigs whose only achievement in life is to be born with a penis in one hand and a Koran in the other. But it just seems to me that if God had intended you to cover your face then, in his wisdom, he would have provided you with a flap of skin for the purpose. Of course, if it gave you any sexual pleasure, it would have to be removed; that goes without saying. But I don’t want to be too hard on Islam here, for two reasons. Firstly, because I don’t want to be murdered by some hysterical, self-righteous carpet-chewing book-burning Muppet with shit for brains. And secondly, I think we do need to make allowances for Islam because we have to remember that it is quite a young religion, so maybe right now it’s just going through a difficult age; a little headstrong, full of itself, thinks it knows all the answers, but I’m sure it will learn. I think years from now a lot of intelligent Muslims will be looking back on all this medievalism and jihad nonsense with embarrassment and shame, like the Germans do with the Nazis, and maybe then we can all have a good laugh about it, but in the meantime, I think any religion that demands earthly vengeance and retribution for any reason, is not really a religion at all, but an illness, and should be treated as such. Peace, and I mean that most sincerely.

The Trouble With Islam (03/16/2007)

=====

I also asked if he wanted to do a podcast with me so we might discuss the escalating problems with Political Islam on “both side of the pond.” But he declined the offer which I respectfully understand. I also asked him what he thought about Globalist Prime Minister Starmer and which candidate he favored more: Farage or Lowe. Personally I think Lowe is the better choice. If Pat responds I will also include that.

Anyway my readers deserve some comic relief and I think Pat Condell delivers.

Did you know that PM Keir Starmer was an executive member of the Globalist Fabian Society

If you have been reading my essays I write from the perspective of an Anti-Globalist. And the Fabian Society is one of the lesser known globalist organizations though it has supplied every Labor Prime Minister in history for Great Britain. 141 of 411 Labor MPs are members. And as if to state the obvious their coat of arms is -- wait for it -- a wolf in sheep’s clothing.

=====
The Fabian Society has supplied every Labor Prime Minister in history. 141 of 411 Labor MPs are members. More than half the cabinet. And they’ll tell you all of this themselves — it’s on their website. Founded in 1884 with a wolf in sheep’s clothing as their coat of arms, the Fabian Society is Britain’s oldest political think tank — and the organization most people have never heard of. Their strategy, which they openly called “permeation,” was to infiltrate institutions from within rather than build new ones. They founded the London School of Economics, started the New Statesman, wrote Labor’s constitution, and traced a direct pipeline from pamphlet to law that still operates today. But the part they’d rather you didn’t examine too closely? The founders — George Bernard Shaw, Sidney and Beatrice Webb, H.G. Wells — were committed eugenicists who advocated forced sterilization and lethal chambers for those they deemed unfit. William Beveridge, the architect of the welfare state, sat on the Eugenics Society’s council and presented his welfare blueprint to eugenicists on the same day Parliament debated it. And the man who tried to warn you? George Orwell. His teacher at Eton was Aldous Huxley — whose brother Julian coined the term “transhumanism” and ran the Eugenics Society. Orwell gave one lecture to the Fabians. They rewrote his words without permission. He spent the rest of his life writing about exactly that. Every claim in this video is sourced from the Fabians’ own publications, verified historical records, and primary documents. This is not a conspiracy theory. It’s their own words.

The Secret Society Running Britain for 140 Years (03/28/2026)

=====

Here is another interesting take on the Fabian Society.

=====
Socialism Part 9: Fabian Society: Wolves in Sheep Clothing w/ Michael Greaney (09/02/2020)

=====

And here is a comprehensive background on Keir Starmer from Wiki.

=====
* Starmer has proven unpopular with the British public. His net approval rating began slightly positive, falling over the course of his premiership to an average of –46% by November 2025; an Ipsos poll that month indicated he was the least popular prime minister since its records began in 1977.

* Starmer led Labor to a landslide victory at the 2024 general election, ending 14 years of Conservative government with the smallest vote share of any majority government since record-keeping began in 1830.

Keir Starmer, Wiki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keir_Starmer
=====

Up until today I never really understood the influence of the Fabian Society on British politics but it does explain a lot: the push for Climate Change, the acceptance of Mass Muslim immigration into the United Kingdom etc. All of these agendas are planks of virtually all globalist organizations: the UN, the WHO, the WEF etc. And it also explains the insanity of Keir Starmer who has yet to stop the mass immigration of Muslims into Great Britain. He doesn’t seem to care that his country is on the verge of civil war as a result of these insane immigration policies. Here is the 30 page pamphlet he wrote for the Fabian Society back in 2021

=====
The Road Ahead by Keir Starmer for the Fabian Society (September 2021)
https://fabians.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/The-Road-Ahead-KEIR-STARMER_web.pdf
=====

Concluding remarks

My SubStack blog is apparently under attack. On January 6th, 2026, I was permanently banned from Facebook where I have been posting my essays of over 20 years. And then on April 4th, 2026, I was permanently suspended from Musk’s X/Twitter platform. I’m beginning to see a pattern here. Most likely this has occurred because of my series of essays on “The Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification” which I began publishing in December of 2025. My best guess is that I pissed off some powerful Islamic Group such as CAIR. It’s just a guess by the way. But I do find it odd that after 20 years, posting to these Social Media Platforms, I get banned from two of the largest platforms within a single month.

There are a number of ways that my readers can help out. One way is to share my essays on all of the major and minor Social Media Platforms. Just cut and paste the links. Another way to help is to become a paid subscriber. I only ask this of those that can afford it. But every penny helps.

I prefer to write long comprehensive essays as I have for 36 years. But I think I will complement that with shorter essays which will allow me to write more essays each month. Goodness knows there are plenty of issues to write about. After this recent suspension from X I’m beginning to feel I’m being targeted for my Anti-Globalist viewpoints. But I do enjoy sharing my thoughts through my essays and have no intention of stopping. I’m beginning work on two essays: The birthright citizenship issue before the Supreme Court and the SAVE Act which seems to have died in the Senate. What they both have in common is they are both what we call 80/20 issues: the vast majority of Americans support both actions. And unless both of them are enacted it just points out the obvious: we are now a Democratic Republic in name only. This notion of a republic “by, for and of” the American People appears to be fading along with free speech, privacy and other inalienable rights. At some point we may have to take to the streets to remedy this sad trend.

The Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification

On January 6th, 2026, Facebook (aka Fascist Book) accused me of hate speech for my 460 page series of essays: The Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification. This series got me permanently banned from Fascist Book after I’ve been on that platform for over 20 years. They accused me of “hate speech” which is not accurate at all. De-Islamification -- taking away the special privileges from the Muslim population -- is now happening throughout the planet. And I think this is necessary to nudge our Muslim populations to assimilate to the values of our society. There was nothing controversial about this series of essays. I was merely calling attention to what is already happening throughout the world and merely coined a term to describe it: De-Islamification. This is a very important series of essays from the perspective of someone who has lived for 72 years in Dearborn which has now recently become a Muslim majority city. Dearborn has become radicalized since the 10/07/2023 Israeli massacre and the subsequent invasion of Gaza. This has resulted in radicalized Muslims calling for the genocide of Israel -- from the river to the sea -- and openly public calls for the “death of America.” This can only be stopped through forcing assimilation of the Muslim community -- through De-Islamification.

There was no impartial judge or jury when I was permanently banned from Facebook. I was not even told which post got me flagged for this alleged “hate speech.” The only reason I knew was because it was the only essay I was posting at the time. I was not afforded my 6th Amendment right to face my accuser. In fact I will never know who my accuser was, though I do have my suspicions: CAIR or some other Islamic Jihadi group. The only thing that is crystal clear is that Facebook has long been censoring Anti-Globalist Speech, which was specifically evident during the Plandemic (2020-2023). They say they are enforcing “community standards” when what they are really doing is censoring anything that challenges the broader globalist agenda. And certainly Immigration, and more specifically Muslim immigration, has been part of the globalist agenda for at least the last 3 decades. So obviously I was not banned from Facebook by some average disgruntled woke activist. I was banned because I upset someone with a lot of power and someone that had the power to make Facebook act. Anyway the entire series is free to read and is about 460 pages in length.

=====
Because we have allowed our national leaders to push this Mass Muslim Immigration, into First World nations, we have now reached a critical point. Cities like London and Paris have become Muslim ghettos where the indigenous populations are feeling unsafe to enter. Muslim enclaves, like Epic City in Texas, are fast becoming parallel segregated Muslim societies unto themselves. Thankfully the world is waking up to the existential threat of Political Islam.

The Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification Part 7
Muslims want a Global Muslim Caliphate Antithetical to our Constitutional Republic

The Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification Part 6
Ending Soft Sharia Laws in Dearborn Michigan and other US Cities

The remaining series of essays can by found here:

Bruce Cain’s Anti-Globalist Newsletter

Bruce’s Newsletter

Stopping the Globalist Agenda

By Bruce Cain

=====

If you get a chance to read through it share your thoughts in the comments of each essay. And for those that do read the series I’m quite certain you will reach the same conclusion that I did:

Political Islam is an existential threat that must be neutralized, both in the United States and throughout the planet.

This need to confront this existential Islamic threat is shared by Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Gad Saad and many others.

=====
Ayaan Hirsi Ali joins Liz Truss to discuss Islamism, immigration, free speech, Europe’s political crisis, Britain’s future, and whether the West still has the confidence to defend its own values. Born in Somalia in 1969, Ayaan Hirsi Ali later served in the Dutch Parliament and is now a research fellow at the Hoover Institution. In this interview, she reflects on her upbringing, her break with Islam, her critique of Islamism, and why she believes Britain and Europe are failing to confront deep cultural and political challenges.

Ayaan Hirsi Ali Warns Britain: Islamism, Europe and the Collapse of Reality (03/20/2026)

=====

How Muslim Immigration benefits the Globalists and the Red/Green Alliance

In my series — The Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification — I’ve explained how Muslim immigration, and really immigration in general, benefits the Globalist Agenda, whose final goals is to set up a global technocratic society where everything is tracked through either CBDCs or Stable coins. The UN has been pushing Muslim immigration, into First World Countries for decades in order to dilute the national character of these host nations. More recently the growing Red/Green alliance has joined in pushing this agenda for the same reasons.

This is a classic application of the Hegelian Dialectic: Problem, Reaction, Solution. We are currently seeing the problem as growing Muslim communities — Dearborn Michigan, Plano Texas (Epic City, the Meadows) etc. — set up parallel segregated communities that begin to implement aspects of Islamic Sharia Law. The reaction has come from Non-Muslims living in or around these Muslim enclaves. They begin to feel increasingly uncomfortable to live in these communities and begin to move out of the area. And the solution will be a cashless society which will begin to monitor and control Muslim extremists. But the reality is it will begin to monitor and control everyone.

Robert Spencer is an expert on Islam. In the following video he basically describes what I have just explained.

“My brother against my brother. But both of us against our cousin.”
Old Arabic proverb

=====
”The Islamic Republic of Iran is Shiite and funds Hamas, which is Sunni. 93% of the funding of Hamas comes from the Islamic Republic of Iran. Even though Sunnis and Shia actually hate each other and kill each other when they get the chance, why then would Iran fund Hamas? Because there’s an old Arabic proverb that translates to my brother against my brother, but both of us against our cousin. And so the idea is that the infidel particularly Jews are worse enemies. The Jews are designated as the worst enemies of the Muslims of all in the Quran. And consequently they the Sunni and Shia are happy to work together. Um, also, if I may add another footnote, um, the idea of inundating the West with Muslims creates a win-win situation for the left because it dilutes the national character of the countries in which these people are coming and makes it harder for the native people to defend their own homeland. Because after all, we live in a republic and if we’re outvoted, then we don’t get to set the agenda. And once they have all these Muslims here voting, then it becomes more difficult to elect the people that we want. Emanuel Macron is only president of France because of the Muslim vote. If there were no Muslims in France, he would have lost seven years ago, not to mention more recently. And so uh that’s the first thing. But also the more the Islamic communities increase the more unrest there is between Muslims and non-Muslims because of the violent aggressive supremacist expansionist character of Islam. The shark aspect. And so there’s always going to be violence. It never there has never been a place where Muslims have come in large numbers and did not commit violence against the non-Muslims. Never in human history. We will not be exempt. We will not be the first. And so that unrest is also something that the left wants because then once this once the country is engulfed in street war, they have an excuse to clamp down with their authoritarian measures, which is what they want to do in the long run anyway. And so there’s no downside as far as they’re concerned. The only thing that they haven’t counted on is the fact that ultimately there’s only going to be those two left and then who wins?”

=====

Spain to legalize between 500,000 and 1.3 million Muslim immigrants

Before getting to the Iranian invasion I’d like to share a video depicting what is going on in Spain where the president has recently moved to legalize between 500,000 and 1.3 million Muslim immigrants. This has led to the rise of the Anti-immigrant VOX party that seeks to deport the Muslim immigrants. In the video the head of the VOX party, Santiago Abascal, confronts the president of Spain for selling out the Spanish people to the Muslims. This same refrain is being heard in Great Britain, Ireland, France and other EU countries where their leaders are also selling out their indigenous populations to Islam. And the same thing is happening in the United States. All of these nations are now moving toward civil war in order to stop the Islamification of their respective countries.

=====
The Spanish Have Had ENOUGH Of Islamist Socialist Takeover (03/27/2026)

=====

=====
The rise of Vox — the voice of Spain’s anti-immigration right (09/24/2025)

A quarter of young people will vote for Vox in next election. The party’s leader issued a rallying cry to fight ‘woke ideology’ and an ‘Islamist invasion’
https://www.thetimes.com/world/europe/article/spain-vox-party-news-frt9dszkp
=====

Why I am glad we invaded Iran

So it was on February 28th, 2026, that Trump, with the aid of Israel, began launching airstrikes across Iran. Unlike previous incursions -- into Iraq, Libya etc. -- this was executed with surgical precision due to the use of drones, AI and Palantir technologies. For those that are interested in a detailed analysis, of the invasion, I recommend the following Wiki article.

=====
On 28 February 2026, a war began when the United States and Israel launched surprise airstrikes on multiple sites and cities across Iran, killing Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and several other Iranian officials. Iran responded with missile and drone strikes against Israel, US bases, and US-allied countries in the Middle East.

2026 Iran war, Wiki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Iran_war
=====

While I was mulling over the loss of my Facebook audience I posted the following comment on various SubStack blogs that were against the invasion of Iran.

“I am glad we invaded Iran. We kicked the can as far down the road as we could. But to put it simply, we could not allow Iran Nuclear Weapons and ICBM’s to launch their missiles at the US or the EU. This will also diminish terrorist groups like Hamas, the Houthis and Hezbollah that have been financed by Iran for decades. Frankly I think Tucker Carlson, Greenwald and others have lost the plot in opposing the invasion.”

I was actually surprised by the number of likes and supportive comments I received, given that I was posting to articles that were opposed to invading Iran. So despite the possible blowback from the invasion -- higher gas costs, fertilizer disruption etc. -- a large number of readers seem to think the invasion was justified.

Nationally a majority of Americans opposed a U.S. invasion or major military action against Iran. And while I disagree with the majority I do understand their concerns: higher gas costs, fertilizer disruption, possible troop fatalities, inflation from supply chain disruption. Once again we could not simply wait until Iran had fully developed Nuclear Weapons and ICBM’s to launch at the US or the EU.

=====
As of March 2026, a majority of Americans oppose a U.S. invasion or major military action against Iran, with support ranging from only 27% to 50% depending on the poll, marking unusually low public support for a new conflict. Reuters/Ipsos polls indicate that while many believe a ground invasion is likely, only about 7% to 27% actually support sending ground troops.

Key polling data from March 2026 regarding the Iran conflict:

* Overall Support: A Reuters/Ipsos survey found just 27% support for military strikes, while other surveys showed a range up to 50%.

* Opposition: A majority (53%–56%) of Americans oppose the military actions launched by President Trump.

* Ground Troops: Support for a ground invasion is even lower, with one poll finding only 7% support among all adults, note Reuters/Ipsos.

* Party Divide: YouGov data shows 51% of Republicans supported using military force to overthrow Iran’s leadership, while 69% of Democrats opposed it.

* Comparison: Unlike previous conflicts (e.g., Iraq, Afghanistan) that saw high initial public support, the 2026 Iran military action is broadly unpopular, with 70% in one survey stating the U.S. should not get involved.

Public opinion remains divided by party lines, but initial reactions indicate that the majority of Americans believe the actions have “gone too far”

Google AI [percent of americans supporting invasion of iran in 2026]
=====

As recent as June 2025, polling also showed that 79% of Americans also said that Iran Cannot Get A Nuclear Weapon and a plurality of Americans also favor U.S. Airstrikes on Iran. Among all of this cognitive dissonance is the reality: the only way to prevent Iran from attaining nuclear weapons was to invade. So regardless of the polling I have supported this invasion for decades. Hopefully the use of AI and Palantir technologies will minimize the collateral damage to Iranian citizens: something that would not have been possible in previous years.

=====
Enten: A Clear Majority Of Americans Believe Iran Cannot Get A Nuclear Weapon, Plurality Favor U.S. Airstrikes on Iran

Posted By Ian Schwartz On Date June 18, 2025
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2025/06/18/enten_a_clear_majority_of_americans_believe_iran_cannot_get_a_nuclear_weapon_plurality_favor_us_airstrikes_on_iran.html
=====

Here is a list of reasons for the invasion

=====
Based on reports as of March 2026, the primary reasons for U.S.-led, Israeli-coordinated strikes against Iran, starting February 28, 2026, were to eliminate Iran’s nuclear program, destroy its ballistic missile capabilities, and neutralize its threats to regional allies and U.S. forces. The Trump administration cited an imminent security threat, aiming for a “decisive” dismantling of Iran’s military capacity.

Key Drivers for the 2026 Action:

* Preventing a Nuclear-Armed Iran: The primary goal stated by the Trump administration was to definitively destroy Iran’s nuclear capabilities.

* Neutralizing Missile Threats: Officials claimed the action was necessary to neutralize Iran’s missile and drone capabilities, which were reportedly deemed a direct threat to U.S. forces and Israel.

* Diplomatic Failure: The administration concluded that negotiations had been exhausted, with President Trump stating he believed Iran would not voluntarily cease its nuclear activities.

* Supporting Regional Allies: The strikes aimed to protect Israel and America’s Arab allies from Iranian regional influence.

* Regime Change Messaging: While some officials insisted this was not the direct goal, the administration encouraged Iranian domestic opposition to act, aiming for a change in leadership.

* Preventing Threat Escalation: There was a belief that Iranian missile and interceptor capabilities were increasing, necessitating a pre-emptive strike.

The administration cited “overwhelming strength and devastating force” rather than a long-term occupation.

Google AI [primary reasons for trump invading iran in 2026]
=====

I would add a few addition reasons.

1) The spread of Political Islam

Iran has most certainly been trying to export this barbaric, medieval theocratic ideology through its financing of Hamas, the Houthis and Hezbollah. I have lived among the Muslims in Dearborn for my entire life -- 72 years. As much as I love my Muslim neighbors it is clear to me that Islam is antithetical to a Constitutional Republic. Under Sharia Law women and Non Muslims are treated as unequal to men. That violates both our Constitution, that treats everyone equal under the law, and the Golden Rule: to treat others as you would want to be treated yourself. It also violates MLK maxim to judge each individual by the content of their character and not by an individuals race, religion or class. Political Islam has but one overarching goal: to establish a Global Muslim Caliphate under Sharia Law. And large swathes of the Muslim population are no longer hiding that goal from us any longer. They are here to dominate, not to assimilate.

2) The massacre of over 30,000 Iranian protesters calling for the end of Islamic Theocracy in early 2026

=====
Since the beginning of the 2025–2026 Iranian protests, the government of Iran has perpetrated widespread massacres of civilians, deploying both its own security forces and also imported foreign militias to suppress widespread public dissent across the country. As of 25 January 2026, the total death toll estimates ranged from 7,007 people to upwards of ~36,500 people,[3][4][5] including 209 government-affiliated military and non-military personnel,[6] making these among the largest massacres in the modern history of Iran.[7]

Iranian authorities have supposedly imposed a near-total internet shutdown as part of their crackdown on the protests, restricting communication inside the country and limiting the flow of information about the killings to the outside world.[8] On 12 January 2026, Esmaeil Baghayi, the spokesperson for the Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, confirmed that security forces had directly shot at protesters.[9]

On 25 January, Time reported that a specific list included 30,304 protest-related deaths registered in civilian hospitals for 8 and 9 January alone.[3] The same day, Iran International estimated the total number of deaths at ~36,500.[4] On 28 January, The Guardian reported that the death toll could be more than 30,000, and that less than 10% of deaths may have been officially registered.[10] AP News reported that the government’s overwhelming use of violence had caused despair among the Iranian public and had given rise to hopes among some citizens for an American attack.[11] Several scholars have argued that the Iranian government now faces a fragile state that could lead to its demise.

2026 Iran massacres, Wiki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Iran_massacres
=====

No one should have to live under Sharia Law which has been going on within Iran since it became a Islamic Caliphate in 1979. For me it all comes down to the Golden Rule: treat others as you would like to be treated yourself. No self respecting human would ever want to live under Sharia Law. Sharia Law is not only antithetical to a Constitutional Republic but also to basic human rights. Hopefully, after this invasion, the Iranian people will reject an Islamic Theocracy in favor of a Secular government. Unfortunately this is not addressed in Trump’s 15 point peace plan. But it should be. Here are 10 of the 15 proposed points in Trumps peace plan. I see no requirement for Iran to transition to a secular government.

=====
* Dismantling existing nuclear capabilities that have already been accumulated

* A commitment that Iran will never pursue nuclear weapons

* No material will be enriched on Iranian soil.

* All enriched material will be delivered to Saba on a schedule to be determined by the parties.

* Natanz, Isfahan and Fordow will be decommissioned - destroyed

* The Atomic Energy Agency will be exposed to all information within Iran’s borders.

* Iran will abandon the proxy paradigm

* Stop actually funding and arming the proxies in the region.

* The Strait of Hormuz will remain open, will be a free maritime zone - and no one will block it

* Missile project: There will be a decision later, but they will have to limit the number and range

Further use: For self-defense purposes only

Trump’s 15-point document to end the war in Iran - and the (03/26/2026)
https://www.mako.co.il/news-diplomatic/2026_q1/Article-c55ca8485012d91027.htm
=====

Why the Red/Green alliance -- Socialists, Communists, Democrats and Muslims -- focuses on the deaths in Gaza but say nothing of the 1200 Israelis murdered on 10/07/2023 or the 30,000 Anti-Islamic Iranian protesters that were murdered in January 2026

I still recall the Pro Hamas rally, held at the Dearborn Civic Center about a week after Hamas slaughtered 1200 Israeli’s. When one of the Muslim participants said we should also be grieving the 1200 Israeli deaths he was shouted down. What predominated the rally were cries of “from the river to the sea” -- an obvious call for the genocide of the Israeli people. This was following by Red/Green protests across dozens of university campuses and throughout many states. While it is true that both sides of the Red/Green alliance, are unified by these idiot embracing anti-Western regimes and Open Borders, the rot started decades before as left wing curriculums took root in our public school systems. Academic excellence and critical thinking were thrown out the window only to be replaced by socialist globalist ideology: DEI, ESG, LGBTQ, Fake Climate Change. My mother, who taught 4th grade for decades, would be rolling in her grave if she could have truly understood what was happening to public education.

When I wrote about the 12/07 Massacre I quoted Shakespeare: a plague on both your houses. I said that because I do believe Netanyahu allowed the attack to provide an excuse to invade the Gaza strip. But I also criticized Hamas for essentially taking the bait. The last time I looked it appears as many as 77,000 have been killed in Gaza and over 30,000 Iranian protesters were murdered in January 2026. I find it frightening how the Red/Green alliance can’t empathize with all those senselessly murdered. After all are not all lives precious? They also ignore the 200,000 Christians and Moderate Muslims that have been slaughtered in Nigeria since 2010 by Muslim Jihadists. And similar genocidal attacks, by Muslim Jihadists, also continue in the Congo and other African nations.

=====
The modern progressive movement has sacrificed its core values of liberty and secularism to form a strategic partnership with theocratic forces against Western democratic interests. By obsessing over the conflict in Gaza while ignoring the systemic massacres in Tehran, these activists demonstrate an ideological bias that favors anti-Western regimes over actual human rights victims.

This convergence rests on three pillars:

1) Shared Enemy: Both identify the United States and Israel (the “Great Satan” and “Little Satan,” respectively) as the primary obstacles to their utopia.

2) Shared Method: Both advocate for the violent overthrow of existing structures. The Left excuses Islamist terrorism as “armed struggle” or “resistance”.

3) Shared Antisemitism: Marx identified capitalism with Judaism (in On the Jewish Question). Islamists identify Judaism with cosmic evil. The Red-Green alliance creates a seamless fusion where “anti-Zionism” serves as the socially acceptable vehicle for this shared hatred.

The Left’s silence on Iran is a direct requirement of this alliance. You do not criticize your comrades in the trenches. If Hamas and Hezbollah are the “vanguard” of the anti-imperialist struggle, as Butler suggested, then the patron of these groups — the Iranian regime — must remain protected from criticism. Postmodernism dismantled the concept of objective truth, replacing it with “narratives” and “power dynamics.” In this worldview, there are no facts, only “colonial” or “decolonial” perspectives. The Iranian regime murders women for showing hair, whereas the postmodern interpretation suggests that criticizing the hijab law is “Islamophobic” and imposes “Western feminist standards” on a unique culture.

The Great Betrayal: Why the Western Left Ignores Iranian Victims (02/2102026)
https://www.fairobserver.com/politics/the-great-betrayal-why-the-western-left-ignores-iranian-victims/
=====

=====
‘Progressive’ left must stop making excuses for Iran’s tyrants (01/09/2026)

To reduce Iran’s history to conspiracy is not only inaccurate; it is insulting. It dismisses the intelligence and courage of people who have paid an extraordinary price for dissent.
https://www.afr.com/world/middle-east/progressive-left-must-stop-making-excuses-for-iran-s-tyrants-20260108-p5nshh
=====

=====
The political left’s varying focus on Gaza versus Iran often stems from ideological frameworks, where Gaza is viewed through the lens of anti-colonialism and Western-aligned Israeli military action, while issues in Iran are complicated by anti-imperialist solidarity with the regime or fears of promoting Western intervention.

Key factors for this disparity often noted in commentary include:

* Anti-Imperialist Focus: Many on the left prioritize opposition to Western imperialism, viewing Iran as a nation opposing Western dominance, while Israel is seen as a proxy of the U.S..

* Geopolitical Framing: Deaths in Gaza are seen as direct results of U.S.-backed, high-profile military actions, making them central to anti-war activism.

* Information Disparity & Complexity: Iran’s regime restricts information, making domestic deaths, such as during protests, harder to verify and track compared to the immediate, televised nature of conflict in Gaza.

* Fear of Co-option: Progressive activists sometimes fear that highlighting human rights abuses in Iran plays into the hands of right-wing Western powers seeking to intervene against the regime.

* Anti-Colonial Lens: The struggle of Palestinians is overwhelmingly framed on the left as a key anti-colonial fight, creating a moral imperative that often overrides internal regional issues.

Consequently, some critics argue this creates a form of “selective solidarity” or “hypocrisy,” where Iranian lives are disregarded, reducing them to secondary casualties of geopolitics, according to an article in AFR and another article in AFR.

Google AI [why the political left complains about deaths in Gaza but not in Iran]
=====

3) The long-range ballistic missiles targeting the U.S./U.K. military base on Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean

So just the other week Iran launched ballistic missiles toward Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean. This was twice the range our military experts thought that Iran could launch missiles. And this means that much of the EU -- including London and Paris -- are now in range of Iranian missile strikes. That should be terrifying to the EU and begs the question: how long before Iran gets ICBMs capable of striking within the United States.

=====
As of March 2026, Iran launched unexpected, long-range ballistic missiles targeting the U.S./U.K. military base on Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean, demonstrating capabilities to reach roughly 2,500 miles—twice their previously declared range. These missiles, which coincided with attacks on Israel and U.S. bases in the Middle East, show increasing, though often unreliable, precision.

Key Detail

* Targeting & Range: The missiles launched around March 20-22, 2026, struck near the Indian Ocean island of Diego Garcia, far exceeding the typical range of Iran’s arsenal.

* Missile Performance: One missile reportedly broke apart, while another was intercepted by U.S. defenses, notes The Conversation.

* Regional Threats: Simultaneous attacks occurred, with missiles striking near a nuclear research center in Israel and targeting U.S. bases in the Middle East, says a YouTube video.

* Significance: Experts note that while the ability to fly that far is not a surprise in terms of physics, it indicates an attempt to threaten areas as far as Europe and Asia.

These developments follow a pattern of intensified, long-range strikes by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).

Iran shows Europe ‘in reach’ with longest-range ballistic missile launch (03/23/2026)
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-03-24/iran-longest-ballistic-missiles-launch-range-europe-reach/106485468
=====

To those opposed to invading Iran

I was somewhat surprised by those opposing the invasion of Iran because we have been in agreement on so many other issues. They include Patrick Wood and Barbara Boyd who write extensively about technocracy.

=====
IMEC: Trump’s War With Iran Is About Global Trade. Period.
Don’t fall for any other narrative,,,
Patrick Wood Mar 18, 2026

Patrick Wood's Technocracy News

IMEC: Trump’s War With Iran Is About Global Trade. Period.

The India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor — IMEC — is being called one of the largest and most ambitious infrastructure projects in modern history. Trump called it [1] ‘one of the greatest trade routes in all of history…

Read more

3 months ago · 306 likes · 154 comments · Patrick Wood

Cognitive Warfare
WE’VE BEEN LIVING IN A “50-YEAR FINANCIAL EMPIRE BUILT ON OIL, TERRORISM & MANUFACTURED CRISIS” - BARBARA BOYD, PROMETHEAN ACTION

Forbidden.News

Cognitive Warfare

Peter Navarro, Trump’s senior counselor for trade and manufacturing wrote in The Wall Street Journal last week that Iran-related tensions have added roughly $5 to $15 per barrel to global oil prices…

Listen now

3 months ago · 247 likes · 67 comments · Forbidden.News

=====

I have no formed opinion about IMEC though, when it comes to profiting from a Presidency, Trump makes the Biden family look like rank amateurs. So the Biden family perhaps made 20 million? Between the Trump Coin, IMEC and so much other crap it appears the Trump family is making billion and nary a word about it. So to be clear I don’t like that as there shouldn’t even be the appearance of such indiscretion or impropriety.

But often many things can be true at the same time. And I fully support the invasion of Iran as they have long been an existential threat to Israel, the US and the entire world. They finance Muslim terrorist groups, they push the Muslim Brotherhoods goal of an Islamic Caliphate and they treat their people like shit. So there’s that. Taking Iran “off the table” will also significantly stop the spread of the Muslim Brotherhood and their goal for an Global Islamic Caliphate under Sharia Law.

Then we have James Corbett of the Corbett report. Again I agree with him on a plethora of issues.

=====
Why Did USrael Attack Iran?
The Corbett Report, Mar 22, 2026
https://brucecain.substack.com/cp/191756949
=====

Corbett teases us with the idea that the War on Iran is really about bringing about the Globalist Great Reset and I think there is truth to that theory. But two things can be true at once. Iran is obviously pushing for a Global Islamic Caliphate through financing proxies such as Hamas, the Houthis and Hezbollah. And eventually Iran would have eventually had nuclear bombs and ICBMs that could hit the EU and the US. So regardless of the Globalist Agenda I think it was wise to decapitate Iran. And I also find it tiresome, this rise of Right Wing Antisemitism. This notion that Israel controls the US is overstated. We have a very complicated strategic reasons for our relationship with Israel. And even if Israel didn’t exist I still believe the invasion was completely unavoidable. Chamberlin’s appeasement of Nazi Germany didn’t work out well. And the decades of Iranian appeasement -- by both Republicans and Democrats -- stop the movement toward a nuclear Iran.

Finally we have the new Right Wing purveyors of Antisemitism: Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens etc.

=====
Right-wing antisemitism has increasingly moved from the fringes to more mainstream conservative discourse, often fueled by nationalist ideologies, anti-globalist conspiracy theories, and populist, anti-elite narratives. Key, identified purveyors include media personalities, political activists, and, at times, political figures who engage in or amplify tropes about Jewish control, “Great Replacement” theory, or Holocaust denial.

Key Figures and Voices

* Nick Fuentes: A prominent white nationalist and internet personality who leads the “America First” (Groyper) movement. He has been documented promoting Holocaust denial and antisemitic conspiracies.

* Stew Peters: A far-right conspiracy theorist podcaster who has been criticized for antisemitic remarks, including promoting Holocaust denial and using hateful rhetoric against Jewish individuals.

* Candace Owens: A media personality who has faced criticism for engaging in rhetoric about a “sinister Jewish gang” in Hollywood, promoting theories that modern Jews are not the biblical descendants of Israel, and downplaying Holocaust atrocities.

* Tucker Carlson: A media commentator who has been accused of amplifying nationalist narratives that lean into “Great Replacement” tropes and providing a platform for antisemitic voices.

* Richard Spencer: A prominent white supremacist who has been a key organizer of white supremacist rallies and a proponent of the “Jews will not replace us” narrative.

* Andrew Anglin: Publisher of The Daily Stormer, a neo-Nazi website that has actively promoted antisemitic conspiracy theories.

* Jimmy Dore and the Jimmy Dore podcast.

* Glenn Greenwald

Themes and Rhetoric

* “Globalist” Tropes: Using the term “globalists” or “globalist elites” as a dog whistle to blame Jewish people for political and social changes.

* George Soros as Target: Focusing intense, often conspiratorial, rhetoric on Jewish financier George Soros, portraying him as a “puppet master”.

* Great Replacement Theory: A belief that a “ruling class” or “Jewish conspiracy” is replacing white Americans with foreign immigrants.

* Historical Revisionism: The spread of Holocaust denial or downplaying of Nazi atrocities, often circulated on far-right platforms.

Platforms and Networks

* Online Platforms: Sites such as Gab, 4chan, BitChute, and Telegram are major conduits for right-wing antisemitism due to limited content moderation.

* “America First” (Groypers): A movement targeting young people through social media to normalize extremist views.

* Alternative Media: Various podcasts and online news outlets that serve as echo chambers for anti-immigrant and antisemitic conspiracy theories.

Various researchers and civil rights organizations have noted a trend where these types of narratives are increasingly discussed within broader political conversations. This shift has led to concerns regarding the potential for extremist rhetoric to become more normalized in public discourse, impacting how different communities interact and perceive one another.

Google AI [purveyors of right wing antisemitism]
=====

=====
Glenn Greenwald EMBARRASSED as Coleman Hughes Lists The Facts About Iran War! (03/27/2026)

=====

I’m most surprised by Tucker Carlson who has transformed into a Pro-Islamic Cuck . . . much like Gays for Palestine. Suddenly he is favoring Qatar over Israel. Doesn’t he understand the Qatar is spending billions a year to promote Islam in our universities and throughout the United States? Doesn’t he know that Qatar is financing the Muslim Brotherhood whose primary goal is to establish a global Islamic Caliphate under Sharia law? Then again it took this idiot years to consider that 911 was most likely an inside job. I knew it was an inside job at 5:20 PM (09/11/2001) when Building 7 fell into it’s footprint at free fall speeds. The only way that happens is by planting the building with explosive charges . . . something that requires weeks of preparation. Next thing you know he will be wearing a Hijab. Or perhaps he will become a transexual dancing boy for the Qatari elite. Idiot.

=====
Tucker Tells Reporter: America’s Relationship With Qatar Is Infinitely More Important Than Israel (12/30/2025)

=====

=====
Tucker Carlson is one of the most attention-grabbing figures in American politics. For years he was an ardent supporter of Donald Trump, but since the outbreak of the war in Iran he has become one of the president’s most vocal critics. In a conversation with The Economist’s editor-in-chief, Zanny Minton Beddoes, Tucker Carlson discusses the fallout of the Iran war and whether Trump betrayed America First over the Iran war.

Tucker Carlson on whether Trump betrayed America First over the Iran war (03/20/2026)

=====

Concluding remarks

I think the invasion of Iran was necessary to stop the development of nuclear weapons, ICBMs and a host of other reasons. But perhaps the most important reason is to stop the spread of Islam through the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis. Political Islam has no legitimate place in the 21st century. And that is why I spent so much time writing the series of essays: The Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification. The push for Islamic dominance is poisoning the EU, the US and other First World Nations. Through De-Islamification -- denying Muslims and special privileges -- it is my hope the Political Islam will fade and Muslims will have no other choice than to assimilate to the nations they have emigrated to.

European Parliament passed new legislation letting member states deport migrants to designated “safe” countries outside the EU

And there are some promising developments that will hopefully aid in this process of De-Islamification. With the rise in Anti-immigrant sentiment European Parliament passed new legislation letting member states deport migrants to designated “safe” countries outside the EU. There are also mounting calls for reimmigration (deporting Illegal Aliens) and denaturalization: deporting naturalized citizens that hold anti-American sentiments. President Washington only wanted virtuous immigrants -- those that held Judeo-Christian values. Those that seek the overthrow of our republic have no legitimate place in our country.

=====
European lawmakers cleared the way Thursday for tougher penalties for irregular migrants and their potential deportation to so-called “return hubs” outside the bloc. The measures, criticised by human rights groups, are part of a tightening of Europe’s immigration rules in response to pressure across the 27-nation bloc to curb migration. FRANCE 24’s Dave Keating reports.

‘Return hubs’ for migrants clear EU parliament hurdle (03/26/2026)

=====

=====
European Parliament passed new legislation letting member states deport migrants to designated “safe” countries outside the EU even if they are not from those nations. European lawmakers approved the measure on Tuesday with a vote of 396‑226 as centre and far-right members backed it.

Under the new rules, EU states will be able to send asylum seekers to third countries they merely transited through, provided those countries are deemed to respect “international standards” for migrant treatment. They could also deport asylum seekers to “safe” third countries with which they have no prior ties, if an agreement is reached with the host state, the UK’s Guardian newspaper reported. The rules are expected to take effect in June. The move underlines the rise in anti-immigration sentiment across the European Union over ⁠the past decade that has broadened popular support for far-right parties. The legislation’s text – which requires final formal approval from the 27 EU member governments – marks a sharp hardening of EU migration policy that has taken shape since an influx of more than one million refugees and migrants in 2015-16.

EU votes to allow deportation of migrants to ‘safe’ third countries (02/10/2026)
New rule could be used to send asylum seekers to countries they have no ties to if they’re ‘deemed’ safe.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/2/10/eu-votes-to-allow-deportation-of-migrants-to-safe-third-countries
=====

Another positive development is the establishment of a Sharia Free American Caucus which already has 51 members throughout 22 states.

Here are the current members of the Sharia Free American Caucus. If your federal representatives are not currently members you should encourage them to join.

=====
The Sharia Free America Caucus is a U.S. House of Representatives caucus launched on December 18, 2025, by Reps. Keith Self (TX-03) and Chip Roy (TX-21). Its stated goal is to combat the spread of Sharia law, which they deem incompatible with the U.S. Constitution, and ensure it holds no sway in American law.

Key Aspects of the Caucus:

* Membership Growth: Launched with a focus on Texas Republicans, the caucus grew to over 50 members from 22 states by late March 2026, including members like Tom Emmer (MN-06), Brandon Gill (TX-26), and Mary Miller (IL-15).

* Core Purpose: Members argue that Sharia law is a “political and legal system” rather than just a personal faith, and argue it poses a threat to American Western values and constitutional sovereignty.

* Proposed Actions: The caucus focuses on legislative action to restrict the influence of Islamic law, including efforts to prevent its adoption in any form within the U.S. legal system.

* Opposition: The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) has designated the caucus as an “anti-Muslim hate group,” alleging the caucus aims to render the practice of Islam illegal in the US and is a threat to religious freedom.

The caucus has held a press conference featuring Senator Tommy Tuberville and has strong support from Texas conservative members, emphasizing a “no compromise” stance in defense of American law.
=====

=====
During remarks on the floor of the United States House of Representatives, Republican lawmakers Chip Roy and Keith Self spoke about concerns related to Sharia law and what they described as potential threats from radical Islamist ideology in the United States.

‘Make America SHARIA-FREE!’: Chip Roy, Keith Self warn of ‘radical Islamist’ threat at House floor (03/09/2026)

=====

What is even more promising is the Sharia Free America Caucus already has a large number of bills to implement their strategy. If you go to the link you can view each bill.

=====
A new House caucus focused on opposing Sharia law in the United States has expanded to 36 members from 18 states, according to Rep. Keith Self (R-Texas), one of its co-founders.

The Sharia Free America Caucus was founded by Self and Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) following a conversation with Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) at the White House Christmas Party, according to Self.

He told JNS that the caucus has three primary goals. “We think our missions and our goals are to, one, alert our colleagues in Congress to the dangers of the explosion of Sharia across America today,” Self said.

“Next, get the American people to understand the danger and help them not be intimidated by the accommodation request and then the intimidation,” he added.

The caucus’s third objective, he said, is legislative action, Self told JNS, noting that “we have seven bills already that have been introduced on the floor of the House.”

Those bills include HR 5512, the No Sharia Act, which would restrict American courts from enforcing judgments or arbitration decisions based on Islamic law or other foreign legal systems that violate constitutional rights. Tuberville is sponsoring the companion bill, S 3008, in the Senate.

Another measure, HR 5722, the Preserving a Sharia-Free America Act, would bar foreign nationals who adhere to Sharia law from entering or remaining in the United States, with a Senate companion bill, S 3009, also introduced by Tuberville.

Additional legislation includes HR 6225, the Pausing All Admissions Until Security Ensured (PAUSE) Act, which would halt all immigration until reforms are implemented, and HR 5890, the No-Tax Exemptions for Terror Act, which would remove tax-exempt status from organizations with alleged ties to terrorist groups, including the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR).

Self also introduced HR 6230, the Tehran Incitement to Violence Act, which would designate as terrorists Iranian clerics who issued Sharia-based fatwas calling for the killing of U.S. President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

That bill has advanced further than the others. “It passed out of the Foreign Affairs Committee unanimously,” Self said, noting two abstentions.

The legislative package also includes HR 4387, the Muslim Brotherhood Terrorist Designation Act of 2025, HR 4097, which would designate CAIR as a terrorist organization, and HR 5890, which would eliminate the tax-exempt status for groups like CAIR “with close ties to terrorist organizations.”

Self said the caucus was formed in response to what he described as increasing attempts to introduce Sharia-based decisions into American civic life. “We have one set of laws in the United States, known as the U.S. Constitution, flowing down through the states to the local entities,” he said. “And those are the laws that govern us, not Sharia.”

On the state level, HB 1471 in Florida, filed by Rep. Hillary Cassel, a Republican, is scheduled for a Feb. 10 hearing. It declares that while religious freedom is protected, it does not extend to practices that violate public safety or individual rights, and singles out Sharia law as a “religious law” that may not be applied if it infringes on constitutional guarantees.

The legislation findings state that certain practices “inherent to Sharia law,” including child marriage, corporal punishment, discrimination against women and violence against non-Muslims, violate fundamental rights and public order, and cannot be enforced by Florida courts. Companion bill S 1632 was filed on Jan. 9 by the Senate Judiciary Committee and Sen. Erin Grall, a Republican.

In Arizona, SB 1573, introduced on Feb. 3 by Sen. Wendy Rogers, a Republican, is scheduled for a Feb. 11 hearing. The bill states that “religious sectarian law cannot be used by U.S. courts in decisions and court rulings.

HJR 10140 in Oklahoma, introduced on Feb. 2 by Reps. Gabe Woolley and David Bullard, both Republicans, bars courts from looking “to the legal precepts of other nations or cultures. Specifically, the courts shall not consider international law or Sharia law.”

In Kentucky, HB 539, introduced by Rep. Billy Wesley, a Republican, on Feb. 3, prohibits “the recognition of adjudicative rulings or contractual provisions based in whole or in part upon Sharia or any foreign law,” and New Hampshire’s HR 34, introduced Jan. 28 by Rep. Matt Sabourin, a Republican, prohibits government institutions from “deference to Sharia law.”

Self told JNS that while these bills are not part of the caucus’s movement, he is “delighted” to hear about them. “We’re going to need the states to be involved,” he said. “But even more than that, we’re going to have to have our citizens understand not to be intimidated.”

The caucus is organizing a meeting for later in February in Texas. “This is something that will not wait,” he said. “We’ve got to act now.”

Sharia Free America Caucus advances its slate of legislation (02/09/2026)
“We have one set of laws in the United States, known as the U.S. Constitution,” Congressman Keith Self, co-founder of the caucus, told JNS.
https://www.jns.org/u.s.-news/sharia-free-america-caucus-advances-its-slate-of-legislation
=====

The Assimilation Act of 2026

Rep. Andy Ogles (R-Tenn.) is also a member Sharia Free America Caucus. He has proposed legislation to stop Chain Migration which accounts for the majority of immigration into the US on a annual basis. I am including it because it is not on the list of proposals in the article I just cited. But, if passed, it could reduce the number of annual immigrants from 700,000 - 1 million, down to a more manageable 70,000 per year. What better way to force American Muslims to assimilate.

=====
For nearly 60 years, U.S. immigration policy has been shaped by a law passed in 1965 that ended a national origins quota system and shifted the focus toward family reunification and skilled workers. Now, Rep. Andy Ogles (R-Tenn.) said he wants to replace that system entirely. In an interview with News 2, Ogles described his proposal as a complete overhaul of how the United States determines who is allowed to enter and remain in the country. “This is a complete and total overhaul for immigration in the United States of America,” Ogles said. The proposal, known as “The Assimilation Act,” would repeal the current framework and replace it with what he describes as a system centered on skills and assimilation. Under his plan, immediate family members could still be eligible to immigrate, but more distant relatives would not. Applicants would be evaluated on their ability to contribute economically, including whether they have a job or a specific skill set. “At the end of the day, it is about what you are bringing to the community,” Ogles said. “Do you provide a skill? Can you get a job?” The plan would also eliminate programs such as the H-1B visa, which allows U.S. companies to hire foreign workers in specialized fields. “It also ends the H-1B visa scam. Companies are hiring foreign workers at $65,000 or $70,000 instead of paying Americans what they should be making,” he said. Ogles argues the current system places too much strain on public resources. He pointed to welfare usage among some immigrant groups as part of his reasoning for reform. “When you have 80 to 70 percent of Somalis in the country on welfare, that is a problem. When you have 50 to 60 percent of Afghanis here on welfare, that is a problem,” he said. The congressman has also faced criticism for recent comments about Muslims, including a statement that drew backlash from lawmakers and community members. “Think about what has happened over the last three weeks,” Ogles said. “We have had four terror attacks, all by Muslims.” Ogles, who represents a district with a growing and diverse population, said his proposal is intended to start a broader conversation about immigration policy in the United States. “There’s roughly 3,000 mosques in United States of America and as of this morning, not a single one of those mosques condemned the violence,” he said. Ogles has not yet released full legislative language, and any changes to federal immigration law would require approval from Congress. If enacted, the proposal would mark one of the most significant shifts in U.S. immigration policy in decades.

Tennessee congressman proposes overhaul of U.S. Immigration system (03/18/2026)
https://www.wkrn.com/news/tennessee-news/tennessee-congressman-proposes-overhaul-of-u-s-immigration-system/
=====

Here is Andy Ogles discussing the proposed legislation on the FOX Will Cain show. [I am not related to Will Cain by the way].

=====
Rep. Andy Ogles R-Tenn., introduces the ‘Assimilation Act’ to overhaul legal immigration, ending chain migration and implementing merit-based criteria on ‘The Will Cain Show.’

These individuals HATE America: Rep Andy Ogles (03/26/2026)

=====

A historic perspective

In 1965 the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, also known as the Hart–Celler Act was enacted under President Johnson. I discuss this in my first essay in the series: The Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification. This was the year that the floodgates for Muslim and African immigration was opened up and has led to huge increases in the number of Muslims and Africans migrating into the US for the last 60 years. The act exacerbated the flow of Muslim/African immigrants by also allowing chain migration: the ability to bring in distant cousins etc. The Assimilation Act of 2026 would reverse the annual flow of immigrants from about 700,000 per year to a more manageable 70,000 per year.

Here is a comprehensive Wiki article on Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965.

=====
The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, also known as the Hart–Celler Act and more recently as the 1965 Immigration Act, was a federal law passed by the 89th United States Congress and signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson.[1] The law abolished the National Origins Formula, which had been the basis of U.S. immigration policy since the 1920s.[2] The act formally removed de facto discrimination against Southern and Eastern Europeans as well as Asians, in addition to other non-Western and Northern European ethnicities from the immigration policy of the United States. The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 marked a radical break from U.S. immigration policies of the past. Since Congress restricted naturalized citizenship to “white persons” in 1790, laws had restricted immigration from Asia and Africa, and gave preference to Northern and Western Europeans over Southern and Eastern Europeans.

Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, Wiki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1965
=====

=====
Every year, about one million new legal immigrants, or lawful permanent residents, are admitted to the United States. More than 10.6 million immigrants were admitted from 2007 through 2016. According to DHS statistics, in recent years about half of these immigrants have been what are sometimes called “initiating immigrants”, or the first in their family to settle permanently in the United States, perhaps after attending college, finding employment, as refugees from persecution, or receiving amnesty after illegal settlement. The other half are not path-breakers, but are joining family members who arrived earlier, in the phenomenon known as chain migration.

This report examines the scale of chain migration and recent trends of family sponsorship over time and across different groups of immigrants. In addition, we examine how an amnesty for beneficiaries of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program is likely to increase chain migration in the future, as DACA beneficiaries eventually qualify for citizenship and the opportunity to sponsor their parents and siblings, many of whom also have been residing in the United States illegally.

Immigration Multipliers: Trends in Chain Migration (Sept. 2017)
https://cis.org/sites/default/files/2017-09/vaughan-chain-migration_1.pdf
=====

And the following article spells out the problems created by the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965

=====
Each year, the United States approves more than a million permanent residency or green cards. For decades, more than half of immigration to our country has been chain migration — immigrants sponsored by a family member who came earlier, most often a new spouse, a grown son or daughter, or a sibling. In contrast, only about 15% of annual immigration is based on skills or sponsorship by an employer, with the remainder based on a green card lottery or humanitarian programs.

Chain migration and periodic amnesties that award huge numbers of green cards outside the regular system have fueled near-constant growth in legal immigration for decades. This is because two of the largest chain migration categories, spouses and parents of naturalized citizens, are not numerically capped. In particular, the number of parents admitted has grown by more than 15% since 2016, with more than 208,000 new green cards issued to parents of prior immigrants in 2023.

When most immigrants are chosen by family members who came earlier, there is no guarantee that immigration will help our country. As it turns out, our chain migration system is very expensive for taxpayers. Census data show that more than half of all immigrant-headed households are accessing at least one welfare program, compared to about 40% of native U.S.-born households, at a cost of $42 billion per year.

President Donald Trump’s recent statements have revealed his interest in reforming the legal immigration system to give greater priority to those who graduate from U.S. colleges and would purchase a $5 million “gold card” as a path to citizenship. In his first term, he backed legislation to reduce chain migration and eliminate the green card lottery in favor of a new points-based system that would greatly favor more highly educated immigrants who can speak English. Additionally, Trump has said he would like to have an amnesty for the 600,000 “Dreamers” who arrived illegally as children, have work authorization, and are protected from deportation.

Eliminating most chain migration in favor of an emphasis on a new skills-oriented program would greatly modernize our immigration system, deliver a flow of global talent for employers, and likely bring in immigrants from a greater range of countries who are more likely to be self-sufficient and less likely to depend on welfare programs. It would also reduce the multiplier effect of allowing extended family immigration.

In particular, Congress should abolish the visa lottery, end categories for non-nuclear family members, preserve categories for spouses and children, and cap the parents category at about 100,000 per year. Instead of admitting 200,000 extended family chain immigrants each year, we should have a new merit-based category of that size.

Thanks to the four-year border crisis that added more than 8 million migrants outside the legal system, Americans are experiencing serious migration fatigue. Replacing chain migration with a modern system balancing family admissions with more skilled immigrants will restore public support for our cherished tradition of generous immigration and better serve our national interest.

Chain migration fuels a bloated and obsolete immigration system
By Jessica M. Vaughan on May 8, 2025
https://cis.org/sites/default/files/2017-09/vaughan-chain-migration_1.pdf
=====

The Assimilation Act of 2026 is possibly the most important piece of legislation proposed by the Sharia Free America Caucus. If passed the flow of Muslim immigrants will virtually stop and will help nudge the American Muslim community to finally assimilate to American culture.

Final thoughts

At the end of the day I’m just an old Perennial Hippie. I just want every human to enjoy their inalienable rights, to get along, to enjoy a dignified life, and to thrive. I spent 5 years of my life protesting and organizing against the Viet Nam War. I was against the invasion of Iraq, Libya etc. Sometimes you get to choose your wars. But sometimes wars choose you. And I think that is the case with Iran. How many decades do we listen to these nut bag Iranian Mullah’s chant “Death to America” before we take them at their word.

And I have also posted numerous videos -- from the US, Great Britain and other First World Nations -- with Muslims openly stating that Islam will Dominate or “Islam will enter every house.” It seems the mask has come off since 10/07/2023. Before that such admonitions were quite rare. Now they have become too common. Again, how much of this crap should we listen to before we take them at their word. The time to destroy Political Islam is upon us. Their ideology must be exposed. Their push for an Islamic Caliphate, under Sharia Law, must be defeated.

Personally I think the 2 gravest threats to humanity are 1) the censorship of free speech and 2) Muslim immigration into 1st World Countries. If both are not addressed kiss you freedoms goodbye.

Response to:

The Bourgeoisie Has Switched Sides
What happens when elites all believe the same thing.
Yascha Mounk Mar 11, 2026

Yascha Mounk

The Bourgeoisie Has Switched Sides

About a year ago, Bernard Schweizer and John Tomasi asked me to contribute to a new book about viewpoint diversity. As regular readers of this Substack know, I have long worried about the narrowing of opinion in many professional circles, and am a big advocate of reanimating real debate, especially within elite circles. But it occurred to me that I had …

Read more

3 months ago · 88 likes · 12 comments · Yascha Mounk

I don’t think your observation really gets to the crux of the problem. You say:

The bourgeoisie has switched sides.

Since the Rockefellers bought out the newspapers (c. 1920) to control the opinions of the masses to the Big Tech Platforms, that serve the same function, the trend has been the same. Perhaps Noam Chomsky said it best:

“The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum”.
Noam Chomsky

The Big Tech platforms have taken it even further by giving more reach to globalist points of view -- Open Borders, Forced Vaccinations, LGBTQ curriculums, Fake Climate Change -- while shadow banning Anti-Globalist points of view. Even Musk is part of the problem when he says on our platform (X) you have freedom of speech but not freedom of reach. What good is freedom of speech if you are unknowingly shadow banned and no one is actually seeing your posts?

The irony in all of this is us Anti-Globalist truthtellers have been right about everything.

• The mRNA injections did not prevent infection or transmission.

• The masks were useless.

• The Plandemic was a global military operation.

• The Great Replacement is real.

• Still we are the ones getting censored till this very day. It is insane what we have allowed.

The core of the problem is this false dichotomy that asserts that Republicans hold Conservative views while the Democrats hold Liberal views

The core of the problem is this false dichotomy that asserts that Republicans hold conservative views while Democrats hold Liberal views. What does that even mean any more? The actual dichotomy, they don’t want you to understand is that most of our Democrat and Republican representatives support globalist policies. The Democrats are the worst but the Republicans are not much better.

The more useful dichotomy is to view contemporary issues as disagreements between Globalists and Anti-Globalists

The more useful dichotomy is to view contemporary issues as disagreements between Globalists and Anti-Globalists. They don’t want people to understand that fact because it puts everything into perfect perspective. And that could be very destabilizing to our elites as it would shine a light on the real problem: globalist policies are antithetical to the interests of the average American worker.

This Conservative/Liberal Dichotomy is as outdated as when we believed the Earth was flat. Thanks to Copernicus and Galileo we now understand we live in a Heliocentric Solar System where the Earth circles the Sun. The Heliocentric Universe prevails because it simply makes more sense. The same can be said of a Globalist/Anti-globalist view of the world. It better explains what is really happening in our world today.

Let me give an example with Republican Thune. He refuses to do what is required to pass the SAVE Act: something over 80% of the American People support. With the proper form of filibuster this could pass and save the Republicans from defeat by requiring Voter ID. Thune is not acting as a Republican he is acting as a globalist. He is fighting against something 80% of the voters demand.

=====
CNN REALITY CHECK: Voter ID Laws Are ‘Not Controversial’ (03/10/2026)

=====

He is also carrying water for the Globalist Democrats that will push their globalist policies should they get majorities in both houses come November 2026. Should that happen:

• Trump will be impeached . . . again.

• The Borders will be reopened.

• And the Great Replacement -- Illegal Aliens over Indigenous American Workers -- will continue unabated.

• And then these Illegals will be allowed to vote which would be “game over” for the American People.

Let me give you another example. In December 2025 I began a series of essays on The Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification. The entire series is about 460 pages in length. So in January 2026 Facebook permanently suspended me from their platform without any form of due process. I have been sharing my essays for over 20 years on that platform. Who demanded my permanent removal from the platform: CAIR, MSM, some other Pro Muslim group? I’ve been writing very controversial essays for decades and the worst I’ve been punished, up till now, was perhaps a 10 day suspension.

In the following weeks I have also been accused of Hate Speech by LinkedIn and even Twitter (X). My first “hate speech” warning from Twitter happened just today. Musk is also a Globalist. His support of real free speech is a manufactured illusion.

I have been writing regularly for 36 years now. NEVER have I seen such obvious suppression of Free Speech. Ironically when I used Twitter’s AI Agent, to figure out how to appeal this it said my post did not constitute hate speech:

Your content appears to be commentary on public events + policy advocacy (ending certain accommodations, suspending specific immigration categories), not targeted abuse of people based on religion/ethnicity.

Despite my efforts I could never figure out how to appeal their judgement. So apparently X is not much better than Fascist Book when it comes to censorship. I’m also pretty sure my reach is being compromised by Shadow Banning on X. I posted the link 100 times that day and only got 5 more reads from that waste of energy.

So I will tell you the real reason that I was banned from Fascist Book: The Globalists (the UN, WEF, WHO) have been pushing for mass migration, into First World Countries, for decades. The globalists don’t like their Hijra Migration Strategy challenged. And the Big Tech Social Media platforms are more than willing to do their dirty work.

So why do the globalists push this Hijra Migration Strategy? This has been done to destabilize 1st World Nations in order to make the people accept their solution: more censorship and eventually a cashless society where we loose all of our freedoms. The problem is the world is waking up to the threat of Political Islam. Paris, London, Rome . . . have all been turned into Muslim ghettos and the people are finally standing up and demanding Mass Deportations. So in essence our Elites are leveraging censorship to shut us all up. In Great Britain Lowe, a hard liner on immigration, is eclipsing Farage who is being seen as increasingly useless. Meanwhile Starmer is letting Pakistani rapist out of prison and replacing them with UK citizens that are saying “hurty words.” Free Speech in Great Britain has evaporated.

Is this not Orwellian? Frankly, as much as I detest violence, I am surprised no one has taken traitor Starmer to task. Interpret that as you like. But at some point the people of Great Britain have every right rise up in anger. And we are actually way past that point. Agree? Starmer is pushing the globalist agenda of open borders as hundreds of fighting age Muslims arrive in boats every single day.

The bourgeoisie have not really switched sides. The bourgeoisie have merely put on a new costume. They have always supported globalist policies and they always will. What this is really about is maintaining their POWER AND CONTROL . . . over us.

Summary

In the sixth part of this series I looked at the Islamic radicalization of Dearborn, Michigan. I then summarized my findings:

When you have Dearborn Muslims publicly yelling “Death to America” you know we have a problem. When you have 3 Dearborn Muslim High School Students planning a terrorist slaughter of Gays in Ferndale and innocent people at Cedar Point you know we have a problem. When you have the Mayor of Dearborn calling a Non-Muslim resident a bigot — for merely stating the truth — you know we have a problem. And when we have Imams, the Mayor and the editor of the Arab News supporting the Iranian theocracy, Hezbollah and Hamas it is obvious: we have a serious problem that requires action.

The Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification Part 6
Ending Soft Sharia Laws in Dearborn Michigan and other US Cities

This is the seventh essay in the series: The Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification. I have written these essays because I have lived in Dearborn for 72 years and have witnessed the gradual radicalization of Dearborn’s Muslim community as well as the radicalization of Muslim groups throughout the planet. This radicalization exploded after the 10/07/2023 slaughter of Israeli’s by Hamas -- a member of the Muslim Brotherhood -- and the subsequent invasion of Gaza. Within a week of the Hamas slaughter they held a rally at the Dearborn Civic Center where 1200 Dearborn Muslims basically called for the genocide of Israel, chanting “From the River to the Sea, Palestine must be free.”

This series of essays is now well over 420 pages in length and is intended both to educate the public and to encourage them to demand De-Islamification in their nations and communities. Political Islam -- the push for a global Islamic Caliphate under Sharia Law -- is an existential threat to our inalienable rights throughout all First World Nations. It is antithetical to the US Constitution for many reasons including the fact that Non-Muslims and women are not treated equally, as Muslim men, under Islamic Sharia law. This form of Political Islam must be neutralized before this medieval barbaric death cult grows any larger.

To be clear De-Islamification is not intended to preclude Muslims from practicing their religion although countries, such as China, have done just that. But it is intended to strip away any “special privileges” currently and exclusively extended to the Muslim population. It is also intended to nudge the Muslim people to assimilate to First World Culture and to undergo the Enlightenment as Jews and Christians have already done hundreds of years ago. Perhaps that is why we talk about Judeo-Christian values and never Judeo-Christian-Islamic values. Basically Judeo-Christian values are wholly incompatible with Islamic values.

De-Islamification is also laser focused on eradicating all forms of Political Islam and criminalizing Jihadist groups, such as the Muslim Brotherhood, that are pushing for an Islamic Caliphate throughout the planet. As I have said many times Islam must be relegated to the status of a dead ghost on a bright sunny day. It should have absolutely no effect on the lives of Non-Muslims or what I call Enlightened Muslims, who no longer support the barbaric medieval practices of Sharia Law.

I have been writing as an Anti-Globalist for many decades. And the reason I have dedicated a whole series on “Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification” is because Mass Migration -- and particularly Muslim Immigration, into First World Nations -- is an integral part of the larger Globalist Agenda and an existential threat to First World Nations. Globalist organizations -- including the UN, the WEF and the WHO -- have been pushing this Hijra -- emigration of Muslims into Non-Muslim nations -- for decades in order to destabilize First World Nations. And sadly these globalists have been aided by the Democrat Party that continues to push for Open Border policies. We witnessed this during the Biden administration when he allowed 20-25 million Illegal Aliens to invade our country.

Because we have allowed our national leaders to push this Mass Muslim Immigration, into First World nations, we have now reached a critical point. Cities like London and Paris have become Muslim ghettos where the indigenous populations are feeling unsafe to enter. Muslim enclaves, like Epic City in Texas, are fast becoming parallel segregated Muslim societies unto themselves. Thankfully the world is waking up to the existential threat of Political Islam. In the following video British Politician Rupert Lowe is calling for mass deportation of Muslim immigrants currently residing in Great Britain. He is also challenging Nigel Farage’s feckless Reform UK party by establishing a new party: Restore Britain.

=====
Muslim MP’s Throw TANTRUM As British Politician Rupert Lowe Exposes Islams Takeover Live In Parliament! (02/22/2026)

Rupert Lowe DESTROYS British Politician Over The Facts on Muslim Migrants! (02/22/2026)

‘There is NO other way!’ - Rupert Lowe TAKES ON Reform UK with new political party (02/16/2026)

The Amelia Memes Are Getting OUT OF CONTROL: Take the Red Pill (01/29/2026)

=====

Phases of Muslim Immigration and Muslim Dominance

The pattern for Muslim immigration and domination has repeated for 1400 years. It proceeds in 3 phases. When they are a small minority population they are tolerant of their host population and claim they are oppressed by an Islamophobic majority.

When they become a large minority they become less tolerant of their host population and begin demanding what I’d call Soft Sharia: Halal foods and prayer rooms in public school etc. During this phase the masks slowly come off and they publicly reveal their hidden goal, Islamic domination. At the end of this essay I will post multiple videos of Muslims openly stating that they desperately want to replace secular constitutional republics with theocratic Muslim Caliphates.

Finally when they become a majority strict Sharia Law is implemented and they begin to subdue or outright murder and rape the Non-Muslim minority. We are seeing this unfold today in Nigeria where 200,000 Christians, and Moderate Muslims, have been murdered since 2010.

I think we are now in the 2nd phase of Islamic domination. And the good news is the entire global population is waking up to the threat that Political Islam represents. No one is any longer looking at Islam as “the religion of peace.” And many nations are now beginning to implement various forms of De-Islamification: banning the Burka, restricting where you can wear a hijab, getting rid of Muslim prayer rooms in the public schools etc. We also need to stop any further Muslim migration into our countries, as well as stopping any further chain migration. If we unite behind this Global De-Islamification agenda I am confident that we can eradicate Political Islam from the face of the planet. If we fail to unite, behind an agenda of Global De-Islamification, Muslim dominance will predictably grow and our inalienable rights will eventually be no more.

The phases of Islamification explained

Piers Morgan doesn’t see an issue with Islam in the UK. But Evolutionary Psychologist Gad Saad provides an historical education. We must actively oppose Political Islam.

Current planks of the Global De-Islamification Agenda

Thankfully true Sharia Law -- child marriages, slavery, apostacy laws, blasphemy laws -- has yet to gain a foothold in the United States. But Dearborn and other cities have instituted what I call “Soft Sharia” including Halal Foods in the Public Schools. All of these “special privileges” must be rescinded in order to nudge the Muslim communities to assimilate to Constitutional norms and American values. Any time there is a dispute between our Constitutional rights and Islamic practices the US Constitution must prevail.

=====
* No Burkas.

* No Halal Foods in the Public Schools.

* No Hijabs in the workplace, the public school system, universities and government buildings

* No Muslim foot baths or prayer rooms in the public schools or universities.

* No ballots in any language other than English.

* No loud disruptive Muslim “calls to prayer” blaring from the speakers of a Mosque some 5 times per day.

* Investigate and prosecute all forms of Muslim fraud (in Minnesota and elsewhere)

* Islamic groups that push Jihadist ideologies should be defunded (no 501c3 tax exempt statue), labeled terrorists and treated accordingly

* Exclusive Muslim enclaves, such as Epic City in Texas, must be entirely eradicated

* Muslim Immigration, including chain migration, into First World Nations must be immediately suspended

* Federal and State money for all Illegal Immigrants should be suspended including support for the children of Illegal Aliens

* All Mosques that preach Political Islam should be monitored and permanently closed

* All large public Muslim prayer demonstrations, such as the recent gatherings in New York City, should be seen as pushing Political Islam and should be shut down =====

Islamic groups that push Jihadist ideologies should be defunded (no 501c3 tax exempt statue), labeled terrorists and treated accordingly

I want to expand on this plank of the De-Islamification Agenda by focusing on what happened before the Dearborn City Council in September of 2025. In the meeting Dearborn resident Ted Barham spoke in opposition to putting up a commemorative street sign for Siblani, the editor of the Arab News. Ted thought this was inappropriate because Siblani had frequently voiced support for Iran, Hezbollah and Hamas -- all arguably Islamic Terrorist groups whose ultimate goal is the establishment of a Global Islamic Caliphate government by Islamic Sharia Law. I agree with Ted Barham 100% and want to explain why we should all be concerned that the City of Dearborn supported the commemorative street sign for Siblani. I provide a full transcript of what was said in the 6th part of this series.

Dearborn City Council Meeting originally aired live on September 9, 2025

In the 6th part of this series I identified News Editor Siblani, Mayor Hammoud and two Dearborn Imams that all support Muslim Terrorist groups: Iran, Hezbollah and Hamas. And there is no doubt that thousands of 55,000 Dearborn Muslim residents also support these groups.

* Mayor Abdullah Hammoud’s supports publisher Siblani as well as other Radical Muslim Clerics

* Siblani, publisher of the Arab American News, continues to support Iran, Hezbollah and Hamas

* Mohammad Elahi, imam of Dearborn Heights’ Islamic House of Wisdom, a cleric known for his close ties to the Iranian regime.

* Husham Al-Husainy, Iraqi-American Sheikh of the Karbalaa Islamic Education Center, who organized the Arbaeen Religious March, has a rather controversial history which included praising of Iran and then refusing to label Hezbollah as a terrorist organization.

In the 5th part of this series we looked at the goals of the Muslim Brotherhood

“The ultimate goal of the Muslim Brotherhood, as articulated by its founder Hassan al-Banna and subsequent leaders, is to create a global, unified Islamic state (caliphate) governed by Sharia law, where Islam is the supreme authority in all aspects of life.”

Iran, Hezbollah and Hamas all support a Global Muslim Caliphate under Islamic Sharia Law. They are also affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood. So when these members of the Dearborn community support these groups they are essentially supporting and encouraging the implementation of Sharia Law. How else can you explain their support for these groups?

They have got away with this because, up until now, most Non-Muslims are unaware of these connections. Muslim Caliphates were largely eradicated from Europe after the First World War in 1922. But in 1928 the Muslim Brotherhood was established in order to re-establish European Caliphates through what they call Hijra: basically Muslim emigration into First World Nations. And over the next 100 years millions of Unenlightened Muslims have emigrated into European Nations, the United States, Canada and Australia. And as I have pointed out they have absolutely no intention of assimilating. They are here to overthrow all First World Nations in order to establish Islamic Caliphates.

The First Hijra: 622 AD

The first Hijra occurred when Muhammed and his followers migrated from Mecca, where they were persecuted, to Medina. That occurred around 622 AD. In the following years Muhammed overthrew Medina and established the first Islamic Caliphate. And after Muhammed’s death the Muslim Ottoman Empire spread Islamic Caliphates throughout Europe.

=====
The Hijra was the migration of Prophet Muhammad and his followers from Mecca to Medina in 622 CE to escape intense persecution. This pivotal journey, marking year 1 of the Islamic calendar, enabled the establishment of the first sovereign Islamic state, transforming a persecuted community into an organized society based on Islamic principles.

Key Aspects of the Hijra

* Context: After 13 years of preaching in Mecca, Muslims faced severe persecution. Muhammad and his followers migrated (Hijra) to Yathrib, later renamed Medina, upon invitation.

* The Journey: Occurring in September 622 CE, the flight was a strategic move to secure safety, where Muhammad and his companion Abu Bakr escaped a plot to assassinate him in Mecca.

* Establishing Islam in Medina: Upon arrival, Muhammad built the first mosque and united the local tribes (Ansar) and the immigrants (Muhajirun).

* The Constitution of Medina: Muhammad drafted the Constitution of Medina, establishing a pact that defined the rights and responsibilities of the community as a unified, sovereign entity.

* Significance: The move is not just a historical event but is considered a triumph, transitioning Islam from a minority faith under threat to a dominant social and political force that spread across Arabia within ten years.

Google AI [hijra mecca to medina to install islam]
=====

So first lets look at all the Islamic Terrorist groups supported by the Muslim Brotherhood.

I found this graphic, above, in the following essay that documents the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood and its connection to virtually all Islamic Terrorist groups throughout the planet.

=====
Now when radical Islam stands as a serious threat for peace of the world, some politicians compare it to patriotic nationalist organisations due to their poor general knowledge, which is utterly malicious and unfortunate.

The Venomous Brotherhood
https://organiser.org/2018/09/10/121387/bharat/muslim-brotherhood/
=====

As you can see the Shia Hezbollah operates in Syria and Lebanon. Then we have Iran, also Shia. And finally we have the Sunni Hamas that operates in Palestine (e.g., the Gaza Strip). All of them support the Muslim Brotherhoods goal to create a global, unified Islamic state (caliphate) governed by Sharia law. And while Sunni’s and Shia’s have their differences they are united in wanting to establish a unified Global Islamic State.

So this brings up an important question. Should the Mayor, the Editor of the Arab News and the Imams, supporting these groups, be labeled as Islamic terrorists, trying to overthrow our Constitutional Republic? How about all the thousands of Dearborn Muslims that support the same goal? How about the millions of Muslims that have emigrated to Great Britain, the EU, Australia and Canada. Should they also be labeled as terrorists that are trying to overthrow First World Republics.

How about all the US-based groups with ties to the Muslim Brotherhood: Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), North American Islamic Trust (NAIT), Muslim Students Association (MSA), International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT) and other like minded groups. Should they also be labeled as terrorists that are trying to overthrow our Constitutional Republic?

=====
Several U.S.-based organizations have been identified by researchers and government documents as having historical or ideological ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, often emerging from efforts in the 1970s and 80s to establish American Muslim infrastructure. Key groups often cited include the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), and the North American Islamic Trust (NAIT).

Key Organizations Associated with the Network

Research indicates a network of organizations with interlocking boards and shared origins:

* Islamic Society of North America (ISNA): Described as a prominent organization in this network.

* Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR): Identified as an organization with roots in this movement. Note: Some state officials have designated CAIR as a foreign terrorist organization, which CAIR has contested.

* North American Islamic Trust (NAIT): Manages assets and finances for many Islamic centers.

* Muslim Students Association (MSA): Often cited as an early, foundational group for the network.

* International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT): An academic/research body often associated with this ideological sphere.

Context and Controversy

* Origin: The network began in the 1960s/70s with Muslim immigrants, including members fleeing persecution in the Middle East, seeking to establish community institutions.

* Allegations: Documents such as those in the 2008 Holy Land Foundation trial have been used by investigators to link some U.S.-based Islamic charities to financial support for Hamas, which shares ideological roots with the Brotherhood.

* Debate: Many of these organizations describe themselves as mainstream civil rights or advocacy groups. Critics argue the “Brotherhood-linked” label is overbroad, while proponents of the label cite efforts to influence U.S. policy and support designated groups.

Google AI [american groups associated with the Muslim Brotherhood]
=====

While it is highly unlikely that the mayor will ever be charged with treason it is important to expose his connections with the Muslim Brotherhood and their agenda to establish an Islamic Caliphate. And that is exactly what I have just done by connecting these dots above. The question for the mayor is how do you square this circle? How do you resolve two inherently incompatible things: insisting you are a moderate Muslim yet supporting Jihadi groups that seek to overthrow our Constitutional Republic.

In addition we must make sure there is no 501c3 tax exempt status for CAIR or other organizations supporting the goals of the Muslim Brotherhood. We should also stop the foreign funding of these groups by nations like Qatar, Turkey and Iran. Currently Qatar is pumping over a billion dollars per year into universities in order to gain influence for their Islamic Agenda. And then we have billionaires supporting the No Kings demonstrations and funding this Red/Green alliance between Socialists, Communists and Islamists.

New York City Mayor Mamdani lies to the people regarding the Hijra

The other day the Muslim Mayor Mamdani, of New York City, talked about the first Hijra as if it was some kumbaya moment in human history. In reality the Hijra represents the template for Muslim conquest, which employed the tactics of massacre, enslavement and sexual exploitation. And after Muhammed’s death the very same tactics were employed to enslave a large portion of Europe.

=====
“I think of the freedom from suffering that Buddhism teaches us is only possible if we remove the three poisons of desire, hatred and ignorance from our daily lives. We need not accept suffering as unchangeable. We need not treat hatred as the natural state. We have the power to set ourselves free. And I consider my own faith Islam a religion built upon a narrative of migration. The story of the hijra reminds us that prophet Muhammad wasallam was a stranger too who fled Mecca and was welcomed in Medina. Surah Nah 16:42 tells us as for those who immigrated in the cause of Allah after being persecuted we will surely bless them with a good home in this world or as the prophet Muhammad sallallahu alaihi wasallam said Islam began as something strange and will go back to being strange so glad tidings to the strangers if faith [applause] [applause] If faith offers us the moral compass to stand alongside the stranger, government can provide the resources. Let us create a new expectation of city hall where power is wielded to love, to embrace, and to protect. We will stand with the stranger today, tomorrow, and all the days that are still to come.”

At Annual Interfaith Breakfast, Mayor Mamdani Reaffirms City’s Sanctuary Status (02/06/2026)

=====

As Lou Dobb’s used to say “that is too cute by half.” Oh if we could only remove the three poisons of desire, hatred and ignorance from our daily lives. Let’s take those poisons one by one.

Desire: Muhammed married Aisha at the age of 6 and started having sex with her at the tender age of 9. He also married his son’s wife. He also desired slaves and concubines.

Hatred: The Koran is replete with verses calling upon Muslims to kill the Jews, the Christians and Non-Muslims is general.

Ignorance: Islam is the only religion that has not acknowledged or embraced the Enlightenment. There are many passages in the Bible talking about slaughtering Non-Christians. But I know of no Christians today that still believe it’s OK to slaughter Non-Christians. Yet for Political Islamists they still take the Koran literally. Look at the 30,000 Iranians that were recently slaughtered because they no longer want an Islamic Caliphate. Look at the 200,000 Christians and Moderate Muslims that have been summarily raped and murdered in Nigeria since 2010.

Yes Muhammed’s first hijra, emigration, occurred around 622 AD when he was kicked out of Mecca and fled to Medina where Mamdani says Muhammed was welcomed. Well how did that work out. Muhammed eventually conquered the people of Medina and set up the first Islamic Caliphate. He stole their land and belongings. He beheaded many of the men. And he relegated the women to the status of sex slaves.

=====
Few episodes in Islamic history illustrate the raw consolidation of power as clearly as the massacre of the Banu Qurayza in 627 CE. Modern portrayals — interfaith dialogues, Muslim apologetics, school textbooks — systematically sanitize this event. They frame Muhammad’s rise in Medina as a spiritual and principled mission, emphasizing mercy, tolerance, and moral authority. However, the primary sources tell an unflinching story of calculated terror: hundreds of men executed, women and children enslaved, property seized and redistributed, and sexual exploitation codified into law. These actions were deliberate, public, and framed as divinely sanctioned, establishing a template of coercion and conquest that would be repeated in subsequent campaigns. This essay provides an exhaustive account of the Banu Qurayza episode: its tribal, political, and military context; the massacre and enslavement itself; the codification of sexual exploitation; and the systematic rebuttal of Muslim apologetics. This is not a peripheral incident. It is central to understanding the mechanics of early Islamic power.

The Banu Qurayza Massacre (02/02/2026)
https://medium.com/@dismantlingislam/part-i-the-banu-qurayza-massacre-80aafd77ca3e
=====

I think Mamdani is knowingly blowing smoke up our ass. For instance does anyone still believe Islam is a “religion of peace?” It is true that Islam was first called the “religion of peace” as late as 1930, in the title of a book published in India by Ishtiaq Husain Qureshi. I suppose it was a great way to cover up the countless atrocities committed by Islam over the past 1400 years.

=====
One may well ask how “the religion of peace” became a brand of Islam, for the phrase cannot be found in the Qur’an, nor in the teachings of Muhammad. Islam was first called the “religion of peace” as late as 1930, in the title of a book published in India by Ishtiaq Husain Qureshi. The phrase was slow to take off, but by the 1970s it was appearing more and more frequently in the writings of Muslims for Western audiences. What does “religion of peace” actually mean? Words for “peace” in European languages imply the absence of war, and freedom from disturbance. It is no coincidence that the German words Friede (peace) and frei (free) sound similar, because they come from the same root. While there is a link in Arabic between salam, a word often translated “peace,” and Islam, the real connection is found in the idea of safety. The word Islam is based upon a military metaphor. Derived from aslama (surrender) its primary meaning is to make oneself safe (salama) through surrender. In its original meaning, a Muslim was someone who surrendered in warfare. Thus, Islam did not stand for the absence of war, but for one of its intended outcomes: surrender leading to the “safety” of captivity. It was Muhammad himself who said to his non-Muslim neighbors aslim taslam, “surrender (i.e. convert to Islam) and you will be safe.”

Is Islam a Religion of Peace? (12/16/2015)
https://www.meforum.org/islam-religion-of-peace#
=====

Will the Internet help or destroy Political Islam

Despite the growing censorship the Internet continues to allow viewpoints that run counter to Globalist Corporate Media (MSNOW, CNN, FOX News). And after the transition from slow phone connections to fast cable connections, around 2000, Google searches and viewing videos has become essentially instantaneous. Because of these advances nearly half of the human population now gets some of their news from the internet.

Of course the internet cuts both ways. On one hand the internet has allowed radical Islamic groups to organize. On the other hand the internet has allowed unfiltered access to varying opinions on Islam. Many Muslims are now able to evaluate Islam without regard to clerical opinions or apologetics from their Imams and Mosques. As a result record numbers of Muslim are leaving the faith, essentially becoming apostates. And I think that is welcomed news.

=====
Islam has long relied on a centralized framework of religious authority, oral transmission, and controlled access to sacred texts and scholarly interpretation. Historically, Muslim-majority societies maintained a tightly woven tapestry of tradition, with clerical gatekeeping acting as both a filter and a fortress. But then came the internet — a borderless, decentralized, and uncensorable force. In less than three decades, the digital revolution has done what centuries of colonialism, missionary efforts, and secular governance could not: fracture Islam from within.

This post investigates the multifaceted impact of the internet on Islam as a religious, ideological, and social system. We will examine how digital access to information, unfiltered discourse, and global connectivity have disrupted the clerical monopoly, exposed doctrinal contradictions, and triggered an unprecedented wave of questioning, dissent, and apostasy.

The Internet vs. Islam: How the Digital Age Is Eroding the Foundations of a Traditional Faith (01/17/2026)
https://medium.com/@unfilteredreasoning/the-internet-vs-islam-3cb4217938d8
=====

As the saying goes there are 3 things that cannot be hidden: the Sun, the Moon and the Truth. Frankly I have never bought into the idea that humans are becoming less religious. I think they are just getting beyond the antiquated literalist Abrahamic religions as more knowledge becomes available. The Golden Rule -- treat others as you would like to be treated yourself -- has been in existence well before the Abrahamic religions. And it remains a central tenant of all Judeo-Christian religious sects to this very day.

Sharia-Free America: Why Political Islam & Sharia Law Are Incompatible with the U.S. Constitution

Throughout this series of essays I have featured many experts that make clear Sharia Law is antithetical to the US Constitution and our Bill of Rights. On February 10, 2026, the House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution and Limited Government held a hearing on the subject. In the links below you can watch the entire 6 hour hearing and access each witnesses written testimony. If you don’t have the time at least watch the testimony of Robert Spencer who is an amazing expert when it comes to Political Islam.

=====
The House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution and Limited Government will hold a hearing on Tuesday, February 10, 2026, at 2:00 p.m. ET. The hearing, “Sharia-Free America: Why Political Islam & Sharia Law Are Incompatible with the U.S. Constitution,” will discuss efforts to establish alternative, Sharia law-based legal and civic institutions, how these alternative institutions are contrary to America’s founding principles, and how they may violate federal law and the Constitution. The hearing will also examine proposed legislative reforms that would protect all Americans from efforts to establish alternative, Sharia-based institutions.

Sharia-Free America: Why Political Islam & Sharia Law Are Incompatible with the U.S. Constitution (02/10/2026)
https://judiciary.house.gov/committee-activity/hearings/sharia-free-america-why-political-islam-sharia-law-are-incompatible-us
=====

=====
US House Judiciary Hearing Examines Sharia Law, Political Islam, & Constitutional Debate (02/11/2026)

=====

=====
Robert Spencer Testifies to Congress About Sharia

=====

The Barbaric History of Islam

The internet has allowed Non-Muslims to better understand the history and practices of Islam. For instance it is a historical fact that Muhammed married Aisha at the tender age of 6 and then started having intercourse, with her, at the tender age of 9. It mystifies me why this is not a problem for Muslims. Then more recently someone mentioned that Muhammed actually married his step son’s wife. I looked it up and that is true as well.

=====
Yes, Prophet Muhammad married Zaynab bint Jahsh, who was the former wife of his adopted son, Zayd ibn Harithah. This marriage took place after Zayd divorced her and was intended to break pre-Islamic customs that treated adopted sons exactly like biological sons, which would have forbidden such a Key details:

* Context: Zayd was a former slave freed by Muhammad and adopted, often referred to as “Zayd, son of Muhammad”.

* Quranic Justification: The marriage was confirmed following a Quranic revelation (Surah Al-Ahzab 33:37) to establish that believers could marry the divorced wives of their adopted sons.

* Social Change: The union was meant to abolish the social stigma surrounding marrying adopted family members’ ex-spouses.

It is important to distinguish that Zayd was an adopted son, not a biological one. Muhammad’s biological sons died in infancy.

Google AI [did muhammad marry his sons wife]
=====

How is it that a Warmongering Pedophile can be presented as a model for Islamic practice?

I want to share two additional experts on the history of Islam. In the video below historian Raymond Ibrahim traces the rapid Islamic expansion following Muhammad’s death in a 2 hour video. Here are the topics that are discussed:

00:00 – Introduction
01:37 – Who is Raymond Ibrahim?
02:21 – Personal Background: Egyptian Heritage and Academic Journey
05:00 – From Academia to Writing: A New Path
06:08 – Key Works: Sword and Scimitar and Christian Persecution
07:12 – The Impact of His Work and Public Controversy
10:00 – The Battle of Yarmouk: Turning Point in Islamic Expansion
12:10 – The Expansion of Islam: From Arabia to the Christian World
17:07 – The Battle of Tours: Stopping the Islamic Advance
20:00 – The Dark Ages: How Islam Shaped Europe’s Future
25:00 – Why Was the Muslim Conquest So Successful?
28:50 – The Reconquista: A Slow and Steady Christian Resistance
33:13 – Andalusia: Myths of Peaceful Coexistence
40:00 – The Seljuk Turks and Pre-Crusade Persecutions
44:10 – Pope Urban II and the Call for the First Crusade
50:00 – The Crusades: Misunderstood or Justified?
55:30 – The Battle of Manzikert and the Beginning of the Crusades
1:00:00 – Charlemagne and the Rise of Christian Defensiveness
1:05:00 – Early Relations Between Islam and the West
1:10:30 – The Persecution of Christians in the Middle East
1:15:00 – Crusades: Religious Wars or Defensive Actions?
1:20:00 – The Myths of Islamic Golden Age Contributions
1:25:00 – Crusades and Their Aftermath: The Long-Lasting Impact
1:30:00 – The Religious and Ideological Roots of the Conflict
1:35:00 – Western Misunderstanding of Islamic History
1:40:00 – The Rise of Jihadism and Modern Conflicts
1:45:00 – The Importance of Historical Context in Modern Conflicts
1:50:00 – The Ongoing Persecution of Christians
1:55:00 – Reflections on Western Values and Islamic Influence
2:00:00 – Conclusion: Understanding the Past to Navigate the Future

=====
Historian and author Raymond Ibrahim joins The Winston Marshall Show for a powerful, eye-opening conversation on the hidden history of Islam’s conquest of the Christian world—and why so few dare to speak about it today. Raymond traces the rapid Islamic expansion following Muhammad’s death, showing how, within just one century, Muslim armies had violently overrun three-quarters of the original Christian world—from Syria and Egypt to Spain and deep into Europe. He dismantles the myth of Andalusian “tolerance,” reveals the brutal realities behind the so-called Islamic Golden Age, and explains how the Islamic conquests shattered the Mediterranean world, plunging Europe into the Dark Ages. Raymond explores the modern censorship around Christian persecution, the resurgence of historical jihadist rhetoric in groups like ISIS, and the urgent lessons today’s leaders refuse to learn. All this—the real story of the Crusades, the lost Christian heartlands, the enduring legacy of conquest, and the history the mainstream media won’t touch…

Islam Exposed: The History They Don’t Want You to Know

=====

The second expert on Islamic history, I want to introduce you to, is Professor Bill Warner. In the following 1 hour video he traces the expansion of Islam in 20 year increments through a series of battle maps.

=====
51% of Islamic doctrinal texts are about politics. The goal of these politics is the submission of all people to Mohammed and Allah. For over 1,400 years, submission to Mohammed and Allah changed many cultures to an Islamic one. Now, knowing the doctrine and tactics of Political Islam, we can help prevent its expansion with the intent of avoiding violence and human suffering.

Why are people afraid (A 1400 year secret about Political Islam) - Dr. Bill Warner (04/08/2015)

=====

He has also written dozens of essays on Islam that can be freely accessed in the link below:

=====
Bill Warner’s complete writing on Islam
https://archive.org/details/a-simple-quran-dr.-bill-warner/A%20Simple%20Quran%20%28Dr.%20Bill%20Warner%29.pdf
=====

Muslims now saying the quite part out loud: Our goal is a Global Islamic Caliphate under Sharia Law

For many decades Political Islamists have insisted that Islam is the religion of peace: something no one believes any longer. All you have to do is look at what is happening in Paris and London. Great Britain and France are on the very of civil war because of unabated Muslim immigration. Muslim have slaughtered and raped over 200,000 Christians in Nigeria since 2010.

Thanks to the MEMRI TV Monitor Project we can now hear what is being said in Mosques throughout the world. And it is frankly shocking to hear what they really think about us Non-Muslims.

=====
The MEMRI TV Monitor Project
https://www.memri.org/tv
=====

So in hopes of enlightening my readers I’m going to share some of the videos I’ve come across, on X, since I was permanently suspended from Facebook in January 2026 for writing this series of essays. The basic theme is Muslims publicly admitting that their ultimate goal is the establishment of a Global Islamic Caliphate under Sharia Law.

=====
Palestinian Islamic scholar in Chicago: “We didn’t come to coexist. We’re superior to all— no one surpasses us. Other religions can live with us only if they worship Allah.”

=====
They are not hiding their intentions.

=====
Just in New York City’s Times Square, Muslims praying in the street and chanting ‘Allahu Akbar,’ claiming they have taken over New York.

=====
Muslims gathered in Times Square on Friday and took it over for a mass prayer during Ramadan. A protest against it formed called ‘Times Square Dog Lovers Gathering.’ Muslims have mosques they can prey at but this isn’t about prayer, it’s about dominance.

=====
American journalist says she’s figured out why Governor Greg Abbott has allowed a Muslim takeover in Texas. Abbott’s top donor is from Pakistan, he’s donated:

- 2019–2020 election cycle: $1,617,500

- 2020 election: $5,599,500

- 2024 election: $6,120,268

- Current election cycle $2,897,086 (already the top donor in the current cycle)

His top donor is Syed Javaid Anwar and he is from Pakistan

=====
Islamists in Germany chant “We hate Germany,” and call to burn the country down. How does any country tolerate this?

=====
New York City has officially become a staging ground for terror sympathizers. Under the shadow of Hamas flags, radicals are now openly calling for mass murder on American streets, promising that their next move will be even louder than the October 7th massacre. This is no longer about free speech; it is a direct threat to national security. If the US government continues to ignore open incitement to violence within its own borders, it is effectively endorsing the chaos.

=====
Honest Imam shocked this woman to her core, when he told her that Muslims are going to enslave UK’s entire non-Muslim population under Islamic Sharia laws.

=====

Concluding remarks

Open Borders in general and Muslim immigration specifically have been a central part of the Globalist Agenda for decades. The ultimate goal is to create social division as they push us toward a cashless society where we become nothing more than slaves on a Globalist Plantation. At that point we will essentially have a Chinese Social Credit System where our movements and purchases will be monitored in real time. Our inalienable rights will be crushed.

One of my observations about the larger globalist agenda is that all of these globalist initiatives are being rolled out “globally and at the same time.” That is what has happened with Open Border Policies, 5G, Smart Meters, CBDC’s, Forced Vaccination Programs, the Plandemic and much more. And the only way this can be happening is if there is a powerful unelected group that is able to trump the sovereignty of cities, states and nations.

And the same pattern is playing as unenlightened Muslims, mostly men of fighting age, are pushed into First World Nations: Great Britain, the EU, Australia, Canada etc. This Hijra/Migration is being pushed by many world leaders in spite of the fact that majorities, in all of these countries, favor mass deportations of violent Muslim immigrants and those that refuse to assimilate. It is being financed by Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey and other Muslim nations that have consistently refused to take in any Muslim migrants. Muslim immigration has also been pushed by the UN for many decades. It is also being pushed by woke political parties as they embrace this Red/Green alliance between Socialists, Communists and Islamists. It is being pushed by billionaires that are financing resisting ICE arrests and Anti-Trump “No Kings” rallies.

The Democrat Party is also complicit as they put all of their political chips on immigration, hoping that they could shift the Census -- from which the Electoral College votes are distributed to Democrat states. And that is why the Census must distinguish between Legal and Illegal Citizens. Illegal Immigrants should not shift electoral votes to Democrat states. Already some states and cities allow Illegal Aliens to vote in local elections which is also patently wrong. They also don’t want to pass the SAVE ACT which would require ID verification to votes: something that is supported by over 80% of the American People. I’ve long been suspicious about Illegal Aliens voting in our elections given states like California that don’t require ANY verification to vote. The Democrats insist that few Illegal Aliens are voting. As an analyst let me just say you can’t find fraud unless you look for it. By requiring ID to vote, going exclusively to paper ballots and eliminating Illegal Aliens from the voter rolls we could easily insure the validity our future elections. That fact that Democrats are so opposed to this tells you everything you need to know.

You saw this during Trumps State of the Union Address last night when he asked “If you agree with this statement, then stand up and show your support. The first duty of the American government is to protect American citizens, not illegal aliens,” said Trump during his State of the Union speech.” As you can see in the video no Democrats stood up.

=====
Democratic lawmakers refuse to stand against illegal immigrants (02/24/2026)

=====
Ilhan Omar & Husband BUSTED as Feds Probe $30 MILLION NET WORTH (02/25/2026)

=====

Political Islam remains one of the greatest threats to First World Nations. In this series of essays I have tried to curate the best resources so that my readers can better understand the dangers of Political Islam as well as the barbaric medieval history of Islamic expansion over the past 1400 years. I have also described a initial De-Islamification Agenda to pressure all Muslim to assimilate to our Western Culture and our Constitutional Republic. Many of the planks, of this agenda, are already being adopted. I can only hope they are universally adopted and Political Islam is tossed into the dust bin of terrible antiquated ideas. I am but one person. To prevail all of us is all we need.

Summary
Amelia: Great Britain’s New AI Generated Anti-Immigrant Hero

As I’ve been writing Great Britain is on the verge of civil war because Starmer refuses to stop the Muslim boat invasion while housing these largely male invaders at the expense of British tax payers. This has been further exacerbated by these Muslim invaders molesting, raping and following young British women around and harassing them. But instead of bending to the will of the electorate Starmer has chosen to ignore their concerns while literally imprisoning those that criticize his immigration policy on social media.

So then around January 9th, 2026 Amelia, Great Britain’s AI Generated Anti-Immigrant Hero began to appear. In the span of weeks the daily posting have gone from a few dozen a day to millions per day. So far Starmer has taken no action. But while he can’t jail a “artificial” character he could still jail those that distribute it. But if he does that it may be the last straw. Great Britain is already on the very of civil war. I’m basically a pacifist but I am actually surprised that no one has physically attacked him for his treasonous disregard for the British people.

The irony of all this is Amelia began life in a counter-extremism video game funded by the UK Home Office and created to deter young people aged 13-18 from being attracted to far right extremism in Yorkshire. The game was called Pathways and you can actually play this ridiculous game by clicking on the following link:

Pathways: Navigating Gaming, the Internet and Extremism
https://www.shoutoutuk.org/pathways/

The following video is a hilarious AI satire on Pathways discussing how housing prices etc. will decline once all the Illegal Aliens are sent back home. It mimics the Pathways game perfectly. But wisely sends the opposite message: stand up for your British culture and deport those that won’t assimilate. Bravo!

=====

“Despite the government’s attempts at controlling Charlie, he kept using his human right to free speech and stood up for what he believed in. This was illegal. Although the police successfully arrested many natives for sharing memes on Twitter, there wasn’t enough persecution. And so Charlie and his friend Amelia were able to speak. This was a major attack on democracy which unfortunately led to the election of leaders who wanted to protect the indigenous and their culture. As a result of Charlie’s actions, all the immigrants went home and because of this there was much less demand for housing which naturally caused house prices to plummet. This unfortunately meant Charlie could afford to buy a house for himself. A house that could have gone to 10 Somali men. Not only that, but with the huge amounts of migrants gone home, there was much less competition in the jobs market, meaning Charlie and all his friends found jobs. Jobs that could have gone to migrants. Eventually, Charlie went on to marry Amelia. They had four children, all of which had white skin. This was clearly racist. Despite all this, Charlie was somehow happy. But at what cost? Millions of foreigners who came to the UK for free housing and social welfare now had to return home and work for a living. Crime rates mysteriously plummeted, which meant the prisons were virtually empty. This saved hundreds of millions of pounds. Money that could have gone to providing migrant grooming gangs with food and shelter during their stay in prison. And it was all thanks to this right bunch of Charlie’s. Or should I say farr right bunch of Charlie’s.”

Oi Mate, New AMELIA Just Dropped (01/22/2026)

=====

The following Guardian article provides more background on how Amelia evolved to what she is today: Great Britain’s New AI Generated Anti-Immigrant Hero.

=====
In certain corners of the internet, on niche news feeds and algorithms, an AI-generated British schoolgirl has emerged as something of a phenomenon.

Her name is Amelia, a purple-haired “goth girl” who proudly carries a mini union flag and appears to have a penchant for racism.

If you are unfamiliar with Amelia, the chances are you will soon encounter one viral meme or another inspired by her on Facebook or X, where her reputation is growing.

Videos of Amelia typically feature her walking through London, or the House of Commons, declaring her love for England and warning of the dangers of “militant Muslims” or “third-world migrants”. In one clip she is harangued by bearded man in Islamic attire for eating a pork sausage.

The message is one well rehearsed on far-right social media, but it is the AI invention of Amelia that has made her endlessly adaptable, creating a viral internet trend that anyone with access to a mainstream chatbot can take part in. Users of X have turned to its Grok AI tool to create so many Amelia memes, she is now breaking out of niche online silos.

The origins of the character are ironic, to say they least. An early iteration of Amelia began life in a counter-extremism video game funded by the UK Home Office and created to deter young people aged 13-18 from being attracted to far right extremism in Yorkshire.

Pathways: Navigating the Internet and Extremism is a simple multiple choice format game with basic animation. Its players are taken on a journey as characters at a college. They are invited to make decisions in scenarios including whether or download potentially extremist content or join an Amelia character on a rally organised by “a small political group” protesting against changes in society and the “erosion in British values”.

Certain scenarios simulated in the game result in a referral under the British government’s Prevent counter-terrorism programme.

However, it is a subversion of the Amelia character that has exploded across social media channels in a way that has astonished even the creators of the original game.

Among the plethora of increasingly sophisticated AI-generated iterations are a Manga-style Amelia, a Wallace and Gromit version and AI-generated “real life” encounters between her and the characters of Father Ted or Harry Potter, accompanied by racist language and far-right messaging.

Analysis provided to the Guardian by Peryton Intelligence, a UK company that monitors disinformation, indicated that an anonymous account known for skilfully disseminating far-right messaging started the Amelia meme on X on 9 January with a post that has since been viewed 1.4m times.

The volume of “Ameliaposting” has since gone from an average of 500 a day when that account first introduced it to the world to roughly 10,000, starting on 15 January as it hit international audiences. On Wednesday, it hit 11,137 posts on X alone.

In one of the most surreal twists, an Amelia cryptocurrency has emerged, with social media users seeking to leverage its value on the meme’s rising profile. On Wednesday, Elon Musk retweeted an X account promoting an Amelia cryptocurrency token.

“What we’re seeing is the monetisation of hate,” said Matteo Bergamini, the founder and CEO of Shout Out UK, a political and media literacy training company that created the original game.

“We’ve seen Telegram groups all messaging each other in Chinese about the meme coin and talking about how to artificially inflate its value, so a lot of money is being made.”

The company itself has been the target of a deluge of hate mail, including threats that have now been reported to the police.

Bergamini points out that the original initiative was never meant to be a stand-alone game. Rather, it was intended to be used in the classrooms alongside a suite of teaching resources, a fact he says coverage and commentary has ignored.

“There has been a lot of misrepresentation unfortunately,” he said. “The game does not state, for example, that questioning mass migration is inherently wrong.”

Others have suggested the initiative had backfired, not least by casting a “cute goth girl” as a negative character, leading to her inadvertently becoming a focus of admiration. But Bergamini said the game – which used feedback from focus groups with young people and was developed with a specific local threat picture in mind – continued to be used and feedback from schools and others was positive.

Nevertheless, the speed and sophistication surrounding the creation of supposedly subversive Amelia memes online has taken him by surprise.

“This experience has shown us why this work is so immensely important, but also gives us pause for thought about our safety in conducting this work due to the highly sophisticated coordination of those who profit from hate,” he said.

Siddharth Venkataramakrishnan, an analyst at the Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD), said: “We have seen the meme having a remarkable spread and proliferating among the far right and beyond, but what’s also been of note is how it is now international.

“In a way it gets to the heart of what we might term the ‘dissident’ far-right – individuals who position themselves outside of the mainstream political scene – whether that’s ‘shitposters’ who are just into provoking, others who are in twee memes. A whole ecosystem has embraced it. Clearly, the sexualised imagery is also key to this. The target audience is almost exclusively young men.”

The Home Office said Prevent had diverted nearly 6,000 people away from violent ideologies. It added that projects such as the Pathways game were designed to target local radicalisation risks and were created and delivered independently of government.

Meet ‘Amelia’: the AI-generated British schoolgirl who is a far-right social media star (01/25/2026)

The avatar, created to deter young people from extremism, has been subverted and is breaking out of niche online silos

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/jan/25/ai-generated-british-schoolgirl-becomes-far-right-social-media-meme
=====

Well this may be my shortest essay ever. I may update it later but her are some sample Amelia videos. Enjoy and let me know what you think in the comments. For the time being reading and commenting is open to everyone. And I hope I can continue this practice.

The Lefties vs The Right Amelia | Gothic Pop Protest Song | Britain 2026 We Stand with Crowborough (01/26/2026)

Sun All Year Round – Remigration Farewell (Amelia Meme Song)(01/22/2026)

AMELIA COMPILATION 2026 | Purple Haired British Patriot 🇬🇧 | Viral UK Meme (01/30/2026)

Sun All Year Round – Remigration Farewell (Amelia Meme Song) (01/22/206)

Amelia’s Charter Pathways UK Parody (02/03/2026)

Amelia, One Meme To Rule Them All (01/30/2026)

And here are a few videos giving more commentary on Amelia:

======
The character of Amelia has been making her rounds on social media these last few weeks, and now the UK government’s propaganda arm, The Guardian, is freaking out over her mainstream appeal. Amelia appears in the game Pathways, which is nothing more than propaganda warning people not to be patriotic, question the government, or think for yourself. Amelia was a standout character because her views are very sensible to anyone besides far-left extremists that hate their country, but the game tries to present her as bad. Now that the character has grown in popularity thanks to her iconic look, the authoritarians within the British government are freaking out because Amelia is starting to get mainstream appeal.

British Propagandists Smears Amelia as Far-Right | Authoritarians are Panicking (01/26/2026)

======

======
In this video, I break down the story behind Amelia — the AI-generated character created as part of the UK Government’s Prevent anti-extremism strategy — and why the internet reacted in a way nobody expected. What was designed to counter radicalization has instead become a viral cultural moment, raising serious questions about how governments try to shape narratives in the digital age.

The Internet Destroyed The UK’s Anti-Extremism Plan - Amelia! (02/03/2026)

======

=====
The UK Government created a monster and the internet has ZERO chill. In this video I react to the latest Amelia memes and viral clips blowing up everywhere. What was supposed to be government propaganda turned into the biggest accidental meme icon of the year, and now people are remixing her into edits, jokes, and absolute chaos. Let’s break down why Amelia hit such a nerve, how fast this trend is spreading, and why the UK messaging totally backfired.

BAN HER! The UK Government HATES Amelia! (01/21/2026)

=====

Recent attempts to deplatform me on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram for publishing my 6 Part, 420 page series: The Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification

I just completed my 6th essay in the series: The Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification. I started the series in December 2025 and at this point it spans about 420 pages. Apparently the series upset “someone” as on January 6th, 2026 Facebook permanently suspended me after 20 years. Acting as “judge, jury and executioner” they accused me of hate speech. When I appealed the suspension they didn’t even identify what content or link led to the accusation. And with no opportunity to challenge my accuser, or the “hateful” content I was accused of posting, they shut down my entire account. It is very Orwellian and should be concerning, even for those that disagree with my viewpoint. We are supposed to have Freedom of Speech in this country which requires an unfettered free market of ideas. It is only cowards and tyrants that are opposed to open debate. And those that censor free speech are never the good guys.

To be clear there is nothing hateful about this series of essays: The Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification. I’ve lived in Dearborn for 71 years and I do love my Muslim neighbors. I’ve made that clear in every one of these essays. All I’m really saying, in these essays, is that we need to stop giving “special privileges to Muslims and Muslim organizations and that we need to encourage them to assimilate to our culture.

Bruce’s Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Of course Facebook is really a Globalist Gatekeeper censoring anything that threatens the globalist agenda. And let’s face it Mass Migration -- both Muslim and Non-Muslim -- is an essential part of the globalist agenda to destroy the United States and other First World Nations. The multifaceted role of Mass Immigration is to 1) create social division by bringing in millions of Illegal Aliens that have no intention of assimilating, 2) placing them on social welfare programs that bleed the host country dry financially and 3) softening up the public to accept their ultimate goal: Digital ID and a Cashless Society where we all become nothing more than Slaves on a Globalist Plantation.

Then just today LinkedIn also accused me of hate speech for my series: The Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification. So far they just deleted my post but did not close down my account. But it is quite likely they will no longer allow me to post links to this series of essays.

And then, just a moment a moment ago, I got a message from Instagram:

=====
You submitted an appeal on February 3, 2026. It usually takes about an hour to review your information. Check back here. Your account is not visible to people on Instagram and you cannot use it.

What happens next?

We’ll take another look at your account.

If we find you account does follow our Community Standards you’ll be able to use Instagram again.

If we find you account doesn’t follow our Community Standards it will be permanently disabled and you won’t be able to appeal again.
=====

It isn’t just me being affected by this censorship. There are thousands being treated the same way and the common denominator is Anti-Globalist Speech. And it appears that anything that challenges Open Borders or Muslim immigration is now being labeled as “hate speech” across all social media platforms, with the exception of Musk’s X platform.

For over 20 years I have been posting on Facebook and other social media platforms. And since I began writing on Substack, in 2021, I have posted my essays on a daily basis to Instagram, Facebook, X and LinkedIn. And during that time I have got my share of 3-day suspensions etc. But to be threatened with a permanent suspension from 3 social platforms within a month? The only thing I can conclude from this is that we now have a central censor, across multiple social media platforms, that is now attempting to silence Anti-Globalist viewpoints by permanently suspending the “offenders.” This is both scary and unprecedented. If this is allowed to continue we have essentially allowed Big Tech to shred our freedom of speech, effectively shredding our First Amendment rights. To be clear these platforms are not really pushing “community standards” but rather “globalist censorship.” This really must stop immediately.

So I really desperately need your help and there are a number of things you can do. If you are able to afford a paid subscription please consider doing it. You can also help by purchasing my complete writings which span 36 years. They are many thousands of pages in length which is why they can only be distributed on a 4 GB thumb drive. Click the button below for more information on ordering.

The Complete Writings of Bruce W. Cain

And if you can’t afford a paid subscription you can also help by distributing the links, to my writings, on your social media platforms: Facebook, X, Twitter, LinkedIn etc.

You can simply copy/paste the link. But it is far better if you copy/paste both the Title and link by first copying both to Notepad. That is because if you just copy/paste the link the title of the essay may not display. Here is an example of what you should cut/paste:

The Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification Part 6
Ending Soft Sharia Laws in Dearborn Michigan and other US Cities
https: //brucecain.substack. com/p/the-urgent-need-for-global-de-islamification-e06

Without your help I might as well stop writing.

At any rate I’ve put a lot of work into this series so please read, share and comment. I love to hear feedback from my readers. You will find all of my Substack essays at the following link including this series:

https://brucecain.substack.com/archive

And here is the latest in the series, just posted yesterday

=====
Please read and share widely. When you have Dearborn Muslims publicly yelling “Death to America” you know we have a problem. When you have 3 Dearborn Muslim High School Students planning a terrorist slaughter of Gays in Ferndale and innocent people at Cedar Point you know we have a problem. When you have the Mayor of Dearborn calling a Non-Muslim resident a bigot — for merely stating the truth — you know we have a problem. And when we have Imams supporting the Iranian theocracy, Hezbollah and Hamas it is obvious: we have a serious problem that requires action.

The Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification Part 6
Ending Soft Sharia Laws in Dearborn Michigan and other US Cities

=====

A summary of the “Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification” series so far

To be clear De-Islamification is not intended to preclude Muslims from practicing their religion although countries, such as China, have done just that. But it is intended to strip away any “special privileges” currently and exclusively extended to the Muslim population. It is also intended to nudge the Muslim people to assimilate to First World Culture and to undergo the Enlightenment as Jews and Christians have already done hundreds of years ago. Perhaps that is why we talk about Judeo-Christian values and never Judeo-Christian-Islamic values.

De-Islamification is also laser focused on eradicating all forms of Political Islam and criminalizing Jihadist groups, such as the Muslim Brotherhood, that are pushing for an Islamic Caliphate throughout the planet. As I have said many times Islam must be relegated to the status of a dead ghost on a bright sunny day. It should have absolutely no effect on the lives of Non-Muslims or what I call Enlightened Muslims.

I have been writing as an Anti-Globalist for many decades. And the reason I have dedicated a whole series on “Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification” is because Mass Migration and particularly Muslim Immigration, into First World Nations, is an integral part of the larger Globalist Agenda

This is the 6th essay in this series. I have been writing against the Globalist Agenda for literally decades. Their endgame is to implement Digital ID and a Cashless Society in order to enslave humanity into what I call a Global Slave Plantation. At that point we will all essentially become slaves. Don’t want to get that next forced vaccination? Then Big Brother simply cuts off your access to your digital wallet. Kiss your inalienable rights goodbye. And sadly President Trump is pushing us toward this endgame through Stablecoin. Digital ID, Tokenization of assets and building the infrastructure for a cashless society.

One of my primary observations about the Globalist Agenda is that it is being “rolled out globally and at the same time” which makes clear there must be a central authority orchestrating this. And this globalist central authority has been able to subvert the sovereignty of nations, states and cities in order to meet it’s objectives. We saw that with the global rollout of Smart Meters (2009), 5G (2019) and the Plandemic (2020-2023).

Mass Migration, into First World nations, also plays an important roll in the Globalist Agenda. It is being used to destabilize First World Nations in order push the masses to accept their solution: total central control through Digital ID’s, a cashless society and the management of every human through constant surveillance by AI Agents. As I wrote in the first essay in this series:

=====
I think there are two main components to this Globalist Mass Immigration strategy: “Divide and Conquer” and the Hegelian Dialectic. So one component is the “Divide and Conquer” strategy where culturally incompatible foreigners are brought in to cause social division among the indigenous populations. This keeps the indigenous populations distracted from the real enemy: the globalists.

The other related component is the Hegelian Dialectic: Problem, Reaction, Solution.

* The problem is introduced by pushing Mass Immigration.

* The reaction is increasing social tension, now leading the UK and EU nations toward civil war.

* And the solution is mandatory digital ID, digital currency and eventually a cashless society where populations can be completely controlled.

At that point we become nothing more than slaves on a globalist plantation as failure to comply will result in the suspension of access to your digital wallet. And all of this is now happening throughout Great Britain, the EU and other First World Nations in real time.
=====

My first 71 years living in the Dearborn area

Now I have lived most of my 71 years in the area of Dearborn and Dearborn Heights, which both have some of the largest per capita Muslim populations in the US. During the Anti-War movement (1971-1972) I organized protests against the Viet Nam War by uniting all of the Dearborn High Schools: Dearborn, Edsel Ford and Fordson High. At that time Fordson had a Muslim population of nearly 50 percent. Today it is probably closer to 90% Muslim. But back then most of us identified as Hippies and we were united against the Viet Nam War. As I recall this motley group of Muslims and Non-Muslims smoked a lot of weed together but never discussed religion. And let us not forget the impact of the Beatles — and their “all you need is love” message during the Hippie Era (1965-1975). It was obviously simplistic but also quite admirable. Unless you lived through this era it is hard to convey the effects the Beatles had on culture worldwide. In a strange sense the Beatles “All you need is love” mantra became the world religion for nearly 10 years. I miss those days.

Another popular song, during the Hippie Era was “Everyday People” by Sly and the Family Stone. I think it perfectly illustrated the push for peaceful coexistence and unity between different groups of people. To put our differences aside. To build one what unites all of humanity. Of course there were literally hundreds of songs during this era pushing a similar message.

=====
Sometimes I’m right and I can be wrong
My own beliefs are in my song
The butcher, a banker, the drummer and then
Makes no difference what group I’m in
I am everyday people, yeah, yeah
There is a blue one who can’t accept the green one
For living with a fat one, trying to be a skinny one
And different strokes for different folks
And so on and so on and Scooby-Dooby-Doo
we got to live together
I am no better and neither are you
We are the same whatever we do
You love me, you hate me, you know me and then
You can’t figure out the bag I’m in
I am everyday people, yeah, yeah
There is a long hair that doesn’t like the short hair
For bein’ such a rich one, that will not help the poor one
And different strokes for different folks
And so on and so on and Scooby-Dooby-Doo
we got to live together
There is a yellow one that won’t accept the black one
That won’t accept the red one, that won’t accept the white one
And different strokes for different folks
And so on and so on and Scooby-Dooby-Doo
I am everyday people

Everyday People - Sly & The Family Stone {Stereo} 1968

=====

During the following decades the Muslim populations of Dearborn, Dearborn Heights and Hamtramck have continued to grow and we now have Muslim mayors in all three cities. Most of my neighbors are now Muslim and we all continue to get along. Part of this growth is due to higher birthrates among our Muslim population and some of it is due to changes in immigration policy which began in 1965. Up until now I would be the first to say that those calling Dearborn the “Sharia Capitol of America” are grossly exaggerating.

But over the last decade there have been a number of things that are beginning to concern me. Around 2001 Dearborn became the first city, in the United States, to exclusively introduce Halal foods -- Muslim blessed foods -- into the public schools. Dearborn followed in 2015. Up until then no school in American allowed “religiously blessed foods” in the public schools. I recall going before the school board to voice my opposition as religiously blessed foods constitute a violation of the “separation between church and state” clause of the First Amendment. That was around 2015. I asked those at the School Board Meeting, “How would you feel if instead of Muslim Halal foods you were forced to eat Jewish Kosher meats?” After all they were forcing non-Muslim students to eat Halal foods as well because there was no Non-Halal choice any longer. There was really no point in pursuing this as President Obama had recently changed Title VI to allow it. But it was also clear that most of those in attendance, mostly Muslim residents, didn’t really care about the First Amendment much less the “Separation between Church and State” clause. And that was a bit troubling because, after all, they are now Americans and should be embracing our Constitution and our social mores (morays). Instead they have put their religious ideology above the US Constitution and American mores.

Sadly many other troubling events have occurred since 2015. And while Dearborn may not be the “Sharia Capitol of America” it is now pushing what I would call “Soft Sharia” laws.

So here is a short list of De-Islamification measures that I feel need to be instituted in Dearborn and throughout the planet. Currently the city of Dearborn allows all of these unconstitutional practices.

Current planks of the Global De-Islamification Agenda

=====
* No Burkas.
* No Halal Foods in the Public Schools.
* No Hijabs in the workplace, the public school system, universities and government buildings
* No Muslim foot baths or prayer rooms in the public schools or universities.
* No ballots in any language other than English.
* No loud disruptive Muslim “calls to prayer” blaring from the speakers of a Mosque some 5 times per day.
* Investigate and prosecute all forms of Muslim fraud (in Minnesota and elsewhere)
* Islamic groups that push Jihadist ideologies should be defunded (no 501c3 tax exempt statue), labeled terrorists and treated accordingly
=====

How the Mayor of Dearborn caused a international backlash against Islam (09/09/2025)

On September 9th, 2025, first-term Mayor Abdullah Hammoud, called Ted Barham a bigot, and racist and an Islamophobe because he had the audacity to question putting up a commemorative street sign for Siblani: the publisher of the Arab American News. Siblani is a supporter of Iran and the Muslim terrorist groups Hezbollah and Hamas. The video went viral and literally millions of viewers could not believe this was occurring in an American city. At this point I would encourage you to read through the transcript and watch the video.

=====
I’m Ted Barham, Dearborn resident, and I want to talk about uh how two intersections have been named after Mr. Osama Siblani. I just know him by his last name. Sorry about that. Okay. And so I’m sure he’s done a lot of good things for the community starting the American Arab American news. But uh one thing I’m very concerned about which I think a lot of people in Dearborn want to be concerned about. I mean I could just read his direct quotations. I’ll read a couple of them. Uh these are from 2022.

City Council: Can you tell us what the issue is? Can you just tell us what your concern is?

Yeah, my concern my concern is he is a promoter of Hezbooa and Hamas and . . .

City Council: The sign that was placed in that area is a county road and it was done by the Wayne County Executive. It’s not under control of the city Dearborn or city council. The sign that was placed was is placed on Warren Avenue, which is a county road, and that was done by the county. County did it. It’s a symbolic placement. The county did it. So, they do have we can get you the list of their meeting um and you could go there and speak to the county commissioners, but we did not have the authority uh to overrule that or to suspend it. So, I wanted to make sure you knew that. So, the Wayne County Commission is the one that approved that. It’s the road of the county and they’re the one that placed it up there.

Yes, that’s fine. And I do I did understand that. But I know that there were people in this room who were there at the you know at the ceremony for putting those signs up and um also it’s in Dearborn so I’m just speaking as a Dearbornite. Uh so you know there’s lots of quotes but just a couple of quotes here. He talks about how the blood of the martyrs irrigates the land of Palestine and then in further quotes he talks about how the terrorists should strike them with knives and with their bare hands and they’re victorious. And he also encourages the use of rockets uh over there. Uh and then uh another quote from 2022. “We are the Arabs who are going to lift Palestinians all the way to victory whether we are in Michigan and whether we are in Jenin. So the reason why I mentioned this is that it sounds like he could be inciting violence in Michigan.

City Council: He’s not. I just want to be clear. He can speak for himself. Well, this is I’m going to stop you because he’s not a violent person. And you can interpret his words any way you want, but I will guarantee you he is not intending to incite violence anywhere in the world. You could defend himself if he were here, but we’re not going to allow personal attacks in our community.

Okay. Well, I mean, I’m just reading his words here.

City Council: That’s fine. But you’re interpreting his words after you read them. He did not use the word violence, did he?

Well, may I continue to do the rest of the quote?

City Council: Well, if you say you want to read them, you can read them. If you want to interpret and give your own opinion of what he’s thinking, that’s a different story.

Okay. Um, sure. I mean, I’d love to discuss this. I just want to finish the quote. Um, so, okay, I’ll continue. “Whether we are in Michigan and whether we are in uh Jennine, believe me, everyone should fight within his means. They will fight with stones. Others will fight with guns. Others will fight with planes, drones, and rockets. Others will fight with their voices. and others will fight with their hands and say free, free Palestine.” So I just find it very concerning.

City Council: There was some dialogue, but as the councilman indicated and just wanted to make sure you be careful when you’re talking about incitement or riot uh there there’s legal termination terminations for that. There’s legal precedent for that and that’s what the councilman’s indicated that you’re drawing a conclusion that you have the right to draw. Uh, as I indicated, the sign was placed uh from the county in that location. So, did you have anything else you’d like to um speak on?

Well, it seems very provocative uh to have those signs up there. I mean, I also appreciate how he has helped to people to sympathize with the people of Palestine, people of Lebanon. As you know, I’ve lived in Lebanon. I also lived in Israel. I’ve stayed for several weeks in Palestine and I feel like having that sign up there it’s almost like having you know Khomeini Street, Hezbollah Street or Hamas Street. I mean Hezbollah bombed the embassy in in Beirut and including many Americans. So I just feel it’s quite inappropriate and as a Christian I would like to encourage peace. I’m not I’m not just being like, you know, pro- Israel in this and, you know, fight back and that sort of thing, but uh I would like to encourage peace. Um and um not violence. Actually, I like to quote from the words of someone who had the same enemy. It was Jewish people who killed Jesus. He was Jewish, but his fellow Jewish people killed him. And he said, “The one who lives by the sword will die by the sword.” And what I would like to encourage on the other side is peace. Uh he is called the prince of peace and he said blessed are the peacemakers and his death at the hands of Jewish people um opens the door to peace between Jewish and non-Jewish people. So that’s what I would like to actively try to encourage.

The Mayor: I think the only comment I’m going to make, I’m not looking for a rebuttal, is the best suggestion I have for you is to not drive on Warren Avenue or to close your eyes while you’re doing it. Uh his name is up there and I spoke at a ceremony celebrating it because he’s done a lot for this community. And I think it’s quite hypocritical to know that you’re approaching this podium when you yourself have videos on YouTube standing in front of my mask saying the cruelest of things about Muslims, about the religion of Islam because you are a bigot and you are a racist and you are an Islamophobe. And although you live here, I want you to know as mayor, you are not welcome here. And the day you move out of the city will be the day that I launch a parade celebrating the fact that you moved out of the city because you are not somebody who believes in coexistence. Uh you’re somebody who tries to preach it. Uh but in fact you do everything uh but that. So I just want to put that on the record.

Dearborn City Council Meeting originally aired live on September 9, 2025

=====

It was clear to everyone that the bigot was not Ted Burham -- it was the mayor. After all this is the definition of a bigot and the mayor fit the definition perfectly:

=====
Bigot: a person who is intolerant or hateful toward people whose race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, etc., is different from the person’s own.

Bigot
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/bigot
=====

What is even more troubling is that the mayor is a supporter of Siblani. And that makes you wonder to what extent the mayor also supports Iran and the terrorist groups Hezbollah and Hamas. After all he seems to surround himself with radical Muslims that support Iran. It is not a good look when you consider Iran just slaughtered 30,000 protesters that want to overthrow the Iranian Islamic Caliphate. Here is some further commentary on the Dearborn City Council Meeting from the Middle East Forum.

In 2018, four years before becoming mayor of Dearborn, Michigan, Abdullah Hammoud joined a rally in the city to denounce President Donald Trump’s immigration policies. Then a state legislator, Hammoud stood alongside Mohammad Elahi, imam of Dearborn Heights’ Islamic House of Wisdom, a cleric known for his close ties to the Iranian regime. Hammoud recently attempted to bully one of his critics into leaving Dearborn at a recent city council meeting.

=====
Dearborn is not the place to live if you want to criticize government actions without being called an “Islamophobe.” Americans who expect politicians to distance themselves from people who say nice things about terrorist organizations that have killed U.S. citizens in the Middle East should also stay out of the city. That’s the takeaway from the September 23, 2025 meeting of Dearborn’s City Council, where first-term Mayor Abdullah Hammoud refused to apologize for trying to bully Christian evangelist Ted Barham into leaving the city at the previous city council meeting on September 9, 2025. Barham attracted the mayor’s ire at that meeting by complaining about the naming of a busy intersection after a Hammoud supporter who, in addition to praising former Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah, once joked about sending Israeli Prime Minister the Benjamin Netanyahu “back to Poland.”

Not only did Hammoud, the mayor of a city with more than 100,000 residents—55 percent of whom are Muslim—fail to apologize for bullying Barham in a vain effort to get him to leave the city, not one council member offered a word of criticism of Hamas and Hezbollah after they were challenged to do so by one of the more than 100 audience members who showed up to attend the September 23 city council meeting. “Do you definitively, unequivocally—by name—denounce Hamas and Hezbollah, or do you support them?” Dearborn resident Anthony Deegan asked the council members on September 23. They said nothing in response.

The New Jim Crow in Dearborn (09/24/2025)
Dearborn Mayor Tries to Put Critic in His Place With ‘Islamophobia’ Accusation
https://www.meforum.org/fwi/fwi-research/the-new-jim-crow-in-dearborn
=====

Tulsi Gabbard calls out Dearborn for pushing Islamic ideology (12/23/2025)

So three months after the Dearborn City Council Meeting Tulsi Gabbard brought Dearborn’s Muslim problem back into the spot light again. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard identified Islamist ideology as the ‘greatest near and long-term threat’ to freedom and security. She stated that this political ideology is fundamentally antithetical to the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights. And then she cited Dearborn and other Muslim majority cities. “In places like Dearborn, Michigan and Minneapolis, Minnesota, Islamist clerics are openly pushing this Islamist ideology.” Here is a transcript of her speech along with the video. And I agree with the vast majority of what she had to say.

=====
There is a threat to our freedom that is not often talked about enough and it is the greatest near and long-term threat to both our freedom and our security and that is the threat of Islamist ideology. [cheering] [applause] It is propagated by people who not only do not believe in freedom, their fundamental ideology is antithetical to the foundation that we find in our Constitution and Bill of Rights, which is that our creator endowed upon us enable rights, the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Now, Charlie focused on this quite a bit. He talked about it in ways that very few others did because he understood this direct threat to freedom. When we look back to the attack on 911 that happened 24 years ago now, it changed so many of our lives where thousands of Americans were killed by Islamist jihadis who attacked us on that day and we were confronted with the reality of the length that they will go to try to attack the foundations of who we are as a country. It was a day that changed my life. probably like some of you in the room. It’s what motivated me to enlist in the army to go out and to fight and to defend and defeat to defend our freedom and defeat those who are attacking us. [applause] But when we talk about this Islamist ideology, yes, it is the ideology that fuels terrorist groups like al-Qaeda and ISIS and al-Shabaab and Hamas and Boo Haram and others. And they must be defeated militarily [applause] as they continue to actively plot and try to attack us. They are a threat to our security and our safety. But this Islamist ideology is a direct threat to our freedom because at its core it is a political ideology that seeks to create a global caliphate that governs us here in America threatening Western civilization governance by Sharia law. Governance by what they are calling their Islamic principles. And if you fail to comply, if you fail to adhere to this ideology, if you dare to exercise your God-given right to free speech, censorship is not what we face. They will use violence or any means they deem as necessary to silence us. If we don’t take action to identify this threat, to define it, to call it out for what it is, and take action to defeat it, then we will find ourselves in a place where many European countries and countries like Australia have found themselves. countries where you can get arrested for praying silently on the street corner as has happened in the UK. Countries where you can be arrested for putting up a social media post that someone finds offensive somewhere. The threats from this Islamist ideology come in many forms. As we approach Christmas right now in Germany, they are cancelling Christmas markets because of this threat. In places like Dearborn, Michigan and Minneapolis, Minnesota, Islamist clerics are openly pushing this Islamist ideology, trying to recruit and radicalize young people. Earlier this year, there was a conference that was held representing organizations like the Council on American Islamic Relations, also known as CARE, which issued a call to action to use American legal and political systems to implement Sharia law. This is already underway in places. This is already underway in places like Houston. This is not something that may possibly happen. It is already happening here within our borders. Patterson, New Jersey is proud to call themselves the first Muslim city. They are working to implement in their own governments these Islamic principles that are forced on people through the use of laws or violence. The bottom line is this. When we talk about the threat of Islamism, this political ideology, there is no such thing as individual freedom or liberty. As Charlie said over and over again, it is fundamentally incompatible with our nation’s foundation of freedom.

=====
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, speaking at an event, identified Islamist ideology as the ‘greatest near and long-term threat’ to freedom and security. She stated that this political ideology is fundamentally antithetical to the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights. Gabbard asserted that the 9/11 attacks, carried out by ‘Islamist jihadis,’ were a pivotal moment that motivated her to enlist in the Army to defend American freedom. She argued that the ideology fuels terrorist groups like al-Qaeda and ISIS but also poses a direct threat to Western civilization by seeking to establish a global caliphate governed by Sharia law. Gabbard warned that this is not a distant threat, citing the cancellation of Christmas markets in Germany, Islamist clerics radicalizing youth in Dearborn and Minneapolis, and a CAIR conference that allegedly called for using the U.S. legal system to implement Sharia. She specifically claimed that Paterson, New Jersey, calls itself the ‘first Muslim city’ and is working to implement ‘Islamic principles’ through laws or violence.

Islamism incompatible with American freedom | Gabbard’s Shocking Speech On Islamism Stuns America (12/23/2025)

=====

Just two days later the Detroit News denounced Gabbard’s remarks about Dearborn’s Muslim Problem and then called Ted Burham an Islamophobe once again. Ironically they quoted a member of the terrorist group CAIR as well. Globalist Corporate Media are such good useful little idiots. And the following article illustrates that perfectly.

=====
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard’s recent comments about Dearborn and Muslims stirred concerns among some residents and activists who say the community and the beliefs of those living there have not been depicted accurately.

Gabbard said at Turning Point USA’s AmericaFest conference Sunday in Phoenix that “Islamist ideology ... fuels terrorist groups like Al Qaeda and ISIS and Al-Shabaab and Hamas and Boko Haram and others.”

Turning Point USA was founded by conservative activist Charlie Kirk, who was fatally shot on Sept. 10 at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah. He was 31.

Its annual four-day AmericaFest conference features speeches from national leaders. This year’s event was the nonprofit group’s first major event since Kirk’s death.

The former congresswoman also said: “In places like Dearborn, Michigan, and Minneapolis, Minnesota, Islamist clerics are openly pushing this Islamist ideology, trying to recruit and radicalize young people.”

Reached Tuesday, Hassan Abbas, a Dearborn spokesperson, said the city had no comment.

Majed Moughni, an attorney and lifelong resident who runs the Dearborn Area Members Facebook group, said he was “deeply concerned by rhetoric from national leaders that paints entire communities with a broad and dangerous brush.”

“Dearborn is home to law-abiding Americans who cherish the Constitution and reject violence in all its forms,” he said. “When senior government officials single out cities like ours, it fuels fear, invites harassment, and places innocent families at risk. We can protect our national security without undermining the dignity, safety, and sense of belonging of American communities that are part of this country’s strength.”

He added: “In recent months, Dearborn has been placed under the national spotlight. We have experienced an alarming increase in hate speech and death threats directed not at a single individual, but broadly at Muslims living in Dearborn.”

Reached Tuesday, a spokesperson for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence did not directly address Moughni’s concerns about a “broad and dangerous brush” applied to entire communities. Instead, Olivia C. Coleman supplied links from other publications about alleged criminal activity in Dearborn.

Protest in Dearborn

Last month, a rally organized by Republican gubernatorial candidate Anthony Hudson — who previously said Americans needed to be “protected from sharia law” but later posted a video apologizing on social media after he visited the Wayne County community — drew competing groups of protesters.

The counterprotesters included Jake Lang, who was among those pardoned by President Donald Trump for his role in the Jan. 6, 2021, U.S. Capitol riot, who carried an “Americans Against Islamification” sign, and other demonstrators who said they came to protest racist, anti-Islamic rhetoric.

Moughni told The Detroit News he believes the “surge in hostility has been fueled by right-wing extremists targeting a community whose only goal is to live in peace and harmony. These narratives ignore Dearborn’s long history of standing firmly against terrorism and extremism. In 2009, when the attempted airline bombing occurred, Dearborn’s Muslim community was among the first to March Against Terrorism ... Our community has also consistently stood up for the civil liberties of others, including defending the rights of Christians to peacefully protest.”

He added: “Dearborn’s story has always been of immigrants living the American Dream. National leaders should reflect that reality.”

Gabbard’s comments

At the Turning Point event, Gabbard singled out the Council on American-Islamic Relations, or CAIR, the nation’s largest Muslim civil rights and advocacy organization, and the cities of Houston and Patterson, N.J.

“Earlier this year, there was a conference that was held representing organizations like the Council on American Islamic Relations ... which issued a call to action to use American legal and political systems to implement sharia law,” she said. “This is already underway in places.”

She said those places include Houston and Paterson, N.J.

“It is already happening here within our borders,” Gabbard said. “Paterson, N.J., is proud to call themselves the first Muslim city. They are working to implement in their own governments these Islamic principles that are forced on people through the use of laws or violence.”

Officials for Washington D.C.-based CAIR, which has a Michigan chapter based in Canton Township, blasted her for her remarks.

“As the director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard is responsible for gathering, analyzing and presenting factual information to policymakers so that they can protect the American people,” CAIR officials said in a statement issued Monday. “The last person who should serve in this critical, apolitical role is a bigoted conspiracy theorist who spreads hate against the American people.

“Tulsi Gabbard’s rant against the American Muslim community and ‘Islamic principles’ was delusional and disqualifying. If DNI Gabbard truly believes that American Muslims are on the verge of imposing Islamic law on Paterson, New Jersey, she is completely detached from reality and has no business serving as the Director of National Intelligence.

“If, on the other hand, Ms. Gabbard spewed these anti-Muslim conspiracy theories knowing they were false, then her dishonesty also disqualifies her from overseeing our nation’s intelligence collection.”

The group also said Gabbard should either apologize for her comments or resign.

“Sadly, Ms. Gabbard has a long history of expressing a thinly-veiled hostility toward Islam and Muslims under the guise of opposing ‘Islamism,’ which is why she happily met with Bashar Al-Assad and Narendra Modi, men who used the specter of a Muslim boogeyman to justify discrimination and violence against their Muslim populations,” the group said.

Olivia Coleman, a spokesperson for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, pointed to Gabbard’s quote from the conference and said, “Do you refute that? There is clear evidence of this happening in Dearborn,” before listing the links to a Daily Caller article and two tweets.

She also mentioned that Dearborn Mayor Abdullah Hammoud told a resident earlier this year that he wasn’t “welcome” in the city. Hammoud has said the resident had a pattern of Islamophobic behavior before he made his comments. [Charles E. Ramirez, cramirez@detroitnews.com]

Gabbard’s remarks on Dearborn, ‘Islamist ideology’ rile residents, activists (12/25/2025)
https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/wayne-county/2025/12/23/gabbards-remarks-dearborn-islamist-ideology-rile-residents-activists/87893956007/
=====

The radicalization of the Dearborn Muslim Community seems to have gotten worse since the 10/07/23 Israeli slaughter and the subsequent invasion of Gaza

As I’ve said I’m just an old Perennial Hippie that simply wants the people of Dearborn to peacefully coexist. But there has been a slow slide toward what I would call “Soft Sharia” laws in Dearborn. It started in 2001 when Dearborn became the first city in the US to mandate “religiously blessed” Halal foods in the public schools -- an obvious violation of the 1st Amendments separation between church and state. As the years rolled by they began allowing Muslim prayer rooms in the public schools -- yet another violation of the 1st Amendments separation between church and state. Then UofM Dearborn put foot baths in the university which are utilized in conjunction with Muslim prayer rooms. All of this needs to be reversed.

Over the last few years a number of concerning events occurred in Dearborn that seem to indicate a radicalization within the Muslim community. The first event occurred after the 10/07/2023 slaughter of 1400 Israeli’s when Hamas invaded Israel. About one week later more than 1,200 people packed the Ford Community and Performing Arts Center to denounce Israel and the bombings in Gaza. During the protest the largely Muslim crowd was yelling “from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.” This chant is basically calling for the destruction of Israel and the genocide of the Israeli people. And since then this Antisemitic rant spread to college campuses across the United States and Europe during pro Palestinian protests.

October 10th, 2023

=====
More than 1,200 people packed the Ford Community and Performing Arts Center to denounce Israel and the bombings in Gaza.

Pro-Palestinians outraged over attacks in Dearborn (10/10/2023)

=====

April 8th, 2024

=====
Anti-Israel protesters chant ‘Death to America’ and ‘Death to Israel’ at rally in Michigan (04/08/2024)

https://www.facebook.com/AJCGlobal/videos/the-chants-of-death-to-america-and-death-to-israel-at-a-recent-protest-in-michig/799231391568629/

=====

To his credit Dearborn’s Mayor Hummoud denounce the hates speech but didn’t specifically say a Dearborn Muslim was call for the “Death of America.” I find this speech concerning as it seems to indicate a radicalization within the Muslim community. And it is impossible to know how widely these sentiments are shared within the Dearborn community.

August 18, 2025

40,000 Muslims Flood Streets In Michigan For Muslim Arbaeen Religious March, Raising Red Flags. Husham Al-Husainy, who organized the march, has a rather controversial history which included praising of Iran and then refusing to label Hezbollah as a terrorist organization.

September 9, 2025

The Dearborn City Council Meeting where the Mayor supported Siblani who is a supporter of Iran, Hezbollah and Hamas

Dearborn Heights, Michigan, posted a prototype police patch featuring Arabic writing. The public was outraged and they quickly responded saying the badges would not be produced.

October 25, 2025

The FBI arrests 3 young Dearborn Muslims for planning a terrorist attack on Ferndale Michigan and Cedar Point Ohio.

=====
Today, the FBI arrested a third defendant, Ayob Nasser, 19, of Dearborn, Michigan, in connection with the alleged ISIS terrorism case from earlier this week against other two Dearborn men, Mohmed Ali and Majed Mahmoud. All three were charged in the amended complaint with conspiring to provide material support to ISIS—a radical Islamic terror group that has repeatedly killed Americans. All three are also charged with having firearms that would be used to commit an act of terrorism on behalf of ISIS. The amended complaint adds to the already chilling allegations of their radical Islamic terror plot involving AR-style rifles, shotguns, handguns, and other tools for a tactical assault.

Third suspect arrested and charged along with two current defendants for conspiring to provide material support to ISIS and having firearms that would be used to commit an act of terrorism on behalf of ISIS (11/05/2025)
https://www.justice.gov/usao-edmi/pr/third-suspect-arrested-and-charged-along-two-current-defendants-conspiring-provide
=====

=====
FBI arrests multiple suspects allegedly plotting potential “terrorist attack” over Halloween weekend (10/31/2025)

=====

November 18, 2025

Anti-Muslim Protests in Dearborn expose the radicalization of Dearborn youth

I believe this protest was organized in response to the Mayor telling Dearborn resident Ted Barham he would have a parade if he left the city. That was in September. Of course the video, of the meeting, went viral internationally and most of the comments were critical of the Mayor who was obviously bigoted in his response. About 20 minutes into the video (below) a Muslim youth jumps out of his car threatening to kill anyone that dares burn the Koran. Just before that another Muslim insists that burning any book is illegal. Of course he is wrong: burning both the American Flag and the Koran are both protected speech under the First Amendment. In many Muslim countries burning the Koran is considered blasphemy and is punishable by imprisonment or execution. Fortunately in the United States we don’t recognize blasphemy laws, period. But I think it is also accurate to say that it is primarily Muslims that get so upset if you burn a copy of the Koran. I could care less if you burn a Bible, so long as its not my copy. And I think most Jewish people don’t care if you were to burn a copy of the Torah.

=====
White nationalist and rightwing agitators recently descended on Dearborn, Michigan, to hold an anti-Islam rally at which they attempted to burn a Qur’an and manufacture controversy over the city’s large Arab American population. But the protest has been dismissed by local leaders as a cheap publicity stunt aimed at generating money and clicks for far-right influencers. But there is little doubt the Michigan city has become a repeated target for the publicity-hungry far-right because it holds the US’s highest percentage of Arab American residents. Similar provocateurs have marched with a pig’s head on a pole at an Arab American fair. Meanwhile, Christian evangelists regularly attempt to convert Muslim children at parks or outside schools. The latest group of Trump-allied influencers appears emboldened by the anti-Muslim current running through much of the president’s second administration. Popular conservative influencers like Cam Higby, Jake Lang, and members of Charlie Kirk’s Turning Point USA partook in the 18 November rally at which some shouted racist abuse, unfurled a banner that read “Americans Against Islamification”, or smacked a Qur’an with a slab of bacon. Lang later went to a meeting of Dearborn’s Arab-American-majority city council, and, while live streaming, yelled at council members: “Get the fuck out of my country. We don’t want you here.” Throughout the day, influencers racked up hundreds of thousands of views on their social media pages and Lang promoted his bid for a US Senate seat in Florida. The aim is to “monetize” their hate through campaign donations and social media views, said Dawud Walid, director of CAIR-Michigan. “Anti-Muslim bigotry is the only acceptable form of overt bigotry in America and it can reward people monetarily,” Walid said. “People can monetize anti-Muslim bigotry through clicks and donations, so it’s not just something that is an issue of hate – hating Muslims pays financial dividends.” Dearborn is a Detroit suburb of about 110,000 that is around 55% Arab-American, with heavy Yemeni and Lebanese populations that began moving here decades ago, often for auto plant jobs. The city was a Democratic stronghold until Trump won it by about 4% in the last election amid deep frustration over the Biden administration’s role in the Gaza genocide. Some former Biden supporters voted for Trump, but many voted for the Green party’s Jill Stein, or sat out. The latest round of controversy stems from Abdullah Hammoud, the Dearborn mayor, in September telling right-wing activist pastor and provocateur Ted Barham, who previously lived in the United Kingdom and Canada, that he wasn’t welcome in Dearborn. Rightwing media built an outrage cycle by framing it solely as a Muslim telling a Christian he is not welcome in a US city. Rightwing and local media largely failed to present the whole story and context. It was widely reported that Hammoud’s comments were in response to Barham criticizing the city for honoring a pro-Palestinian activist who founded the Arab-American News, a local outlet. But Barham and groups he works with are among Christian evangelicals who have for years set up outside Dearborn schools or at parks to lure kids with candy, face painting or soccer games, then tried to convert them to Christianity.

Rightwing influencers spin anti-Muslim rage in Michigan for social media reach (11/26/2025)
In Dearborn, provocateurs have held anti-Islam rallies, attempted to burn the Qur’an and rile residents for clickbait
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/nov/26/rightwing-influencers-michigan-anti-muslim-clickbait

=====

=====
In this video Nick Shirley goes to Dearborn Michigan as Christians and Muslims battle in the streets as tensions are high because of the rise of Islam in America

Chapters
00:00 Dearborn has fallen
00:47 Is Sharia Law taking place in Dearborn?
2:49 Whats the difference between Muslim and ISIS?
3:42 Christians AGAINST the Rise of Islam
6:41 Is Islam taking over America?
10:45 British women WARNS America about their fate
13:10 Americans in support of Islam
13:46 Black Christian America SPEAKS OUT
14:54 Islamist ATTACK Journalist
16:00 Man attempts to burn Quran
18:00 CHAOS IS UNLEASHED
21:48 Men search to KILL Christian American
24:13 Would Islamist support America in War?
26:01 Muslims chant “ALLAHU AKBAR”

Dearborn Michigan Has Fallen... Christians and Muslims Battle (11/20/2025)

=====

December 23, 2025

Gabbard’s remarks on Dearborn, ‘Islamist ideology’ rile residents, activists while Dearborn leaders discount her concerns

=====
Islamism incompatible with American freedom | Gabbard’s Shocking Speech On Islamism Stuns America (12/23/2025)

=====

Why we should really be concerned about Mayor Abdullah Hammoud’s support for Siblani and other Radical Muslim Clerics

So let us review what has been uncovered in this essay alone:

* Mayor Abdullah Hammoud’s supports publisher Siblani as well as other Radical Muslim Clerics

* Siblani, publisher of the Arab American News, continues to support Iran, Hezbollah and Hamas

* Mohammad Elahi, imam of Dearborn Heights’ Islamic House of Wisdom, a cleric known for his close ties to the Iranian regime.

* Husham Al-Husainy, Iraqi-American Sheikh of the Karbalaa Islamic Education Center, who organized the Arbaeen Religious March, has a rather controversial history which included praising of Iran and then refusing to label Hezbollah as a terrorist organization.

As I will explain this should be troubling for every American.

Before we proceed please watch this documentary which focuses on another Michigan Muslim Majority city: Hamtramck. I have the video start with an interview of Mohammad Elahi, imam of Dearborn Heights’ Islamic House of Wisdom. He seems like a nice affable Muslim but does not shy away from his support of Iran, Hezbollah and Hamas. He also seemed to have a hard time admitting that there should be no death penalty for apostates: those that choose to leave the Islamic faith. If I were interviewing him today I’d ask him what he thinks about Iran where 30,000 have been recently slaughtered because they no longer want to live under an Islamic Caliphate.

=====
What happens when Muslims take over an American city? Pro-Hamas parades, animal sacrifice, burqas, a ban on LGBT flags, Arabic signs, male and female entrances to Mosques, restrictions on music lessons in schools, the call to prayer blasting over loudspeakers; Strolling the streets of Hamtramck, Michigan, one can hardly recognise that this was once a mighty American industrial centre. A new GB News documentary with US Correspondent Steven Edginton goes to America’s only Muslim city to investigate how Islam has changed the town. The tiny city is known as ‘the world in two square miles’ due to its hugely diverse population. Bosnians, Poles, Bangladeshis, African Americans, French, Germans, and Yemenis are among the many nationalities who populate or once populated the town. Until a few decades ago Hamtramck was dominated by Poles; one resident told us it was typical to solely speak Polish, read local Polish newspapers, go to Polish banks and go to one of three Polish churches. Just one such church remains now. A flurry of Mosques have taken their place. Conservative Yemeni Muslims have flooded into Hamtramck in recent years. In 2021 Hamtramck made history when it became the first American city to elect a full Muslim council and mayor. After 100 years of continuous Polish mayors and politicians, not one remains in local government.

We confronted zealous Imams in America’s Muslim City (05/09/2024)

=====

=====
Muslim-American activist Asra Nomani has praised GBN America’s investigation into America’s Muslim-led city in Michigan. In the documentary, GBN America reporter Steven Edginton visited Dearborn in Michigan where a pro-Palestine rally recently saw calls for the “Death of America”. Speaking to GBNA, Nomani said: “Thank you to GB News and Steven for doing such a provocative and important documentary about the reality and the trenches of America. “I grew up in America. I’m a daughter of India, born into a Muslim family and grew up in this country in the foothills of West Virginia, from where I’m now talking to you. “On January 23rd, 2002, I was in Pakistan along with thousands of other journalists and my colleague was the journalist Daniel Pearl, an amazing friend who helped me understand American culture in a way that I, as an immigrant, couldn’t really fathom. She added: “He came with his wife, Marianne, who was just a few months pregnant, and then as many in the world know, Danny was tragically kidnapped from the streets of Karachi. “We started a manhunt for Danny, and five weeks later we discovered that he had been beheaded, executed in the most brutal of ways. And this memory echoes within me, through these decades and has this particular pulse today, because so much has changed in our world. “But everything has stayed the same because the men who kidnapped Danny and murdered him did so in the name of Islam, and using Danny’s Jewish and Israeli heritage as their excuse to put a death sentence on him. “Now we know that same narrative, that same excuse, was used to kill innocents in October 2023, in Israel. “So much, like I said, has changed, but so much has remained the same. And what your documentary does is it captures the insidious intrusion of this phenomena that British people have known very well of these Islamists or these political Muslims who are trying to change our society and bring regressive ideas into our Western secular communities.

America’s Muslim City: GBN film ‘captures insidious intrusion’ of US, says top author (04/06/2024)
https://www.gbnews.com/news/us/americas-muslim-city-gbn-film-top-author
=====

So let’s further disassemble all of this . . .

In the 5th part of this series we looked at the goals of the Muslim Brotherhood:

“The ultimate goal of the Muslim Brotherhood, as articulated by its founder Hassan al-Banna and subsequent leaders, is to create a global, unified Islamic state (caliphate) governed by Sharia law, where Islam is the supreme authority in all aspects of life.”

So let’s dig deeper.

What groups in the United States are supported by the Muslim Brotherhood

=====
Organizations and networks in the United States historically linked to or influenced by the Muslim Brotherhood include the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) and the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). These groups were often established by activists to support causes like Palestine, and they, along with various mosques and charities, have been identified as part of a U.S. network

with, at times, overlapping personnel and ideologies.

Key Aspects of the U.S. Network:

* Ideological Origins: Many entities were established by immigrants associated with the Muslim Brotherhood to promote Islamist values and, in some cases, support overseas causes.

* Past Fundraising: The Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development (HLF), which was shut down by the U.S. government, was previously a key organization involved in supporting Hamas, a group with ties to the Brotherhood.

* Influence and Scope: These groups often focus on advocacy, legal defense, and civic engagement, with some analysts noting their ability to influence American policy and perception.

It is important to note that many of these organizations operate independently, and while they may share historical or ideological roots with the international Muslim Brotherhood movement, their activities are often focused on domestic American issues, sometimes separating them from the actions of the parent organization.

Google AI [what groups in the United States are supported by the Muslim Brotherhood]
======

Which countries finance or support the Muslim brotherhood

======
Qatar is the primary state supporter and financier of the Muslim Brotherhood (MB), utilizing entities like Qatar Charity to fund projects and providing sanctuary for leaders. Turkey also provides significant political support and refuge. Conversely, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE have designated the group a terrorist organization.

Key Supporters and Facilitators

* Qatar: Serves as the main financial hub, with Qatar Charity channeling funds to projects, including numerous Islamic centers across Europe. Qatar also offers media support via the Al Jazeera Media Network.

* Turkey: Offers safe haven to many Brotherhood leaders and political backing.

* Financial Networks: Various networks, including the historical use of Al-Taqwa Bank, have been implicated in financing.

Regional and Global Impact

* Middle East: The Jordanian Muslim Brotherhood (JMB) operates with some latitude but faces increasing scrutiny.

* Europe: Qatar-linked initiatives have funded numerous “mega-mosques” and Islamic centers, such as in France.

* Funding Flows: Despite losing some Gulf funding, the organization receives support through various NGOs and private donors.

Designation as Terrorist Organization

Several nations have officially designated the Muslim Brotherhood or its affiliates as a terrorist organization due to their, or their affiliates’ (like Hamas), involvement in financing, material, or technological support:

Google AI [countries that finance or support the Muslim brotherhood]
=====

Are Hamas Hezbollah and Iran supporters of the Muslim brotherhood

=====
Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran hold complex, shifting relationships with the Muslim Brotherhood (MB). Hamas is a direct offshoot of the MB, while Iran and its proxy Hezbollah are Shiite, sometimes conflicting with the Sunni-based Brotherhood. All three share a foundational ideological hostility toward Israel.

* Hamas: Founded in 1987 as an offshoot of the Palestinian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood. While it retains this ideological, Sunni-based root, it often operates independently to secure funding and arms from Iran.

* Iran: As a Shiite revolutionary power, Iran is not a member of the Sunni Muslim Brotherhood but sometimes finds tactical, strategic alignment with it against common enemies. Iran’s support for Hamas—a Brotherhood branch—is often described as pragmatic.

* Hezbollah: A Shiite group backed by Iran, Hezbollah generally operates as part of the “Axis of Resistance” against Israel. Its relationship with the Sunni-focused Muslim Brotherhood can be strained due to sectarian differences, particularly regarding the Syrian civil war.

While Hamas has historically been tied to the MB, it has at times diverged, such as when it sought closer ties with Iran for survival, despite the MB’s general opposition to Iranian-backed regimes in recent years.

Google AI [are hamas hezbollah and iran supporters of the muslim brotherhood]
=====

So what should we make of all of this? We have the Mayor of Dearborn supporting publisher Sablani and a number of what I would call radical Imams. And what they all seem to have in common is support for Iran, Hamas and Hezbollah. More generally one could argue they all support the ultimate goals of the Muslim Brotherhood: to create a global, unified Islamic state (caliphate) governed by Sharia law, where Islam is the supreme authority in all aspects of life.

I think all Americans should have a problem with that as they are all promoting ideologies that are absolutely antithetical to the US Constitution and long held American norms. Furthermore I think all of them think us non-Muslims are Dhimmis: useful idiots that don’t understand how radical they really are. That may have been true 20 years ago. Today no one seriously considers Islam to be the “religion of peace.” And that is why the people of Great Britain and the EU nations want to see mass deportation of recent Muslim immigrants.

At the very least I think Mosques and organizations supporting Civilization Jihad should loose the 501c3 non-profit status. We may also want to designate them as Islamic Terrorist organizations and make them illegal to operate within the United States. There are already Muslim nations that have already done just that.

Trump has not gone nearly far enough to defund Muslim groups in the United States

I don’t think Trump has gone nearly far enough to defund these radical Muslim groups and Mosques within the United States. Just the other week he did designated Muslim Brotherhood chapters outside of the US.

=====
Today, as a first step in support of President Trump’s commitment to eliminate the capabilities and operations of Muslim Brotherhood chapters that pose a threat to the United States as described in Executive Order 14362, the United States is imposing terrorist designations against the Lebanese, Jordanian, and Egyptian chapters of the Muslim Brotherhood. The Department of State is designating the Lebanese Muslim Brotherhood as a Foreign Terrorist Organization and a Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT), and the group’s leader Muhammad Fawzi Taqqosh as an SDGT. Concurrently, the Department of the Treasury is designating the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood and Jordanian Muslim Brotherhood as SDGTs for providing material support to Hamas. These designations reflect the opening actions of an ongoing, sustained effort to thwart Muslim Brotherhood chapters’ violence and destabilization wherever it occurs. The United States will use all available tools to deprive these Muslim Brotherhood chapters of the resources to engage in or support terrorism.

Terrorist Designations of Muslim Brotherhood Chapters
Press Statement
Marco Rubio, Secretary of State, January 13, 2026
https://www.state.gov/releases/office-of-the-spokesperson/2026/01/terrorist-designations-of-muslim-brotherhood-chapters
=====

But he has done little to nothing to stop Muslim Brotherhood chapters operating inside of the US. In my opinion he has not done nearly enough on this front. Frankly I would like to see him adopt this De-Islamification platform and implement it nationally. None of us wants to see Dearborn -- and other majority Muslim cities -- go the way of Great Britain, London, France, Paris or Spain. Spain is now considering legalizing a half million recent Muslim immigrants. Have they learned nothing from the past 20 years?

=====
Spain’s government has announced a plan to grant legal status to around 500,000 undocumented migrants already living in the country. Officials say the measure, approved by royal decree, will allow eligible migrants to apply for temporary residence and work permits. Applicants must have arrived before 31 December 2025, prove at least five months of residence and have no criminal record. Applications will open between April and June. Authorities estimate more than 840,000 undocumented migrants live in Spain, many working in agriculture, tourism and services. The move follows sustained pressure from civil society groups and comes as other countries tighten immigration policies.

Spain Plans to Grant Legal Status to 500,000 Undocumented Migrants (01/28/2026)

=====

As Gad Saad said, in the last essay, these idiots are like the Wood Crickets whose brains have been overridden with Suicidal Empathy. They are committing cultural suicide. The citizens of Spain need to rise up and reject this.

I’m also very skeptical that a UAE investment groups just poured a half BILLION dollars into Trump’s family crypto venture. It reeks of a “pay for play” scheme and you have to wonder what the UAE is getting our of the deal beyond access to Nvidia’s advanced chips.

=====
An investment group backed by one of Abu Dhabi’s most powerful royals poured half a billion dollars into Donald Trump’s family crypto venture just days before the president’s inauguration, according to reporting from the Financial Times and Wall Street Journal. World Liberty Financial, the cryptocurrency company founded by Trump’s three sons alongside Steve Witkoff’s children, received the investment from backers of Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed al-Nahyan, the UAE’s national security adviser. The deal reportedly gave investors a roughly 49 percent equity stake in the company. The timing has sparked fresh scrutiny of the intersection between Trump family business interests and administration policy. Sheikh Tahnoon has been central to Abu Dhabi’s push into artificial intelligence and its negotiations with the US to secure advanced Nvidia chips. During Trump’s visit to the Gulf last May, the two countries announced plans for a massive AI data center campus in Abu Dhabi—a facility expected to house power equivalent to more than 2 million of Nvidia’s latest-generation chips.

Abu Dhabi royal’s $500M bet on Trump family crypto venture (02/01/2026)
https://seekingalpha.com/news/4545108-abu-dhabi-royals-500m-bet-on-trump-family-crypto-venture
=====

Concluding remarks

When you have Dearborn Muslims publicly yelling “Death to America” you know we have a problem. When you have 3 Dearborn Muslim High School Students planning a terrorist slaughter of Gays in Ferndale and innocent people at Cedar Point you know we have a problem. When you have the Mayor of Dearborn calling a Non-Muslim resident a bigot — for merely stating the truth — you know we have a problem. And when we have Imams supporting the Iranian theocracy, Hezbollah and Hamas it is obvious: we have a serious problem that requires action.

Dearborn and many other large Muslim cities have seen an obvious rise in Anti-Semitism and Islamic Radicalization. We have also seen this on University Campuses and in the recent Anti-Ice Rallies. This is not organic and is being funded by millionaires trying to push a Red/Green alliance: between Marxists and Jihadist Muslims. That should be obvious to anyone reading my essays. And the same thing is happening in Great Britain and the EU nations. We are being played by very powerful globalist and Islamist groups.

Is this radicalization being fueled by our Public Schools, our local Mosques or through Social Media? I’m quite sure all 3 play a part. I’m also sure of the solution: Urgent Global De-Islamification. Basically we need to finally deprive these radical Muslim groups of any special privileges in order to nudge them toward assimilating into 21st Century norms.

This is the 6th essay in the series: The Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification. If you were to print each essay out it would be 371 hundreds of pages in length, not including this current essay. I hope my readers take the time to go through all of the following related essays, which can be accessed through my home page:

* An Anti-globalist view on the Israeli Massacre by Hamas and the explosion of global Antisemitism
The funding of Mass Migration and Religious extremism is but part of the Globalist Agenda
83 pages

* Mass anti-immigration protests are erupting throughout the planet
The UN’s Open Borders Agenda is leading to a Global Civil War
47 pages

* The Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification
How Mass Muslim Immigration is an important part of the larger Globalist Control Agenda
38 pages

* The Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification: Part2
Somali Muslims committing massive fraud costing US taxpayers billions
51 pages

* The Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification: Part3
My online video discussion with Naomi Wolf on 12/16/2025
16 pages

* The Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification: Part 4
Facebook permanently suspends my account for discussing De-Islamification
28 pages

* The Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification: Part 5
Eradicate the Muslim Brotherhood: the head of the Unenlightened Jihadist Snake
71 pages

As I’ve said, numerous times, I value the Muslims residing in Dearborn and Dearborn Heights. But in recent years I have become concerned about the radicalization that is taking place as these Muslim majorities continue to gain political and demographic power. From an Anti-Globalist point of view it is obvious that the Globalists -- the World Economic Forum, the United Nations, the World Health Organization etc., -- have been pushing Muslim immigration to destabilize First World Nations and softening them up for introduction into the Global Beast System of Digital ID and a Cashless Society. Muslims should be able to worship as the 1st Amendment guarantees “freedom of religion.” At the same time the 1st Amendment guarantees “freedom from religion.” As such Muslim Mosques and organizations, that push Political Islam (e.g., a Global Islamic Caliphate) should be designated as terrorist organizations and treated accordingly. Both Political Islam and Globalism should have no legitimate place in the 21st Century. Making sure that doesn’t happen will be up to all of us uniting. All of us is all we need.

For those that can afford it . . . please consider a paid subscription to my Substack blog. Every little bit helps and it looks like I may need to purchase a new laptop in the near future. Please do what you can.

Finally my complete writing are now available for purchase. They contain over 36 years of my writings and at least 840 essays relating to Islam alone. Just click on the picture below for more information on purchasing.

https://buy.stripe.com/9B64gz5Xh3THfrl43L28800

=====
Imam Tawhidi explains the dangers of Radical Islam & the Muslim Brotherhood on PBD podcast.
PBD Taken Aback When Imam Reveals Radical Islam’s Plan To Takeover America! (12/26/2025)

=====

A summary of the Global De-Islamification series so far

This is the 5th essay in this series. I have been writing against the Globalist Agenda for literally decades. Their endgame is to implement Digital ID and a Cashless Society in order to enslave humanity into what I call a Global Slave Plantation. At that point we will all essentially become slaves. Don’t want to get that next forced vaccination? Then Big Brother simply cuts off your access to your digital wallet. Kiss your inalienable rights goodbye.

One of my primary observations about the Globalist Agenda is that it is being rolled out globally and at the same time which makes clear there must be a central authority orchestrating this. And this globalist central authority has been able to subvert the sovereignty of nations, states and cities in order to meet it’s objectives. We saw that with the global rollout of Smart Meters (2009), 5G (2019) and the Plandemic (2020-2023).

Mass Migration, into First World nations, also plays an important roll in the Globalist Agenda. It is being used to destabilize First World Nations in order push the masses to accept their solution: total central control through Digital ID’s, a cashless society and the management of every human through constant surveillance by AI Agents. As I wrote in the first essay in this series:

=====
I think there are two main components to this Globalist Mass Immigration strategy: “Divide and Conquer” and the Hegelian Dialectic. So one component is the “Divide and Conquer” strategy where culturally incompatible foreigners are brought in to cause social division among the indigenous populations. This keeps the indigenous populations distracted from the real enemy: the globalists.

The other related component is the Hegelian Dialectic: Problem, Reaction, Solution.

* The problem is introduced by pushing Mass Immigration.
* The reaction is increasing social tension, now leading the UK and EU nations toward civil war.
* And the solution is mandatory digital ID, digital currency and eventually a cashless society where populations can be completely controlled.

At that point we become nothing more than slaves on a globalist plantation as failure to comply will result in the suspension of access to your digital wallet. And all of this is now happening throughout Great Britain, the EU and other First World Nations in real time.
=====

Overview of this essay

The need to eradicate the Muslim Brotherhood: the head of the Unenlightened Jihadist Snake

In this essay I make the case that we can put Muslims in two categories: Enlightened and Unenlightened. Enlightened Muslims are those that have embraced the transformation of the Enlightenment (1500 - Present) and adhere to the laws of their adopted countries as well as their social mores. Unenlightened Muslims are those that refuse to assimilate to the laws of their host country or who seek to engage in Jihad against their host country.

De-Islamification must be used to neutralize the Unenlightened Jihadists, such as the Muslim Brotherhood, and the woke leftists that support them. De-Islamification, like De-Nazification after WWII, is primarily about denying Political Islam any more oxygen by removing all “special privileges” we have unwisely allowed them: prayer and Halal foods in the public schools, the wearing of Burka and Hijab in public schools etc. De-Islamification is not meant to demonize the entire Muslim population. But it is most definitely meant to reduce the effect of Political Islam to the status of a dead ghost on a bright sunny day. It is meant to utterly destroy Political Islam entirely. Sorry but in Western Democracies there should be absolutely no room for those pushing an Islamic Theocracy or an Islamic Caliphate based on a 1400 year old system of medieval barbarism.

Islamic groups that push Jihadist ideologies should be defunded (no 501c3 tax exempt statue), labeled terrorists and treated accordingly. As I have covered in this series De-Islamification is already being implemented throughout the planet because the majority of people finally see it for what it really is: an existential threat to humanity. And as I will cover in this essay De-Islamification is also about eradicating this ideology by exposing and eradicating Unenlightened aspects of Islam: Sharia Law, Blasphemy Law, Apostacy Law etc. The truth of the matter is the Muslim Marketing Brand has been shredded and the vast majority of humans want it eradicated. Since I got suspended from Facebook I have migrated to X. And I can’t even count the number of posts saying simply: Fuck Islam. WE THE PEOPLE, globally, have had enough with Political Islam.

Here are my current planks for the Global De-Islamification Agenda

At the end of this series I will provide a longer list.

=====
The Global De-Islamification Agenda

* No Burkas.
* No Halal Foods in the Public Schools.
* No Hijabs in the workplace, the public school system, universities and government buildings
* No Muslim foot baths or prayer rooms in the public schools or universities.
* No ballots in any language other than English.
* No loud disruptive Muslim “calls to prayer” blaring from the speakers of a Mosque some 5 times per day.
* Investigate and prosecute all forms of Muslim fraud (in Minnesota and elsewhere)
* Islamic groups that push Jihadist ideologies should be defunded (no 501c3 tax exempt statue), labeled terrorists and treated accordingly
=====

I am dedicated to writing about De-Islamification because I live in Dearborn, Michigan, which until recently was the largest Muslim enclave in the United States. I love my Muslim neighbors but have been alarmed by the rise in radicalization and antisemitism that has occurred, in my city, since the Hamas genocide in Israel on 10/07/2023. I simply want us all to peacefully coexist moving forward.

Globalist Censorship of Anti-Globalists is on the rise

On January 6th, 2026 I was permanently suspended from Facebook after being a member for over 20 years. And even prior to that Facebook has used other measures to effectively minimize my ability to share my essays. Because of this the number of times my essays are read has gone from 7000 reads, in 2023, to a mere 800 reads today. I suppose you could call this authoritarian censorship by algorithm and Artificial Intelligence (AI). Without a doubt the censorship of social media platforms, like Facebook, are increasingly using AI Agents to censor Anti-Globalist Speech: questioning Open Borders, opposing further Muslim immigration, questioning the Plandemic Lockdowns, questioning forced vaccination etc.

There is no doubt, in my mind, that my permanent suspension was due to my current series of essays on De-Islamification. I obviously upset some prominent figure within the Muslim community.

Those that support my writings can help out by sharing my essays on the various Social Media platforms and, if you can afford it, considering a paid subscription. Every little bit helps.

By no means and I the only one being silenced by Globalist Censorship. There are virtually millions suffering the same fate including Anti-Muslim activist Eva Vlaardingerbroek who was barred entry into Great Britain just last week. Prime Minister Starmer should be charged with treason for violating the free speech of British Anti-Globalists while continuing to allow millions of Muslims to invade their country.

=====
For the crime of criticizing the British prime minister, Eva Vlaardingerbroek has been banned from the UK. England is descending into darkness.

Eva Vlaardingerbroek Speaks Out After Being Banned From the UK (01/16/2026)

=====

Starmer should be charged with treason for his “two-tiered” justice system that favor Muslims over the indigenous population. The latest chapter in the “two-tiered” justice system happened just the other day when the British police beat Iranian protesters calling for an end to the Islamic regime in Iran. It took place at the Iranian Embassy in London as the police sided with the IRGC (Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. Unbelievable. He is literally putting thousands in prison for exercising their free speech while releasing Muslim criminals and rapists.

=====
BREAKING: Multiple Iranians INJURED In London - UK Police Crackdown On Anti-IRGC Protesters (01/16/2026)

=====

The Democrat Party and the Left have been co-opted by Jihadist Islamic Groups and Marxist Groups that seek an end to the United States and First World Nations

When we speak of the red-green alliance the red refers to the left (socialists, communists, Marxists) while the green can either refer to Muslim or Environmental groups. I will be mainly focusing on green groups as primarily Muslims. One shared attribute between Muslims and Marxist is a hatred of Jews: Antisemitism. This goes back to Marxist paradigms in the 19th century.

=====
The left’s view of Jews and its understanding of antisemitism can be traced back to 19th century Marxist and anarchist paradigms. Karl Marx and the leading theoreticians of anarchism, Pierre-Joseph Proudhon and Mikhail Bakunin, depicted Judaism as nakedly materialistic and anti-social. Describing the Jew as an unscrupulous moneylender and petty trader in his essay “On the Jewish Question,” Marx (1844) claimed that “huckstering” was the Jew’s “worldly religion.” Drawing on the Christian stereotype of the Jew as obsessed with financial gain and lacking compassion, Marx maintained that “money is the jealous god of Israel, in face of which no other god may exist.” The Jews were amassed in a dying social class—the petty bourgeoisie—relying increasingly on illicit methods to extract profits. “Petty bourgeois” to this day remains one of the most vicious epithets in the Marxist lexicon (Norwood, 2013). Marx wrote little about the Jewish question after the 1840s, “though when he referred to Jews in private correspondence his tenor was almost always negative” (Laqueur, 2006, p. 24).

The founders of modern anarchism were just as contemptuous of Jews as Marx was. To Proudhon, the Jew by temperament was a non-producer, “always fraudulent and parasitic.” Bakunin similarly referred to Jews as “an exploiting sect, a bloodsucking people” (Wistrich, 2012, pp. 46, 186). Wistrich further noted that Proudhon’s diary contained antisemitic statements that were even more inflammatory, anticipating those of the Nazis, such as “the Jew is the enemy of the human race” and the Jew “poisons everything” (Wistrich, 2012, pp. 185–186). Bakunin was surely aware that people would associate the term “bloodsucking” with the medieval blood libel, that Jews kidnapped and murdered Christian children to extract their blood to mix with the matzo at Passover.

Left-Wing Antisemitism in the United States: Past and Present (10/13/2021)
https://www.inss.org.il/publication/antisemitism-left/
=====

The Iranian Revolution (1978–1979) is often cited as the first major example of a “red-green” alliance, where Marxist, socialist, and liberal factions allied with Ayatollah Khomeini’s Islamist movement to overthrow the Shah. This should be a cautionary tale for the leftists as: following the success of the revolution, the “green” faction (Islamists) turned on their “red” (Marxist/socialist) allies, marginalizing or eliminating them. It is also interesting that the left has been dead silent as the Iranian People are now rising up against the Iranian Theocracy which has already slaughtered as many as 20,000 Iranian protesters. Oh the cognitive dissonance as the left empathizes with the Palestinian and Hamas deaths in Gaza but is utterly silent about the Iranians being slaughtered by a radical Muslim Imam. Then again the left -- both Marxists and Environmentalists -- have long been useful idiots for both Muslim theocrats and the Globalist “Net Zero” agenda.

=====
The term “Red-Green alliance” refers to two distinct types of political cooperation: parliamentary coalitions between left-wing (red) and environmentalist (green) parties in Western democracies, and ideological alignments between far-left, anti-imperialist movements (red) and Islamist or, in some cases, agrarian movements (green).

Here are key historical examples:

1. The Iranian Revolution (1978–1979)

This is often cited as the first major example of a “red-green” alliance, where Marxist, socialist, and liberal factions allied with Ayatollah Khomeini’s Islamist movement to overthrow the Shah.

* Context: The revolution was a “revolt of society against the state,” bringing together diverse opponents of the Shah’s regime, including socialists who believed they could later outmaneuver the religious faction.

* Outcome: Following the success of the revolution, the “green” faction (Islamists) turned on their “red” (Marxist/socialist) allies, marginalizing or eliminating them.

2. European Parliamentary Coalitions (1990s–Present)

Since the 1990s, “red-green” parliamentary coalitions between social democratic/socialist parties and Green parties have been common in Europe, focusing on social justice and environmental policies [0 al.13]. Notable examples include:

* Germany (1998–2005): A federal coalition of the Social Democratic Party (SPD) and Alliance ‘90/The Greens.

* Denmark (1989–Present): The Red-Green Alliance (Enhedslisten) is a major party formed from leftist groups that supports center-left governments.

* Norway (2005–2013): A majority coalition involving the Labour Party, Socialist Left Party, and the Centre Party (an agrarian party often grouped as “green”).

* Sweden (2014–2021): A minority government coalition of the Social Democrats and the Greens.

* France (1997–2002): The “Plural Left” included socialists, Greens, and communists.

3. Modern Anti-Imperialist/Anti-Zionist Alliances

The term is also used for alliances between far-left groups and Islamist movements, united in opposition to Western foreign policy, capitalism, and Zionism.

* Palestinian Cause: Leftist groups and Islamist organizations often collaborate under an “anti-imperialist” banner.

* Western Activism: This dynamic has been observed in activist networks that combine leftist ideologies with support for, or tolerance of, conservative Islamic groups.

* Examples in Politics: Some European parties focus on Muslim minority rights through a leftist, anti-capitalist lens.

4. Nordic Agrarian-Left Alliances

In Scandinavia, “green” can sometimes refer to agrarian Centre Parties rather than environmentalists.

* Norway: The “red-green” coalition (2005-2013) included the agrarian Centre Party and socialist parties, prioritizing rural communities and welfare.

5. Other Notable Alliances

Other examples include the formation of parties like the GreenLeft of the Netherlands (1989), SYRIZA in Greece, and the Left-Green Movement in Iceland.

Google AI [Red-green alliance throughout history examples]
=====

In October 2025 I wrote about how Left Wing Extremists and Radical Islamic Groups are being funded by Billionaires Globally to destroy all First World nations.

=====
Left Wing Extremists and Radical Islamic Groups are being funded by Billionaires Globally (10/16/2025)
The Globalist Agenda moves forward globally, and at the same time, to divide and conquer WE THE PEOPLE

=====

The Invisible Coup

This funding of Islamic and Left Wing groups is brilliantly explored in Peter Schweizer’s new book: The Invisible Coup: How American Elites and Foreign Powers Use Immigration as a Weapon. Here is a brief description of the book.

=====
Our debates about immigration revolve around what happens with immigrants once they arrive. We need to start talking about who is sending them and why. For decades, establishment elites sold us the story of immigration as a compassionate renewal of the American Dream within a harmonious melting pot. But beneath that narrative lies a different reality: Mass migration has morphed into the most powerful political weapon ever aimed at the United States—one engineered by elites at home and aided by adversaries abroad. Now Peter Schweizer, the bestselling investigative journalist of our time, is blowing the lid off this whole series of schemes. Schweizer detonates a political shock wave eclipsing his past bombshells, revelations that have sparked FBI probes and bipartisan reforms. Urgent, shocking, and overflowing with national security implications, The Invisible Coup makes America’s greatest political threat visible for all to see—and solve.

The Invisible Coup: How American Elites and Foreign Powers Use Immigration as a Weapon (2026)
https://www.amazon.com/Invisible-Coup-American-Foreign-Immigration/dp/0063422506
=====

Here are a few video segments of Peter Schweizer discussing the book with Levin on “Life, Liberty and Levin.” Lots of great information. I encourage my readers to watch all of them. One takeaway is that it is not just Islamic infiltration that must be addressed. There are many nations (e.g., Mexico) that are setting up shop within the US to undermine our republic.

=====
‘The Invisible Coup’ author Peter Schweizer breaks down how Democrats benefit from ‘weaponized immigration’ and more on ‘Life, Liberty & Levin.
Author sounds alarm on ‘WEAPONIZED immigration’ (01/18/2026)

=====
=====
Mark Levin interviews investigative author Peter Schweizer about his new book The Invisible Coup, arguing that immigration has been “weaponized” by foreign adversaries and political actors to destabilize the United States. Schweizer claims countries like Mexico and China—and movements tied to Marxism and Islamist networks—use mass migration to build hostile political infrastructures inside America, fueling protests, manipulating elections, and reshaping institutions. He highlights alleged involvement of Mexican consulates in U.S. political organizing and argues Democrats benefit electorally through accelerated naturalization and shifting demographics. The conversation frames open borders, sanctuary policies, and birthright citizenship as national security threats, urging viewers to treat immigration as an organized geopolitical strategy, not merely an economic issue.

Anti-ICE Chaos Isn’t Spontaneous - ‘Weaponized Immigration’ Explains in 2 Minutes (01/18/2026)

=====
=====
To Mexican officials, “immigration is about TRANSFORMING the United States,” investigative journalist Peter Schweizer tells Glenn Beck. And he has the quotes to PROVE it, as he lays out in his newest book, “The Invisible Coup.”

STUNNING DETAILS: How Mexico is WEAPONIZING Immigration to Attack the USA (01/25/2026)

=====

Why does the leftist Democrat Party continue to support Radical Islam and Marxist groups?

Since the massacre in Israel (10/07/2023) we have seen a global alliance between Democrats, Leftists and radical Islamic organizations. Indoctrinated by a new wave of Antisemitism they have shown compassion towards Hamas (a Islamic Terrorist organization) but absolutely no compassion for the 1200 Israeli’s slaughtered on 10/07. And you don’t hear any of them denouncing the recent slaughter of thousands of Iranians that have been calling for an end to Iran’s Islamic theocracy which has trampled on the rights of Iranian citizens since the coup in 1979.

Even after the Muslim Genocide of Christians in Nigeria. Even after podcaster Shirley exposed tens of billions of fraud by Somali Muslims in Minnesota, Ohio and Maine. Even after Iran murdered thousands of Iranian protesters calling for an end to Iran’s Muslim Theocracy. Even after all of that, the Democrats and the Left continue to lend their support to Muslim Jihadists. And of course that includes groups like “Gays for Gaza” who would be summarily executed in many Islamic countries. The movie Idiocracy wasn’t just a comedy. It accurately predicted the dumbing down of America.

I believe the primary reason that Democrats and the Left support Muslim immigration, and Open Borders, is primarily to grow the Democrat base through the US Census which effects the Electoral College: shifting Electoral votes to Democrat States in order to amass a permanent Globalist Democrat electorate. They are willing to look beyond the massive Somali fraud in order to grow their base. Beyond that their support for Muslim immigration is a result of decades of Pro-Muslim indoctrination through our public schools and universities.

Gad Saad explains why Islam is incompatible with Western laws and Western values

Gad Saad is a professor who recently wrote “The Parasitic Mind: How Infectious Ideas Are Killing Common Sense.” We both grew up among large Muslim populations: he in Montreal Canada and me in Dearborn Michigan. And we both share an interest in Evolutionary Psychology and other subjects. In the following video and transcript he makes a number of insights that I fully support.

Key Insights

* Islam is primarily political, not just spiritual, and inherently supremacist with a goal to convert the world.
* The concept of “Islamism” or “radical Islam” is a Western rhetorical device to separate violent or political aspects from the religion, which is inaccurate.
* Islam’s behavior in society changes with demographics: peaceful in minority, increasingly assertive and supremacist as numbers grow.
* Historical and contemporary Muslim-majority countries do not exhibit Western-style democratic or liberal social orders.
* The alignment of Western progressive movements with Islamic causes is explained through the concept of cognitive and emotional hijacking (“parasitic mind” and “suicidal empathy”).
* Islam is incompatible with Western values such as LGBTQ+ rights, freedom of religion, and pluralism.
* The conflict with Israel is theological, rooted in Islam’s supremacist mission, not merely territorial.
* Christianity and Judaism have evolved away from violent religious enforcement; Islam is urged to undergo a similar metamorphosis to embrace peace and modernity.
* Dialogue and understanding are essential to prevent further conflict and bloodshed.

Here is the video followed by the transcript. At the very least read through the transcript as it contains many important insights.

=====
Gad Saad discuses What Makes Islam Incompatible with Western Civilizations.

=====
=====
What is the distinction with respect to Islam or maybe we’ll say a majority of people within Islam that doesn’t make that possible or as conducive? >> Islam is roughly about 10% spiritual 90% political Islam in Islam. It’s not outside of Islam. There is no Islamism. There is no radical Islam. There is no extremist Islam. There is no militant Islam. There is just Islam. I’m not the first to say it. Islamic scholars and leaders will tell you that. >> Is there any chance that there can be coexistence with the Islam theology and the west? Is there any possibility under the sun that the two worlds can ever coexist with each other? Well, let’s listen to professor Mr. God sad who grew up around Muslims and let’s hear his take. I think you would be very well informed and educated through his wisdom, knowledge and understanding. But if you’re agreeing that um Islam is not conducive to what we would call western culture or western values or systems of government, what do you think are the key characteristics of it that make it incompatible? Because again when we said the Janis or the Hindus or Shinto’s or even not just religion, if we just look at people that have different um economic or social structures in other countries um we we see people that can come over to the west and can flourish, can do very well despite different religious traditions or social traditions. What is the distinction with respect to Islam or maybe we’ll say a majority of people within Islam that doesn’t make that possible or as conducive? >> Nearly every single tenet of Islam. Okay. And Islam is roughly depending on you know the canonical analysis about 10% spiritual 90% political Islam. In Islam it’s not outside of Islam. There is no Islamism. There is no radical Islam. There is no extremist Islam. There is no militant Islam. There is just Islam. I’m not the first to say it. Islamic scholars and leaders will tell you that Islamism is just a way for Westerners to feel as though we’re attacking something other than the religion, which is it’s go to attack a religion because we’re kind and empathetic people and we have freedom of religion. So if I magically put the uh suffix ism after something, commune is nice, communism is bad, Jude is nice, Judaism is bad, right? Capital is nice, capitalism is bad. I’m being facetious, but that’s really the kind of parasitic brainwashing that takes place whereby Islamism is something that is practiced outside the beautiful confines of the religion. Nothing could be further from the truth. Islam is a supremacist. It is the most supremacist religion by far. Right? As I mentioned earlier, it specifically states that we need to convert the entire world. That is the fundamental driving motive of the religion. Right? That’s the supra motive of the religion. So therefore, now you might say, “But how but my friend Ahmed works at the convenience store and he’s gay and he’s married to a Jewish guy and he’s never hurt a fly.” Well, sure, >> men are taller than women. Even though your aunt Linda is taller than your uncle Bob, the fact that you can find a singular case of a woman who’s taller than a man, every WNBA woman is taller than most men on Earth, that doesn’t negate the fact that’s true at the population level that men are taller than women. That’s called statistical distributions overlapping. Okay? So, we could point to millions of perfectly lovely Muslims. You you served in the military. You’ve met many of them. I come from the Middle East. I’ve met many of them. Many of them are fans of mine that write to me and are perfectly lovely. Individuals are different from the ideology. Islam will act differently depending on how prevalent it is in a society. Right? Take for example the shingles virus. The shingles virus can be dormant in you for decades. Then in your 50s or 60s there is a catalyst that ignites the virus from being dormant to no longer being dormant and now you have some very painful situations that you have to deal with in shingles in your you know middle to late middle age. Okay. So Islam when it’s a very few people that are in a society it’s a very exotic and peaceful we’re just peaceful we just want to wear the very exotic scarves that we wear on our hats on our heads as we become more and more the pattern is very clear. It is as clear as the existence of gravity. If you jump off a building a hundred times I could tell you every single time what’s going to happen. It’s called gravity. So there is 1,400 years of incontrovertible data that says what happens to a society as a function of more Islam. Notwithstanding the fact that most Muslims are perfectly lovely, right? >> It it’s what happens to the So you see it in the west. For example, take Montreal, my hometown. I’ve been standing on top of the mountain for 30 plus years warning people as you >> may know and I exactly predicted what would happen. So now we start getting more aggressive accommodation requests at universities. You have well >> why didn’t it happen when I first joined my university? Because they weren’t enough in number. Once we become more number we want our separate prayer space. Once we get the prayer space we want to pray in the street. Once we pray in the street, we want to cut traffic to pray and on and on. So it’s the boiling frog parable. So it’s not the case that everywhere that Islam goes, they just orgiastically kill everybody. Sometimes it takes 500 years to Islamize society. Sometimes it takes five minutes. But once there is enough of us in here, good luck to you. So the question then becomes, >> what do you do about it? Well, demography is destiny. I mean, nothing could be clearer. What makes America what it is not the water. It’s not the Rocky Mountains. It’s the fundamental deontological principles that animate the American spirit. Is that spirit consistent with Islam? If the answer is yes, you should open your doors more to Islam. If the answer is no, maybe you need to be a bit more judicious in your choice of immigrant. >> I think it’s fair to say that if if again if the West has certain values that we wish to protect and we wish to live under and the question is whether or not a a different cultural, religious, social, economic tradition is conducive to that. One of the questions we should least ask is okay, has it been attempted somewhere else in the world? And with the question of Islam, the answer is yes. you know, we have over what 50 countries. Um, so the question is, okay, great. Are any one of those 50 countries that are predominantly Islamic, are any one of do any one of them have a um economic, political, or social system that would be considered conducive to the West? Is it something where someone from the West could move to one of those countries and just feel, you know, welcome and at home? And the answer is overwhelmingly no. Which leads me to my second question and that has to do with and I and I think this is where we can lean heavily into this concept of maybe the parasitic mind, your book, the parasitic mind. How in the world do we get to a point of queers for Palestine? And when we when we look at when we look at the people who will say I identify themselves or advertise themselves as the most liberal, the most tolerant, the most accepting within the West, we almost the people that use those words to describe themselves are predominantly on the left. And yet they seem overwhelmingly dedicated to this idea of making common cause with a religious and cultural tradition that would never describe themselves as being tolerant and open and accepting. Quite the opposite. Um and so my question there is why do you think especially recently that there has been such this this common cause between woke ideology between the purveyors of of critical theory and Islam. >> Yes. Uh so let me give a a background to sort of the two prong approach of the parasitic mind and then my forthcoming book suicidal empathy. And I mentioned this not because I’m frivolously trying to plug the books because that’s where I explain all this. The parasitic mind talks about what happens to your cognitive system when it is parasitized when it is hijacked by dreadful ideas. and I’ll explain in a second why I use the neuropathological framework. Suicidal empathy then completes the story and I’ll give examples of both that will address your question. Suicidal empathy then completes the story by explaining what happens when your emotional system is hijacked because we are both a thinking and feeling animal. So for me to fully zombify you, Nick, I need to zombify both of your systems. Okay. Okay. So let’s let me first explain generally what the neuroparacetical framework is and then we’ll apply it to queers for Palestine and so on. In nature there is the field of study called parasitology. Parasitology is the study of host parasite interactions and how these have evolved. So for example a tapeworm is a parasite that parasitizes your intestinal tract. But that’s not a neuroparasite. A neuroparasite is a parasite that needs to end up in the host’s brain altering its circuitry to suit its reproductive interest. So the classic example that I give which has now become viral everywhere is when I when I call for example someone I call them a wood cricket Jew. What am I saying? The wood cricket the actual wood cricket the insect abhors water. It wants nothing to do with water. But when it is parasitized by a neuroparasite called a hairworm, the hair worm needs the wood cricket to jump into water in order for it to complete its reproductive cycle. And by jumping into the water, it merrily commits happily commits suicide because its brain has been hijacked. So now you can start seeing where I’m going with this. The queers for Palestine are wood crickets. They’re just bipedal wood crickets. They only have two legs, but they’re wood crickets. Why? Because they have been parasitized by a set of ideas and in this case by dysregulated empathy, which I call suicidal empathy. That makes it the highest goal to demonstrate your progressive credentials by saying I’m willing to give up my life to demonstrate how empathetic I am, how tolerant I am, how non-judgmental I am. Hence, I happily jumped into the water to commit suicide. And let me just mention this. People think often just because I have a sense of humor that I mean, yes, I use a colorful style, but I I’m dead serious. Imagine if you are someone who identifies your biggest identity marker is your queer identity. More power to you. Live and let live, which by the way, Islam doesn’t tolerate, right? It’s not live or let live. It’s I tell you how you should live. Okay? So, if you are queer, where should you put all of your support behind? Should you put it behind Tel Aviv, which is one of the most queer friendly cities in the world? I mean, short of San Francisco, short of New York, short of my hometown in Montreal. You’d be very hard pressed to find a more queer friendly society. or should you put all of your support behind Gaza, which has come up with a 100% effective conversion therapy. It’s a gravity-based form of conversion therapy. We throw you off the top of the mountain and when your head splashes on the on the pavement, it cures you of your queerness. But if you’re a wood cricket, then of course it’s queers for Palestine. >> Thank you very much. Professor God said, “We have always appreciated your insights.” You know, unless you have lived amongst them, then you really don’t have a true appreciation and understanding of the the of theology and their missions or rather as we say in a corporate world, the mission statement. Unfortunately, we have seen over the last seven decades that information that has been spread throughout the world understanding that the it began in the 1920s. The idea of a caliphate, the caliphate is where the Arab world wants world dominance to be with Muslim. They want their religion to be the dominant religion and they want they want world dominion and that is why the antisemitism the anti-Israel has been the priority we have learned and we have known that the charter in Kamas that their mission statement is to annihilate the Jewish people. It’s not about real estate. It’s not about Israel. It’s about the theology. This is a religious war. It’s about the religion. It’s about the religion where the Judeo-Christian fundamental faith is believing in God and not accepting the Islam theology is what’s at war. And this isn’t foreign to us. The only biggest issue that we’re all dealing with is that we seem to get that God brought us to the 21st century through a journey in history. We are embracing the 21st century. But what’s happening with Islam is they are stuck in the seventh century. They for some reason have not wanted to move forward and to develop into a nation that should be based on a religion that’s based on godly sentiments, which means life, love, compassion, kindness, understanding, non-judgmental, unconditional love. That’s what religion is all about. That is the foundation of religion. The fundamentals of any religion is that we are ambassadors of God. God did not create us to kill each other. God did not create us to become suicide bombers. God did not create us to hijack airplanes and fly them into the Twin Towers. God did not create us to breach the border of Israel on October 7 and slaughter 1,200 innocent, beautiful citizens who woke up a Saturday morning and never saw the end of the day. God did not want us to take 250 hostages and torture them in the tunnels of Gaza. There’s no God that exists that would want that. That is not godly. It’s not spiritual. It’s the antithesis to spiritual and to godliness. So the question that you are discussing if there is compatibility or not. So we have heard many theologians talk about it. Let’s just go back a little bit in history about 2,000 years ago. The Inquisition. What happened in the Inquisition? The Inquisition in Spain was where the Christians believed that unless the Jews accept Christianity, they should be killed. Very similar to the Islam philosophy and millions of Jews died on that notion. But Christianity has matured and has changed and had a reboot. That that’s no longer their mantra. It’s no longer the mission to force Jews to convert Christianity by punishment of death. We have moved on from those dark days and we have embraced the 21st century where you have a Judeo-Christian alliance that has never happened before. Who who would have ever imagined going through the Spanish Inquisition thinking that one day that you’re going to have thousands of Christians making pilgrimage to Israel and supporting the Jewish people. The alliance that we currently have, one could have never imagined. But it went through a metamorphosis. It went through a transformation. It had a reboot. So many theologians saying Islam has to go through the same maturity. They have to go through the same metamorphosis. They need to move away from killing for religion. They need to move away from hating and just being a a death cult. And they need a total reboot, a total makeover and to and to just welcome themselves to the 21st century and to get off the spot of being stuck in the in in in the stone ages in the sixth, seventh century where everything is by the sword, the death. We are about life. We’re not about death. God put us on this world. We live a very short amount of time. If we make it to 90s, hundreds where we’re so lucky, we run into a centennial and you say, “Wow, what a blessing.” It’s a very short amount of time. Do you think God wants us to spend a short amount of time in in hate, in killing, in murder, in causing carnage, pain, suffering to our fellow human beings? Don’t we all realize that we’re all created in God’s image? Don’t we all realize that we are all here by the kindness of God to make a difference in this world to help make this world an inhabit habitable place to make this place a divine place. This is who we are as human beings because the day you and I were born God said the world can no longer exist without you. So you have a purpose. You have a meaning. Your purpose and meaning cannot be to wake up in the morning and say today I’m gonna kill as many Jews or others as possible. That is not your purpose. Your purpose in living is to say, what can I do to assist God? What can I be? What can I do to be God’s ambassador in doing good for the world and good for humankind and for mankind? And ultimately, this is the dialogue that needs to happen. This is what we as the Judeo-Christian Alliance needs to be able to wrap around our fellow Muslims and try one at a time. Yeah, there two billion of them will be a very long time. But the dialogue has to happen. We need to open up the dialogue and to be able to just look back in history that we can if we don’t learn from history, we’re going to repeat it again. So once again, thank you for this wonderful talk. It’s inspiring. It’s enlightening. It’s frightening. But these are the realities. Unless we don’t know, we don’t know how to deal with it. Now that we are in the know, hopefully we can make change in the world. Ultimately, God Almighty in heaven will protect the righteous. We’ll protect the right side of history. We will prevail. We just pray and we hope that it doesn’t happen through any more bloodshed, any more losses of life. God bless you. God loves you.
=====

Human Evolution, the Brain Explosion, the Abrahamic Religions and the Enlightenment

Here is a graphic I drew up to encapsulate human history from our first common ancestor, who lived among the dinosaurs for 20 million years, to the present. Very few understand that the first religion was Animism which goes back 100,000 years Vs the Abrahamic religions that only go back roughly 4,000 years. Very few understand that the “brain explosion,” some 100,000 years ago defies Darwinian evolution.

It is only because of the expansion of our collective knowledge, Gnosis, that we understand our place in the Cosmos. The Abrahamic religions long believed that the Earth was the center of the Cosmos, that the Earth was only 6000 years and that it was created by a singular god. They had no idea that we reside in the Milky Way Galaxy composed of billions of solar systems. They had no idea that the Cosmos is composed of trillions of galaxies It is only because of the Enlightenment and the expansion of the sciences that we now know that:

* Our Cosmos may be a part of a Multiverse going back trillions of years.
* Our Cosmos originated with the Big Bang some 13.7 Billion years ago
* Our planet Earth began 4.7 billion years ago
* Our Sun may well implode in the next 2-4 billion years

The Abrahamic religions also had no understanding of human evolution. Through archeology, anthropology and other evolving sciences we now know that our earliest human ancestor, a small-brained version of today’s dwarf lemur, coexisted with the dinosaurs from 88 million years ago until an asteroid decimated the dinosaurs 66 million years ago. They had no clue that us humans, Homo sapiens, go back some 300,000 years.

But then something happened between 150,000 to 70,000 years ago that defies Darwinian evolution, because it happened in the evolutionary wink of an eye. It is often referred to as “The Human Brain Explosion.” During this period there was an exponential rewiring of the brain and an exponential evolution of certain genes, including the FOXP2 gene and mirror neurons which gave us the ability to empathize and think symbolically. These changes quickly led to advanced speech, writing, the first religion and advanced societies. It happened far to fast to be explained by Darwinian evolution.

=====
We already know some basics of human brain evolution. First came the enlargement of the primate brain, culminating perhaps 2 million years ago with the emergence of our genus, Homo, and the use of crude stone tools and fire. Next came a tripling of brain size during the 500,000 years before Homo sapiens arose. Finally, just over 50,000 years ago, there was a great leap forward in human behavior, with archaeological evidence of more efficient manufacturing of stone tools and a rich aesthetic and spiritual life. What transpired genetically? Prior research has taken a piecemeal approach to occasional genes that have different structures in humans versus non-humans. For example, Walsh’s lab has identified several genes that regulate cerebral cortical size and patterning, some of them through the study of brain abnormalities. The lab recently found a gene involved in brain folding—thanks to a brain malformation called polymicrogyria—that may have enhanced our language ability. But such findings only scratch the surface of the cognitive, behavioral and cultural strides humans have made over the past 50,000 years. That’s a blink of the eye in evolutionary terms. What enabled us to invent money, develop agriculture, build factories, write symphonies, tell jokes?

Decoding Brain Evolution (07/06/2027)
New center asks: What genetic changes gave us the human brain?
https://hms.harvard.edu/news/decoding-brain-evolution#
=====

Ancient Aliens (Season 1, Episode 4, “Human Genesis”) goes into the human brain explosion in great depth. The entire episode is not available on YouTube as far as I can tell. Of course they attribute the brain explosion to alien intervention. Alternatively it could be the intervention of cosmic intelligence supported by string theory. It is also possible that the use of plant entheogens had a part in the rewiring of the brain. Of course all of these theories are mere speculation. But something miraculous happened in the evolutionary “blink of an eye.”

=====
Researchers in Chicago come to the conclusion that the sophistical of the human brain isn’t just a result of evolution. See more in this clip from Season 1, Episode 4, “Human Genesis.”

The Brain’s Big Bang: Origins of Consciousness (Season 1) | Ancient Aliens (05/07/2025)

=====

And these exponentially fast changes led to the first religion around 100,000 years ago: Animism.

Animism, the first human religion, the oldest spiritual system

=====

ANIMISM: The Oldest Spiritual Belief in Human History (Explained from A to Z) (04/05/2025)

=====
=====
Yes, many scholars believe animism, the belief that spirits inhabit natural objects and phenomena, is humanity’s oldest spiritual system, potentially emerging tens of thousands of years ago during the Paleolithic era, with roots possibly extending back 100,000 years or more, evidenced by early cave art and burial practices suggesting a world view where everything was alive and communicative. While exact origins are debated, studies of hunter-gatherer societies suggest animism was the earliest religious trait, preceding beliefs in an afterlife or shamanism.

Key Points about Early Animism:

* Deep Roots: Animism predates formal religions, temples, and writing, developing as early humans sought to understand and interact with a world they perceived as full of agency and spirit.

* Evidence in Art & Ritual: Paleolithic cave paintings (like Lascaux) and ritualistic burials are interpreted as communications with the animal spirit world or evidence of beliefs in the afterlife, points to animistic thought.

* Hunter-Gatherer Basis: A study of hunter-gatherers identified animism as the foundational religious trait, with other elements like shamanism and ancestor worship developing later.

* Universal Concept: Animistic ideas, where non-human entities have souls or spirits, have appeared independently across diverse cultures globally and continue in many indigenous traditions.

Why it’s Considered First:

* It reflects a fundamental human tendency to see the world socially, extending personhood beyond humans to animals, plants, and even inanimate objects, a worldview supported by early archaeological finds.

Google AI [first religion animism 100,000 years ago]
=====

Animism, Entheogens and string theory

String Theory basically supersedes Einstein’s Theory of Relativity and, like Animism, sees every particle in the Cosmos connected by what are called strings. When I was a young hippie in high school (c. 1970 - 1972) I did many entheogens -- LSD, Psilocybin, Peyote, Mescaline -- and eventually worked for Hearing Aid where we basically talked people down from “bad trips.” One of the recurrent themes from these psychonauts (entheogen users) was that during their “trips” they felt as if everything was connected.

=====
Astrotheology, the study of cosmic myths in religion, and entheogens, consciousness-altering substances used in spiritual rituals, intersect as ancient cultures linked celestial events (astro) with divine experiences (theology) often facilitated by hallucinogens like mushrooms or peyote, suggesting early humanity used these plants for profound cosmic connection, foresight, and divine communication, themes explored in modern astrotheology’s look at space-mythology links.

Astrotheology

* Definition: Combines astronomy/space science with theology, examining the divine or mythological aspects of the cosmos and space exploration.

* Focus: Finds religious, cultural, and ethical meanings in space, linking ancient myths (like constellations) with modern scientific discoveries, as explored in books like Gods of the New Millennium or theories by Michael S. Brown.

Entheogens

* Definition: Substances (like psilocybin, peyote, ayahuasca) used to induce spiritual or mystical states, meaning “generating the divine within”.

* Historical Use: Widely used by ancient civilizations (Maya, Aztecs, Siberian shamans) in rituals for healing, divination, connecting with deities, and shamanic journeys.

The Intersection: Cosmic Connection

* Ancient Practices: Many ancient cultures used entheogens in ceremonies focused on the sky, stars, and celestial cycles, viewing these plants as keys to understanding the cosmos and communicating with celestial beings or gods.

* Visionary Experiences: Entheogenic journeys often produced vivid, cosmic visions, patterns (like fractals), and encounters with “divine” entities, which could then be mapped onto the night sky, influencing mythology and early astronomical observations.

* Modern Exploration: Contemporary astrotheology and researchers in consciousness (like Graham Hancock, Terence McKenna) suggest these ancient practices were foundational to early religions, where entheogens served as powerful tools for interpreting the universe.

In essence, early humans used entheogens to directly experience the cosmos (astro), fostering deep spiritual beliefs (theology) that shaped their understanding of the universe, a concept explored in modern astrotheology.

Google AI [astrotheology and the use of entheogens]
=====

Animism and string theory

=====
Animism and string theory, while originating from vastly different frameworks—one a deeply rooted, indigenous, or spiritual worldview, and the other a cutting-edge, mathematical, theoretical physics framework—find a conceptual bridge in the idea that the universe is composed of active, interconnected, and vibrating energy.

Conceptual Parallels

* Vibrating Energy: String theory proposes that the fundamental constituents of the universe are not points, but rather tiny, one-dimensional, vibrating strings of energy. Animism, in a modern, metaphysical interpretation, posits that all matter—including rocks, water, and trees—is animated by, or composed of, living forces or spirits.

* Fundamental Interconnectedness: String theory suggests a deeply interconnected universe, often discussed in terms of particles being different vibrations of the same fundamental strings. Similarly, animism views the world as a web of relationships, where every entity is in direct, often spiritual, interaction with its surroundings.

* The “Living” Universe: String theory describes a universe that acts as a symphony of vibrating strings. This can be interpreted in an animistic sense, where the “music” or “dance” of these strings gives rise to the “mindedness” or agency found in all things.

Differences in Approach

* Methodology: String theory is based on complex mathematical formulas, attempting to unify quantum mechanics and gravity, yet it lacks direct empirical evidence. Animism is a, sometimes ancient, intuitive or, in some contexts, philosophical understanding of the world as fundamentally “alive” or sentient.

* Interpretation of “Spirit”: Animism directly attributes “spirit” or “soul” to natural objects. String theory describes “energy” and “vibrational modes,” which are, for some, a metaphorical or philosophical equivalent to the “spirits” of traditional animism.

* Scope: While some interpretations of string theory suggest a 10- or 11-dimensional universe, including a “landscape” of possible universes, animism often focuses on the immediate, felt, and relational world.

The Intersection in Modern Thought

* “Animistic Physics”: Some thinkers describe modern quantum physics, including string theory, as a form of “animistic physics,” where the distinction between “living” and “inanimate” matter dissolves, as all things are seen to be in motion, connected, and possessing “agency” or energy.

* Panpsychism: The idea that all matter has some form of mind or consciousness, a concept closely linked to some interpretations of animism, finds a, sometimes debated, home in modern discussions of the nature of reality.

In summary, the connection between animism and string theory is not one of direct scientific proof, but rather a compelling parallel where modern physics, in its search for the fundamental nature of reality, has arrived at a picture of a vibrating, interconnected universe that resonates with the ancient, animistic belief in a world filled with living, active, and, at its core, “spirited” entities.

Google AI [animism and string theory]
=====

In essence, animism represents humanity’s earliest way of perceiving and relating to the world as a living, spiritual entity, making it a strong candidate for the first form of human religion, with evidence pointing to its presence well over 100,000 years ago.

A brief history of human religion/spirituality: from Animism to the Abrahamic Religions

The evolution of human religions goes back to Animism at least 100,000 years ago. The following graphs and videos trace this evolution from Animism to the Abrahamic Religions. I have left out the Mystical Traditions -- such as Yoga, Buddhism, Tao etc. -- that, unlike the literalist religions, believed in a direct connection between man and god. The graphics and videos were produced by Simon Davies and depict how all religions basically go back to the first religion: Animism. I hope you find this as fascinating as I do.

=====
Simon Davies and I look at his Great Tree of Religion, which documents over 500 religions and how they are connected. This was a fascinating discussion and the first ever livestream, and you all were amazing. Thankyou!

The Great Tree of Religion with Simon E Davies (06/23/2024)

=====

=====
Our Stone Age ancestors left Africa around 90,000 years ago, carrying with them the seeds of a spiritual awakening known as the mortuary ritual. As they migrated east towards Asia and Australia, this belief system evolved, leading to an early expression of animism in Asia and establishing the Dreaming in Australia, one of the oldest surviving traditions still with us today.

Out of Africa: The First Wave of Religion (08/31/2024)

=====

The Enlightenment Vs Islam

As the following article states “The central doctrines of the Enlightenment were individual liberty, representative government, the rule of law, and religious freedom, in contrast to an absolute monarchy or single party state and the religious persecution of faiths other than those formally established and often controlled outright by the State. I would encourage reading the entire Wiki article. My primary point is that Judaism and Christianity went through the Enlightenment and came out the other side less violent and more tolerant. It is only Islam that continues to push for a Theocratic Global Caliphate and the medieval barbarism that goes with it. There are no longer any Christian or Judaic theocracies. During the evolution of the Abrahamic religions they tried to convince the masses that “god” was always watching them as a means of social control. They all insisted that their “church or mosque” would remain an intermediary between the individual and god. And they crucified the Gnostics, and similar religious ideologies, because they believed in a direct relationship between man an god. Such heretical thoughts were seen as threat to their social control. Today, because of the 4th Industrial Revolution, we are entering a period where a centralized technocratic control grid, could soon scrutinize everything we do and everywhere we go. And if we don’t submit our digital wallets will be suspended and our livelihoods will be destroyed. In a sense you could argue we are building a Digital God, centrally controlled by Elite Global Psychopaths. If we want to preserve individual liberties for future generations then both Islamic Theocracies and a Technocratic Slavery must be neutralized.

=====
The Age of Enlightenment (also the Age of Reason) was a period in the history of Europe and Western civilization[1] during which the Enlightenment,[b] an intellectual[6] and cultural[6] movement, flourished, emerging in the late 17th century[6] in Western Europe[7] and reaching its peak in the 18th century, as its ideas spread more widely across Europe[7] and into the European colonies, in the Americas and Oceania.[8][9][10] Characterized by an emphasis on reason, empirical evidence, and scientific method, the Enlightenment promoted ideals of individual liberty, religious tolerance, progress, and natural rights. Its thinkers advocated for constitutional government, the separation of church and state, and the application of rational principles to social and political reform.[11][12][13]

The Enlightenment emerged from and built upon the Scientific Revolution of the 16th and 17th centuries, which had established new methods of empirical inquiry through the work of figures such as Galileo Galilei, Johannes Kepler, Francis Bacon, Pierre Gassendi, Christiaan Huygens and Isaac Newton. Philosophical foundations were laid by thinkers including René Descartes, Thomas Hobbes, Baruch Spinoza, and John Locke, whose ideas about reason, natural rights, and empirical knowledge became central to Enlightenment thought. The dating of the period of the beginning of the Enlightenment can be attributed to the publication of Descartes’ Discourse on the Method in 1637, with his method of systematically disbelieving everything unless there was a well-founded reason for accepting it, and featuring his dictum, Cogito, ergo sum (’I think, therefore I am’). Others cite the publication of Newton’s Principia Mathematica (1687) as the culmination of the Scientific Revolution and the beginning of the Enlightenment.[14][15][16] European historians traditionally dated its beginning with the death of Louis XIV of France in 1715 and its end with the outbreak of the French Revolution in 1789. Many historians now date the end of the Enlightenment as the start of the 19th century, with the latest proposed year being the death of Immanuel Kant in 1804.[17]

The movement was characterized by the widespread circulation of ideas through new institutions: scientific academies, literary salons, coffeehouses, Masonic lodges, and an expanding print culture of books, journals, and pamphlets. The ideas of the Enlightenment undermined the authority of the monarchy and religious officials and paved the way for the political revolutions of the 18th and 19th centuries. A variety of 19th-century movements, including liberalism, socialism,[18] and neoclassicism, trace their intellectual heritage to the Enlightenment.[19] The Enlightenment was marked by an increasing awareness of the relationship between the mind and the everyday media of the world,[20] and by an emphasis on the scientific method and reductionism, along with increased questioning of religious dogma—an attitude captured by Kant’s essay Answering the Question: What Is Enlightenment?, where the phrase sapere aude (’dare to know’) can be found.[21]

The central doctrines of the Enlightenment were individual liberty, representative government, the rule of law, and religious freedom, in contrast to an absolute monarchy or single party state and the religious persecution of faiths other than those formally established and often controlled outright by the State. By contrast, other intellectual currents included arguments in favour of anti-Christianity, Deism and Atheism, accompanied by demands for secular states, bans on religious education, suppression of monasteries, the suppression of the Jesuits, and the expulsion of religious orders. The Enlightenment also faced contemporary criticism, later termed the “Counter-Enlightenment” by Sir Isaiah Berlin, which defended traditional religious and political authorities against rationalist critique.

Age of Enlightenment, Wiki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_Enlightenment
=====

Of the three Abrahamic religions Christianity and Judaism have reformed significantly since the Enlightenment (c. 1500 - 1800). It is only Islam that continues to push for a Global Caliphate and the medieval barbarism that often goes with it.

=====
One of the central tenets of science is to define a problem to be studied with as much clarity as possible, and the key to clear communication is calling things what they really are. Unfortunately, both the American media and public intellectuals have failed to be honest in identifying what everyone in Europe knows is the primary source of terrorism in the world today: Islam.

Yes, there are political and economic motives behind terrorism in addition to religion, and most Muslims are not terrorists, particularly those living in Western countries. And of course Islam is not the only religion that can lead to violence, as witnessed in the occasional abortion clinic bombing by Christians, but I can’t even remember when the last one was. (I just checked: there were two in 2012, no injuries, three in 2007, also no injuries, a handful of inept attempts at arson in the early 2000s, with most serious attacks made in the 1980s and early 1990s.) Instead, most Christians who oppose abortion protest peacefully, as they did in front of the Supreme Court building in Washington DC that I happened upon on January 22, the 40th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, when I was in town on my book tour for The Moral Arc.

By contrast, a news cycle does not go by without a report of Islamic terrorists blowing themselves to smithereens, igniting car bombs and IEDs, shooting or stabbing so-called infidels and heretics, and cutting off the heads of or burning alive journalists and other innocents who happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. How common are these attacks? According to a preliminary report issued by scientists at the University of Maryland at College Park working at the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism, Islamist terrorists stand out far above domestic terrorists on both the Far Left and the Far right. Utilizing data from the Global Terrorism Database, which has accumulated information on over 125,000 terrorist attacks from 1970-2013, including 58,000 bombings, 15,000 assassinations, and 6,000 kidnappings, researchers have been able to more carefully identify what the problem is, starting with a clear definition of terrorism: “The threatened or actual use of illegal force and violence by a non-state actor to attain a political, economic, religious, or social goal through fear, coercion, or intimidation.” Their focus is on terrorism in the United States. Here are a few of their preliminary findings.

Waves of terrorist violence have flared up over the decades. Far Left violent extremists were most active in the late 1960s to early 1970s. Far Right terrorists were most active in the 1990s. And since 9/11 most terrorists are Islamist extremists.

Far Right and Far Left extremists tend to be loners and individuals with psychological problems, whereas “Islamist extremists tended to be part of tight-knit groups.” All three groups experienced similar rates of radicalization in prison.

Additional risk factors for all three groups included relationships with other extremists and romantic relationship troubles, but “only far right extremists had extensive previous criminal backgrounds.”

Violent Islamist terrorists tended to be young (between 18 and 28 years old), unmarried, and not well integrated into American society.

Most tellingly (for my point here) is that for both Far Right and Far left extremists, “religious activities and beliefs were negatively correlated with the use of violence,” whereas for Islamist terrorists, almost by definition, religion was the primary motive (why else would they be so labeled—the motive is right there in the name “Islamist”).

This graph, generated from the Global Terrorism Database by typing in the keyword “Islam” found a total of 5,704 terrorist incidents, the vast majority in the last couple of years, thereby confirming our intuitions that the trend lines match the headlines.

Additional data illuminates why violence may be inherent in the Islamic religion, to the extent that Muslims believe in sharia, especially the parts of the law that command corporal punishment for minor crimes, stoning for adultery, and capital punishment for leaving the Islamic faith. A 2013 Pew poll found these disturbing percentages of Muslims who believe that anyone who leaves Islam should be executed: South Asia (76%), Middle East-North Africa (56%, Southeast Asia (27%, Central Asia (16%), and Southern-Eastern Europe (13%). Why do they believe this? One reason is that most Muslims believe sharia is the revealed word of God: Pakistan (88%), Afghanistan (81%), Palestinian territory (76%, Egypt (70%), Malaysia (66%), Jordan (57%), Iraq (56%), Kyrgyzstan (54%), Lebanon (50%), Bangladesh (50%), Tunisia (44%), Albania (43%), and Russia (39%).

A 2009 Pew study found these percentages of Muslims who say suicide attacks against civilians in defense of Islam are justified: 43% of Nigerian Muslims, 38% of Lebanese Muslims, 15% of Egyptian Muslims, 13% of Indonesian Muslims, and 12% of Jordanian Muslims. A 2006 study found that nearly a quarter of British Muslims believe that the 7/7 terrorist attacks on London in 2005 were justified, and 28% said they hoped that one day the U.K. would become a fundamentalist Islamic state.

So when the Islamic terrorists who murdered the editors and cartoonists at Charlie Hebdo shouted “Allahu Akbar” and proclaimed their acts to be revenge for insulting the prophet Muhammad, we should take them at their word that their religion is what motivated them.

But why is Islam caught up in this cycle of violence and not one of the other two great monotheistic religions, Judaism and Christianity. It was not always so. In the book of Numbers, 31:7–12, for example, Moses assembled an army of 12,000 troops to defeat the Midianites, who were allied with the Moabites in their desire to see the Israelites wiped off the face of the earth.

They warred against Mid′ian, as the Lord commanded Moses, and slew every male. They slew the kings of Mid′ian … And the people of Israel took captive the women of Mid′ian and their little ones; and they took as booty all their cattle, their flocks, and all their goods. All their cities in the places where they dwelt, and all their encampments, they burned with fire, and took all the spoil and all the booty, both of man and of beast. Then they brought the captives and the booty and the spoil to Moses.

That sounds like a good days pillaging, but when the troops got back, Moses was furious. “What do you mean you didn’t kill the women?” he asked, exasperated, since it was apparently the women who had enticed the Israelites to be unfaithful with another God. Moses then ordered them to kill all the women who had slept with a man, and the boys. “But save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a man,” he commanded, predictably, at which point one can imagine the thirty-two thousand virgins who’d been taken captive rolling their eyes and saying, “Oh, God told you to do that, did he? Right.” Was the instruction to “keep the virgins for yourselves” what God had in mind by the word “love” in the “love thy neighbor” command? I think not. Of course, the Israelites knew exactly what God meant (this is the advantage of writing scripture yourself—you get to say what God meant) and they acted accordingly, fighting for the survival of their people. With a vengeance.

Worse, the book considered by over two billion people to be the greatest moral guide ever produced recommends the death penalty for saying the Lord’s name at the wrong moment or in the wrong context, for imaginary crimes like witchcraft, for commonplace sexual relations (adultery, fornication, homosexuality), and for not resting on the Sabbath. How many of today’s Jews and Christians agree with their own holy book on the application of capital punishment? I dare say it is close to zero. That is how far the moral arc has bent in four millennia.

The reason, I argue in The Moral Arc, is the Judaism and Christianity went through the Enlightenment and came out the other side less violent and more tolerant. Ever since the Enlightenment the study of morality has shifted from considering moral principles as based on God-given, Divinely-inspired, Holy book-derived, Authority-dictated precepts from the top down, to bottom-up individual-considered, reason-based, rationality-constructed, science-grounded propositions in which one is expected to have reasons for one’s moral actions, especially reasons that consider the other person affected by the moral act.

The Enlightenment secular values that we hold dear today—equal treatment under the law, equal opportunity for all, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, civil rights and civil liberties for everyone, the equality of women and minorities, and especially the separation of church and state and the freedom to practice any religion or no religion at all—were inculcated into the minds of Jews and Christians (and others) in the West, but not so much in Muslim countries, particularly those who would prefer a return to the medieval barbarism of theocracies. Until we can take an honest look at the problem and stop accusing people of “Islamophobia” who are courageous enough to say what almost everyone else is thinking, the problem will not go away on its own.

Why Islam? Of the three great monotheistic religions only Islam did not go through the Enlightenment(2015)
https://moralarc.org/why-islam-of-the-three-great-monotheistic-religions-one-did-not-go-through-enlightenment/
=====

A short history of theocratic Islam

The following graph depicts the rise and fall of Islam since it’s inception in 620 AD under Muhammad.

Muslim expansion continued under the Ottoman Empire from 1300 until 1922. In the aftermath of World War I, the victorious Allied Powers occupied and partitioned the Ottoman Empire, which lost its southern territories to the United Kingdom and France. The successful Turkish War of Independence, led by Mustafa Kemal Atatürk against the occupying Allies, led to the emergence of the Republic of Turkey and the abolition of the sultanate in 1922. So basically the first Global De-Islamification was secured in 1922.

Then in 1928 Hassan al-Banna formed the Muslim Brotherhood which sought to continue to push for a Global Islamic Caliphate. And for the next 100 years the Muslim Brotherhood continued its expansion throughout the world. To better understand this I would highly recommend exploring the Wiki articles on Muhammed, the Ottoman Empire and the Muslim Brotherhood. I show the graph line going down at the far right of the graph. That is to show what I hope will be the next Global De-Islamification and the final end of Islam as a political force in the world. It will be up to all of us to insure that happens.

=====
Muhammad, wiki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad
=====

=====
The Ottoman Empire,[l] also known as the Turkish Empire,[n] controlled much of Southeast Europe, West Asia, and North Africa from the 14th century to the early 20th century. It also controlled parts of southeastern Central Europe between the early 16th and early 18th centuries.[27][28][29]

The empire emerged from a beylik, or principality, founded in northwestern Anatolia in c. 1299 by the Turkoman tribal leader Osman I. His successors conquered much of Anatolia and expanded into the Balkans by the mid-14th century, transforming their petty kingdom into a transcontinental empire. The Ottomans ended the Byzantine Empire with the conquest of Constantinople in 1453 by Mehmed II. With its capital at Constantinople and control over a significant portion of the Mediterranean Basin, the Ottoman Empire was at the centre of interactions between the Middle East and Europe for six centuries. Ruling over so many peoples, the empire granted varying levels of autonomy to its many confessional communities, or millets, to manage their own affairs per Islamic law. During the reigns of Selim I and Suleiman the Magnificent in the 16th century, the Ottoman Empire became a global power.[30]

While the Ottoman Empire was once thought to have entered a period of decline after the death of Suleiman the Magnificent, modern academic consensus posits that the empire continued to maintain a flexible and strong economy, society and military into much of the 18th century. The Ottomans suffered military defeats in the late 18th and early 19th centuries, culminating in the loss of territory. With rising nationalism, a number of new states emerged in the Balkans. Following Tanzimat reforms over the course of the 19th century, the Ottoman state became more powerful and organized internally. In the 1876 revolution, the Ottoman Empire attempted constitutional monarchy, before reverting to a royalist dictatorship under Abdul Hamid II, following the Great Eastern Crisis.

Over the course of the late 19th century, Ottoman intellectuals known as Young Turks sought to liberalize and rationalize society and politics along Western lines, culminating in the Young Turk Revolution of 1908 led by the Committee of Union and Progress (CUP), which reestablished a constitutional monarchy. However, following the disastrous Balkan Wars, the CUP became increasingly radicalized and nationalistic, leading a coup d’état in 1913 that established a dictatorship.

In the 19th and early 20th centuries, persecution of Muslims during the Ottoman contraction and in the Russian Empire resulted in large-scale loss of life and mass migration into modern-day Turkey from the Balkans, Caucasus, and Crimea.[31] The CUP joined World War I on the side of the Central Powers. It struggled with internal dissent, especially the Arab Revolt, and engaged in genocide against Armenians, Assyrians, and Greeks. In the aftermath of World War I, the victorious Allied Powers occupied and partitioned the Ottoman Empire, which lost its southern territories to the United Kingdom and France. The successful Turkish War of Independence, led by Mustafa Kemal Atatürk against the occupying Allies, led to the emergence of the Republic of Turkey and the abolition of the sultanate in 1922.

Ottoman Empire, wiki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ottoman_Empire
=====

Eradicating the Muslim Brotherhood: the head of the Unenlightened Jihadist Snake

There are literally dozens of organizations in the United States and Europe that are associated with the Muslim Brotherhood. The ultimate goal of the Muslim Brotherhood, as articulated by its founder Hassan al-Banna and subsequent leaders, is to create a global, unified Islamic state (caliphate) governed by Sharia law, where Islam is the supreme authority in all aspects of life. Of course Sharia law is absolutely antithetical to our US Constitution and Bill of Rights. Sharia law treats women, non-Muslims etc. as inferior and imposes barbaric punishment that the US would never support. As such all Muslim Brotherhood organizations, and Mosques that promote Sharia law, should be treated as terrorists and treated accordingly. Sharia has no legitimate place in the Post Enlightened 21st Century both in the United States and throughout the planet.

“The ultimate goal of the Muslim Brotherhood, as articulated by its founder Hassan al-Banna and subsequent leaders, is to create a global, unified Islamic state (caliphate) governed by Sharia law, where Islam is the supreme authority in all aspects of life.”

=====
The ultimate goal of the Muslim Brotherhood, as articulated by its founder Hassan al-Banna and subsequent leaders, is to create a global, unified Islamic state (caliphate) governed by Sharia law, where Islam is the supreme authority in all aspects of life. The organization aims to achieve this through a bottom-up approach that starts with reforming individuals, establishing a “Muslim home,” and eventually influencing society and government.

Key aspects of the Muslim Brotherhood’s goals include:

* Establishment of a Caliphate: The long-term, often implicit goal is to unite Muslim-majority lands under a single, supreme authority.

* Implementation of Sharia Law: The group seeks to make the Qur’an and Sunnah the sole, binding constitution for state and society.

* Reclaiming “True” Islam: The Brotherhood aims to eliminate Western influence in the Muslim world, which they argue has corrupted Islamic society.

* “Islam is the Solution”: This foundational slogan emphasizes that the group views Islam not just as a faith, but as a complete system managing politics, economy, and social life.

* Global Reach and Influence: While originating in Egypt, the movement operates globally, aiming to strengthen its influence in both the Middle East and the West.

Methods and Strategies:

* Grassroots Islamization (Dawa): The Brotherhood historically focused on charity, education, and healthcare to gain popular support and influence society.

* Political Engagement: While banned in some countries, the group often seeks to participate in electoral politics to influence legislation and government.

* “Civilization Jihad”: Critics and some investigations describe the group’s strategy in the West as a form of non-violent, structural subversion—a “civilization jihad” aimed at strengthening Muslim communities and influencing policy through lobbying and educational efforts.

Evolution and Divergence:

While officially renouncing violence in the 1970s and focusing on peaceful, political opposition, the Brotherhood has faced significant, sometimes violent, crackdowns in Egypt and elsewhere. Some offshoots, such as Hamas, continue to use violent methods. The organization is often described as a “network of networks” that adapts to local conditions in different countries, leading to variations in strategy.

Google AI [what are the ultimate goals of the Muslim brotherhood]
=====

Here is a partial list of groups in the united states associated with the Muslim Brotherhood.

=====
In the U.S., groups identified as connected to the Muslim Brotherhood network, often through origins or ideology, include the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), the Muslim American Society (MAS), and the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), with think tanks and advocacy groups also noted for promoting similar narratives, though CAIR denies links to the Brotherhood. While the Brotherhood itself isn’t federally banned in the U.S., its associated networks are accused of fostering influence, fundraising for groups like Hamas, and coordinating a broader Islamist agenda, prompting some state-level actions and ongoing debate.

Key Organizations Mentioned:

* Islamic Society of North America (ISNA): Described as part of the U.S. Brotherhood network, involved in broader Muslim community activities.

* Muslim American Society (MAS): Also linked to the network and seen as promoting Brotherhood goals.

* Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR): A prominent civil rights group that denies any ties to the Brotherhood, despite criticisms and state-level actions.

Other Related Entities & Concepts:

* Interlocking Networks: Groups like the North American Islamic Trust (NAIT) and International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT) are part of this ecosystem, as noted in internal documents.

* Ideological Fronts: Organizations promoting Egyptian-American dialogue and advocacy also push Brotherhood-aligned narratives, according to research.

* Financial Links: The Brotherhood’s U.S. network has been implicated in fundraising for Hamas, with entities like the now-defunct Holy Land Foundation (HLF) convicted for supporting terrorism.

Context & Controversy:

* Federal vs. State Action: The U.S. government has designated foreign Brotherhood branches as terrorist entities (e.g., Egyptian & Jordanian chapters) but has not federally designated U.S. groups like CAIR, though states like Texas have taken action.

* “Peaceful Façade”: Critics argue these U.S. groups maintain a public image of civil rights advocacy while advancing the Brotherhood’s broader, extremist agenda, a claim these groups strongly dispute.

Google AI [groups in the united states associated with the Muslim Brotherhood]
=====

And here is a list of groups and nations supporting a global Muslim caliphate, just as the Muslim Brotherhood does in both the United States and other First World nations.

=====
Groups like the Islamic State (ISIL/ISIS) and ideological movements such as Hizb ut-Tahrir explicitly advocate for a global caliphate, while some states like Turkey and Qatar have been cited as supporting Islamist groups (like the Muslim Brotherhood) with similar ambitions, though their direct support for a unified global caliphate is debated. Historically, various caliphates (like the Umayyad, Abbasid, Fatimid) ruled vast Muslim empires, inspiring modern revivals, but currently, no major nation officially supports a single global caliphate, with most supporters being non-state actors or fringe political movements.

Key Groups & Ideologies Supporting a Caliphate:

* Islamic State (ISIL/ISIS): Explicitly aims to re-establish a global caliphate through violence and territorial conquest, though its control has been largely dismantled.

* Hizb ut-Tahrir (HT): A transnational political organization seeking to unify the Muslim world under a single Islamic caliphate through non-violent means, viewing historical Muslim lands (including parts of Europe, India, Russia) as part of it.

* Muslim Brotherhood (MB): While not solely focused on a caliphate, its Islamist ideology promotes a unified Islamic society and governance, with Qatar and Turkey providing significant support to its affiliates.

Nations & State Actors (Indirect or Ambiguous Support):

* Turkey (AKP government): Has provided political and material support to Islamist groups, including the Muslim Brotherhood, aligning with broader Islamist agendas, though official endorsement of a global caliphate is absent.

* Qatar: A major backer of the Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamist movements, seen as promoting Sunni Islamist influence, which can align with caliphal goals.

Why No Major Nation Officially Supports It:

* Nationalism vs. Pan-Islamism: Most modern Muslim-majority nations prioritize national sovereignty over a unified caliphate.

* Sectarian Divisions: Sunni-Shia divides and theological differences hinder unified support.

International Relations: A global caliphate would clash with existing world order and sovereignty, leading to conflict.

In essence, the concept of a global caliphate remains a powerful, albeit often radical, ideal within certain Islamist movements, with some state actors offering support to factions that share parts of this vision, but no major world power endorses its actualization.

Google AI [groups and nations supporting a global Muslim caliphate]
=====

Here is a great article on the history of the Muslim Brotherhood

=====
The Society of the Muslim Brothers (Arabic: جماعة الإخوان المسلمين Jamāʿat al-Ikhwān al-Muslimīn), better known as the Muslim Brotherhood (الإخوان المسلمون al-Ikhwān al-Muslimūn), is a transnational Sunni Islamist organization founded in Egypt by Islamic scholar, Imam and schoolteacher Hassan al-Banna in 1928.[34] Al-Banna’s teachings spread far beyond Egypt, influencing various Islamist movements from charitable organizations to political parties.[35]

Initially, as a pan-Islamist, religious, and social movement, it preached Islam in Egypt, taught the illiterate, and set up hospitals and business enterprises. It later advanced into the political arena, aiming to end British colonial rule in Egypt. The movement’s self-stated aim is the establishment of a state ruled by sharia law under a caliphate[36]—its most famous slogan is “Islam is the solution”. Charity is a major aspect of its work.[1]

The group spread to other Muslim countries but still has one of its largest organizations in Egypt, despite a succession of government crackdowns since 1948.[37] It remained a fringe group in the politics of the Arab world until the 1967 Six-Day War, when Islamism replaced popular secular Arab nationalism after a resounding Arab defeat by Israel.[38] The movement was also supported by Saudi Arabia, with which it shared mutual enemies like communism.[39]

The Arab Spring brought it legalization and substantial political power at first, but as of 2013 it has suffered severe reversals.[40] The Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood was legalized in 2011 and won several elections,[41] including the 2012 presidential election when its candidate Mohamed Morsi became Egypt’s first president to gain power through an election.[42] A year later, following massive demonstrations and unrest, he was overthrown by the military and placed under house arrest; with a later review finding that the group failed to moderate its views or embrace democratic values during its time in power.[43] The group was then banned in Egypt and declared a terrorist organization. The Persian Gulf monarchies of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates followed suit, driven by the perception that the Brotherhood is a threat to their authoritarian rule.[44][failed verification]

The group’s founder accepted the utility of political violence[45] and members of Brotherhood conducted assassinations and attempted assassinations on Egyptian state figures during his lifetime, including Egyptian prime minister Mahmud El Nokrashi in 1948.[46] Sayyid Qutb, one of the group’s most prominent thinkers, promoted takfirism in Ma’alim fi-l-Tariq (Milestones), a doctrine that permits “the stigmatisation of other Muslims as infidel or apostate, and of existing states as unIslamic, and the use of extreme violence in the pursuit of the perfect Islamic society”; this doctrine continues to inspire many Jihadist movements.[47][48] The group abandoned the use of violence in the 1970s. However, Hamas, a Palestinian militant group that controls the Gaza Strip, is an off-shoot of the Brotherhood that continues to use violence. The Brotherhood itself claims to be a peaceful, democratic organization, and that its leader[who?] “condemns violence and violent acts”.[49]

In recent times, the primary state backers of the Muslim Brotherhood have been Qatar and the AKP-ruled Turkey.[50] As of 2015, it is considered a terrorist organization by the governments of Bahrain,[51] Egypt,[52] Russia,[53] Saudi Arabia[54] and the United Arab Emirates.[55]

Muslim Brotherhood, wiki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_Brotherhood
=====

Reciprocity

The practice of exchanging things with others for mutual benefit, especially privileges granted by one country or organization to another.

Reciprocity is a corollary to the Golden Rule: treat others as you would like to be treated. For far too long First World Nations have allowed our Muslim population to take advantage of our First Amendment and our inalienable rights in ways that would never be allowed in their countries of origin.

We might also consider reciprocity should other Global De-Islamification measures prove insufficient. For instance there are many Muslim countries that severally restrict the establishment of Christian Churches. We could pressure these countries to fall in line or begin imposing similar restrictions to Mosques throughout America: forbidding the building of new Mosques and shutting down Mosques guilty of promoting Sharia law.

=====
While outright bans on churches are rare, countries like Saudi Arabia have extremely strict limitations, forbidding public Christian worship and construction of churches, though expatriates can sometimes worship privately; other nations with severe restrictions or outright bans on conversion and proselytization, like Afghanistan under Taliban rule, effectively prevent open Christian presence, with a general pattern of high persecution in nations like Iran and Somalia, despite many Muslim countries allowing some form of Christian worship.

Here’s a breakdown of the spectrum:

Countries with Near-Total Bans/Severe Restrictions:

* Saudi Arabia: Public Christian worship, evangelism, and church construction are prohibited. While private worship for foreigners occurs, apostasy from Islam is punishable by death, creating a deeply restrictive environment.

* Afghanistan (under Taliban): The Taliban enforces strict Islamic law (Sharia), which prohibits non-Muslim faiths, leading to the forced conversion or expulsion of remaining Christians, making church presence virtually impossible.

* Iran: While some recognized Christian minorities exist, evangelism, conversion from Islam, and building new churches face severe government suppression and persecution, especially for converts.

Countries with High Persecution & Restrictions:

* Somalia: Extreme restrictions, with a near-total absence of public Christian activity due to extremist groups and government policies.

* Yemen & Syria: Ongoing conflicts and extremist elements make open Christian worship extremely dangerous, with many churches destroyed or closed.

Countries Allowing Churches (But With Caveats):

Many Muslim-majority nations, such as the UAE, Qatar, Jordan, and Malaysia, permit Christian churches, often for expatriate communities, but restrict proselytization to Muslims and sometimes limit public displays of faith.

In essence, while few Muslim-majority states have laws explicitly stating “no churches,” the combination of strict interpretations of Sharia, apostasy laws, and extremist activity creates environments where churches cannot exist or operate openly.

Google AI [muslim countries that don’t allow christian churches]
=====

To better understand the expansion of the Muslim Brotherhood, since its inception in 1928, I highly recommend watching the following 30 minute video featuring Islamic Expert Daniel Pipes.

=====
The Silent Jihad of the Muslim Brotherhood is a radical network infiltrating the U.S.(01/07/2026)

=====

The following article gives a concise overview of the Muslim Brotherhood and its history.

=====
The Muslim Brotherhood is a pan-Islamist organisation that was founded in Egypt in 1928 as an Islamic political movement to counter the spread of secular and nationalist ideas. It swiftly spread through Muslim countries, becoming a major player but often operating in secret. Its founder, Egyptian schoolteacher Hassan al-Banna, believed that reviving Islamic principles in society could enable the Muslim world to resist Western colonialism. The Muslim Brotherhood is now outlawed as a terrorist group in Egypt and Saudi Arabia. More recently, Jordan banned it in April 2025. It is popular in Jordan, and had continued to operate there even though the country’s top court in 2020 ruled to dissolve the group. Authorities have turned a blind eye to its activities in the past.

In Egypt, the Muslim Brotherhood has been banned since 2013, after the overthrow of its leader and then-president Mohamed Morsi, who was deposed in a military coup led by then military chief Abdel Fattah al-Sisi. Sisi has led Egypt since then, forging a key alliance with Washington in the process. In May 2025, president Emmanuel Macron of France ordered his government to draw up proposals to counter the influence of the Muslim Brotherhood and the spread of political Islam in that country. In November, the US president, Donald Trump, began the process of designating certain Muslim Brotherhood chapters as foreign terrorist organisations and specially-designated global terrorists, a move would bring sanctions against one of the Arab world’s oldest and most influential Islamist movements.

What is the Muslim Brotherhood – explained in 30 seconds (11/24/2025)
The Muslim Brotherhood one of the Arab world’s oldest and most influential Islamist movements
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/nov/25/what-is-muslim-brotherhood-islamist-movement-explained
=====

The Holy Land Foundation (HLF)

The prosecution of the Holy Land Foundation (HLF) was possibly the first evidence that Muslim groups were funneling money to terrorist organizations in the United States. They were under investigation as early as 1994 and by 2009, the founders of the organization were given sentences of between 15 and 65 years in prison for “funneling $12 million to Hamas.”

I can just hear the Somali’s in Minnesota saying, “hold my beer.”

The Somali’s in Minnesota have funneled millions to hundreds of millions, of US tax dollars, to Muslim Terrorist groups in Somalia. And the fraudulent schemes they conspired has probably cost US taxpayers between 10 and 20 Billion dollars. Those involved should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law and summarily deported.

=====
The Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development (HLF; Arabic: مؤسسة الأرض المقدسة للإغاثة والتنمية, romanized: Muʾassasat al-ʾArḍ al-Muqaddasa li-l-ʾIghātha wa-t-Tanmiya), originally known as Occupied Land Fund (صندوق الأرض المحتلة, Ṣundūq al-ʾArḍ al-Muḥtalla), was an Islamic charity in the United States.

Headquartered in Richardson, Texas, and run by Palestinian-Americans, the organization’s stated mission was to “find and implement practical solutions for human suffering through humanitarian programs that impact the lives of the disadvantaged, disinherited, and displaced peoples suffering from man-made and natural disasters.”[1][2][3]

In December 2001, the U.S. designated HLF a terrorist organization, seized its assets, and closed the organization. At the time it was the largest Muslim charitable organization in the United States. It had been under FBI surveillance since 1994.[4][5] In 2004, a federal grand jury in Dallas, Texas, charged HLF and five former officers and employees with providing material support to Hamas and related offenses. The government’s assertion was that HLF distributed charity through local zakat (charity) committees located in the West Bank that paid stipends to the families of Palestinian suicide bombers and Hamas prisoners; that Hamas controlled those zakat committees; that by distributing charity through Hamas-controlled committees, HLF helped Hamas build a grassroots support amongst the Palestinian people; and that these charity front organizations served a dual purpose of laundering the money for all of Hamas’s activities.[6]

Simultaneously, in November 2004, U.S. magistrate judge Arlander Keys ruled that HLF, along with the Islamic Association of Palestine (IAP), were liable for the 1996 killing of 17-year-old American citizen David Boim in Israel.[7]

The first criminal trial, in 2007, ended in the partial acquittal of one defendant and a hung jury on all other charges. At a retrial in 2008, the jury found all defendants guilty on all counts. The 2008 trial of the charity leaders was the “largest terrorism financing prosecution in American history.”[8] In 2009, the founders of the organization were given sentences of between 15 and 65 years in prison for “funnelling $12 million to Hamas.”[9]

The trial has been criticised by some NGOs, including Human Rights Watch.[10] Civil rights attorney Emily Ratner wrote that the use of anonymous and hearsay evidence by the prosecutors was “constitutionally questionable” at best.[11][12] Families of the men charged, known as the Holy Land Five, have demanded their release.[13]
=====

The backlash against the Muslim Brotherhood has recently expanded in both the United States, Europe and even some Muslim countries

As I’ve written, earlier in this series, many countries, are restricting the Islamic practice whether that be the wearing of Burkas, Hijabs, Halal foods in the public schools etc. Now we are seeing many countries that have banned or designated the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) as a terrorist group. That is good news though it should have been done decades ago.

=====
Countries that have banned or designated the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) as a terrorist group include Egypt, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Bahrain, Jordan, and Russia, with some nations like the US (under Trump), Austria, France, and Germany considering or taking steps to counter its influence or designate specific chapters. These bans stem from regional security concerns, ideological clashes, and accusations of supporting extremism, leading to crackdowns and legal prohibitions in these nations.

Key Countries with Bans/Terrorist Designations:

* Egypt: Banned the MB in 2013 following the ousting of President Morsi.

* Saudi Arabia: Designated the MB a terrorist organization in 2014 due to ideological threats to its rule.

* United Arab Emirates (UAE): Labeled the group a terrorist organization, notes this U.S. Congressional testimony.

* Bahrain: Also lists the MB as a terrorist entity.

* Jordan: Outlawed the group in April 2025, confiscating assets and targeting its political arm, the Islamic Action Front.

* Russia: Has banned the organization.

Countries Considering or Taking Action:

* United States: The Trump administration began designating MB branches as Foreign Terrorist Organizations in late 2025.

* France: Ordered investigations in 2025 to counter the group’s influence.

* Austria: Some politicians view the MB as a threat, with discussions around banning it, though not fully enacted.

* Germany: Discussions and proposed legislation in 2025 targeted the MB and affiliated groups.

Reasons for Bans:

* Terrorism Allegations: Accusations of involvement in bombings, assassinations, and material support for militant groups like Hamas.

* Ideological Threat: Perceived challenge to ruling regimes and national stability, particularly by monarchies like Saudi Arabia.

* Political Islam: Concerns over the spread of political Islam and its impact on social cohesion.

Google AI [countries that have banned the Muslim brotherhood]
=====

For those that wish to delve deeper into Political Islam and the Muslim Brotherhood let me suggest the following:

=====
THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD’S STRATEGIC ENTRYISM INTO THE UNITED STATES: A SYSTEMIC ANALYSIS (2025)
This document is 265 pages and is very thorough in it’s analysis.
https://isgap.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/MB-Project-Final-251117-01.pdf
=====
=====
The Muslim Brotherhood in America A brief history (July 2025)
by LORENZO VIDINO
https://extremism.gwu.edu/sites/g/files/zaxdzs5746/files/2025-07/The%20Muslim%20Brotherhood%20in%20America.pdf
=====

Concluding remarks

All groups supporting Sharia law or associated with the Muslim Brotherhood should be defunded and treated as Islamic Terrorist organizations. And the urgent need for Global De-Islamification needs to expand and become a top priority internationally. But De-Islamification is not, in any way, about persecuting the entire Muslim population. Muslims are free to pray in their Mosques and in their homes. But any “special privileges” -- such as Halal foods in the public schools -- do need to be revoked. Assimilation to our cultural norms must become mandatory and expected. And any Muslims that wage jihad against the United States, or countries throughout the world, need to be treated as terrorists. De-Islamification is ultimately about peaceful coexistence.

I’d also remark that I don’t really think Americans are becoming less religious. I just think their beliefs are becoming more sophisticated and that the Abrahamic Religions seem less relevant and antiquated. Still the vast majority of Americans support the Golden Rule and Judeo-Christian values. I certainly do. As I have described in this essay I also think there is an underlying intelligence permeating the Cosmos and steering our evolution. Over the years I have referred to it as the Lifeforce: an amoral force whose primary concerns are extending life through the continuum of time and improving the human genome in order to avoid extinction. It also seems to favor hierarchy to optimize its goals while having no concern whether this happens through a utopian or dystopian paradigm. That has always been up to us and requires action.

Finally there are 3 ways you can help me with my Sub stack publication.

1) Share my essays with your friends and on your social media platforms, especially on Facebook where I have recently been permanently suspended.
2) Consider a paid subscription
3) Purchasing a copy of my Complete Writings (1989 - 2025)

I suppose January 6th, 2026 will be a day that lives in infamy for me. After posting on Facebook, for well over 20 years, they have permanently disabled my account, without explanation. This will obviously effect my ability to distribute my essays, as Facebook has long been my primary platform for distribution. To be clear I have been permanently removed from Facebook with absolutely no due process. This is what happens in Tyranny’s. It should not be allowed from Social Media platforms like Facebook — which was established in 2004 through DARPA and your tax dollars.

The only stated reason for my suspension was “violating community standards,” but no specific reason or post was cited. After years of Facebook censoring “Anti-Globalist” speech -- there is no Anthropogenic Climate Change, there are only 2 genders, the mRNA injections caused deaths and injury etc. -- “violating community standards” is really just an excuse for censoring Anti-globalist viewpoints, which Facebook does on a daily basis. When you look at FB’s “Community Standards” page there are nearly 30 separate sections. So if they really want to censor your voice they have 30 reasons to do it.

=====
These standards are based on feedback from people and the advice of experts in fields like technology, public safety and human rights. To ensure everyone’s voice is valued, we take great care to create standards that include different views and beliefs, especially from people and communities that might otherwise be overlooked or marginalized.

Every day, people use Facebook, Instagram, Messenger and Threads to share their experiences, connect with friends and family, and build communities. Our services enable billions of people to freely express themselves across countries and cultures and in dozens of languages.

Meta recognizes how important it is for Facebook, Instagram, Messenger and Threads to be places where people feel empowered to communicate, and we take our role seriously in keeping abuse off the service. That’s why we developed standards for what is and isn’t allowed on these services.

Categories: Coordinating Harm and Promoting Crime Dangerous Organizations and Individuals Fraud, Scams, and Deceptive Practices Restricted Goods and Services Violence and Incitement Adult Sexual Exploitation Bullying and Harassment Child Sexual Exploitation, Abuse, and Nudity Human Exploitation Suicide, Self-Injury, and Eating Disorders Adult Nudity and Sexual Activity Adult Sexual Solicitation and Sexually Explicit Language Hateful Conduct Privacy Violations Violent and Graphic Content Account Integrity Authentic Identity Representation Cybersecurity Inauthentic Behavior Memorialization Misinformation Spam Third-Party Intellectual Property Infringement Using Meta Intellectual Property and Licenses Additional Protection of Minors Locally Illegal Content, Products, or Services User Requests

The Community Standards outline what is and isn’t allowed on Facebook, Instagram, Messenger and Threads.
https://transparency.meta.com/policies/community-standards/?
=====

Subscribe now

Certainly some of these categories, such as violence and incitement, are legitimate concerns. But my primary use of Facebook is to distribute my essays. And I’ve never incited violence toward anyone, ever. It is quite obvious that it had something to do with my series of essays on De-Islamification which I have been distributing, through Facebook, for the past 3 months. In a recent podcast, with Naomi Wolf, I described how Facebook was censoring the distribution of my essays.

=====
Bruce Cain:
I used to do a lot of YouTube, on my YouTube channel. But I don’t post on YouTube anymore because they censor everything I write. In fact, I’ll mention one last thing. I distribute my essays primarily through Facebook groups. Four months ago, it was virtually unlimited. I could post to 40+ groups a day, right? Then about four months ago, they limited me to four a day. And with these last two essays, they won’t let me post it to any groups at all.

Naomi Wolf
Well, then you’re over the target.

“Is there a Legal Basis for the ‘De-Islamification’ of the US?” (12/18/2025)

=====

I can only speculate about who is behind this but their intent is crystal clear -- someone wants to eliminate my voice.

Facebook permanently suspends my account for discussing De-Islamification

The Muslim Brand has been shredded

Before 911 (09/11/2001) many Americans and Europeans might have bought into the idea that Islam is the religion of peace. That is no longer the case. After decades of Muslim immigration most of the indigenous populations want to see mass deportations which was the primary reason that Trump won in November 2024. Muslim Rape Gangs and Muslim Ghettos are destroying cities throughout the EU, Great Britain, Canada, Australia and the United States. Meanwhile Muslim Jihadi’s in Nigeria have murdered and raped over 200,000 Christians and moderate Muslims since 2009. The indigenous populations are sick and tired of providing free housing to these immigrants while they are left with the bill. The people feel they are being betrayed by their leaders.

Then in September 2025 the mayor of Dearborn insulted a local priest who protested putting up a sign for the editor of the Arab News: Siblani. The priest said it was inappropriate to post a commemorative sign to someone that supports Iran, Hezbollah and Hamas. Basically both the Mayor and Siblani are commemorating terrorism. The story went viral on various national news networks after the bigoted mayor told the priest he was no longer welcome in Dearborn.

=====
Dearborn City Council Meeting originally aired live on September 9, 2025

=====

More recently the Muslim Somali fraud story also went viral nationally and may involve tens of billions in fraud, from California to Maine. It is becoming clear that the fraud is happening throughout Somali communities throughout the country: not just in Minnesota. And the American People are now understandably angered by this massive fraud committed by Somalian Muslims.

=====
Nick Shirley REVEALS How He Exposed Somali Daycare Fraud and Corrupt Minnesota Politicians (01/07/2026)

=====

Here is the 5 hour “Oversight of Fraud and Misuse of Federal Funds in Minnesota Part I.” The revelations are shocking.

=====
The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee holds a hearing on “Oversight of Fraud and Misuse of Federal Funds in Minnesota Part I.”

House Minnesota fraud hearing (01/07/2025)

=====

What I noticed, in late September, was a sudden surge of Muslim posts, on my feed, doing damage control for the Muslim community. Before late September I had no Muslims posting on my Facebook feed. But the user comments made it crystal clear no one was buying it. Everyone is sick and tired of being told that Islam remains a “religion of peace.” And I made sure to post links to my De-Islamification essays in reply to their posts. So it wouldn’t be a big surprise if some Muslim with influence called Zuckerberg to insist I be deplatformed from Facebook.

I often prepended my responses with “Fuck Islam.” I never got cited for that once by Facebook. And in the context of my writings I am not saying Fuck Muslims. I happen to like my Muslim neighbors. What I’m saying in my essays is we should no longer allow Political Islam any “special privileges” moving forward: No calls to prayer, No Burkas, No prayer rooms in public schools or universities, no Halal or Kosher foods in public schools etc. These are what I’d call “Soft Sharia Laws.” By eradicating such “special privileges” we are gently pushing all Muslims to assimilate to American law (e.g. the Bill of Rights) and mores (pronounced ‘morays’). By eradicating such “special privileges” we are making it far less likely that Muslim Jihadists will ever gain a foothold in our country. If I didn’t feel this was necessary, obviously I wouldn’t have spent so much time writing about the subject.

Another good possibility, for my deplatforming, is that Facebook announced the appointment of Tawakkol Karmen to it’s independent oversight board in May of 2020. Tawakkol Karman is a former member of the Muslim Brotherhood-linked Al Islah Party in Yemen. To be clear the primary goal of the Muslim Brotherhood is the establishment of a Global Muslim Caliphate under the auspices of Islamic Sharia Law. I could see Zuckerberg appointing a Muslim but never someone representing the Muslim Brotherhood. As I have made clear, in previous essays, Sharia Law is completely at odds with the US Constitution and American morays.

=====
Among the first 20 members that Facebook announced last week to its new and independent oversight board is Peace Prize Nobel laureate Tawakkol Karman, a former member of the Muslim Brotherhood-linked Al Islah Party in Yemen. Nicknamed by some as Facebook’s “Supreme Court,” the independent oversight body has been tasked with making decisions on controversial content issues, including online extremism, hate speech, harassment, and user privacy and security related to Facebook and Instagram, which is owned by the former. “We are all committed to freedom of expression within the framework of international norms of human rights,” wrote the four co-chairs of the board in a May 6 New York Times opinion piece. However, Karman has a history of praising the Muslim Brotherhood, which is known to be an extremist movement. According to the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI), Karman said in a Sept. 15, 2013, BBC Arabic interview: “The most important achievement of the January [2011] Revolution [in Egypt] was the abolishment of the emergency law. Unfortunately, the July 3 [2013] coup reinstated that law. The Muslim Brotherhood and its supporters, who oppose the military rule, are engaged in a legendary struggle, which they are waging with their blood, their resolute steadfastness, and their belief that they will restore the revolution to its true path.” When asked if she supports the Muslim Brotherhood, Karman said, “You can hear it from me: Yes, at this stage, I am partial towards the Muslim Brotherhood … .”

Facebook names ex-member of Muslim Brotherhood-linked party to new board (05/13/2020)
https://www.jns.org/facebook-names-ex-member-of-muslim-brotherhood-linked-party-to-new-board/
=====

A third possibility, for my deplatforming, may involve President Trump. I have certainly praised the president when it comes to closing our borders to illegal aliens. But I have also criticized him for pushing digital ID and a digital currency. And I have also criticized him for his support for Qatar which is the primary funding source for Islamic Terrorist groups throughout the planet: Hezbollah/Lebanon, Houthis/Yemen, Hamas/Gaza etc. And Qatar also pumps tens of millions of dollars, annually, to our universities in order to radicalize their students and gain influence. He also accepted a commercial jet from Qatar which is worth nearly a half billion dollars. And then he allowed Qatar to build an air force facility in Idaho which has been questioned by a majority of Americans. Why would he do this?

=====
Qatar to build air force facility in Idaho, US says (10/10/2025)
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c75q2y92090o
=====

Frankly I doubt I am on Trumps radar so I doubt he had anything to do with my deplatforming from Facebook. What is far more likely is some of these Muslim groups complained to Facebook and Tawakkol Karmen (Muslim Brotherhood advocate on Facebooks’ independent oversight board) was more than happy to take action.

How I was permanently deplatformed from Facebook after 20 years

It only took a single day. On the morning of January 6th, 2026 I got the following post from Facebook:

Again they never cited the post or action that led to the suspension. They basically just said I violated “community standards” which is about as vague as it gets. I immediately appealed my suspension which required me to upload a copy of my drivers license along with a picture of myself.

Next I got a message saying that the appeal was in process.

Some hours later they said my drivers license could not be accepted even though it met all stated criteria.

And finally, a few hours later, I got a message stating that I had lost my appeal and would be deplatformed permanently from Facebook.

Zuckerberg has no right to remain Judge, Juror and Executioner when it comes to Free Speech on Facebook

=====
“Judge, jury, and executioner” describes someone with absolute, unchecked power to decide someone’s fate, including finding them guilty, passing sentence, and carrying out the punishment, all without due process or oversight, implying unfairness and authoritarianism. It refers to a single entity holding all three roles, a stark contrast to modern legal systems that separate these powers.

* Judge: Decides the law and evidence.

* Jury: Determines the facts (guilt or innocence).

* Executioner: Carries out the sentence.

Meaning & Usage

* Unilateral Power: It signifies total control over someone’s life or situation.

* Disapproval: The phrase is typically used disapprovingly to criticize someone who acts autocratically or unfairly.

* Origin: It stems from historical contexts like frontier justice where formal laws were absent.

* Modern Context: It’s used figuratively for dictators, corrupt officials, or even individuals who make swift, biased judgments in everyday life (e.g., a boss acting as the “judge, jury, and executioner” in firing someone).

Google AI [judge jury and executioner meaning]
=====

If you’ve been reading my essays it is clear that I am a free speech absolutist. Censorship should be minimal and speech that offends us must be allowed. But Zuckerberg has no right to remain Judge, Juror and Executioner when it comes to Free Speech. Sadly Great Britain, Australia, the EU and even the United States Congress are now pushing the most draconian censorship laws in recent history. All of this needs to stop. Perhaps George Washington said it best:

Let us not forget that during the Plandemic Biden pressured Facebook and other Social Media Platforms to censor those opposed to the mRNA injections, the masks, the distancing and all sorts of other unmitigated bullshit. As a result of this censorship nearly 17 million died worldwide from the mRNA shots, the use of Remdesivir, the intubations, restricted access to Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine and the forced isolation. My mother (b. 1927) died at a retirement center from the isolation. You would think we would have learned from this that we are better off in a free market of ideas than in a world where idiots can suppress our speech. Obviously we’ve learned nothing. And let us not forget that nearly all the censored conspiracy theories turned out to be true. And the censors were universally wrong. And yet we still allow them to censor.

=====
The Biden administration pressured social media companies on issues primarily related to COVID-19 (vaccine hesitancy, lab leak theory, general “misinformation”) and elections (”disinformation”).

According to reports and testimony from social media executives, the specific issues the Biden administration focused on included:

* COVID-19 Misinformation: This was the primary area of concern. The White House, Surgeon General, and Press Secretary repeatedly urged companies to remove or reduce content they deemed “untrustworthy” or “misinformation,” which officials argued was “killing people”. This included not just false information, but at times, true information, humor, and satire that did not violate the platforms’ existing policies.

* Vaccine Content: Administration officials specifically flagged posts that questioned the safety or efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines and pressured platforms like Facebook and YouTube to adopt stricter enforcement strategies against them.

* Election Integrity: The administration also sought to suppress content related to “disinformation” about elections.

* Hunter Biden Laptop Story: The House Judiciary Committee has released information suggesting that the FBI’s communications with social media companies prior to the 2020 election, warning of potential “hack and leak” operations, allowed social media companies to conclude the Hunter Biden laptop story was Russian disinformation, leading to its suppression.

Social media companies like Meta (Facebook/Instagram) and Google (YouTube) have acknowledged receiving significant pressure from the White House, with executives like Mark Zuckerberg and Google representatives stating they regret how they handled the situation and that they will resist similar pressure in the future.

The legal battle over these communications, Murthy v. Missouri, reached the U.S. Supreme Court, which ultimately ruled in June 2024 that the plaintiffs lacked the legal standing to sue, thereby dismissing the case without ruling on the constitutionality of the administration’s actions.

Google AI [Biden pressures social media of these issues]
=====

=====
Mark Zuckerberg says White House pressured Facebook to ‘censor’ Covid content in 2021

=====

=====
Zuckerberg says the White House pressured Facebook to ‘censor’ some COVID-19 content during the pandemic (08/27/2024)
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/zuckerberg-says-the-white-house-pressured-facebook-to-censor-some-covid-19-content-during-the-pandemic#
=====

The push for Global De-Islamification is already underway

As I have made clear the push for Global De-Islamification is already underway. Some countries are already banning Burkas, Hijabs, Halal foods etc. The following podcast reflects the growing anger Americans are having toward giving Muslim “special privileges.”

=====
PBD & Scott REACTS Violent Dearborn Protest & Muslim Population overtaking Christianity (01/04/2026)

=====

And that is essentially what De-Islamification is all about: taking away all “special privileges” currently afforded to the Muslim people. You might say the party is over.

In my first essay, on De-Islamification, I made clear that the UN’s push for Muslim immigration was to destabilize first world nations and to push for a Hegelian Dialectic in order to push forward the final goals of the globalists: digital ID and a digital currency. Because once that is achieved we become nothing more than slaves on a Global Plantation.

=====
I think there are two main components to this Globalist Mass Immigration strategy: “Divide and Conquer” and the Hegelian Dialectic. So one component is the “Divide and Conquer” strategy where culturally incompatible foreigners are brought in to cause social division among the indigenous populations. This keeps the indigenous populations distracted from the real enemy: the globalists. The other related component is the Hegelian Dialectic: Problem, Reaction, Solution. The problem is introduced by pushing Mass Immigration. The reaction is increasing social tension, now leading the UK and EU nations toward civil war. And the solution is mandatory digital ID, digital currency and eventually a cashless society where populations can be completely controlled. At that point we become nothing more than slaves on a globalist plantation as failure to comply will result in the suspension of access to your digital wallet. And all of this is now happening throughout Great Britain, the EU and other First World Nations in real time.

Another important aspect of the globalist agenda is the imposition of a digital ID for every human on planet Earth. This is absolutely essential for the transition to a cashless society: the ultimate end goal for the globalists. Trump is pushing this forward by nudging anyone that uses air transportation to have Real ID. Just about a week ago he further nudged people to get Real ID by charging an additional $45 per flight, for those that don’t yet have it.
=====

In my next essay, on De-Islamification I will be making the general point that it is only Islam that has not embraced the cultural shift of the Enlightenment. Both Christianity and Judaism have modified their beliefs accordingly. And to further emphasize that point I will be putting Muslims into two general categories: Enlightened and Unenlightened Muslims.

In the meantime I would like to encourage my readers to share this De-Islamification series on all social media platforms: X, Redit, Facebook etc. To do this simply copy/paste the name of the essay and the corresponding link.

=====
The Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification
How Mass Muslim Immigration is an important part of the larger Globalist Control Agenda

=====
The Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification: Part2
Somali Muslims committing massive fraud costing US taxpayers billions

=====
The Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification: Part3
My online video discussion with Naomi Wolf on 12/16/2025

=====

I’m obviously upset by my deplatforming from Facebook as that is how I share my essays. But as Naomi Wolf reminded me: the fact you are getting censored shows that you are right over the target. Unfortunately my target is now shooting back. At the end of the day I just want everyone to peacefully coexist. And I don’t expect that to happen over night.

Subscribe now

The Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification: Part 3

If you still don’t have a paid subscription you can still help out by sharing this on Facebook, X and other internet platforms. That would be highly appreciated. My complete writing are also available which are many thousands of pages in length and span 36 years of writing.

I want to thank Naomi, again, for interviewing me about my series of essays on “The Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification.” So far I have written two essays on this important topic and more will follow.

And here are some links to the 1 hour video discussion:

=====
Naomi Wolf discusses “The Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification” with author Bruce W. Cain (12/16/2025)

https://www.facebook.com/watch/live/?ref=watch_permalink&v=1986247005252350

Outspoken with Dr Naomi Wolf

"Is there a Legal Basis for the 'Islamification' of the US?"

"Bruce Cain, a citizen journalist, has uncovered a series of laws, many of them already passed, that provide a legal structure for a two-tier society in the U.S. that privileges Islam. This two-tier legal structure has already been erected in the U.K. and is causing havoc in that nation. Our Founders ensured a separation of Church and State for all reli…

Listen now

6 months ago · 44 likes · 81 comments · Dr Naomi Wolf

=====

You can access the first two essays for free in the links below.

=====

Please read, subscribe and share.. This is the first part of my series of essays on “The Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification.” I have a unique viewpoint on this issue as I have lived in Dearborn, Michigan, for over 70 years. And Dearborn has had one of the highest per capita populations of Muslims in the United States. So while I love my Muslim neighbors I have recently become concerned that radical Muslim and communist groups, such as Antifa, are gaining a significant foothold in Dearborn, Minneapolis, New York and other American cities.

The Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification

How Mass Muslim Immigration is an important part of the larger Globalist Control Agenda

=====

Please share widely as FB is censoring this post. This is the second part of my series of essays on “The Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification.” In the first part of this series I discussed how Muslim immigration is part of the globalist agenda to nudge us toward a cashless society where we become nothing more than slaves on a Globalist Plantation. Click here to read the first part. I also discussed how Political Islam is totally incompatible with Western morays and the US Constitution. In this essay I will speak in defense of the Cinnabon worker and will discuss how Muslims are committing massive fraud against the American people: aided and abetted by Democrat leaders like Tim Walz, Omar, Newsom and others. I have a unique viewpoint on this issue as I have lived in Dearborn, Michigan, for over 70 years. And Dearborn has had one of the highest per capita populations of Muslims in the United States. I happen to like my Muslim neighbors but it is past time to allow Muslims any special privileges not afforded to Non-Muslims. We need to push for Global De-Islamification.

The Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification: Part2

Somali Muslims committing massive fraud costing US taxpayers billions

=====

Muslim immigration is part of the globalist agenda

In the first part of this series I discussed how Muslim immigration is part of the globalist agenda to nudge us toward a cashless society where we become nothing more than slaves on a Globalist Plantation. Most of my essays, over the past 20 years, have focused on opposing this Globalist Agenda.

From the first essay:

=====
I think there are two main components to this Globalist Mass Immigration strategy: “Divide and Conquer” and the Hegelian Dialectic. So one component is the “Divide and Conquer” strategy where culturally incompatible foreigners are brought in to cause social division among the indigenous populations. This keeps the indigenous populations distracted from the real enemy: the globalists.

The other related component is the Hegelian Dialectic: Problem, Reaction, Solution.

* The problem is introduced by pushing Mass Immigration.

* The reaction is increasing social tension, now leading the UK and EU nations toward civil war.

* And the solution is mandatory digital ID, digital currency and eventually a cashless society where populations can be completely controlled.

At that point we become nothing more than slaves on a globalist plantation as failure to comply will result in the suspension of access to your digital wallet. And all of this is now happening throughout Great Britain, the EU and other First World Nations in real time.
=====

Midway through our discussion the power to my home cut out for about 2 minutes. It was a strange coincidence as that only happens about 4 times a year. What are the odds. LOL. Fortunately I was able the rejoin the discussion within 5 minutes.

To be clear I have lived amongst my Muslim neighbors -- in Dearborn Michigan -- for nearly 71 years and the vast majority are “good people.” But after the 01/07/2023 massacre, in Israel, I was blindsided by the sudden rise of Antisemitism within my community. I could not believe so many Dearbornites were suddenly calling for the genocide of the Jewish people as they chanted “From the River to the Sea.” And sadly this rise in Antisemitism has spread globally -- throughout our universities and cities -- since the genocidal attack on Israel. And that is why I feel compelled to write about this. It needs to be stopped immediately.

As the series continues I will be building a list a actions to pressure the assimilation of our Muslim populations. This is a perfect time to implement these actions as the “Muslim Brand” has been shredded over the past year. No one any longer believes Political Islam is the “Religion of Peace.” The list is being built from my observations of what other countries are currently doing to bring about this Global De-Islamification.

For example the Dearborn Public Schools have allowed religiously bless Halal foods since 2001. That is a violation of the First Amendment which demands a separation between Church and State. So that program needs to be terminated. And I’d be saying the same thing if religiously blessed Kosher foods were being served in the public schools.

Anyway here is the De-Islamification list as it currently stands. Hope you enjoyed the discussion and I also hope you will take the time to read the essays.

We basically need to enforce our cultural norms as well as to demand reciprocity. And here is a short list of what should be implemented under De-Islamification:

* No Burkas
* No Halal Foods in the Public Schools.
* No Hijabs in the workplace, the public school system, universities or government buildings
* No Muslim foot baths or prayer rooms in the public schools or universities
* No ballots in any language other than English.
* No loud disruptive Muslim “calls to prayer” blaring from the speakers of a Mosque some 5 times per day.
* Investigate and prosecute all forms of Muslim fraud (in Minnesota and elsewhere)

Put another way it is beyond time we stop giving our Muslim populations “special privileges” not generally afforded to Non-Muslims.

Summary

This is the second part of my series of essays on “The Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification.” In the first part of this series I discussed how Muslim immigration is part of the globalist agenda to nudge us toward a cashless society where we become nothing more than slaves on a Globalist Plantation. Click here to read the first part.
I also discussed how Political Islam is totally incompatible with Western morays and the US Constitution. In this essay I will speak in defense of the Cinnabon worker and will discuss how Muslims are committing massive fraud against the American people: aided and abetted by Democrat leaders like Tim Walz, Omar, Newsom and others. I have a unique viewpoint on this issue as I have lived in Dearborn, Michigan, for over 70 years. And Dearborn has had one of the highest per capita populations of Muslims in the United States. I happen to like my Muslim neighbors but it is past time to allow Muslims any special privileges not afforded to Non-Muslims. We need to push for Global De-Islamification.

Somali couple edits video to make Cinnabon worker appear to be a racist

Here is the shorter video that was mass distributed, the other day, through Facebook and other internet platforms. It was obviously done intentionally to paint the Cinnabon worker, Crystal, as a racist. I have a sneaking suspicion it was done to divert attention from the billion dollar fraud committed by Somali Muslim groups in Minnesota and the remarks the Muslim Mayor of Dearborn made earlier in September that led to national condemnation.

=====
Cinnabon employee video, Cinnabon employee video with Somalian couple video, Cinnabon worker (12/06/2025)

=====

Over the past few days my Facebook feed has been inundated with literally dozens of post showing this female Cinnabon worker insulting a Somali couple. Why would she just go on a tirade against these Somali’s? It seemed suspicious to me and turns out I was right, after seeing the longer video. The full video shows what none of the other videos show: that the Somali couple insulted her first. Here is part of what the podcaster said in her video that contains more of the conversation than any of the other videos I’ve seen posted.

=====
“But the part that’s been cut out of a lot of the videos -- (about 99%) of them -- is where they, the Somali couple, were accusing her of sexualizing her body because she wasn’t wearing a hijab. So a lot of people are standing with her because I think we’re at our boiling point and tired of being expected to put up with harassment and just certain behaviors in general. Because if we call people out that are darker than me (white) for anything then it’s because we’re racist and not because they’re actually doing something that’s problematic. And people are just over it. And I completely understand that perspective.”

So this is the part of the that’s missing from 99% of the video posts.

“Does sexualizing your body makes you a better person?”

The Somali man made this remark because she wasn’t wearing a hijab.

Cinnabon lady gets fired for going on a racist rant against a Somali couple.

CINNABON LADY Fired for Racist Rant

=====

We still don’t know what the Somali’s said to her before the couple started recording. It would be interesting to see if the surveillance cameras, at the Cinnabon store, captured the entire conversation. Watching the longer video we see that the Somali man basically called her the Cinnabon worker, Crystal Wilsey, a whore because she wasn’t wear a hijab. So while I would have taken a different approach she did have good reason to be upset: the Somali man basically called her a whore. What is becoming clear is the Somali couple intentionally edited the widely distributed video in order to frame Crystal Wilsey as a racist and Islamophobe.

The following article — “Serial criminal Cinnabon worker in viral hate video denies she’s racist for bizarre reason” — says nothing of the initial insult. By omitting this essential part of the conversation it is easy to paint her as a racist which is exactly what they did. And then they go on to assassinate her character by making her seem like a major criminal. She had a DUI and got busted for carrying some Cannabis. So basically she’s like many people we know and love.

=====
The serial criminal Cinnabon employee at the center of a viral racist video in Wisconsin denied Monday that she is prejudiced, citing her “colored” son. Disgraced former worker Crystal Wilsey, 43 — who has been charged with more than a dozen various offenses over two decades — later appeared to have badly misused the outdated term for black people, saying her boy just had darker skin because of a health condition. Wilsey also has a lengthy rap sheet, which includes charges of child endangerment, disorderly conduct and drug possession as well as traffic offenses, court records seen by The Post show. She lost her job after footage of her foul-mouthed, hate-filled outburst toward a Somali couple at a store branch in Ashwaubenon last week was posted on TikTok. Wilsey repeatedly called the Somali pair filming her the n-word while also proudly declaring herself to be a racist. The mom from Oneida has since taken to social media to defend her actions, while a fundraiser set up by her supporters has raised $110,000 and counting. “P.S., to the racism, if you look at my Facebook from 2010, you’ll see on there that I have a blended family, and my son was colored,” she said in the voiceover to a TikTok video she published early Monday. Wilsey then later appeared to go back on her claim about having a “colored” child by saying a health condition actually made his skin darker. Wilsey, 43, has a lengthy rap sheet dating back 25 years. “Addison’s disease, and he was discriminated called chocolate because he had brown skin – explanation of racism,” she wrote in one comment. Addison’s disease is a rare disorder caused by an issue with the adrenal glands, which can result in darkening skin. Court records show that Wilsey was charged with child endangerment, marijuana possession and marijuana drug paraphernalia in February 2022 related to an incident when she was pulled over by state troopers while driving in Erie County, Ohio, according to records. Her address at the time was listed as Green Bay, Wis. Wilsey pleaded no contest before being sentenced to two years’ probation and minor fines. She has also left a trail of legal damage across the Midwest, with a history of more than a dozen charges dating back almost 25 years. In June 2001, she was arrested for disorderly conduct and domestic abuse and was sentenced to 12 months’ probation later that year. In September 2002, she appeared in court in Menominee County, Wis., charged with marijuana offenses. A year later, she was arrested for disorderly conduct in Brown County, Wis., and pleaded no contest. Then in January 2009, she was again arrested for disorderly conduct in Brown County and sentenced to three days in jail. In March 2015, she was charged with driving without a license, operating a vehicle while intoxicated and driving under the influence in Hobart, Wis., records show. She pleaded guilty to driving while intoxicated and was jailed for 20 days. In June 2016, she was charged with resisting arrest and disorderly conduct in Outagamie County, Wis., and sentenced to 90 days in jail after pleading no contest to disorderly conduct. And just two months later, in the Oneida Tribe, Wis., she was arrested over a DUI for operating a vehicle with a revoked license and driving without insurance and pleaded guilty by not contesting the charges. After news of Wilsey being fired came to light, a fundraising appeal was set up on her behalf, placing the blame for her racist ramblings on the two Somali customers.

“Meet Crystal: hardworking White mom doing her job at Cinnabon. Two Somali customers decide to make her shift hell with intimidation,” the donation page reads. Instead of banning the offenders and backing their employee, Cinnabon fires Crystal to keep the nons happy. We’re not letting this slide. Funds go to making sure Crystal lands on her feet after this betrayal. No White person should lose their job for refusing to be harassed by Somalians,” the post says.

As of Monday afternoon, the page has received more than $110,000 in donations.

Wilsey has defended her actions on her TikTok page when responding to critics. A user wrote, “You are so embarrassing to the human race. Good luck finding a job from here forward,” to which Wilsey replied, “For defending and inspiring others? Okay Karen.” Wilsey claimed that the Somali couple who took the video started the dispute and said she was merely defending herself. “Standing up for myself and turning into a defensive individual for said reasons did not make me racist,” she said. “The initial word could be referenced to a racial slur, except he called me racist and I returned the comment, and you have no idea what occurred previously to her recording or the harassment I endured.”

Serial criminal Cinnabon worker in viral hate video denies she’s racist for bizarre reason (12/08/2025)
https://nypost.com/2025/12/08/us-news/cinnabon-employee-crystal-wilsey-denies-shes-racist-after-wisconsin-outburst/?
=====

As Mick Jaggers once said in the song Stray Cat Blues -- “its no hanging matter, it’s no capital crime.” None of us are perfect.

The Rolling Stones - Stray Cat Blues

Muslim Genocide against Moderate Muslims and Christians in Nigeria

I’m a little bit more concerned with hundreds of thousands of Christians and moderate Muslims being raped, slaughtered and murdered by Muslim jihadists in Nigeria. Over 125,000 Christians have been murdered and over 19,000 Christian churches have been destroyed since 2009. Are the local Imams speaking out against this in their mosques? Doubt it. Perhaps we should close down one American Mosque every time a Christian Church is burned down anywhere in the world? What’s wrong with a little reciprocity?

=====
Christians in Nigeria face a brutal wave of killings, kidnappings, and burned churches. Over 125,000 dead since 2009, yet the media barely covers it. Boko Haram, ISIS, and extremists target villages while the world looks away. Why is Christian persecution ignored?

Christian Genocide in Nigeria Exposed (10/02/2025)

=====

=====
Trump named Nigeria a “country of particular concern” – a U.S. declaration for nations it says fail to act on religious freedom violations — and this month told defense officials to begin preparing for military action here. On Monday, the State Department reiterated to AP that the U.S. “stands ready, willing, and able to act” in Nigeria.

Trump’s declaration followed a campaign by Republican lawmakers who say 100,000 Christians have been killed in Nigeria — a figure also cited by TV talk-show host Bill Maher. The number now echoes among Nigeria’s Christian communities, but experts say it’s likely inflated. The ACLED — which uses local news reports for its data — says 52,915 civilians have been killed in Nigeria through targeted political violence since 2009, with both Christian and Muslim victims. “It is important to note that while attacks against Christians are both real and deeply concerning, communities across religious lines are affected,” said Ladd Serwat, senior Africa analyst at ACLED.

The Council on Foreign Relations’ Nigeria security tracker, which also uses news reports, shows that more than 100,000 Nigerians have died in armed violence since 2011 — but that figure includes civilians and security forces, which are overstretched and often targeted by gangs. Analysts say breakdowns by religion simply aren’t possible. Religious identities aren’t always reported, recordkeeping amid violence is difficult, and attack motivations can be unclear. Like Christians, some Muslims say they’re targeted for their faith. Mosques have been attacked during prayers, and worshippers inside killed or abducted. Experts say that in all cases, religious or economic motives could be at play.

Trump says Christians are being persecuted in Nigeria. Experts and residents say the reality is more complicated (11/18/2025)
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/trump-says-christians-are-being-persecuted-in-nigeria-experts-and-residents-say-the-reality-is-more-complicated
=====

And I’m also a whole lot more concerned about the Muslim Somali’s in Minnesota committing over a billion dollars in medical fraud, which I will discuss shortly.

As of 12/11/2025 Crystal Wilsey has receive $150,000 dollars from the “GiveSendGo” website that supports conservative causes. So apparently a whole lot of the donators see through the allegations that she was a racist. As the podcaster said “people are just over it.” They are over being called Nazi’s, Islamophobes, Xenophobes, bigots and racists by both Muslims and Socialist Democrats. They are over listening to Muslims say “Islam is the religion of peace” while Islamic Jihadi’s are slaughtering hundreds of thousands of Christians, and moderate Muslims, in Nigeria and other African countries. You might say the Muslim “brand” is being exposed and ripped to shreds.

If you would like to donate a few bucks to Crystal here is the link.

=====
Meet Crystal: hardworking White mom doing her job at Cinnabon. Two Somali customers decide to make her shift hell with intimidation. Instead of banning the offenders and backing their employee, Cinnabon fires Crystal to keep the nons happy. We’re not letting this slide. Funds go to making sure Crystal lands on her feet after this betrayal. No White person should lose their job for refusing to be harassed by Somalians.

Stand With Crystal
https://www.givesendgo.com/HelpCrystal
=====

Meanwhile a cousin of the Somali couple is trying to raise $45,000, through GoFundMe, to either sue Cinnabon or possibly Crystal. They barely raised $4,000 dollars. So Crystal is getting the lion’s share of the support: 150 K vs 4 K. And despite the attempts to slander her she now has plenty of public support.

=====
Cinnabon worker fired after racist tirade caught on video (12/09/2025)

If I were to guess the “worm turned” nationally when the Mayor of Dearborn insulted a priest on September 9th, 2025. The priest could not have been more measured in his remarks. But the mayor proceeded to call him a bigot and said he was not welcome in his city. The story made all of the national news networks and the mayor received universal condemnation. I will be covering this incident in much more depth in a future essay.

Please watch the video and let me know what you think of the mayor in the comment section.

=====
Dearborn City Council Meeting 09/09/2025

=====

If you watch the video (above) it is obvious that the priest said nothing that could be interpreted as bigotry. On the other hand the mayor was bigoted in a number of ways. First let’s consider the definition of a bigot:

A bigot is someone intolerant of others’ differing ideas, races, genders, religions, politics, etc.

So the mayor said the priest was no longer welcome in Dearborn and would have a parade commemorating the priest leaving the city. So the mayor was bigoted on many levels. He was bigoted because he was intolerant of the facts the priest presented, all of which are true. He was bigoted because he wanted the non-Muslim priest thrown out of the city: perhaps because he was non-Muslim. And the Koran itself is bigoted because it is full of references against Jews. Here is but an example:

The Day of Judgement will not come about until Muslims fight the Jews, when the Jew will hide behind stones and trees. The stones and trees will say O Muslims, O Abdullah, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him. Only the Gharkad tree, (the Boxthorn tree) would not do that because it is one of the trees of the Jews. (related by al-Bukhari and Muslim)

Now of course Globalist Google AI is quick to point out that this is an Islamic Hadith, not a verse in the Koran. That is just convenient deflection as Islamic practice is derived from multiple sources. And to fully understand Islam you must consider all the sources: the Koran, the Hadiths and the Sunna’s.
=====
Sunnah or Sunna (سنة, plural سنن sunan), is an Arabic word that means “habit” “way” or “usual practice”. Within the context of Islam it refers to the words and actions or example of Prophet Muhammad, who is known to them as al-Insān al-Kāmil (the perfect human) and uswa hasana (an excellent model of conduct). The Qur’an instructs Muslims to obey the Messenger, and to do this they have to refer to the Sirah and Hadith which collectively form Muhammad’s Sunnah. Even the most insignificant of actions on his part (found therein) have a drastic effect upon Islamic doctrines and laws, as the Qur’an and Sunnah collectively form the Shari’ah. Bid’ah (innovation) is forbidden, and the closer one emulates Muhammad’s behavior the more pious they are considered.

Sunnah, From WikiIslam, the online resource on Islam
https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Sunnah
=====

=====
The reference to Jews hiding behind trees and rocks, which then speak out to a Muslim to come and kill them, is from an Islamic hadith, not a verse in the Koran (Quran) itself.

A hadith is a traditional account of the sayings or actions of the Prophet Muhammad and his companions, which serve as a major source of religious law and moral guidance for Muslims, second only to the Quran. The Quran is the central religious text of Islam, believed to be a revelation from God.

The Hadith in Question

The specific hadith is found in authoritative Sunni collections, such as Sahih al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim. One common wording, narrated by Abu Huraira, is:

“The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. ‘O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him.’”

A variation also mentions a specific tree, the Gharqad (boxthorn tree), which will not speak because it is considered “the tree of the Jews”.

Google AI [koran verse killing jews behind the tree or rock]
=====

Why Are Muslims Faking Anti-Muslim Hate Crimes?

The following article lists a whole series of staged hate crimes that were actually perpetrated by Muslims -- just like those two Somali Muslims attempted to do to Crystal. Why are they doing it? According to the article:

“FBI data show that hate crimes against Muslims are actually rare, which probably explains the need to make them up. Such hysteria over “Islamophobia” is merely used by terror-support groups such as CAIR to shut down debate over jihadism and the responsibilities of the Muslim community to reform violent Islam and call out the terrorists radicalized in its ranks.”

Yep that sounds about right. Put otherwise it is being used to distract the public from understanding that Islam is not a “religion of peace” and is in need of major reform. They want to push the idea that all Non=Muslims are Islamophobic so we don’t focus on all the atrocities committed in the name of Islam. I mean let’s face it, when a Muslim terrorist screams Allah Akbar, it doesn’t mean “god is great.” What it really means is “kill all Non-Muslims.” It is their way of saying they want the entire world to live under Islamic Sharia Law under a global Caliphate.

=====
As the attorney general threatens to prosecute Americans for anti-Muslim hate crime, Muslims are faking anti-Muslim hate crimes across the country to prop up the fiction that Muslims are victimized in the U.S. The latest fabrication involves the torching of a Houston mosque on Christmas Day. The arson was quickly seized on by the national media and Muslim-rights groups like the Council on American-Islamic Relations, which demanded that police investigate it as a hate crime. “We urge law enforcement authorities to investigate a possible bias motive for this fire,” CAIR’s Houston chapter said in a statement. Federal authorities did investigate, and they collared a suspect. Sorry, CAIR, he’s not a Muslim-hating Trump supporter. He’s a Muslim. Not only that, he’s a longtime member of the damaged Islamic Society of Greater Houston mosque, where he prayed five times a day, seven days per week. Last Christmas, a similar incident was reported at a mosque in Fresno, Calif.; and in a similar rush to judgment, the media joined Muslim groups in accusing anti-Islamic bigots for the vandalism of the Islamic Cultural Center there. Only, it turned out that the incident was not an act of “Islamophobia” at all. As in Houston, the damage was self-inflicted by a member of the mosque. Police arrested Asif Mohammad Khan. They said that he was an admirer of Osama bin Laden.

These are hardly isolated cases of Muslim groups and their media apologists misleading the public about anti-Muslim hate crimes. They are part of a long series of events — including pure fabrications — that serve to portray non-Muslims as threats and deflect attention away from Muslims as the real threats. Learning from other groups, they’ve discovered that racism can be blamed for almost everything.

• October 2014: Two Muslim activists released a video showing NYPD cops harassing and “racially profiling” Muslims just for wearing Islamic garb. The video went viral; CAIR demanded an investigation for discrimination. But the whole thing was staged. The cops weren’t even real.

• June 2014: After three burned Qurans were found in front of a mosque in Dearborn, Mich., the imam there led a campaign to pass a local statute criminalizing the desecration of holy books. The media ran with it, and his crusade gained traction — until it was revealed that the Quran barbecuer was none other than a Muslim named Ali Hassan al-Assadi.

• April 2014: After murdering his wife, a Muslim man in El Cajon, Calif., made it look like an anti-Muslim bigot did the crime. He left a note with her body that read: “Go back to your country, you terrorist,” which led the media to report the murder as an “Islamophobic” hate crime. Some claimed that the slain wife was targeted for “wearing a hijab.” CNN host Reza Aslan blamed conservative “Islamophobic f**ks” for the homicide — even after the truth came out that it was an Islamic honor killing, not a hate crime.

• August 2010: A Muslim high school girl in Ann Arbor, Mich., claimed that a mob physically attacked her in an apparent hate crime which included ethnic slurs and the forcible removal of her hijab. The “alleged hate crime” prompted CAIR to lead a media blitz calling for investigations by state and federal authorities. Except the assault never happened. The girl was eventually charged and found guilty of disorderly conduct.

Why Are Muslims Faking Anti-Muslim Hate Crimes?
https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/muslims-fake-hate-crimes-to-serve-political-agenda/#
=====

It also reminds me of the Jussie Smollett incident a few years back where he falsely claimed to have been the victim of a racial hate crime. But as we all know he staged the attack. The fact of the matter is most Americans are not racists, Islamophobes, Xenophobes or bigots. On the other hand many Muslims are bigots in their view of Jews and Non-Muslims. And that fact needs much more public disclosure.

=====
Jussie Smollett (/ˈdʒʌsi sməlˈɛt/, born June 21, 1982)[1] is an American actor, filmmaker and singer. He began his career as a child actor in 1991 debuting in The Mighty Ducks (1992). From 2015 to 2019, Smollett portrayed musician Jamal Lyon in the Fox drama series Empire. In January 2019, Smollett claimed to have been a victim of a hate crime, but police later determined that he had staged the attack with two acquaintances. He was initially charged with filing a false police report, but charges were dropped after he completed community service and forfeited $10,000. In 2020, a special prosecutor re-indicted him, and he was convicted on five counts in December 2021. He was sentenced to jail in March 2022, although his release was ordered after six days. The sentence was upheld on appeal in 2023, but the Illinois Supreme Court later reversed the conviction in 2024 on the basis that he had fulfilled the plea agreement made in 2019.

Jussie Smollett, Wiki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jussie_Smollett
=====

Speaking of Burkas and Hijabs

For those unaware a Hijab is a Muslim scarf that doesn’t cover the face while a Burka is like a black garbage bag that covers everything except the eyes. And there has been an increase of women wearing Burkas in my city of Dearborn which I find troubling. Full face coverings are generally prohibited throughout the US. And while I don’t care about the wearing of Hijabs, the banning of Burkas should be made illegal throughout the US as part of the De-Islamification agenda.

First let’s look at countries where wearing a hijab is mandatory

=====
Hijab is legally mandatory in only a few countries, primarily Iran, Afghanistan (where the Taliban enforce strict veiling like burqa/niqab), and the Aceh Province of Indonesia, with Brunei also enforcing mandatory headscarves under its Sharia law; while not always legally enforced, strict dress codes (including head covering) are expected in places like Saudi Arabia, though reforms have loosened some rules.

Here’s a breakdown of countries with mandatory hijab laws:

* Iran: Mandatory since the 1979 revolution, enforced by morality police, with fines and penalties for non-compliance.

* Afghanistan: Under Taliban rule, there’s a mandatory burqa/niqab law for all women, requiring full face/body covering.

* Brunei: Implemented mandatory hijab under Sharia law in 2014.

* Indonesia (Aceh Province): This specific province has its own Sharia-based mandatory hijab rules.

* Saudi Arabia: While historically strict, reforms have made it less of a legal mandate for tourists and locals in many areas, but modest dress (covering shoulders/knees) is still expected and often required at religious sites.

* Sudan & Gaza (Palestine): Have also seen mandatory hijab enforcement, particularly in Gaza schools, though national policies can differ.

Key Takeaway: The most consistently and strictly enforced national laws for mandatory hijab (or full face veiling) are in Iran, Afghanistan, and Brunei, with regional variations elsewhere.

Google AI [countries where wearing a hijab is mandatory]
=====

=====
Various styles of head coverings, most notably the khimar, hijab, chador, niqab, paranja, yashmak, tudong, shayla, safseri, carşaf, haik, dupatta, boshiya and burqa, are worn by Muslim women around the world, where the practice varies from mandatory to optional or restricted in different majority Muslim and non-Muslim countries. Wearing the hijab is mandatory in conservative countries such as the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Taliban-led Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan. Gaza school officials have also voted to require young girls to wear hijab,[1] though the Palestinian Authority (in 1990) considered the hijab optional.[2] The hijab is traditionally associated with Islamic principles of modesty, privacy, and spiritual awareness.[3][4][5][6] In addition to its religious significance, it has also become a marker of cultural identity and, in some contexts, a form of personal or fashion expression.[7][4] Surah An-Nur (24:31) in the Qur’an states: “And tell the believing women to lower their gaze and guard their private parts and not expose their adornment except that which [necessarily] appears thereof and to wrap [a portion of] their head covers over their chests and not expose their adornment...”.[7] Surah Al-Ahzab (33:59) in the Qur’an further instructs: “O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves [part] of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused.”[8] In some Muslim majority countries (like Morocco and Tunisia)[9] there have been complaints of restriction or discrimination against women who wear the hijab, which can be seen as a sign of Islamism.[10][11] Several Muslim-majority countries have banned the burqa and hijab in public schools and universities or government buildings, including Tunisia (since 1981,[12] partially lifted in 2011), Turkey (gradually lifted),[13][14] Kosovo (since 2009),[15] Azerbaijan (since 2010[16]), Kazakhstan, and [17] Kyrgyzstan.[18] Muslim-majority Tajikistan banned the hijab completely on 20 June 2024.[19]

Islamic veiling practices by country, Wiki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_veiling_practices_by_country#
=====

Next let’s look at countries that have banned the Burka

In recent years Burkas are being banned in many countries but have yet to be banned throughout the United States. That needs to change immediately.

=====
Several countries, including France, Austria, Denmark, Belgium, Netherlands, Switzerland, Bulgaria, China (Xinjiang), Tajikistan, Tunisia, Sri Lanka, Cameroon, Chad, Congo, Gabon, Morocco, and some regions in Germany, Italy, and Spain, have banned or restricted full-face veils like the burqa in public spaces, citing security, secularism, and integration reasons, though critics argue these bans infringe on religious freedom.

Countries with Full or Partial Bans (as of late 2025):

* Europe: France, Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Netherlands, Switzerland, Bulgaria, Luxembourg, with some local bans in Germany (schools), Italy (localities), and Spain (Catalonia).

* Africa: Cameroon, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Gabon, Tunisia, Morocco.

* Asia: China (Xinjiang region), Tajikistan, Sri Lanka, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan (restrictions).

Key Points on Bans:

* Scope: Bans often target the niqab (face veil with eye slit) and burqa (full body and face covering) in public areas, public transport, schools, and government buildings.

* Rationale: Proponents cite security (identification), secularism, and promoting integration as reasons for bans.

* Opposition: Critics argue bans violate religious freedom, discriminate against Muslim women, and can worsen social tensions.

These laws vary, with some being national bans and others specific to regions or situations, reflecting ongoing debates about security, religion, and women’s rights globally.

Google AI [countries where wearing the burka is prohibited]
=====

=====
There are currently 18 states that have banned the niqab and burqa, both Muslim-majority countries and non-Muslim countries, including:

* Africa: Cameroon, Chad, the Republic of the Congo, Gabon, Senegal, Tunisia[13]

* Asia: China,[14] Kyrgyzstan, Sri Lanka, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan

* Europe: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria,[15] Denmark, France,[16] Luxembourg, the Netherlands,[17] Switzerland

The niqab is controversial in the Western world. In France specifically, although the niqab is not individually targeted, it falls within the scope of legislation which bans the wearing of any religious items (Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, or Buddhist) in state schools (universities are not affected), and another ban on face coverings (which also includes carnival masks and motorbike helmets when not on a motorbike).

Niqab/Burka, Wiki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niqab#
=====

And then let’s look at countries where the Hijab is prohibited.

And here are the countries where the more modest hijab is prohibited.

=====
While outright hijab bans are rare, several countries, including Tajikistan, China, Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, Tunisia (historically/partially), and some regions in Russia, have implemented restrictions, often targeting the headscarf in schools, universities, or government buildings to promote secularism or national identity, though European nations like France, Belgium, and Austria generally focus bans on face-covering garments (burqa/niqab), not the hijab itself.

Muslim-Majority Countries with Restrictions:

* Tajikistan: Completely banned the hijab in June 2024, viewing it as foreign attire, with fines for wearers and companies.

* Kazakhstan & Kyrgyzstan: Have banned or restricted headscarves in schools and universities to promote secularism and national unity.

* Azerbaijan: Banned the hijab in schools, citing separation of religion and state.

* Tunisia: Historically banned the hijab in government buildings and schools (partially lifted in 2011) but faced recent restrictions.

* Uzbekistan: Previously banned the selling of religious clothing and restricted hijab in schools, though some rules were relaxed in 2021.

European Countries with Bans (Focus on Face Coverings):

* France, Belgium, Austria, Netherlands, Denmark, Switzerland: Have bans or restrictions, but these primarily target full-face veils (burqa, niqab) for security or integration, not the hijab that leaves the face visible.

Other Notable Mentions:

* China: Has restrictions on religious attire, including the hijab, particularly in regions like Xinjiang.

* India: Some schools have policies against the hijab, but it’s not a nationwide ban.

Key Distinction: Most bans target the hijab in specific public sectors (education, government) for secular/nationalist reasons, while European bans target full-face coverings for security/cultural reasons, with outright hijab prohibitions being less common than bans on face-covering Islamic attire.

Google AI [countries where wearing the hijab is prohibited]
=====

In terms of De-Islamification -- depriving Unenlightened Islam any “special privileges” -- how should we be treating the Hijab and Burka?

* The Burka should be banned entirely as it has even been prohibited in many Islamic and European countries

* The Hijab should be allowed publicly but should be banned in the public schools, universities and government buildings.

How Crystal could have responded to the Somali couple that called her a whore because she wasn’t wearing a hijab.

Crystal is from Oneida, Wisconsin. And Wisconsin only had about 68 thousand Muslims in 2025: compared 724 thousand in New York, 504 thousand in California, 473 thousand in Illinois, 313 thousand in Texas and 241 thousand in my state of Michigan. So I wasn’t able to determine whether there is a large enclave of Somali’s in Oneida. In my state of Michigan Muslims constitute about 3% of the population though Dearborn, Dearborn Heights and Hamtramck are currently around 50% Muslim.

https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/muslim-population-by-state

As I said Crystal could have been a bit more diplomatic though I do understand whey she was angry. I might have responded something like this:

“So your husband just called me a whore because I have no interest in wearing a stupid hijab. How can you trust your husband when every unclad girl he looks at gives him a boner? Beyond that there are many Muslim theocracies that force women to wear a Hijab or even a Burka. You should be thankful you now live in a country that doesn’t force women to cover their heads and doesn’t treat women like second class slaves. That’s because many Unenlightened Muslims treat their women like slaves while Islamic Sharia law treats women like second class citizens. How are you even putting up with that shit? At any rate I guess I’d rather be called a whore than treated like a slave by my husband. Do you rape your wife, just occasionally, or on a continuing basis? Would you like some additional glaze on those buns.”

Massive Muslim fraud going on in Minneapolis Minnesota, Columbus Ohio and most probably Dearborn Michigan

Unless you are living under a rock you have heard about the massive fraud scandal in Tim Walz’s Minnesota involving Somali Muslims. But as I will explain it is most probably going on throughout the entire country and it needs to be stopped entirely. And what is odd is how little attention Gov. Newsom has received as California has lost over 50 billion to Illegal Immigrant fraud and policies that favor Illegal Aliens over Legal Californian citizens. How this asshole remains in office is beyond my understanding.

We already have one Muslim from Dearborn Heights implicated in the “Feeding our Future” scam. The FBI needs to do further investigation into fraud in Dearborn and Dearborn Heights.

=====
A Dearborn Heights man has been charged in connection with a scheme to buy a condominium in the Middle East. The complaint claims that Wahid Mohamed Makki, 59, used more than $1 million in federal pandemic relief funding to buy a condominium in the Middle East. He is charged with wire fraud and money laundering. According to the criminal complaint from the U.S. Attorney’s office in Detroit, loans were obtained for 10 shell corporations and then wire-transferred to a bank in Turkey for the purchase of a “sea view condo in Beirut, Lebanon.” Makki’s wife, Zeinab Makki, was charged the same day with health care fraud in a $10.6 million insurance fraud scheme. The Economic Injury Disaster Loans are part of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act that allows qualifying small businesses and other organizations to receive forgivable loans to cover payroll, mortgages, rent and utilities. The Justice Department recently named Associate Deputy Attorney General Kevin Chambers to lead efforts to combat pandemic-related fraud and the department has already taken enforcement actions related to more than $8 billion in suspected pandemic fraud, including bringing charges in more than 1,000 criminal cases involving losses of more than $1.1 billion, opening civil cases against more than 1,800 individuals and businesses for alleged fraud of more than $6 billion in loans, and seizing more than $1.2 billion in relief funds. It was not confirmed if Makki had already secured an attorney or when he will face trial.

Dearborn Heights man accused of using $1 million in pandemic relief to buy Middle East condo (03/23/2022)
https://arabamericannews.com/2022/03/23/dearborn-heights-man-accused-of-using-1-million-in-pandemic-relief-to-buy-middle-east-condo/?
=====

=====
The non-profit organization “Feeding Our Future” was a Minnesota-based entity and is not currently operating a legitimate food program in Dearborn or Dearborn Heights. It was the center of a massive $250 million federal fraud scheme that claimed to serve millions of meals to children but instead diverted the funds for personal luxury items.

One individual from Dearborn Heights, Wahid Mohamed Makki, was charged in connection with this Minnesota-based fraud scheme in March 2022. The case primarily involved operations within Minnesota, where the state agency administered the federal program funds.

If you are looking for legitimate food assistance in the Dearborn and Dearborn Heights areas, you should contact local food banks or state agencies that administer federal nutrition programs, not the now-defunct “Feeding Our Future” organization.

Google AI [is “feeding our future” operating dearborn and dearborn heights]
=====

=====
$250 Million Fraud Scandal: Inside the massive Feeding Our Future case in Minnesota (12/08/2025)

=====

=====
The NY Times has thrown Minnesota governor Tim Walz under the bus over a massive and sprawling fraud scandal that federal prosecutors say siphoned over $1 billion from the state’s social safety net programs - more than the entire state spends annually to run its Department of Corrections.

Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN)

The fraud involved a series of schemes that federal authorities say took root over the past five years, many centered within Minnesota’s Somali diaspora, where individuals established companies that billed state agencies for services that were never performed. Prosecutors say 59 people have been convicted across various cases so far, in three separate plots.

NYT Torches Tim Walz After Somalians Scam Woke Minnesota For $1 Billion ‘On His Watch’
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/nyt-torches-tim-walz-after-somalians-scam-woke-minnesota-1-billion-his-watch?
=====

=====
As the federal government amps up fraud investigations in MN, criminals statewide are on notice. Journalistic report. Includes news footage for purposes of commentary, criticism and analysis.

ILLEGALS ‘MOB’ Minnesota Airports… as Trump “Marks Them All” as ENEMY COMBATANTS (12/12/2024)

=====
House Majority Whip Tom Emmer joins House Leadership Stakeout (12/02/2025)

=====
House Majority Whip Tom Emmer joins Varney & Co (12/03/2025)

=====

Just the other day I watched the following video discussing the massive Muslim fraud being committed in Minneapolis Minnesota and Columbus Ohio. In both cases the fraud was being committed by Somali Muslims: many who arrived during the Biden Administration. But I’m pretty sure similar fraud is being committed in the area that I live: Dearborn, Dearborn Heights and Hamtramck Michigan. All three cities now have Muslim majorities. All three cities recently elected Muslim Mayors.

=====
While everyone is watching Minnesota, this JUST HAPPENED in Ohio! (12/06/2025)

=====

In the video she plays a clip of a black women in Columbus, Ohio, discussing the Muslim Somali fraud going on in her neck of the woods.

“Okay, listen. Come see Columbus, Ohio, fraud investigators. If you go to the government assisted housing areas, you will find that most of the housing is Somali. Mhm. I would say about 80% of the government assisted housing in Columbus is occupied by Somalians. And the parking lot is occupied with a whole bunch of brand new cars. Same thing in Minnesota, Minneapolis. Women walking around have designer purses with EVT cars and they have Apple iPhones stuck up in their hijab. Yeah. And then go to the businesses that are owned by the men. Oh, this is it. Listen. Mhm. Because see what happens is when you have a restaurant or when you have a little corner store and you have a couple of wives and you only have to claim one, then that means the other wives get EBT cards and you can use those EBT cards to buy food for your store or your restaurant. Little fingers of fraud. Or what you can do is you can get a home health aid company. Oh, this one. We’ll get to that. You only hire Somalians to work the home health aid. And what you do is you just make sure their paperwork looks right. It don’t have to be right, but you just make sure it looks right. And then you send them off for those home health aid jobs. Y’all don’t want to talk about fraud.”

About 5-10 years ago this black cashier, at Kroger’s (in Dearborn Michigan), said “you have to see this” as she was cashing me out. And she was really pissed off. She said we see many Muslims come in here and purchase a full cart of just juice, milk or something else. And just like the lady in Columbus she alleged they are reselling this stuff at their stores or using it in their restaurants. Then she pulled out the copy of the Muslim women’s receipt that showed her EBT balance: over $2,000 dollars. I have no idea how common this is but it has fraud written all over it.

Back to Minnesota and we have a former TSA Agent Saying that $1 Billion in Cash Was Flown Out of Minneapolis-St. Paul Airport by Somali Men over the span of just a couple of years! You can bet that much of this money, your tax dollars, were delivered to the Somali terror group al-Shabaab. The most stunning aspect of the video was that the TSA baggage checkers routinely allowed them to get on the plane with their million dollar suitcases. Former TSA employee, Liz Jackson, points out that the government has record of those that brought these million dollar suitcases through the airport. They all need to be identified and prosecuted to the full extent of the law.

=====

Liz Collin, an investigative journalist from Minnesota who was threatened by Antifa at her home and was fired from her TV job for her reporting during the Derek Chauvin scandal in 2020, is now independent on Youtube.

Collin has posted an interview with Liz Jackson, who worked for the TSA from 2016 – 2021, and witnessed “suitcases filled with millions of dollars of cash. And the couriers were always Somali men traveling in pairs and they got through the checkpoint.” She said that law enforcement would check their identification, so a trail of the exportation of the money should exist. She said that the transport scheme occurred about once per week and estimated that $1 billion was shipped out of the US. She believes it was delivered to the Somali terror group al-Shabaab.

Liz Collin breaks down her investigation into Somali fraud rings that are linked to Democrat politicians like Congresswoman Ilhan Omar, Governor Tim Walz, Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey. The social service scams under investigation include the ‘Feeding Our Future’ program that claimed to provide meals using COVID funds, the dramatic increase in autism funding in the Somali community and the alleged Medicaid fraud in a Housing Stabilization program for the disabled.

Former TSA Agent Says $1 Billion in Cash Was Flown Out of Minneapolis-St. Paul Airport by Somali Men! (12/10/2025)
https://needtoknow.news/2025/12/former-tsa-agent-says-1-billion-in-cash-was-flown-out-of-minneapolis-st-paul-airport-by-somali-men/
=====

=====
Former TSA agent recalls millions in cash flying out of Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport (12/08/2025)

Inside the alleged Minnesota welfare fraud (12/08/2025)
Alpha News journalist Liz Collin breaks down her investigation into the Minnesota welfare fraud allegations on ‘The Will Cain Show.’

Audio leak shows AG Ellison’s vow to Feeding Our Future defendants (04/11/2025)
Leaked audio from a December 2021 meeting between Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison and now-convicted defendants in the Feeding Our Future fraud case is leading Republican lawmakers to call for further investigation. Reporter Adam Duxter breaks down the details.

=====

Meanwhile in California Governor Gavin Newsom has allowed 54 Billion in fraud, much of it going to Illegal Aliens. That is 54 times the fraud being committed in Minnesota under Governor Tim Walz. So basically when it comes to Illegal Alien fraud Newsom can say to Waltz: “hold me beer.”

=====

While Minnesota Governor Tim Walz is getting roasted for allowing $1 billion in fraud within the Somali community, Gavin Newsom, who lost $54 billion, is the Democrats’ top pick to run for president. Under Newsom, California has been scammed out of $32 billion in unemployment fraud, $13 billion in medical fraud and $6 billion in food stamps.

California’s one-party rule has led to no investigation, no accountability, no consequences. No one is even asking questions. The liberal media wants Newsom to be president. So they look the other way.

Gavin Newsom, the King of Fraud, Lost $54 Billion, Knocking Out Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz (12/10/2025)
https://needtoknow.news/2025/12/gavin-newsom-the-king-of-fraud-lost-54-billion-knocking-out-minnesota-gov-tim-walz/
=====

Here is a excerpt from the article.

=====
Steve Hilton, the conservative California Gubernatorial candidate, reported on California state benefits paid to Afghan migrants… Hilton said that Afghans rake in thousands each month for healthcare, housing, food stamps, and more. But since you can’t receive benefits if you make more than a certain amount, the migrants open work under the table for cash – avoiding taxes and keeping their taxpayer funded benefits. “A few weeks ago, a business owner here in California told me that one of his new employees asked to be paid in cash not on payroll.” “Why, the business owner asked? Well because the employee from Afghanistan was worried that he would lose his welfare payments. How much is that? $7000 a month. That’s 84 thousand dollars a year here in California.” “So when we look at this massive scandal in Minnesota, a billion dollars from the social services system and fraud and corruption. You can be sure it is much worse right here in California.” “We already know that over $20 billion in pandemic from EDD scandal was sent welfare payments to people jail on death row, people who are dead. We know over 24 billion was completely lost in home business spending.” “All that money spent and we still have situations like this all over California everywhere you look. That’s why today I am calling for a complete and total audit of every part of California’s bloated welfare state.” “So we find the corruption, the fraud, waste in Gavin Newsom’s California. End it.” California’s Refugee Cash Assistance dishes out up to $1,400 monthly per household in cash and CalFresh benefits. This is layered on top of Medi-Cal health coverage and housing vouchers—often totaling far north of $7,000 a year per person, scaling up fast for families. Multiply that by dependents, and $84,000 isn’t that far fetched.
=====

So basically this illegal Afghan Muslim tells his employer he wants to be paid under the table so he can continue receiving $84,000 a year in fraudulent welfare benefits. Screw that. Make him pay all the money back and then deport him.

Somali’s are some of the most radical Muslims in the world

As I’ve said I have lived among the Muslim population of Dearborn for 71 years. They began coming to Dearborn in the 1890’s and most are what I’d call enlightened Muslims. But since federal immigration laws changed, in 1965, we have assimilated Muslims from Iraq, Iran, and other countries who may well not be so enlightened. But they are not nearly as radical as the Muslims from Somalia. In the following video Ami Horowitz interviews Somali’s from Minnesota. And without blinking an eye they all say:

* They prefer the Koran over the Constitution
* If you insult Muhammed you should be killed
* If you draw a picture of Muhammed you should be killed
* If you burn a Koran you should be killed

What more proof do you need. They should not be here. They should be deported.

=====
Reporter HORRIFIED When Somalian Muslim Sends Jarring Threat To Non-Muslims! (12/10/2025)

Ami Horowitz went to Minneapolis and asked Somalis living there if they prefer US law or Sharia law, and they all said yes. If you don’t prefer the US Constitution you do not belong here.

=====

And as this crime report makes clear:

* Somali’s from Minnesota have left the country to fight for ISIS and other Jihadist fighters.
* Somali’s from Minnesota have been involved in rape gangs and account for far greater crime than their non-Muslim counterparts.

=====
Beginning in 2007, several Somali-Americans from Minnesota began traveling to Somalia to join the Al Shabaab terrorist organization and after 2012 several others travelled to join ISIS (Elliott, 2009). In 2008, police in Minneapolis-St. Paul began an investigation, after hearing concerns from leaders, elders, and parents from the Somali community in St. Paul, about young girls being trafficked. Allegedly, local Somali young persons, who were thought to be gang members, shuttled Somali-American girls between Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota, Columbus, Ohio, and Nashville, Tennessee. Allegedly, girls as young as 13 were forced to engage in sex acts so gang members could receive money, drugs, or liquor. In November 2010, the New York Times reported that a trafficking in persons ring among Somali-Americans had been disrupted by investigators (Eckholm, 2010). What do these different crimes, including violent extremism and trafficking in persons, have to do with one another? How do community members explain the possibility of such crimes occurring in their midst?

Transnational Crimes among Somali Americans: Convergences of Radicalization and Trafficking (2019)
https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/252135.pdf
=====

People throughout the planet are over it. Unenlightened Islam and the Radical Left can no longer be tolerated

The Muslim brand has finally been ripped to shreds. For decades we have been told that Islam is the religion of peace. No one’s buying that any longer. Muslims and the Democrat Left have been calling half of Americans Islamophobes, Xenophobes, Racists, Bigots etc. for decades. It worked for years. It no longer works today. As the podcaster said earlier: We are over it. And today more and more Americans are unapologetically speaking out against the Radical Left and Radical Islam. And they can’t believe that the Radical Left is now aligned with Radical Islam as they call for the genocide of the Israeli people. The following video is a perfect example of that.

=====
No, I don’t like Somali. I don’t want them in my country and they bring absolutely nothing of value here. And I know people are going to sit there and scream and cry. Oh my gosh, the statistics. They’re so racist. But at the end of the day, the facts are the facts. And I’m not going to apologize for that. I mean, genuinely, what have they brought of value here? And I’m not saying that they’re all bad on an individual level. I understand that people who lack nuance aren’t going to be able to comprehend that as a collective they’re bad. Individuals, I’m sure that there are some that are fine, just like any other population. But if you look at the violent crime statistics, you would see that it’s not stopping when they get to America. Somalia has a terrible problem with violent crime. They come into places like Minnesota and despite being an extremely disproportionate amount of the population, their violent crime rates are sky high. It’s absolutely disgusting doing some of the worst atrocities like raping young girls because over there in their country, they do not value women. They do not see them as an equal and they are totally okay with things like child marriage. In fact, when there was a law proposed to raise the marriage age to 18 years old, the protest got so bad from the grown men that the courts decided that they were just going to leave it at the age of nine. Is that what you want brought into your country? Is that what you want around your wives, your sisters, your daughters, just other human beings? Is that what you want to bring into this country so that you could feel better about being a white warrior? I’m sorry, that’s absolutely disgusting. We know that once they got into this country, were they grateful? Did they work harder to make it better? No. They scammed the welfare system out of millions while Tim Waltz just sat back and allowed them to do so. That’s absolutely apparent. We know that Somalia is one of the most dangerous countries for Christians going. So why would we bring them into a predominantly Christian country where they’re going to go around trying to propose their views, force their views down people’s throats? Because in Islam, that’s something that’s seen as permissible to do. We know that they have a huge terrorism problem. So why would we invite that into our country? Just because a country is poor and struggling does not automatically mean that it’s America’s problem. I’m sorry, but they’re poor and they’re struggling because of who they are as people. So many other countries have been dealt a bad hand and they’ve been able to figure it out. Countries such as Somalia aren’t able to because of the people living there. We do not need to import them to make our country worse. Sorry.

“I Don’t Like the Somalis Taking Advantage of This Country...” Woman Talks Huge Fraud In Minneapolis

=====

The is what the women was referring to when she said the Somalia ban on child marriage only lasted 24 hours. What a bunch of sick pedophiles. They do not belong in the United States. It is time to stand against this fake Muslim “religion of peace.”

=====
Somalia Overturns Law Banning Child Marriage lasts Just 24 Hours After Male-Led Protests (10/22/2025)

=====

Concluding remarks

De-Islamification -- depriving Unenlightened Islam any “special privileges” -- needs to be implemented immediately in the United States and throughout the entire planet. To be clear this does not mean that Muslims can no longer practice their religion. But what it does mean is, moving forward, Islam will no longer have any more affect on non-Muslims as a dead ghost on a bright sunny day. We are done. We are over it.

While the vast majority of Muslims are good people there is a significant number -- within CAIR, the Muslim Brotherhood etc. -- that are actively trying to overthrow Western nations and implement a global Caliphate under Islamic Sharia Law. Hopefully in the coming years we can eradicate this threat entirely. And hopefully many of you will go to your city councils and demand that De-Islamification is adopted immediately.

We basically need to enforce our cultural norms as well as to demand reciprocity. And here is a short list of what should be implemented under De-Islamification:

* No Burkas.

* No Halal Foods in the Public Schools.

* No Hijabs in the workplace, the public school system, universities and government buildings

* No Muslim foot baths or prayer rooms in the public schools or universities.

* No ballots in any language other than English.

* No loud disruptive Muslim “calls to prayer” blaring from the speakers of a Mosque some 5 times per day.

* Investigate and prosecute all forms of Muslim fraud (in Minnesota and elsewhere)

At the end of this series I’m sure the list will be longer.

Summary

This is the first part of my series of essays on “The Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification.” I have a unique viewpoint on this issue as I have lived in Dearborn, Michigan, for over 70 years. And Dearborn has had one of the highest per capita populations of Muslims in the United States. So while I love my Muslim neighbors I have recently become concerned that radical Muslim and communist groups, such as Antifa, are gaining a significant foothold in Dearborn, Minneapolis, New York and other American cities. There is also a shocking rise in Antisemitic speech since the 10/07/2023 genocide in Israel. The same thing is happening throughout the other advanced societies of the world. As an old Perennial Hippie I just want a world that embraces personal freedom and aspires to the Golden Rule: to treat other as we would like to be treated. And sadly radical Islamists, including Muhammed himself, have never abided by the Golden Rule. And radical Islamists have never embraced freedom. In fact the term Islam basically translates to submission. I’m not interested in submitting to anyone. And neither should you. It is time to throw this unenlightened form of Islam into the dustbin of human history.

How did we end up with so much Muslim Immigration into Western Nations?

Mass Muslim Immigration is an important part of the larger Globalist Agenda and like all other globalist agendas it has been rolled out globally and at the same time. It began in 1965 with the Immigration and Nationality Act.

=====
The 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act abolished the national-origins quota system, replacing it with a new system based on family reunification and skilled labor preferences. This landmark legislation, signed by President Lyndon B. Johnson, ended discrimination based on race, sex, or national origin in immigration and significantly changed the sources of immigration to the U.S., leading to increased immigration from Asia and Latin America.

* Abolished national origins quota system: The act eliminated the previous system, which favored immigrants from Northern and Western Europe and severely limited or excluded immigration from other parts of the world.

* Established a new preference system: Immigration was now prioritized based on family ties and professional skills, allowing U.S. citizens and permanent residents to sponsor relatives.

* Ended discrimination: The law prohibited discrimination in visa issuance based on race, sex, nationality, or place of birth.

* Increased immigration: By opening up the system, the act led to a significant increase in the number of immigrants and a major shift in their countries of origin, with a substantial rise in immigration from Asia and Latin America.

* Signed into law: President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the bill into law on October 3, 1965, in a ceremony at the Statue of Liberty.

Google AI [1965 Immigration and Nationality Act]
=====

If you have the time this hour long review of the history of immigration in the United States is well worth a view.

=====
America’s immigration policy and border enforcement have changed dramatically over the past 250 years, reshaping demographics, culture, and politics along the way. With President Trump’s effort to end birthright citizenship now on trial at the Supreme Court, we may soon see another major shift. In the early years of the republic, immigration was largely unrestricted, with policy focused more on who could become a citizen than on who could enter the country at all. That began to change in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, culminating in the restrictive quota system of 1924, which sharply limited immigration based on national origin.The 1965 Hart-Celler Act reversed that approach, radically expanding immigration from around the world and embracing President Kennedy’s “nation of immigrants” vision of America. Unfortunately, it also coincided with the rise of the modern welfare state, which fundamentally shifted the incentives surrounding immigration. The result is a system that often rewards the wrong behaviors, fuels political backlash, and discourages assimilation.

The 1965 Immigration Reform Changed America Forever (04/01/2026)

=====

This was a historic departure from US immigration policy that favored the immigration from culturally similar European nations. Suddenly we began bringing in cheap labor from Asian and African nations who were culturally dissimilar, including a majority who were Muslim. This also was a complete departure from President George Washington’s immigration policy who wanted “virtuous” immigrants: those that shared our cultural norms, our Constitution and were motivated to assimilate. As we have seen in the United States, and throughout the planet, many Muslims have resisted assimilation. To gain a wider understanding I would encourage reading the entire article below as it outlines the history of US immigration policy from the beginning of our republic.

=====
The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, also known as the Hart–Celler Act and more recently as the 1965 Immigration Act, was a federal law passed by the 89th United States Congress and signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson.[1] The law abolished the National Origins Formula, which had been the basis of U.S. immigration policy since the 1920s.[2] The act formally removed de facto discrimination against Southern and Eastern Europeans as well as Asians, in addition to other non-Western and Northern European ethnicities from the immigration policy of the United States.

Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, Wiki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1965
=====

As I will explain the Globalist United Nations (UN) has been pushing both Muslim and Non-Muslim immigrants into Western Nations for many decades. They are doing this to sow social division and make these nations more malleable in order to get these Western Nations to accept Mass Censorship, Digital ID and Digital Currency. Their goal is global enslavement of the entire human population.

When I asked Google AI “what role did the UN have pushing Muslim immigrants into Europe and the united states” it insisted the UN wasn’t pushing immigrants but was rather managing the refugee crises. Of course that is total bullshit and exposes the fact that these AI “search engines” have a globalist bias. Members of the UN’s UNHCR were directly involved in the 10/07/2023 slaughter of Israeli Jews at the hands of Hamas. Other UN groups have been responsible for aiding Hamas terrorists as well as indoctrinating the Palestinian’s in Gaza to commit genocide on the state of Israel: “from the river to the sea.”

=====
The UN’s role isn’t “pushing” immigrants but rather managing refugee crises by providing aid, coordinating responses (like with the Global Compact on Migration), and protecting asylum seekers fleeing conflict, with major influxes into Europe driven by wars in Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan, leading to millions seeking refuge, though most Muslim growth in Europe stems from post-WWII labor migration and births, not just recent asylum. The US saw earlier, often skilled, Muslim immigration, while Europe’s post-war guest worker programs created larger, permanent Muslim populations, with the UN helping manage subsequent refugee flows.

How the UN Responds to Displacement

* Humanitarian Aid: Agencies like the UNHCR provide essential services (shelter, food, water, legal help) to those displaced by conflict, like in Syria, helping them survive and sometimes return home.

* Global Compacts: The UN facilitates frameworks, such as the Global Compact for Migration, to help countries manage migration flows and share responsibility, not to force people to move.

* Coordination: UN networks assist governments in implementing policies, offering expertise to handle large-scale refugee situations.

Drivers of Muslim Migration to Europe & US

* Conflict & Persecution: Major drivers for recent waves (e.g., 2015 crisis) were wars in Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia, and Eritrea, pushing people to Europe and the US.

* Economic Needs (Europe): Post-WWII labor shortages led to guest worker programs, bringing many Muslims who later settled, leading to natural population growth through births, says the Foreign Policy Research Institute.

* US Immigration: The US saw earlier waves, often skilled workers who brought family, differing from Europe’s guest worker model, notes the Cato Institute.

The UN’s Role vs. “Pushing”

* The UN is a responder and coordinator, not a “pusher”. It provides support for refugees fleeing persecution, as mandated by international law, and helps nations manage the resulting movements.

* The large numbers arriving in Europe are a consequence of conflicts the UN tries to alleviate, and a result of differing national immigration policies, not UN directives to move people to Europe or the US.

Google AI [what role did the un have pushing Muslim immigrants into Europe and the united states]
=====

In any case Muslim immigration really began to increase after 2000 and reached a historic level during the 2015 European migrant crisis which brought in over 1.3 Muslims into the EU nations in a single year. And the flow into Europe continues today: 10 years later. And because of the economic and cultural disintegration of Great Britain -- due to this largely Muslim influx and stupid globalist policies (e.g., the Green Agenda) -- we are headed toward a global civil war.

=====
The 2015 European migrant crisis was a period of significantly increased movement of refugees and migrants into Europe, mostly from the Middle East. An estimated 1.3 million people came to the continent to request asylum,[2] the most in a single year since World War II.[3] They were mostly Syrians,[4] but also included a significant number of people from Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Nigeria, Eritrea,[5] and the Balkans.[6] The increase in asylum seekers has been attributed to factors such as the escalation of various wars in the Middle East and ISIL’s territorial and military dominance in the region due to the Arab Winter, as well as Lebanon, Jordan, and Egypt ceasing to accept Syrian asylum seekers.[7]

The 2015 European migrant crisis, Wiki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015_European_migrant_crisis#
=====

Then from 2021 through 2024 the Biden administration allowed a historic 20-30 million Illegal Aliens -- not all Muslim -- to invade our country. Other Globalist leaders — such as Macron/France were also accelerating Muslim immigration into their countries during the same time period. And it continues. Not only did Biden let them invade, he also offered them food, housing and other economic incentives, not available to US Citizens. The same things were done in Great Britain, Canada, Australia and the EU nations. Then after Biden withdrew from Afghanistan in 2021 he allowed 190,000 Afghans into the United States without any serious vetting.

=====
Since the U.S. withdrawal in August 2021, the United States has admitted over 190,000 Afghans, who are predominantly Muslim, under various humanitarian and immigration programs. The U.S. government’s effort to resettle these individuals was primarily managed through a program called Operation Allies Welcome (OAW).

The number of Afghans admitted can be broken down by their initial immigration status:

* Humanitarian Parole The majority of Afghans, approximately 76,000, were initially granted humanitarian parole, which gave them temporary permission to stay in the U.S. for two years. This status allowed them to live and work in the U.S. but did not provide a direct pathway to permanent residency without further application for asylum or a Special Immigrant Visa (SIV).

* Special Immigrant Visas (SIVs) The SIV program is for Afghans who took significant risks to support the U.S. mission, such as interpreters and translators. As of early 2025, about 68,654 Afghans (including principal applicants and their eligible family members) have been granted SIVs since the program’s inception, with a third of those issued since the 2021 withdrawal.

* Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) A smaller number of Afghans were also admitted through the standard U.S. Refugee Admissions Program.

Google AI [how many muslims were allowed in after biden withdrew from afghanistan]
=====

So it should be no surprise that an Afghani immigrant, Rahmanullah Lakanwal, has been charged with murder and assault in the November 26, 2025 shooting of two West Virginia National Guard members in Washington, D.C. When you allow 190,000 Non-enlightened Muslims into your country what could possible go wrong. A lot. And of course the remaining question is how many Muslim sleeper cells are now active in the United States and other first world nations?

=====
A man named Rahmanullah Lakanwal has been charged with murder and assault in the November 26, 2025 shooting of two West Virginia National Guard members in Washington, D.C.. Court documents and witnesses confirm he yelled “Allahu Akbar” during the attack.

Details of the Incident and Legal Proceedings

* Victims: Army Spc. Sarah Beckstrom, 20, died from her injuries on Thanksgiving Day. U.S. Air Force Staff Sgt. Andrew Wolfe, 24, was critically injured and remains hospitalized. Both were shot in the head during the ambush near the Farragut West metro station.

* Suspect: Rahmanullah Lakanwal, a 29-year-old Afghan national who came to the U.S. in 2021, was arrested at the scene after being shot and subdued by a National Guard major and a witness as he attempted to reload his firearm.

* Charges and Plea: Lakanwal was formally charged with first-degree murder, assault with intent to kill, and weapons offenses. He pleaded not guilty during a virtual court appearance from his hospital bed on December 2, 2025.

* Motive and Background: The motive remains under investigation. Lakanwal previously worked with a CIA-backed unit in Afghanistan and his asylum case was approved earlier in 2025. Reports suggest he was struggling with his mental health and had become isolated before the attack.

* Court Status: A D.C. Superior Court judge ordered Lakanwal held without bond, citing the strength of the government’s case and the “sheer terror” of the attack. His next court hearing is scheduled for January 14, 2026.

The incident has sparked a political debate surrounding U.S. immigration policies and the deployment of National Guard troops in D.C..

Google AI [2 national guard shot in dc Allah Akbar]

[Note: I have to laugh. Microsoft Notes notified me that Allah Akbar should be capitalized. Insane.]
=====

So the question remains. How many terrorist cells did Biden allow into the United States? As far as I’m concerned he should be charged with treason. None of this should have ever been allowed to happen.

Millions were also given Temporary Protected Status (TPS) that gave them work permits and other economic incentives. By the end of Biden’s term the American People had it with his “illegal alien invasion policy.” By then nearly 75% of American voters wanted all Illegal Aliens deported. That is most certainly the issue that propelled Donald Trump into office in the 2024 Presidential Election. And so far he has made good on his promise: completely sealing the Southern Border in a matter of weeks.

This has been a major blow to globalist leaders such as Starmer, in Great Britain, who refuses to stop the flow of Muslim immigrants coming into the country. And just to rub a little extra salt into the wound he is providing them with free housing at the expense of the British People who have already been suffering economically for years. Trump proved that Illegal Immigration can be stopped. This has made it clear to the British People that this invasion is obviously being allowed by Starmer and the British Elite. And that, in turn, has put Great Britain -- and other EU nations -- on the brink of Civil War. The world is slowly rising up against their globalist leaders and are demanding an end to the immigrant invasion and other globalist policies.

So on one hand we had extremist groups -- Muslim and Antifa -- overrunning London.

=====
Britain is facing a security crisis that even officials can no longer explain. In this report, news uk breaks down how extremist-leaning migrant groups overran central London while police were ordered to stand down. As chaos spread across Oxford Circus, the silence from Downing Street only fueled public anger. This week, news uk investigates why operational warnings were ignored, why officers lacked authority to respond, and why citizens felt abandoned. With streets collapsing and confidence shattering, news uk follows every leak, every failure, and every unanswered question. Stay with news uk as we expose what truly happened.

Extremist Blocs Take London — Is This the Breaking Point for Britain? (12/04/2025)

=====

On the other hand we had violent British demonstrators demanding mass deportations.

=====
BREAKING: 104,000 Rise After Starmer’s Directive — London ERUPTS (12/04/2025)

=====

How Mass Muslim Immigration is an important part of the larger Globalist Agenda

As an Anti-Globalist I have been writing about the Globalist Agenda for literally decades. This agenda has been pushed by the United Nations, World Economic Forum, World Health Organization for at least the last 60 years. Fast forward to the present and we can see their agendas spelled out in the UN’s Agenda21/Agenda2030, the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset or the WHO’s global plandemic treaty. The agendas are very similar and the ultimate goal is obvious: total control of the world’s people.

And that is just the short list. You could also include the Bank of International Settlements along with a long list of globalist leaders: Starmer in Great Britain, Carney in Canada, Macron in France. One thing they all have in common is supporting Mass Immigration, of largely Muslim populations, into their countries against the wishes of their indigenous populations.

President Trump is the only major world leader that is pushing back against Mass Immigration. But sadly he is pushing many other globalist policies: Digital ID, Digital Currency and massive AI facilities that will soon be tracking every aspect of our lives.

I think there are two main components to this Globalist Mass Immigration strategy: “Divide and Conquer” and the Hegelian Dialectic. So one component is the “Divide and Conquer” strategy where culturally incompatible foreigners are brought in to cause social division among the indigenous populations. This keeps the indigenous populations distracted from the real enemy: the globalists. The other related component is the Hegelian Dialectic: Problem, Reaction, Solution. The problem is introduced by pushing Mass Immigration. The reaction is increasing social tension, now leading the UK and EU nations toward civil war. And the solution is mandatory digital ID, digital currency and eventually a cashless society where populations can be completely controlled. At that point we become nothing more than slaves on a globalist plantation as failure to comply will result in the suspension of access to your digital wallet. And all of this is now happening throughout Great Britain, the EU and other First World Nations in real time.

Another important aspect of the globalist agenda is the imposition of a digital ID for every human on planet Earth. This is absolutely essential for the transition to a cashless society: the ultimate end goal for the globalists. Trump is pushing this forward by nudging anyone that uses air transportation to have Real ID. Just about a week ago he further nudged people to get Real ID by charging an additional $45 per flight, for those that don’t yet have it.

And now just about every nation on the planet is pushing for a digital ID as a prerequisite to merely browse the internet. The globalists insist that this is to protect children from porn and online predators. But the real reason is obviously censorship of Anti-Globalist speech and the prosecution of those who dare question any aspect of the globalist agenda: Mass Immigration, Climate Change, Forced vaccination etc. In the past this was done using human censors. Today this work is increasingly done using Artificial Intelligence (AI). AI is a very important force multiplier, for the globalists, as it allow the proliferation of millions of AI agents that are far smarter and more efficient than us mere humans. And unlike human labor they require no benefits, salaries, vacations or healthcare.

The evisceration of free speech reached a high mark during the Plandemic (2020-2023). And the irony of the Plandemic was much of what was being censored -- masks don’t work, distancing doesn’t work, the mRNA injection does not prevent infection or transmission, Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine did reduce symptoms -- turned out to be true. In addition Globalist Corporate Media still refuses to admit that the mRNA injections literally killed 17 million worldwide. So instead of admitting their errors the globalists are now pressing for even more censorship. Great Britain has arrested and imprisoned thousands for merely questioning Mass Immigration and other globalist policies while releasing thousands of violent Muslim extremists. And now countries around the world are in lockstep to require a digital ID in order to merely browse the internet. The intent is clear. Once everyone’s internet anonymity is lost it will be far easier to suspend or prosecute internet users that continue to question the larger globalist agenda.

Of course this is just a brief overview. If you want a more detailed explanation it is still free to read through my Substack essays which go back to June 2021. Or you could purchase my complete writings that go back 36 years: to 1989. If you search my complete writings for “Islam” you will find over 800 essays containing that term. Click here if you want to know more about my complete writings or are interested in purchasing a copy.

=====
Bruce Cain’s Complete Writings 1989-2025 (10/24/2025)

36 years of activism against the Viet Nam War, Cannabis Prohibition and the Globalist Agenda. Thousands of pages of Anti-Globalist essays now available on a thumb drive.

=====

But the sad treasonous truth is that Global Political Leaders Are Fast-Tracking the Islamification of Europe. And that cannot be tolerated any longer.

=====
* Surveys have been exposing what British Muslims think. In March 2024, a poll conducted by the Henry Jackson Society reported that 32% of British Muslims favor the implementation of Sharia law in the UK; 48% feel more sympathy with Hamas than with Israel; 80% believe that Israel is committing genocide. 49% think Israel has no right to exist, and 46% think Jews in the UK -- only 0.5 % of the population -- have too much power.

* The situation in the United Kingdom is worrying: what affects the UK affects all Western Europe. While the situation in France may seem a bit better, it is probably worse.

* While the UK Labour Party expelled its former leader, Jeremy Corbyn in 2024 over accusations of anti-Semitism, a French political party, La France Insoumise (France Unbowed), includes several MPs who are on record as having made anti-Semitic remarks. One of its MPs, Rima Hassan, openly supports Hamas.

* Millions of people in Western Europe appear anxious about the future they see taking shape in their countries and have been turning to political parties that address their concerns. Since these parties have been growing in strength, current leaders are doing everything they can – such as preventing their leaders from running for election, or forming a coalition, or branding their policies as “fascism” and “Nazism” – in an apparent effort to bury these concerns. These are virtually the only parties that support Israel and denounce rising anti-Semitism by actually calling it by its name.

* Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party is leading in voter polls, but the next elections will only take place in 2029. During the next four years, the ruling Labour Party can continue to radically transform the country.

* “The great replacement” -- the eventuality of a basically Christian Europe being slowly replaced by a Muslim one -- is not a conspiracy theory. It is rapidly underway. The birth rate of Muslim populations remains higher in Western Europe than that of non-Muslim populations, whose birth rates have been collapsing and are now vastly below the replacement level. Muslim births add to the numbers of those who have immigrated from the Muslim world. The proportion of Muslims in Western European countries continues exponentially to increase. Data further shows that Muslim populations are integrating less and less, and that the influence of radical Islam has also been exponentially increasing.

How Political Leaders Are Fast-Tracking the Islamification of Europe (11/04/2025)
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/22031/islamification-of-europe
=====

Islam is incompatible with the US Constitution

I have lived in Dearborn, Michigan, which has one of the largest per capita Muslim populations in the United States, for over 70 years and counting. Because of this I have studied Islam in great detail, over the decades, and have written hundreds of essays on the subject. Until recently I had always hoped that the Muslim population would voluntarily assimilate to accept the US Constitution and American social morays. I love my Muslim neighbors but recent events have me concerned that an unknown percent are becoming radicalized. One pivotal event occurred at the Dearborn City Council Meeting where the mayor told a Non-Muslim priest that he was no longer welcomed in the city. The video below contains the dialog between the priest and the mayor in the video below. And here, also, are my thoughts on the unfortunate dialog between the mayor and the priest.

=====
I’ve lived in the Dearborn area for 71 years and counting -- twice as long as the current Mayor of Dearborn has been alive. I thought we were seeing general assimilation until the Dearborn Mayor insulted a non-Muslim who thought it inappropriate to name a street after Sablani: editor of the Arab News. Upon further research Sablani openly supports Iran, Hezbollah and Hamas and the Mayor is associated with many Muslims that feel the same way. That is a problem that needs to be nipped in the bud. We also have politicians like Debbie Dingell who have cozied up with these fundamentalist Muslims. What we need is what I’d call Pressurized Assimilation . . . better than calling it Forced Assimilation.

We basically need to enforce our cultural norms as well as to demand reciprocity.

* No Burkas.

* No Halal Foods in the Public Schools.

* No Muslim prayer rooms in the public schools.

* No ballots in any language other than English.

* No loud disruptive Muslim “calls to prayer” blaring from the speakers of a Mosque some 5 times per day.

Then we may have to force reciprocity. Can’t have Christian Church’s in Iran. Then how about no more Mosques in the US. And finally we need to expose Muhammed for who he really was. He believed in killing Apostates that no longer wanted to be identified as Muslim. If your religion is so god damn great why the need for such coercion?

He believed in killing those accused of blasphemy while blasphemy laws are not supported by the first amendment. He married his wife when she was 6 and consummated their marriage at the young age of 9. Today we call men that have sex with underage girls pedophiles. He was a conqueror who made sex slaves of those he conquered. In short only a member of Gays for Palestine would think “Islam is the religion of peace.” In any case it would not be inaccurate to call Muhammed a war mongering pedophile. Hardly the role model we want to present to our children.

And let’s face it -- all the literalist Abrahamic Religions were primarily invented to control the masses: not just Islam. Islam was most likely an invention of the Vatican. It was crafted like a biological weapon -- fully intended to disrupt any society the ideology was injected: either through war or mass immigration. The globalists have pushed Muslim immigration: not because they like the Muslims. They did it because they knew if was an effective means to divide societies: making them more malleable to globalist takeover. And that is exactly what we are seeing in Great Britain as they teeter towards a Civil War against Islamification and Globalization.

In 1972 I organized protests against the Viet Nam War at all 3 Dearborn High Schools: Dearborn, Edsel Ford and Fordson (which was about 50% Middle Eastern at the time). As Hippies -- not Christians or Muslims -- we really thought we were on our way to world peace. And during that short era love seemed to trump all religious ideologies. Perhaps it is time we got back to that?

“There’s nothing you can do that can’t be done.”

John Lennon, All You Need Is Love.

Dearborn City Council Meeting 09/09/2025

=====

I suppose what I found most troubling was exactly the same thing the priest found troubling. Wayne County and the City of Dearborn were naming a street after Siblani, editor of the Arab News. And Siblani has voiced support for Iran, Hezbollah and Hamas numerous times: all exponents of the Muslim Brotherhood who are pushing for a Global Islamic Caliphate. Frankly I find this almost treasonous. The priest just laid out the facts. So when the mayor called him Islamophobic and a bigot my jaw just dropped open in disbelief. This story was also covered in the national news where the majority of Americans could not believe this was happening in a US city. In point of fact that mayor was exhibiting bigotry towards the priest. He doesn’t seem to like Non-Muslims questioning support for unenlightened radical Muslims. Worse yet it seems to show the mayor also must support these fundamentalist Muslim organizations. And that is a big problem.

Here are a few articles explaining how Islam is incompatible with the US Constitution:

=====
Some views hold that certain interpretations of Islam, particularly regarding the application of Sharia law in public life, can be incompatible with the U.S. Constitution’s principles of separation of church and state, individual liberties, and legal equality. Specific points of contention include debates over:

* Political participation: Concerns exist that some interpretations of Islam are incompatible with constitutional principles of democracy, religious tolerance, and the equality of men and women.

* Legal and social norms: Some Sharia-based interpretations of law, particularly those related to family law or social issues, are seen as conflicting with the Constitution’s protection of individual rights and equality.

* “Sharia panic”: The focus on the potential “threat” of Sharia can be used to fuel discrimination and fear against Muslims, creating a conflict with constitutional protections against religious discrimination.

Examples of proposed incompatibility:

* Public law: Some interpretations of Islam advocate for Sharia to be applied as a source of public law, which would clash with the U.S. Constitution’s establishment clause, as it prohibits government endorsement of any religion.

* Individual rights: Certain interpretations of Islamic law can restrict individual rights, such as women’s rights and freedom of speech, which are protected by the U.S. Constitution.

* Religious and legal systems: The establishment of a separate legal system based on Sharia would conflict with the principle that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land and all laws must comply with it.

Google AI [examples where islam is incompatible with the us constitution]
=====

=====
Shariah is Anti-Constitutional

Whether pursued through the violent form of jihad (holy war) or stealthier practices that shariah Islamists often refer to as “dawa” (the “call to Islam”), shariah rejects fundamental premises of American society and values:

* the bedrock proposition that the governed have a right to make law for themselves;

* the democratic republic governed by the Constitution;

* freedom of conscience; individual liberty

* freedom of expression (including the liberty to analyze and criticize shariah);

* economic liberty (including private property);

* equal treatment under the law (including that of men and women, and of Muslims and non-Muslims);

* freedom from cruel and unusual punishments; an unequivocal condemnation of terrorism (i.e., one that is based on a common sense meaning of the term and does not rationalize barbarity as legitimate “resistance”); and an abiding commitment to deflate and resolve political controversies by the ordinary mechanisms of our democratic republic, not wanton violence. The subversion campaign known as “civilization jihad” must not be confused with, or tolerated as, a constitutionally protected form of religious practice. Its ambitions transcend what American law recognizes as the sacrosanct realm of private conscience and belief. It seeks to supplant our Constitution with its own totalitarian framework.

The U. S. Constitution and Sharia Law (2018)
https://nccs.net/blogs/articles/the-u-s-constitution-and-sharia-law#
=====

The Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification

After the Second World War a Denazification program was put in place to rid German and Austrian society, culture, press, economy, judiciary, and politics of the Nazi ideology.

=====
Denazification (German: Entnazifizierung) was an Allied initiative to rid German and Austrian society, culture, press, economy, judiciary, and politics of the Nazi ideology following the Second World War.[1] It was carried out by removing those who had been Nazi Party or SS members from positions of power and influence, by disbanding or rendering impotent the organizations associated with Nazism, and by trying prominent Nazis for war crimes in the Nuremberg trials of 1946. The program of denazification was launched after the end of the war and was solidified by the Potsdam Agreement in August 1945. The term, in the hyphenated form de-nazification, was first used in 1943 by the Pentagon, intended to be applied in a narrow sense with reference to the post-war German legal system.[2]: 5–6 [not verified in body] However, it later took on a broader meaning, according to historian Frederick Taylor (see:Exorcising Hitler).[3]: 253–254 

Denazification, Wiki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denazification
=====

Today I believe we need a Global De-Islamification program to rid all nations of both Soft Sharia and Jihadist Sharia Laws. Dearborn is already pushing “Soft Sharia” by allowing Halal foods and prayer rooms in the public schools among other things I’ve already listed. So since Halal foods were introduced in the Dearborn Schools (2001) Non-Muslim students have been forced to eat Halal foods. The same thing happened in the Dearborn Heights School District beginning in 2015. In the following video you can see members of CAIR -- a radical Muslim organization -- gloating over their victory. They threatened to litigate against the Dearborn Heights public schools and the schools submitted like the dumb kaffers they really are.

Furthermore, the following video also details how CAIR -- which is considered a terrorist front organization of the Muslim Brotherhood -- is pushing Halal Foods, School Prayer and many other initiatives which overtly mention their willingness to sue if they don’t get their way.

=====
CAIR-MI 15th Banquet: Safe Spaces Coordinator & Counsel Warda Kalim (03/04/2015)

=====

And let us not forget that CAIR was an unindicted co-conspirator linked to the most radical of Muslim organizations: The Muslim Brotherhood. Formed in the early 1900’s the Muslim Brotherhood has formally stated they want to overthrow the United States and establish a Muslim Caliphate: to replace the US Constitution with theocratic Muslim Sharia Law.

=====
Even though most of the goals of the Muslim Brotherhood are out in the open, it is quite a different thing to see it from the inside. This is a rather new phenomenon in the United States of America. In the 60’s and 70’s there were threats in the United States, but they were of a different form. In the 40’s and 50’s, there were many concerns about Communism. They were certainly exaggerated, but they were not without basis. Today’s radical Islamic threats are more sinister, are more homegrown than many people realize, and are growing rapidly from decade to decade.

A Jew Went Undercover Inside the Muslim Brotherhood – What He Exposed Will Leave You Totally Disturbed (12/04/2025)
https://www.israelunwired.com/a-jew-went-undercover-inside-the-muslim-brotherhood-what-he-exposed-will-leave-you-totally-disturbed/?

=====

These practices need to stop.

The good news is that Global De-Islamification is already beginning to happen

Recently many EU nations are beginning to ban the wearing of the Burka along with mass deportations. Trump is also taking measures toward De-Islamification.

Trump is designating the Muslim Brotherhood as a Foreign Terrorist Organization. Good move.

=====
SECURING AMERICA FROM EXTRAORDINARY THREATS: Today, President Donald J. Trump signed an Executive Order directing the Secretary of State and the Secretary of the Treasury to consider whether certain chapters of the Muslim Brotherhood should be designated as Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs) and Specially Designated Global Terrorists (SDGTs).

* The Order directs the two aforementioned Secretaries, in consultation with the Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence, to submit a report on whether to designate any Muslim Brotherhood chapters, such as those in Lebanon, Egypt, and Jordan, as FTOs under 8 U.S.C. 1189 and SDGTs under with 50 U.S.C. 1702 and Executive Order 13224.

* It mandates the Secretary of State and Secretary of Treasury take action within 45 days after the report to designate chapters as FTOs and SDGTs if appropriate.

* The Order’s ultimate aim is to eliminate the designated chapters’ capabilities and operations, deprive them of resources, and end any threat such chapters pose to U.S. nationals and the national security of the United States.

Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Begins Process to Designate Certain Muslim Brotherhood Chapters as Foreign Terrorist Organizations and Specially Designated Global Terrorists (11/24/2025)

https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/11/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-begins-process-to-designate-certain-muslim-brotherhood-chapters-as-foreign-terrorist-organizations-and-specially-designated-global-terrorists/
=====

=====
There are those of us who have waited decades for this. The Muslim Brotherhood have done reparable harm to this country and are linked to every major Islamic group in the US. If this becomes reality — with enforcement and consequences — it could deal a crushing, unprecedented blow to America’s entrenched pro-Sharia network. Nearly every major Muslim group operating in the U.S. is tied, directly or indirectly, to the Muslim Brotherhood. This comes after Texas Governor Abbot did the same last week.

“It will be done in the strongest and most powerful terms,” Trump said. “Final documents are being drawn.” The president’s announcement came just days after Just the News published a long expose on the Muslim Brotherhood’s activities and growing concerns inside the Trump administration. Trump has been considering the move since his first administration. The Muslim Brotherhood is an Islamist group founded nearly a century ago in Egypt but with chapters, parties, and affiliated movements around the world…. Hamas is also considered to be a branch of the MB, and other Muslim groups and organizations are closely linked to the brotherhood (Just the News).

President Trump To Designate Muslim Brotherhood Terrorist Organization (11/24/2025)
https://gellerreport.com/2025/11/president-trump-to-designate-muslim-brotherhood-terrorist-organization.html/?
=====

Trump is actively pushing Illegal Aliens off the SNAP food stamp benefit program.

=====
There are 42 million people using SNAP food stamp benefits. The Trump Administration requested Immigration status and other data on recipients, but 21 Democrat-led states refused to comply. There is rampant fraud in the system: within the 29 states that did comply, it was revealed that 186,000 deceased people are receiving SNAP benefits and that 500,000 are getting benefits more than once.

Last year, former President Biden, in order to buy votes, reportedly increased food stamp program funding by 40%. Progressives exploit subsidies as a way to lure migrants to the US and buy their votes once they become naturalized. The Democrat agenda is to upend the demographics of the country in their favor.

Trump to Stop SNAP Benefits to ‘Blue States’ Refusing to Provide Immigration & Fraud Data. Democrats Sue (12/03/2025)
https://needtoknow.news/2025/12/trump-to-stop-snap-benefits-to-blue-states-refusing-to-provide-immigration-fraud-data-democrats-sue/
=====

Trump is issuing a permanent pause to migration from 19 Third World Muslim Countries.

=====
President Donald Trump has announced a “permanent pause” on migration from “all Third World Countries” and his administration has issued directives to reexamine the immigration status of individuals from a specific list of 19 countries.

Key Actions and Statements

* Following a shooting, President Trump announced on Truth Social a “permanent pause migration from all Third World Countries” and stated plans to terminate “millions of Biden illegal admissions” and deport those deemed “not a net asset to the United States” or “non-compatible with Western civilization”. DHS and USCIS have been directed to conduct a rigorous reexamination of Green Cards for individuals from “countries of concern”. USCIS has also paused immigration processing and naturalization ceremonies for nationals from these countries.

Countries of Concern

A list of 19 countries, mostly in Africa, the Middle East, and the Caribbean, has been identified, which were previously subject to a travel ban. The countries included are Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen, Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela.

Impact and Controversy

Tom Homan, the new White House “border czar,” indicated that many migrants from these countries who arrived under the Biden administration might face deportation due to difficulties obtaining adequate vetting information from their home countries. Critics view the policy as a form of collective punishment. The administration’s prior “travel ban” also faced legal challenges.

Google AI [Trump bans 3rd world migrants]
=====

“DAY OF WRATH”... 500,000 Illegals “LOSE IT” as Trump Bans “THIRD WORLD MIGRANTS” (11/28/2025)

=====

=====
Donald Trump has said the US will “permanently pause” migration from all “Third World Countries” following the death of a National Guard member in a shooting near the White House. He did not identify the countries he was referring to by name, but the Department of Homeland Security said it was re-examining green cards issued to people from 19 “countries of concern”. It came after Trump announced the death of Sarah Beckstrom, 20, who was shot along with another National Guard member, Andrew Wolfe, 24, who remains in a critical condition. Investigators say the shooting was carried out by an Afghan national who entered the US in 2021 under a resettlement program.

The 19 ‘third-world countries’ Trump has blocked migration from – and what it means (11/28/2025)
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/the-19-third-world-countries-trump-has-blocked-migration-from-and-what-it-means/ar-AA1RkZq8#
=====

This is a good start but much more needs to be done to fully implement a Global De-Islamification strategy. The goal is the eradication of Islamic extremism and the complete assimilation of Muslims to Western culture and values. And to be clear this isn’t intended interfere with Muslim’s First Amendment Right to practice their religion. But it is intended to stop what I call “Soft Sharia Laws” such as Halal Foods in the Public Schools or prayer rooms in the Public Schools. Both of these examples violate the First Amendment’s Separation of Church and State. In the following essays, to this series, I hope to discuss additional and related topics:

* Mass Muslim Immigration bringing Civil War to Great Britain
* The De-Islamification of Dearborn Michigan

“Listen, this is a very simple concept. If it’s not voluntary it’s tyranny”

Summary

I’ve had “writers block” for the past few weeks because I suddenly had the feeling that this Globalist Psychopathic Agenda cannot be stopped. So for a few weeks I just thought, what is the point of writing, or pushing this Anti-Globalist Agenda, when it appears we have no hope of prevailing. I’m slowly getting beyond this bout of hopelessness but remain extremely concerned that the masses remain distracted and unaware of what is actually happening throughout the planet. And much of that can be attributed to Globalist Corporate Media (CNN, MSNBC/MSNOW, FOX etc.) that continues to pacify their audiences through daily newsfeeds of irrelevant crap. On the right you have FOX News fawning over the accomplishments of President Trump, while on the left we have MSNBC/MSNOW continuing to portray him as a Nazi. But there is no substance to any of it. Without a doubt Trump is pushing as toward Digital ID and a cashless society which will eventually leave us as nothing more than slaves on a Globalist Plantation. But conveniently this is never discussed, leaving WE THE PEOPLE essentially like sheep on their way to the slaughterhouse. It is the role of journalists to ask probing questions to both the president and Congress. The president is far too insulated from legitimate criticism as have all past presidents.

In September I spoke before the Dearborn Heights City Council. I explicitly asked how much the involuntarily mandated Smart Water Meters were costing each resident and what we could do to opt out, as we had previously done with the Smart Electric Meters. Despite numerous emails, to all council members, not a single member answered the questions. So here I am two months later without an answer. I also asked them to implement 6 Anti-globalist actions. Again I was completely ignored. This is the same City Council that had the audacity to push for a police badge with Arabic text which is a reflection of our growing Muslim majority. That story received national attention and the majority of Americans could not believe this was happening in our country. Thankfully the national repudiation of this idea forced them to back down on the proposal. But the main point is -- like most City Councils throughout the United States -- they really don’t care what their citizens want or what they think.

“I just think it time that we all begin to rise up to this unelected globalist cabal that is poisoning us with EMF radiation, deadly mRNA “gene editing” shots, neurotoxic fluoride in our water supply and nanoparticle toxins in our skies through Geoengineering and Chemtrails.”

The basic point of my presentation, before the City Council, was to encourage activists throughout the planet to demand action against globalist agendas that can be opposed on the local level. So, for example, there was no point bringing up Digital ID or Digital Currency as these issues are beyond local jurisdiction.

Here is the video of my presentation before the City Council

=====

Bruce Cain speaks before the Dearborn Heights City Council Meeting (09/23/2025)

=====

And here are two essays that explained what I was hoping to accomplish.

=====
This essay is to encourage citizens to go before their city councils to demand 6 Anti-Globalist actions: 1) No Water Smart Meters on people’s homes, 2) No forced vaccination of teachers, students and public school workers 3) No Fluoride in the Water supply 4) No Chemtrail spraying over our cities 5) No further expansion of 5G/6G technologies at the local level and 6) No further LGBTQ, DEI or CRT indoctrination in our schools. With Trump in office there is no better time to make these very reasonable demands. It is high time our City Councils reflect the interests of their citizens.

How Citizens can oppose the Globalist Agenda through their City Councils (09/19/2025)
A Template for local resistance to Water Smart Meters and Globalist Policies

=====

=====
“I just think it time that we all begin to rise up to this unelected globalist cabal that is poisoning us with EMF radiation, deadly mRNA “gene editing” shots, neurotoxic fluoride in our water supply and nanoparticle toxins in our skies through Geoengineering and Chemtrails.”
Bruce Cain at the Dearborn Heights City Council Meeting, September 23rd, 2025

The Great Reset is being implemented globally and at the same time (09/27/2025)
It is being orchestrated by a Global Cabal that trumps the sovereignty of nations and local governments

=====

As I prepared my talk before the City Council -- “How Citizens can oppose the Globalist Agenda through their City Councils” -- I decided to focus on 2 main themes:

1) All recent globalist initiatives are being implemented globally and at the same time.

That includes Smart Electric Meters (2009), 5G (2019), The Plandemic (2020) and Smart Water Meters (2025)

2) This orchestration requires an unelected global authority that can trump the sovereignty of cities, states and nations

So today I’d like to add a third theme . . .

3) All of this is being done without the consent of the people, which is essentially tyranny.

This is completely antithetical to a representative government which is supposed reflect the will of the people. What we are really looking at here is an emerging Global tyranny.

=====
In simple terms, tyranny is the oppressive and cruel use of power, where a single ruler or small group has absolute authority and uses it unjustly, ignoring the rights and freedoms of others. It is a form of government that is arbitrary and severe, often characterized by a lack of accountability and a disregard for the well-being of the people. The term can also refer to any harsh or unjust control, even by a person in a non-governmental role.

Absolute power: A tyrant or a small group holds total control, with no checks or balances on their authority.

Oppressive and unjust rule: The ruler’s actions are cruel, arbitrary, and often disregard the laws and rights of the people.

Abuse of power: The power is used for personal gain or to suppress individual freedoms, rather than for the welfare of the public.

Broader application: While often applied to governments, the term can describe any situation where power is used in an oppressive and harsh way, such as the “tyranny of the majority” or a harsh employer.

Google AI [tyranny definition]
=====

Examples of policies, done without the consent or support of local communities is quite obvious with Starmer’s push for Illegal Immigration, Digital ID and mass censorship of the internet in Great Britain. As I predicted, many years ago, the vast migration of Muslims into Great Britain is pushing Great Britain, Scotland and Ireland toward civil war. The same thing is happening in all of the EU nations. The people have had it being treated like red headed stepchildren where their voice in continually ignored. The indigenous people, of Great Britain, are tired of the government spending millions to house Illegal Aliens while the British people suffer economically and culturally. They are tired of being treated as second class citizens in the country in which they were born. A now the pot is boiling over.

=====
Britain erupts overnight as riots spread from London to cities across the UK, police walk off duty, and authorities lose control in one of the most chaotic nights in modern history. As fires burn, protests escalate, and government silence fuels public anger, the crisis pushes Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s leadership to the breaking point. This video breaks down how the unrest began, why it spiraled, and what it means for the future of the UK.

JUST IN: Starmer AMBUSHED as Police Walk Out — UK ERUPTS Overnight! (11/18/2025)

=====

Our Biology is out of sync with our economy and our society

As much as I despise New York’s Mandami, I do understand why he won. And it is far more than affordability as parroted by Globalist Corporate Media. Our Biology is out of sync with our economy and our society. Today the human lifespan is about 80 years in the United States. During this time we become adults and hopefully have children. And toward the end of life’s journey we expect a dignified retirement. But sadly birthrates are plummeting because a growing number of young adults can neither afford children much less afford a house to raise them. And this has been exacerbated by the influx of rich migrants and Blackrock buying up hundreds of thousands of residential properties. Together these trends are putting home ownership out of reach for most young Americans. In the 1950’s nearly 50% of 30 year old men were married and had a home mortgage. Today that has plummeted to a mere 15%. This is just one of many issues that Trump and Globalist Corporate Media continue to ignore. Home ownership has historically been the primary way that families have built wealth and equity. This is a recipe for disaster and will leave future generations in poverty as they enter their retirement years.

Ah, and then there is retirement. Many studies have suggested that you have to have 1.6 million saved in order to have an economically secure retirement. Very few retire with anything close to that amount. It makes you wonder how many current retiree’s will become homeless in the coming years as the value of our money continues to be debased through government overspending and their nest eggs continue to shrink because of the resulting inflation. And let’s face it, both parties have accelerated this process by continued overspending. During the Plandemic (2020 - 2023) Biden and Trump printed nearly 7 trillion dollars.

But leave it to Trump to gaslight the people and insist that everything is just fine and getting better.

=====
Donald Trump: Dems lying about affordability (11/17/2025)

=====

=====
Donald Trump has referred to the affordability issue as a “con job” and “propaganda” perpetuated by Democrats. He has downplayed concerns about the cost of living, claiming that prices are “substantially” down under his administration, a claim that is contradicted by economic data.

Specifically, Trump has:

Called “affordability” a “new word” after recent Democratic election successes that focused on the issue.

Stated, “I don’t want to hear about the affordability,” dismissing the concerns as a political tactic.

Claimed that Democrats are “great at lying” about inflation and high energy prices, insisting that any current economic issues were inherited from the previous (Biden) administration.

Argued that prices are in fact “down” and that the U.S. is in a “golden age” economically, despite reports showing persistent inflation.

Used specific, but fact-checked as misleading, examples like the cost of Thanksgiving dinners to push his narrative, for instance, claiming a 25% price drop based on a Walmart promotion that used different and fewer items than the prior year’s offering.

While polls show Americans overwhelmingly link rising costs to Trump’s policies and view affordability as a major issue, the President’s approach has been to push back on this perception, at times by denying the reality of the price increases or calling the concerns a “con”.

Google AI [trump says the affordability issue is propaganda]
=====